Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 11, 2025 2:32 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 621 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 32  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
kingkerna wrote:
Can anyone confirm that Fitzy was at the meeting? If so I am sure that should fill most of us with confidence seeing we believe he is the messiah, better to take longer to make the correct decision then too rush into the wrong one to please the masses.

This crap about people ringing the switchboard is hilarious - since when does the club take notice of irate people phoning in?


Since they apparantly changed their mind on sacking Pagan.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:33 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
Molly wrote:
Synbad said
Quote:
Mitch is the obvious best candidate


But that can't be right Synners. According to the HUN 80 per cent of callers to the Carlton switchboard want Denis to stay. Of course, the fact that their names are Roos, Wallace, Eade, Malthouse, Worsfold, etc doesn't count...
Denis must have alot of relatives too.

80%......how does explain the drop in membership. I'd bet it won't go back to it's former levels the way things are now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:35 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
I'm not sure a week spent further analysing options isn't a bad idea - it's an important decision and perhaps they're sounding out managers about certain coaches in waiting??

Who knows, but I've been asking for considered judgements to be made by the club and I believe they may be doing just that - in this case they haven't rushed in to supporting Pagan for instance.

Perhaps they've already agreed DP is gone; perhaps a benefactor has agreed to step in and assist in the payout; perhaps they need a week to sort out detail in order to make a strong announcement.

If they come out next week and announce Pyke, McKenna or Mitchell et al, coach and an arrangement for Pagan gone and a new sponsor/s for next year coming on board or old heads returning, then they will have been seen to have followed an appropriate path by many on this forum who are now bitching about how directionless they are.

If not, then crucify them for wasting time and @#$%&! it up.

But in the meantime, we have no information on which to make a decision.

And please, don't take too much notice of what a few of the journos come out with - much of it is only to fill live crosses or copy. And much of the stuff that is leaked is leaked for a reason.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:39 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
I reckon that's a fair call WBY. ;)

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
TruBlueBrad wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
Can anyone confirm that Fitzy was at the meeting? If so I am sure that should fill most of us with confidence seeing we believe he is the messiah, better to take longer to make the correct decision then too rush into the wrong one to please the masses.

This crap about people ringing the switchboard is hilarious - since when does the club take notice of irate people phoning in?


Since they apparantly changed their mind on sacking Pagan.


Who is "they" though? No decision has been made on anything. It's quite possible, without all the media hype, the Club would be in exactly the same position it is this morning. Anyone who's sat on a committee would know just how round and round these meetings go. It's infuriating. Even with someone like Iron Fist Jack running the show you're still faced with hours upon hours of people prattling on and on and on, everyone having their say, people changing their minds, people being stubborn.

If you want the decision to be made by committee, don't expect anything to happen quickly.

If you want the decision to be made by an authoritarian who will check the numbers and strike (like it used to be - read the appointment of Pagan), we would most likely have a new coach by now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:40 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 1689
Assuming that nobody on the board was willing to dip into their own pockets to fund a payout & the supposed benefactor would only contribute to a payout if Mitchell was the replacement coach;

then surely the board did what every Carlton supporter would want them to do:

• they presumably assessed the situation;
• decided that Mitchell wasn’t who the Board wanted as a coach (it is after all their job as directors to make this decision – not the “benefactor’s decision);
• made a decision to clarify funding for a payout.

Given the parlous state of the Club’s finances, the board would have been derelict in its duties to have proceeded to sack DP without certainty as to how it would fund any payout.

It is possible that they will use the next week to assess funding scenarios.

The board is under no obligation to make a decision in a timeframe to satisfy us or the media. Much better that the right decision is made rather than a hasty decision.

_________________
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:41 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
In the cold light of day Ockham you are right.

In the cold darkness of last night I wanted a freaking answer!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:05 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
I dont have a problem with Fraser Brown offering the 1.2 mill to pay Pagan out...someone has to do something and credit to him for stepping up to the plate...none of the other so called white knights have done anything or contributed..at least Brown has shown he still cares for the club.

Ok he is pushing Mitchells bandwagon and conspiracy theory's abound but I have yet to see another coaching prospect actually put his hand up and say I will do the job for peanuts ...

While I would like to see a decent interview process and all the "t's" crossed and "i's" dotted it wont happen..not with a basketcase organisation like the carlton football club is at the moment.

The club need to terminate Pagans services....his position is now untenable....
take Browns money for the payout...appoint Mitchell with a new team of assistants ....Contracts for two years only and then reviewed....
You dont need 5 hours, just a decent board capable of common sense decision making.....we need to stop the bleeding and stabalise the patient..

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:07 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17238
KingKerna wrote:

Quote:
Can anyone confirm that Fitzy was at the meeting?


Fitzpatrick WAS present last night...along with...
Smorgon / Malouf / Sticks / John Valmorbida / Lauraine Diggins / Adrian Gleeson / Greg Lee / Bruce Mathieson / Richard Newton / Marcus Rose and Simon Wilson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:11 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Ockham's Razor wrote:
Assuming that nobody on the board was willing to dip into their own pockets to fund a payout & the supposed benefactor would only contribute to a payout if Mitchell was the replacement coach;

then surely the board did what every Carlton supporter would want them to do:

• they presumably assessed the situation;
• decided that Mitchell wasn’t who the Board wanted as a coach (it is after all their job as directors to make this decision – not the “benefactor’s decision);
• made a decision to clarify funding for a payout.

Given the parlous state of the Club’s finances, the board would have been derelict in its duties to have proceeded to sack DP without certainty as to how it would fund any payout.

It is possible that they will use the next week to assess funding scenarios.

The board is under no obligation to make a decision in a timeframe to satisfy us or the media. Much better that the right decision is made rather than a hasty decision.


