Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jul 16, 2025 3:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 7:21 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10091
Location: Australia
SurreyBlue wrote:
We've seen these incidents time and time again with no repercussions until it's us.
We have become the AFL's punching bag.......no f@#$ing b@#ls at the club any longer and are getting treated accordingly.

Agree, it will be interesting to see what the response is from this "new" Carlton under Cook and Wright. Will the club roll over again?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 7:59 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2775
sinbagger wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
We've seen these incidents time and time again with no repercussions until it's us.
We have become the AFL's punching bag.......no f@#$ing b@#ls at the club any longer and are getting treated accordingly.

Agree, it will be interesting to see what the response is from this "new" Carlton under Cook and Wright. Will the club roll over again?


Whilst I love the unsociable mongrel in the kid, I do think this sort of action should be banned and warrants a stiff penalty. There are others who should have been dealt harshly before now, but hopefully anyone who does this gets rubbed out to a similar degree from now on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2746
17th Premiership wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
We've seen these incidents time and time again with no repercussions until it's us.
We have become the AFL's punching bag.......no f@#$ing b@#ls at the club any longer and are getting treated accordingly.

Agree, it will be interesting to see what the response is from this "new" Carlton under Cook and Wright. Will the club roll over again?


Whilst I love the unsociable mongrel in the kid, I do think this sort of action should be banned and warrants a stiff penalty. There are others who should have been dealt harshly before now, but hopefully anyone who does this gets rubbed out to a similar degree from now on.


He doesn't push the guy into his teammate he just pushes him away from the ball. Unfortunately the on coming Brisbane player gets his head in the way. And yet you can push a guy in the back into a pack when going for a mark. :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:57 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7485
bondiblue wrote:
Effes wrote:
B Camporeale likely unavailable

Josh Gabelich
@JoshGabelich
Ben Camporeale has been handed a four-game suspension in the VFL for rough conduct. Incident left Dev Robertson and James Tunstill with concussion and broken teeth. Story on @AFLcomau


WTF

Well done Ben


Very well done Ben . It was no accident . Ben lined Robertson up . Robertson punched him in the head earlier in the match . Ben just evened up .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:21 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1160
bender wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Gov finished game on bench Hammy

But then again it is Gov probably cramp

Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk


hamstring 'awareness'..... for flowers sake, this bloke..... i'll never call any afl player soft, but he comes the closest to it....


Have seen him run with the flight of the ball into a pack and take a mark while getting KO'd in the act. Whatever it is that is less than Koutoufides about Gov, he isn't soft. Hesitant at times perhaps, indecisive at times, injury prone (but so was half our team in '22 & '23 & '24 don't really know)… but not soft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1160
malbi wrote:
We never (or rarely) win with two rucks. So I don't know why Voss persists. Neither Pitto or TDK can play forward well (despite three goals between them today). When we go with two rucks Pitto is the preferred starting ruckman and in the last two weeks he has actually played well.

If TDK has checked out then I would drop him to the VFL and bring in a true forward Lemmey. A decent target might take the pressure off Charlie. If TDK wants a future with us then he needs to show it. At the moment he is not worth half of $1.7M. It could be another Tom Boyd situation. Imagine him going to St Kilda with all of this fanfare and him not being any good.

I think his contract situation has been one big factor in our fall off this year.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk


When they brought back Pitto a few weeks ago I was hoping for Lemmy instead of Pitto but knew they would go with Pitto and TDK… the problematic two rucks situation. Voss looks for consistence of personal to "build that chemistry in the ones"… the chemistry with the worst kicking effectiveness (#18 in two key kicking stats I think they were general play KE and kicking inside 50 KE) in the AFL as revealed in the stats by Josh Gablich on one of those AFL shows this week).

Two rucks hasn't worked well at Pies or Demons in the past, not say it cannot work at all but depends on the kinds of players the two rucks are and the holes in the rest of the list. It's mainly a problem b/c TDK plays his best as a follower not as a KPF, ditto Pitto.

Maybe they don't want to torch Lemmy with whatever disease has infected our KPFs? Keep him in reserves for rest of the year and let him build his confidence and skill with decent opportunities to take marks on the lead.

TDK contract situation wouldn't be a big deal if we were top 4 this year. Lots have top 8 clubs have an important player out of contract. And who knows… Saints might end up back peddling on the $1.7 for TDK if some of their other fish stay to fry.

