Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 8:34 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25541
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

You know you’re being highly disrespectful .

You know there’s a whole thread on Dan Houston in recruiting thread. You know we all posted there. You know we all know the facts.

No idea why you bought up the naive bit about common knowledge. I didn’t even go there. It’s not the point.

Why divert the conversation?

You don’t do any math.


With you we go around and around in circles.

Bottom line is value we get for the pay players receive. If they were all performing there would be no discussion on salary space.



okay okay. so you guys do the math, do you? from numbers you guess over. and you guys have your dan houston thread where you "discussed" everything. including the "facts"

and then there's our very own coach talking among friends at xmas time where we share many mutual friends. and everything he says flies in the face of what you guys "thought" you know, and the numbers you guys cooked up with no actual evidence of what guys are getting paid. so your egos are hurt bcos you were wrong, i get it.

but rather than face you're wrong. no. lets shoot the messenger. haha. unreal.

for example pittonet is on 400k per season, not the 350k bondi says in his spreadsheet.

so for every player if bondi is 25-75k out with. what about if he's 100 or 200k out with other players? ... where does that leave his final cap? i'll tell you, nowhere near where it really is.


i'm kinda done here.


You’re attacking me again.

I don’t doubt what you’ve told me in private. Why do you even think that? Are you paranoid?
I like hearing about peoples opinions and feel privileged to hear private conversations your mates had with Vossy.
I don’t dismiss anything, but I dismiss everything. Do you understand that old saying? then I discuss, then I hear opinions, then I contemplate, sometimes I don’t conclude, but May harbour suspicion or surprise.

You present a conversation as inside information from Austin. It’s not. It’s a conversation from a coach who wanted Houston. We gave you a few reasons why his view may not be right. That’s all. Why do you take it so personally? Why can’t you see the virtue in what others tell you?

Can’t you see it’s best for the club that Vossy thinks it’s the salary cap constraint that forced the rejection of a player Vossy bought to the club? And all the other reasons?

I didn’t say I was right. Stop spooking. I said from the outset it’s a workbook based on information I have gathered over the years. It’s open to discussion.

What do you do? Pick Pitto, and I can share the story of his first and second contract he signed with Carlton, the second when he was injured with a PCL and TDK about to take the mantle. His contract was stretched to 4 years, like L. Young, and Cerra to keep the annual pay down. Security of tenure. Ask a banker what that means to them.

People get shocked we contracted Pitto and L. Young for 4 years but when they realise how cheap they came it becomes a good deal. It’s important to know before bagging a player or decision.

Then what do you do, just to discredit me, not the workbook, you generalise, and say I deduct 50k per contact x 44 players implying I’m 2.2k out. Do you understand what you are saying? You are saying we are 1.3M over the salary cap.

Between your comment and my workbook do you see who is closer to the pin?

Why?

Can we just discuss things without taking it personal. And you have to accept why you may doubt some of the things you hear and you have admitted, sometimes you don’t recall the facts and shoot. You admit it. Please mate. Be reasonable.

It’s a discussion. No one is shooting the messenger. You need to understand to comprehend the doubts one presents, and acknowledge the validity or not, and why.

You just shoot off, shooting at anyone and everyone if if don’t agree with you. Maybe it’s the way you deliver your “Facts”. Maybe they are opinions. Heard of Chinese whispers?

I’m aware my numbers might not be correct, as I have presented them, but I’ve avoided Front lading etc I have on my private sheets. It’s an exercise.

Just point out where it’s wrong and what you think. We can discuss it.

Im not going to respond to every single player. It’s too hard. I will address with my evidence at a late date.

What this worksheet does is makes people aware of ball park numbers that make up a list and the rules around salary cap. Food For Thought.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Last edited by bondiblue on Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18736
Location: threeohfivethree
I didn’t have a long look at the figures Bondi. That one just stood out for a fifth year player to me.

As I said I have no idea what he’s paid but if you want a “gut feel”, for whatever that’s worth, then I’d say he’s easily in the $250-300k range.

The other problem I see is that you state he was on $95k at Geelong but if that’s correct it would be a base salary without match payments. He played 15 games in his first season so that would significantly inflate that figure.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 3:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25541
Location: Bondi Beach
GWS wrote:
I didn’t have a long look at the figures Bondi. That one just stood out for a fifth year player to me.

As I said I have no idea what he’s paid but if you want a “gut feel”, for whatever that’s worth, then I’d say he’s easily in the $250-300k range.

The other problem I see is that you state he was on $95k at Geelong but if that’s correct it would be a base salary without match payments. He played 15 games in his first season so that would significantly inflate that figure.


Thanks for honest response.

You are correct re games played at Geelong.

Only 6 in his last year and 2 the previous year. That’s worth $24k plus $8k. He played 15 in his first year then fell out of favour.

