- Spoiler
-
Blue Vain wrote:
Excuses. It's still a 1 v 1. That means there are no other players involved in the contest. If it's not an open forward line, it means we're probably getting repeat entries which is a good outcome. The fact that Harry has had twice as many 1 v 1's tells you he has had many more of those opportunities than Gunston. Well done by the coaches hey?
As for your other insights, if your forwards need it gift wrapped, they aren't worth a pinch of shit. Even if the ball is kicked along the ground to no ones advantage, I'd still expect my players to win it minimum 50% of the time. If he can't win it, at least get the @#$%&! thing to ground!
As for the stats, they're not the determining factor but they're a great tool to corroborate what people see. They're also great to dispel inaccuracies for what people think they see. They're a reflection of what is actually occurring. Hence the 18 clubs get all the stats from Champion data every week and not fan sites.
We're 2 games in with a 50% winning percentage. Playing a new game style with a third of the team new. Let's try giving it a few weeks with the players giving effort for 4 quarters before sacking the coaches.
A forward likes space, room to attack and ball to advantage, everything that gunston gets.
I can and many others can clearly see our forward line is congested and our entries to the detriment of our players.
Harry is clearly not the main focus in the forward line which restricts his ability to reach the potential we require as a team.
We all can see we get it in there but how and to who's advantage is the argument.
Everyone is caught up in repeat entries but try and focus on efficiency.
That is the key get the ball in there and score, we get the ball there, but our scoring is erratic.
Maybe if they looked at the game and got their heads out of a computer screen they would figure out why.
Login
Register
FAQ