Also I don't think TDK has checked out, if it was about him resigned to transferring to St Kilda he'd be playing out of his skin to make sure he banks the extra $0.5m per year for the next 7 yrs or whatever they are offering. same with Charlie he's not "checked out" they're both just struggling and somewhat starved of opportunities to shine. not to mention team success and the confidence that brings like the rest of the players.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 3:58 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 399
can we not kick the ball to MAX when he goes to backline ,thats all i ask


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7485
jpulice1969 wrote:
can we not kick the ball to MAX when he goes to backline ,thats all i ask


Not while Steven May is back there .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 5:04 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10091
Location: Australia
diesel95 wrote:
malbi wrote:
We never (or rarely) win with two rucks. So I don't know why Voss persists. Neither Pitto or TDK can play forward well (despite three goals between them today). When we go with two rucks Pitto is the preferred starting ruckman and in the last two weeks he has actually played well.

If TDK has checked out then I would drop him to the VFL and bring in a true forward Lemmey. A decent target might take the pressure off Charlie. If TDK wants a future with us then he needs to show it. At the moment he is not worth half of $1.7M. It could be another Tom Boyd situation. Imagine him going to St Kilda with all of this fanfare and him not being any good.

I think his contract situation has been one big factor in our fall off this year.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk


When they brought back Pitto a few weeks ago I was hoping for Lemmy instead of Pitto but knew they would go with Pitto and TDK… the problematic two rucks situation. Voss looks for consistence of personal to "build that chemistry in the ones"… the chemistry with the worst kicking effectiveness (#18 in two key kicking stats I think they were general play KE and kicking inside 50 KE) in the AFL as revealed in the stats by Josh Gablich on one of those AFL shows this week).

Two rucks hasn't worked well at Pies or Demons in the past, not say it cannot work at all but depends on the kinds of players the two rucks are and the holes in the rest of the list. It's mainly a problem b/c TDK plays his best as a follower not as a KPF, ditto Pitto.

Maybe they don't want to torch Lemmy with whatever disease has infected our KPFs? Keep him in reserves for rest of the year and let him build his confidence and skill with decent opportunities to take marks on the lead.

TDK contract situation wouldn't be a big deal if we were top 4 this year. Lots have top 8 clubs have an important player out of contract. And who knows… Saints might end up back peddling on the $1.7 for TDK if some of their other fish stay to fry.

Also I don't think TDK has checked out, if it was about him resigned to transferring to St Kilda he'd be playing out of his skin to make sure he banks the extra $0.5m per year for the next 7 yrs or whatever they are offering. same with Charlie he's not "checked out" they're both just struggling and somewhat starved of opportunities to shine. not to mention team success and the confidence that brings like the rest of the players.


I think the TDK/Lemmy conundrum was that we already had a bunch of youngsters been thrown around by more mature bodies and we didn't want to add Lemmy to that equation. Whatever TDK's motivation is (or is not), he has enough pre seasons that he should be able to compete effectively in the fwd line.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 5:19 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10091
Location: Australia
Cerra available to play, will only get a fine and not a suspension - sanity prevails


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 5:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3541
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
but Gov and Fantasia out with hamstring injuries.

Saad available.

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 5:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13552
Location: Melbourne
bluebo baggers wrote:
but Gov and Fantasia out with hamstring injuries.

Saad available.


Silvagni still not available either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 6:58 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14903
Location: Sydney
My god we are going to be BAD this week, and I'm almost looking forward to the Clownshoe Derby in the final round


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 7:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:42 pm
Posts: 2965
Location: dudley!!!
I bet cerra wishes he got suspended.....

_________________
my last one was rubbish


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 7:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13552
Location: Melbourne
GreatEx wrote:
My god we are going to be BAD this week, and I'm almost looking forward to the Clownshoe Derby in the final round
Both us and the Bommmerz will struggle to field a team at this rate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 7:40 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2164
Location: East Melbourne
sinbagger wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
malbi wrote:
We never (or rarely) win with two rucks. So I don't know why Voss persists. Neither Pitto or TDK can play forward well (despite three goals between them today). When we go with two rucks Pitto is the preferred starting ruckman and in the last two weeks he has actually played well.

