Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 1:57 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:56 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
I don't wish to dwell on the events that took place in the late hours before the 2002 draft, but one question has been bugging me for some time.

If we knew that we were guilty as sin, why didn't we try to off trade Picks 1 and 2 for an established player in the system?

Or were we that convinced we were innocent, the thought of trading our first two picks never entered our minds?

Thoughts?

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Going on my memory I think the AFL told clubs not to trade players for the draft picks with us, does this sound familiar to people? We got away with it for French? But I think a scare campaign went out about conducting further deals???

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18764
Location: threeohfivethree
There was a lot of talk that the other clubs had been warned off trading with Carlton for those first rounders at that any trades may be null and void and they'd miss out all together.

It happened later in the draft with Barney the stakes were much lower and the AFL may have either let that one through or simply added more penalty to the end.

Whether it's true or not you can't blame the other clubs for being wary.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:01 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20275
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Yeah that's how I remember it. Clubs I think were told that if they traded with us they could lose those picks. Was never going to happen but was scary enough. Certainly the talk was that they were told not to deal with us.

All the more reinforcement of the decision being a shambles. Either it had to take place before the entire trade period and draft, or entirely after for future years. But anyway...

If I remember the Kane Johnson deal pissed off the Tigers, as they gave up pick 4, which eventually became pick 2.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
bluehammer wrote:
If I remember the Kane Johnson deal pissed off the Tigers, as they gave up pick 4, which eventually became pick 2.


I definitely remember that.

The Tigers were about the only club that didn't want us sailed down the river, and only for that reason.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
bluehammer wrote:
Yeah that's how I remember it. Clubs I think were told that if they traded with us they could lose those picks. Was never going to happen but was scary enough. Certainly the talk was that they were told not to deal with us.

All the more reinforcement of the decision being a shambles. Either it had to take place before the entire trade period and draft, or entirely after for future years. But anyway...

If I remember the Kane Johnson deal pissed off the Tigers, as they gave up pick 4, which eventually became pick 2.


absolutely, the tigers got ripped off, the Kangas were the big winners from memory - the deal that got Johnson to Richmond gave them pick 2 instead of pick 4 - hence Wells

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
It was the Wayne Carey deal. I wonder if the Crows would prefer to have taken Wells, and whatever else they gave up for Carey, in retrospect.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:17 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:11 pm
Posts: 247
Location: Canterbury
I guess it didn't turn out too bad for the Tigers. Johnson is now captain of a side that promises some big things in the next few years whilst Wells has not been able to sustain his brilliance (still love him at carlton tho) :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:24 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 940
TruBlueBrad wrote:
It was the Wayne Carey deal. I wonder if the Crows would prefer to have taken Wells, and whatever else they gave up for Carey, in retrospect.


Sure as shark shit, I reckon.

Dictionary wrote:
Draconian |drəˈkōnēən; drā-|
adjective (of laws or their application) excessively harsh and severe.


This word is always mentioned in regard to Carlton's draft penalties. And it is pretty apt, too - by issuing the decree that clubs couldn't trade for our picks in the 2002 draft it effectively stomped on our ability to recruit any kind of talented fresh blood to revitalise the patently mediocre playing list.

Honestly, it was an incredible lack of foresight - or excessive vindictiveness - on the AFLs part.


To answer your question though, no, I don't think that the AFL would have penalised clubs for trading for our picks. How could they?

And yes, we should have had the foresight to offload them for some seriously talented players. Pity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:27 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Ok.

So if we did offload them, who were the big name players coming out of contract at the time?

Was Spider one of them?

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18078
GWS wrote:
There was a lot of talk that the other clubs had been warned off trading with Carlton for those first rounders at that any trades may be null and void and they'd miss out all together.


Talk alright.

Demetriou blatantly came out and stated so.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
The only people who knew we were guilty werent talking. Pagan and O Sullivan were in charge for trade week.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:02 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
The Power didn't lose the pick they obtained for French. :wink: :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24657
Location: Kaloyasena
This is no retrospective because the AFL's change in the PRIORITY PICK rules for National Draft 2006:

is nothing more than an extra year of Draft Penalties by stealth - which "The Spew" has gleefully inflicted on us. This is the same arsehole who said the AFL went easy on us in 2002.

The club should be shouting from the highest rooftop that this decision be reversed by the AFL and we should have a Priority Pick in the first Round thus giving us Picks 1 and 2.

We should be making our case to the AFL in the strongest possible terms - and if the AFL reply that changing the rules to this years draft would be "prejudicial" to the draft then we should point out that draft order was changed at the 11th hour in 2002 to penalise us - they can again be changed at the 11th hour to assist us.

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:25 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
Any one want Goddard for pick 17???

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
phoenix johnson wrote:
Ok.

So if we did offload them, who were the big name players coming out of contract at the time?

Was Spider one of them?


Not necessairly coming out of contract...we could have still traded for players under contract.

Trent Croad was definitely discussed.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:01 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:44 pm
Posts: 63
I have recollections of someone suggesting that Collo brokered a deal with the AFL Management, about the penalties we would get if we made a clean breast of it. Then supposedly the AFL Board didn't like the deal Demitrou agreed to and basically ignored the agreement and smashed us. This was why it took so long and explains the shellshocked expression of Collo face after the meeting. If Demitrou had agreed for us to keep the picks that year or something like that then we may have not traded them for that reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:42 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 940
Wildman wrote:
I have recollections of someone suggesting that Collo brokered a deal with the AFL Management, about the penalties we would get if we made a clean breast of it. Then supposedly the AFL Board didn't like the deal Demitrou agreed to and basically ignored the agreement and smashed us. This was why it took so long and explains the shellshocked expression of Collo face after the meeting. If Demitrou had agreed for us to keep the picks that year or something like that then we may have not traded them for that reason.


..Or maybe we were told that they'd take it easy on us if we played it 'clean' - with the intention of caning us all along?

I love conspiracy theories!


F•cking Demitrispew!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
The part that really hurt was barring us from trading into the earlier rounds.

Until the day I die I'll never have any respect for Demetriou et al. To stand there and tell us we got off lightly was the height of arrogance and vindictiveness.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:45 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
bluehammer wrote:
Yeah that's how I remember it. Clubs I think were told that if they traded with us they could lose those picks. Was never going to happen but was scary enough. Certainly the talk was that they were told not to deal with us.

All the more reinforcement of the decision being a shambles. Either it had to take place before the entire trade period and draft, or entirely after for future years. But anyway...

If I remember the Kane Johnson deal pissed off the Tigers, as they gave up pick 4, which eventually became pick 2.


Tigers won out of that one. Would have Johnson well ahead of Wells, validated by the fact he become the Tiger's cpatain.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, Google [Bot], Mickstar and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group