Mrs Caz wrote:
ThePrez wrote:
however, pagan, lost me completly against Richmond when he moved Whitnall only Richo.
We where in command of the game leading 4 goals to 2 with Richo having kicked one goal and getting vast majority of possession on the wing and Thorton was doing more than okay.
Nope - Pagan shit himself, reacted negatively and turned the game with that very negative decision.
How do we know he shat himself? Maybe...he decided we were holding them quite nicely, but not capitalising on the forward line...Maybe...he decided Whits might be the man to do the job and the backline should have been able to do their job without him?
have you got the games mixed up. perhaps thinking of the collingwood game where Whitnall went to the forward line at 3/4 time.
he took Whitnall from the forward line and put him in Defence when we where winning the game 4 goals to 2 at 1/4 time
I would have thought that would of meant our forward line was winning the battle and our back line was also winning the battle in the first quarter

then Pagan shit himself becuase Richo had 1 goal and wanted Whitnall to go down to defence, thus taking him out of the forward line and stuffing up the winning match ups we had in the 1/4.
or am i missing the point completly?
We were winning, Richo was getting a few touches, but wasnt worrying us on the scoreboard so wasnt a problem to worry about IMO.
I cant make head nor tails of your post

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod
