Braithy wrote:
some super interesting footage on fox about gunston ... and how the brilliant minds at hawks coaching, are keeping gunston in the square all by himself.
no doubt hawks small ball plays into all this. they have the cattle. but my take is ... some creative coaching could absolutely set harry up I50 to be successful
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAu3S6c4unUIs this what you are referring to?
If so:
1. Gunston is able to play this role, because he is both competitive defensively and offensively.
2. He is also wining more than 25% of his 1 on 1s unlike Harry, as per BV comment.
3. And he is in a team that has a fast transitioning midfield that can hit targets in the F50.
4. Plus, he's not exactly being left 'in the square all by himself' according to this footage.
Unfortunately this isn't a case of comparing apples with apples just to blame coaching.
Gunston has been around for as long as he has because he's an extremely smart 3 x premiership, 2 x AA footballer.
And Simpson is the one making these observations as well as mentoring Voss, so I am pretty sure our coaching department is all over this.
To think otherwise is being a bit presumptuous IMO.
You can have the best game plans in place, but if your players can't deliver them, then they don't mean jack.
Our players have a lot of work to do, we have all seen the poor disposals, fumbling and dropped tackles.
Let's not gloss over the basics that are not being completed.
Harry is as much to blame as others.
e.g. He's had 11 turnovers out of 25 possessions so far this year.
I hope he steps it up a level this weekend, we really need it.
Actually, we need them all to step it up, especially in Max's milestone game, Max is going to go off.