Jarusa wrote:
What I just said, thought it was pretty clear.
I have been wrong on many, many occassions, and admit it. Yet others keep up with the adversarial type of debate ad nauseum until it is boring and laughable, it is not a winner take all dick measuring exercise here, we are having an old fashioned pub chat of give and take.
It seems that those that criticise the most are the most sensitive to criticism.
that would be an excellent answer, if it were relevant to the issue at hand.
No one has ever said Carrazzo was a bad player. Rather, several people went to great lengths to say he was very good player, with one major malfunction that we needed to address. I doubt 1 match has addressed it completely, but in the spirit of "debate", we all proposed different strategies that would address his "condition".
So, I fail to see how anyone could have been wrong, unless you're proposing that we were either blind during the first 3 rounds, or that his kicking issues have been magically cured over the last week.
So which is it? We're his "CRITICS" wrong about his kicking in rounds 1-3? Are we blind or insane? Are we wrong to half expect his long game to continue to arise as an issue in the near future?
Yes, I hope Andrew Carrazzo gets delisted at the end of the year, just so I can come in here and say "AH HA! I WAS RIGHT! WE'VE TURFED ONE OF OUR BEST YOUNG TALENTS, BUT WHO CARES... AT LEAST I WAS RIGHT!!!!"
You must have been drinking, Jar, because I don't know where you're getting this from.
PERSPECTIVE!!!!!!!!!
Login
Register
FAQ
