Blue Vain wrote:
keogh wrote:
To think we gave our first and second rounder to Hawthorn for pick 14 tells you so much about the football department
They overrated the list massively
Don't look at the numbers, look at the outcomes.
It has nothing to do with overrating the list. It's about complementing in an area where we are significantly deficient. Jagga was the perfect addition structurally.
Forget our second rounder because that would have been swallowed up by Harry Dean anyway so it's irrelevant. We have a second rounder to offer.
This years draft is poor in quality and 3 of the top 5 picks will be academy, and others will come between 5-10.
So we gave up pick 12 last year and our first this year in a poor draft, (which will possibly drift into the teens anyway) to get Jagga Smith. The player we rated the best in an elite draft.
We also got O'Farrell and the 2 Campo's.
So 2 picks in the teens for Jagga, I'm taking it every time. Couple that with Harry Dean this year and it perfectly addresses deficiencies.
IMHO, when we look back on the 2024/2025 draft strategy, it will be a great outcome.
So our List Management under Austin is going ok?
Must be the coaching department then?
Or the footy department
Or the culture
Or the board
Or the colour of the walls
Perfectly addresses our deficiencies
The trade for Kennedy resulted in us getting O’Farrell
Let’s hope the club doesn’t ruin him by playing him regularly too early
Key position players need time
Young kids need at least 2 years to settle in
From what I have seen of the Campos they have a crack but arnt quick and average kicks
That adds to our deficiencies
And don’t forget Sam Davidson was available
Another VFL player” not good enough “
Jagga Smith hopefully is as great as you and others say