Concur with this.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:13 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 7:00 pm
Posts: 807
Wouldnt it be nice if they just came out and said what actually went on at this bloody meeting!!!!!

_________________
Happy Days Are Here Again!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:14 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Quote:
"Carlton is going through a process and it's a very important decision for the club and we've got to get it right and we're looking at all issues that are being presented from management to the board," Smorgon said.

"We are looking at improvements and to see what changes can be made to improve the operations of the whole club. Clearly we're looking for a change in improving the club and the performance of that (football) department."


Fantastic. John Cleese is our president.


(And he has Orally men fixing the place up)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:16 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
I don't agree with Synbad's assertion that nobody would want to coach us. I agree that the field might be narrowed a little by the state the club is in, but there are some positives for a new coach:

1) A list of young kids who have had some game time and are/will get better
2) The first draft pick, 3 in the top 20 and 5 in the top 50 or so
3) The first pick in the PSD
4) After two wooden spoons noone would be expecting too much, 5-7 wins would be seen be the media as a fantastic result, and around 4 wouldn't be perceived badly
5) If the board can be pushed around, a strong figure might even find that attractive in terms of getting the structures around them correct.

Even the media have started to talk about our kids this season, the public perception (ie non Carlton fan) is definately starting to change. This will also be viewed as a positive by a potential coach.

The biggest single thing I see stopping a potential new coach signing is the contract terms. As a new coach, you'd want a 3 year contract to turn this around and be judged fairly on performance, but I reckon this board will be gun shy over the DP situation and only offer 2 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:16 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
I don't think I have read anywhere that Brown is paying out the $1.2M.

It sounds more like Brown will pay the difference wrt Mitchell as assistant and Mitchell as senior coach.

Can anyone with sauce confirm what exactly Brown is offering the club?

$1.2M sounds like a very large investment for someone like Brown. At a guess I reckon it would likely be much smaller than that.





_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:22 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Agree Jarusa, that's how I read it too. And if he's the front man for a group of ex players, they could just be tipping in say $20,000 each (eg 8 ex players giving $160,000) to turn an assistant coaches salary into a low head coaches salary.

This makes the most sense, the club is no worse off if it sacks DP, and the players don't have to find too much cash.

One sticking point there, if we sacked DP, would we be in breach of contract and have to pay out the remaining contract up front if DP didn't agree to receiving the money over time? Could this be the sticking point?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:28 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
steve wrote:
Agree Jarusa, that's how I read it too. And if he's the front man for a group of ex players, they could just be tipping in say $20,000 each (eg 8 ex players giving $160,000) to turn an assistant coaches salary into a low head coaches salary.

This makes the most sense, the club is no worse off if it sacks DP, and the players don't have to find too much cash.

One sticking point there, if we sacked DP, would we be in breach of contract and have to pay out the remaining contract up front if DP didn't agree to receiving the money over time? Could this be the sticking point?


Denis may have threatened the board that if he is sacked he will blow the whole tanking story out into the public and get the club in trouble with the AFL for cheating again, Black Friday II. :wink: </joke>



_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:32 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Jar,

Don't even joke about that! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:34 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
Ockham's Razor wrote:
Assuming that nobody on the board was willing to dip into their own pockets to fund a payout & the supposed benefactor would only contribute to a payout if Mitchell was the replacement coach;

then surely the board did what every Carlton supporter would want them to do:

• they presumably assessed the situation;
• decided that Mitchell wasn’t who the Board wanted as a coach (it is after all their job as directors to make this decision – not the “benefactor’s decision);
• made a decision to clarify funding for a payout.

Given the parlous state of the Club’s finances, the board would have been derelict in its duties to have proceeded to sack DP without certainty as to how it would fund any payout.

It is possible that they will use the next week to assess funding scenarios.

The board is under no obligation to make a decision in a timeframe to satisfy us or the media. Much better that the right decision is made rather than a hasty decision.


sounds very reasonable OR unless
the Board had decided on a set path and began to 'leak' that out to people (ie Kenny, EB, Synbad) and then changed their mind sbecause they were too scared of the ramifications of their decision.

If what you say is right I am fine with the whole thing - quite happy for Denis to stay on in fact.

If the latter though then the board is gutless and right now the last thing we need is a gutless Baord to scared to do what it wants to do for fear of the protest.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
steve wrote:
I don't agree with Synbad's assertion that nobody would want to coach us. I agree that the field might be narrowed a little by the state the club is in, but there are some positives for a new coach:

1) A list of young kids who have had some game time and are/will get better
2) The first draft pick, 3 in the top 20 and 5 in the top 50 or so
3) The first pick in the PSD
4) After two wooden spoons noone would be expecting too much, 5-7 wins would be seen be the media as a fantastic result, and around 4 wouldn't be perceived badly
5) If the board can be pushed around, a strong figure might even find that attractive in terms of getting the structures around them correct.

Even the media have started to talk about our kids this season, the public perception (ie non Carlton fan) is definately starting to change. This will also be viewed as a positive by a potential coach.

The biggest single thing I see stopping a potential new coach signing is the contract terms. As a new coach, you'd want a 3 year contract to turn this around and be judged fairly on performance, but I reckon this board will be gun shy over the DP situation and only offer 2 years.



I agree with most of what you have said, and lets face it, the window of opportunity for someone to become a coach can be quite small - Mark Harvey (no thanks) has been waiting for 5+ years for a chance and still can't get a gig. These 'coaches in waiting' would be super confident types that belive they could turn things around and would jump at the chance to coach at senior level.

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:41 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Yup, and it's been pretty stable lately, no coaching changes for at least the last couple of years...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 621 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 32  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group