At Carlton he’s played 13 this year, 15, 12, 3. He was on his way to being delisted last year as an injury prone player, till his fortunes changed when he was picked to play a defensive small forward role. He would not be a trade target for that elsewhere. Carlton were not threatened by the approaches of other teams. If he was, he’d be trade bait.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 4:05 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Australia
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

You know you’re being highly disrespectful .

You know there’s a whole thread on Dan Houston in recruiting thread. You know we all posted there. You know we all know the facts.

No idea why you bought up the naive bit about common knowledge. I didn’t even go there. It’s not the point.

Why divert the conversation?

You don’t do any math.


With you we go around and around in circles.

Bottom line is value we get for the pay players receive. If they were all performing there would be no discussion on salary space.



okay okay. so you guys do the math, do you? from numbers you guess over. and you guys have your dan houston thread where you "discussed" everything. including the "facts"

and then there's our very own coach talking among friends at xmas time where we share many mutual friends. and everything he says flies in the face of what you guys "thought" you know, and the numbers you guys cooked up with no actual evidence of what guys are getting paid. so your egos are hurt bcos you were wrong, i get it.

but rather than face you're wrong. no. lets shoot the messenger. haha. unreal.

for example pittonet is on 400k per season, not the 350k bondi says in his spreadsheet.

so for every player if bondi is 25-75k out with. what about if he's 100 or 200k out with other players? ... where does that leave his final cap? i'll tell you, nowhere near where it really is.


i'm kinda done here.


How do you know what Voss said was the truth? Maybe he made up some bullshit because a bunch of idiots kept badgering him to say something? Maybe he had some agenda to say what he said. Just because you hear someone for the club say something you can't guarantee it's true. You'd be vary naive if you did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2025 4:08 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Australia
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

You know you’re being highly disrespectful .

You know there’s a whole thread on Dan Houston in recruiting thread. You know we all posted there. You know we all know the facts.

No idea why you bought up the naive bit about common knowledge. I didn’t even go there. It’s not the point.

Why divert the conversation?

You don’t do any math.


With you we go around and around in circles.

Bottom line is value we get for the pay players receive. If they were all performing there would be no discussion on salary space.



okay okay. so you guys do the math, do you? from numbers you guess over. and you guys have your dan houston thread where you "discussed" everything. including the "facts"

and then there's our very own coach talking among friends at xmas time where we share many mutual friends. and everything he says flies in the face of what you guys "thought" you know, and the numbers you guys cooked up with no actual evidence of what guys are getting paid. so your egos are hurt bcos you were wrong, i get it.

but rather than face you're wrong. no. lets shoot the messenger. haha. unreal.

for example pittonet is on 400k per season, not the 350k bondi says in his spreadsheet.

so for every player if bondi is 25-75k out with. what about if he's 100 or 200k out with other players? ... where does that leave his final cap? i'll tell you, nowhere near where it really is.


i'm kinda done here.


You’re attacking me again.

I don’t doubt what you’ve told me in private. Why do you even think that? Are you paranoid?
I like hearing about peoples opinions and feel privileged to hear private conversations your mates had with Vossy.
I don’t dismiss anything, but I dismiss everything. Do you understand that old saying? then I discuss, then I hear opinions, then I contemplate, sometimes I don’t conclude, but May harbour suspicion or surprise.

You present a conversation as inside information from Austin. It’s not. It’s a conversation from a coach who wanted Houston. We gave you a few reasons why his view may not be right. That’s all. Why do you take it so personally? Why can’t you see the virtue in what others tell you?

Can’t you see it’s best for the club that Vossy thinks it’s the salary cap constraint that forced the rejection of a player Vossy bought to the club? And all the other reasons?

I didn’t say I was right. Stop spooking. I said from the outset it’s a workbook based on information I have gathered over the years. It’s open to discussion.

What do you do? Pick Pitto, and I can share the story of his first and second contract he signed with Carlton, the second when he was injured with a PCL and TDK about to take the mantle. His contract was stretched to 4 years, like L. Young, and Cerra to keep the annual pay down. Security of tenure. Ask a banker what that means to them.

People get shocked we contracted Pitto and L. Young for 4 years but when they realise how cheap they came it becomes a good deal. It’s important to know before bagging a player or decision.

Then what do you do, just to discredit me, not the workbook, you generalise, and say I deduct 50k per contact x 44 players implying I’m 2.2k out. Do you understand what you are saying? You are saying we are 1.3M over the salary cap.

Between your comment and my workbook do you see who is closer to the pin?

Why?

Can we just discuss things without taking it personal. And you have to accept why you may doubt some of the things you hear and you have admitted, sometimes you don’t recall the facts and shoot. You admit it. Please mate. Be reasonable.

It’s a discussion. No one is shooting the messenger. You need to understand to comprehend the doubts one presents, and acknowledge the validity or not, and why.

You just shoot off, shooting at anyone and everyone if if don’t agree with you. Maybe it’s the way you deliver your “Facts”. Maybe they are opinions. Heard of Chinese whispers?