If TDK has checked out then I would drop him to the VFL and bring in a true forward Lemmey. A decent target might take the pressure off Charlie. If TDK wants a future with us then he needs to show it. At the moment he is not worth half of $1.7M. It could be another Tom Boyd situation. Imagine him going to St Kilda with all of this fanfare and him not being any good.

I think his contract situation has been one big factor in our fall off this year.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk


When they brought back Pitto a few weeks ago I was hoping for Lemmy instead of Pitto but knew they would go with Pitto and TDK… the problematic two rucks situation. Voss looks for consistence of personal to "build that chemistry in the ones"… the chemistry with the worst kicking effectiveness (#18 in two key kicking stats I think they were general play KE and kicking inside 50 KE) in the AFL as revealed in the stats by Josh Gablich on one of those AFL shows this week).

Two rucks hasn't worked well at Pies or Demons in the past, not say it cannot work at all but depends on the kinds of players the two rucks are and the holes in the rest of the list. It's mainly a problem b/c TDK plays his best as a follower not as a KPF, ditto Pitto.

Maybe they don't want to torch Lemmy with whatever disease has infected our KPFs? Keep him in reserves for rest of the year and let him build his confidence and skill with decent opportunities to take marks on the lead.

TDK contract situation wouldn't be a big deal if we were top 4 this year. Lots have top 8 clubs have an important player out of contract. And who knows… Saints might end up back peddling on the $1.7 for TDK if some of their other fish stay to fry.

Also I don't think TDK has checked out, if it was about him resigned to transferring to St Kilda he'd be playing out of his skin to make sure he banks the extra $0.5m per year for the next 7 yrs or whatever they are offering. same with Charlie he's not "checked out" they're both just struggling and somewhat starved of opportunities to shine. not to mention team success and the confidence that brings like the rest of the players.


I think the TDK/Lemmy conundrum was that we already had a bunch of youngsters been thrown around by more mature bodies and we didn't want to add Lemmy to that equation. Whatever TDK's motivation is (or is not), he has enough pre seasons that he should be able to compete effectively in the fwd line.
Alright. Let's do something different. Let's play them both and stretch the Demons back line. Lemmey comes in for McGovern and plays FF. TDK stays down there and then relieves Pitto. Charlie roams at CHF. Acres comes back for Fantasia and Evans comes in for Fogarty. I'd give Lord a full game and play Durdin sub. Saad wait one more week.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk

_________________
Silvagni


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 7:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10091
Location: Australia
malbi wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
malbi wrote:
We never (or rarely) win with two rucks. So I don't know why Voss persists. Neither Pitto or TDK can play forward well (despite three goals between them today). When we go with two rucks Pitto is the preferred starting ruckman and in the last two weeks he has actually played well.

If TDK has checked out then I would drop him to the VFL and bring in a true forward Lemmey. A decent target might take the pressure off Charlie. If TDK wants a future with us then he needs to show it. At the moment he is not worth half of $1.7M. It could be another Tom Boyd situation. Imagine him going to St Kilda with all of this fanfare and him not being any good.

I think his contract situation has been one big factor in our fall off this year.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk


When they brought back Pitto a few weeks ago I was hoping for Lemmy instead of Pitto but knew they would go with Pitto and TDK… the problematic two rucks situation. Voss looks for consistence of personal to "build that chemistry in the ones"… the chemistry with the worst kicking effectiveness (#18 in two key kicking stats I think they were general play KE and kicking inside 50 KE) in the AFL as revealed in the stats by Josh Gablich on one of those AFL shows this week).

Two rucks hasn't worked well at Pies or Demons in the past, not say it cannot work at all but depends on the kinds of players the two rucks are and the holes in the rest of the list. It's mainly a problem b/c TDK plays his best as a follower not as a KPF, ditto Pitto.

Maybe they don't want to torch Lemmy with whatever disease has infected our KPFs? Keep him in reserves for rest of the year and let him build his confidence and skill with decent opportunities to take marks on the lead.

TDK contract situation wouldn't be a big deal if we were top 4 this year. Lots have top 8 clubs have an important player out of contract. And who knows… Saints might end up back peddling on the $1.7 for TDK if some of their other fish stay to fry.

Also I don't think TDK has checked out, if it was about him resigned to transferring to St Kilda he'd be playing out of his skin to make sure he banks the extra $0.5m per year for the next 7 yrs or whatever they are offering. same with Charlie he's not "checked out" they're both just struggling and somewhat starved of opportunities to shine. not to mention team success and the confidence that brings like the rest of the players.


I think the TDK/Lemmy conundrum was that we already had a bunch of youngsters been thrown around by more mature bodies and we didn't want to add Lemmy to that equation. Whatever TDK's motivation is (or is not), he has enough pre seasons that he should be able to compete effectively in the fwd line.
Alright. Let's do something different. Let's play them both and stretch the Demons back line. Lemmey comes in for McGovern and plays FF. TDK stays down there and then relieves Pitto. Charlie roams at CHF. Acres comes back for Fantasia and Evans comes in for Fogarty. I'd give Lord a full game and play Durdin sub. Saad wait one more week.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk


I think Skull would be a better option than Lemmy at this stage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 8:04 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2164
Location: East Melbourne
sinbagger wrote:
malbi wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
diesel95 wrote:
malbi wrote:
We never (or rarely) win with two rucks. So I don't know why Voss persists. Neither Pitto or TDK can play forward well (despite three goals between them today). When we go with two rucks Pitto is the preferred starting ruckman and in the last two weeks he has actually played well.

If TDK has checked out then I would drop him to the VFL and bring in a true forward Lemmey. A decent target might take the pressure off Charlie. If TDK wants a future with us then he needs to show it. At the moment he is not worth half of $1.7M. It could be another Tom Boyd situation. Imagine him going to St Kilda with all of this fanfare and him not being any good.

I think his contract situation has been one big factor in our fall off this year.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk


When they brought back Pitto a few weeks ago I was hoping for Lemmy instead of Pitto but knew they would go with Pitto and TDK… the problematic two rucks situation. Voss looks for consistence of personal to "build that chemistry in the ones"… the chemistry with the worst kicking effectiveness (#18 in two key kicking stats I think they were general play KE and kicking inside 50 KE) in the AFL as revealed in the stats by Josh Gablich on one of those AFL shows this week).

Two rucks hasn't worked well at Pies or Demons in the past, not say it cannot work at all but depends on the kinds of players the two rucks are and the holes in the rest of the list. It's mainly a problem b/c TDK plays his best as a follower not as a KPF, ditto Pitto.

Maybe they don't want to torch Lemmy with whatever disease has infected our KPFs? Keep him in reserves for rest of the year and let him build his confidence and skill with decent opportunities to take marks on the lead.

TDK contract situation wouldn't be a big deal if we were top 4 this year. Lots have top 8 clubs have an important player out of contract. And who knows… Saints might end up back peddling on the $1.7 for TDK if some of their other fish stay to fry.

Also I don't think TDK has checked out, if it was about him resigned to transferring to St Kilda he'd be playing out of his skin to make sure he banks the extra $0.5m per year for the next 7 yrs or whatever they are offering. same with Charlie he's not "checked out" they're both just struggling and somewhat starved of opportunities to shine. not to mention team success and the confidence that brings like the rest of the players.


I think the TDK/Lemmy conundrum was that we already had a bunch of youngsters been thrown around by more mature bodies and we didn't want to add Lemmy to that equation. Whatever TDK's motivation is (or is not), he has enough pre seasons that he should be able to compete effectively in the fwd line.
Alright. Let's do something different. Let's play them both and stretch the Demons back line. Lemmey comes in for McGovern and plays FF. TDK stays down there and then relieves Pitto. Charlie roams at CHF. Acres comes back for Fantasia and Evans comes in for Fogarty. I'd give Lord a full game and play Durdin sub. Saad wait one more week.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk


I think Skull would be a better option than Lemmy at this stage.
It would be nice to do something different. It's like going through Groundhog Day week after week.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk

_________________
Silvagni


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2025 11:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 10091
Location: Australia
You want to do something different?

Pick Lemmey and Skull and TDK to play fwd and have Charlie play either on the wing or CHB.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:08 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2164
Location: East Melbourne
sinbagger wrote:
You want to do something different?

Pick Lemmey and Skull and TDK to play fwd and have Charlie play either on the wing or CHB.
Sounds good to me. Mix it up. We can't do any worse.

Sent from my SM-S931B using Tapatalk

_________________
Silvagni


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 82 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group