I’m aware my numbers might not be correct, as I have presented them, but I’ve avoided Front lading etc I have on my private sheets. It’s an exercise.

Just point out where it’s wrong and what you think. We can discuss it.

Im not going to respond to every single player. It’s too hard. I will address with my evidence at a late date.

What this worksheet does is makes people aware of ball park numbers that make up a list and the rules around salary cap. Food For Thought.


I'd back Bondi over Brathy to have a better idea of what Pittonet is on any day of the year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 10:28 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6767
If TDK leaves would you consider adding Tom Lynch in the F50?
Surely with 3 tall target gun forwards we might actually be able to take marks and kick goals.
Harry could still play a ruck/forward role with Reilly.
And Tom and Charlie could take it in turns to move up the ground and provide better delivery into F50.
Imagine Charlie and Tom leading to opposite wings with Harry in the goal square, defenders would s#%t themselves.
It would open the F50 up a lot more and the smalls might get some good space.

Plus you would add 2 guns for no draft capital, both unrestricted FAs.

I don't know, just a thought.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 10:40 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18736
Location: threeohfivethree
Um… no.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 10:42 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6767
GWS wrote:
Um… no.

Constructive, but noted. :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 10:54 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7444
Sidefx wrote:
GWS wrote:
Um… no.

Constructive, but noted. :grin:


That's not a bad idea . Premiership player . I"d think about it for sure .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:46 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9975
Location: Australia
Sidefx wrote:
If TDK leaves would you consider adding Tom Lynch in the F50?
Surely with 3 tall target gun forwards we might actually be able to take marks and kick goals.
Harry could still play a ruck/forward role with Reilly.
And Tom and Charlie could take it in turns to move up the ground and provide better delivery into F50.
Imagine Charlie and Tom leading to opposite wings with Harry in the goal square, defenders would s#%t themselves.
It would open the F50 up a lot more and the smalls might get some good space.

Plus you would add 2 guns for no draft capital, both unrestricted FAs.

I don't know, just a thought.


Would add instant mongrel to the list that is missing, but would any of these three chase their defenders as they ran down the field?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:55 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6767
Mickstar wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
GWS wrote:
Um… no.

Constructive, but noted. :grin:


That's not a bad idea . Premiership player . I"d think about it for sure .

He could add that leadership in the F50 we need.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:56 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6767
sinbagger wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
If TDK leaves would you consider adding Tom Lynch in the F50?
Surely with 3 tall target gun forwards we might actually be able to take marks and kick goals.
Harry could still play a ruck/forward role with Reilly.
And Tom and Charlie could take it in turns to move up the ground and provide better delivery into F50.
Imagine Charlie and Tom leading to opposite wings with Harry in the goal square, defenders would s#%t themselves.
It would open the F50 up a lot more and the smalls might get some good space.

Plus you would add 2 guns for no draft capital, both unrestricted FAs.

I don't know, just a thought.


Would add instant mongrel to the list that is missing, but would any of these three chase their defenders as they ran down the field?

Hopefully they wouldn't need to, they could just wait for the centre bounce. :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 12:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7730
Location: Bendigo
Sidefx wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
GWS wrote:
Um… no.

Constructive, but noted. :grin:


That's not a bad idea . Premiership player . I"d think about it for sure .

He could add that leadership in the F50 we need.

Are we talking about the same guy?

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 4:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18736
Location: threeohfivethree
Crusader wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
GWS wrote:
Um… no.

Constructive, but noted. :grin:


That's not a bad idea . Premiership player . I"d think about it for sure .

He could add that leadership in the F50 we need.

Are we talking about the same guy?


I think we just found ourselves in a parallel universe where Lynch isn’t a regularly injured [REDACTED] on 1.5 million a year.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 7:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14765
Location: Sydney
Leadership is 5 frees against and 0 disposals in a half of footy, and frequent suspensions for completely losing your rag. Let's put him on the "maybe" pile.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 7:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13500
Location: Melbourne
Lynch is a flog and always seems to have a busted foot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 7:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18059
missnaut wrote:
Lynch is a flog.


:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2488
Location: Princess Park
Blue Vain wrote:
missnaut wrote:
Lynch is a flog.


:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:


Forget Lynch.

Mihocek, out of contract and continues to be offered a one year contract - how about we offer 2 or 3 (yes he is 32yrs old) he's smart, durable, a team player and would provide the mid size forward we desperately need. Martin couldn't do it and now it seems Elijah may not be available. I bet the Pies are paying peanuts.

I mentioned this last week, I think it was J Brown after the game suggested something similar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14741
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Mihocek might like winning

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35959
Location: Half back flank
Blue4ever wrote:
I bet the Pies are paying peanuts.



He's been known to ask them, where's my cheque



I'll see myself out


Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 55, 56, 57, 58, 59  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, daggs001, Expat Blue, Google Adsense [Bot], rodrocketman, windy and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group