Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
We moved on the injured players (real depth) last year to get some young talent through the door.
You cannot cover too many injuries (and other issues) with 1st year players. The depth has been there in the seniors, but not the VFL level.
Talent is definitely there but the game we want the young developing kids like Carroll, White, Campo's, HoK's, HoF's etc. to play at AFL level, is unachievable with their current bodies.
All other teams have transitioned to a completely different game plan, we didn't, and it's even worse with our list changes and age demographic this year.
Voss isn't and hasn't been willing to change and accommodate this. That has played a major part to our demise.
He needed to understand the ramifications of such list changes last year and update the game plan to suit the list or at the very least had a plan B in place.
See this is what frustrates me, people only look for what you want to see.
I agree the competition has changed to a different game plan, I have pointed this out already.
Bondi, myself and countless others have all pointed out the preseason game plan, plan B as you have allured to.
But this playing group is unable to execute it and if they do it is only in bursts.
They tried it again after the break and they still can't do it.
Our midfield is too slow and gets punished too easily on the turnover because of it.
And there is a reason we have about 8 small forwards on our list.
Missing targets and missing goals makes that game plan unsustainable.
Who did we trade/draft in of any decent quality to accommodate our weakness in this area to adapt to this new style of game?
Jagga Smith and that is it.
I just don't understand how you can't see that we changed nothing with the list last year, we've had similar amounts of injuries and yet we are expected (only by supporters by the way) to be in the top 8.
Most first year players are not depth, if they can't step up into the seniors and have an immediate impact they are developing players not depth.
No team can afford too many of these and win games regularly and no game plan can 'accommodate' to this either.
TBH why would you unless you are putting the cue in the rack.
And if the depth was there in the seniors I'm pretty sure players like Doc and Acres would not be getting games.
i.e. If Elijah and Cottrell were on the park, Fantasia/Fog and Doc would not be getting games.
Hollands has been moved down back because forward of centre he is a liability and we are missing a running HBF.
So our wings are Acres and Doc with cameos from Lord, Walsh and Binns.
Lord is the only one out of the wings and Hollands that can actually hit a target with a penetrating kick into F50.
I don't know what else to say on this other than go back and watch a few of our games with this in mind.
Keep up the fight sidex. And who cares about the ignorant.
I can't believe people think we have depth.
We have 17 kids under 21. The most in the AFL. FMD. Wake up and look at the list.
I said it before the season started, we will be tested if we have injuries because our depth players are not good enough or not developed.
We can't win a game with more than 8 injured. We beat the Cats with 5 out injured. We lost to NM with 9 out injured.
We still have injury prone players, and yes that includes Charlie, Walsh and Docherty to a degree, and Gov doesn't take hits to avoid injury, and when he does, he goes to hospital, only to reappear for his match payments the next game, Williams, Acres is never fully fit, Fantasia, Cottrell, Durdin...who thinks we got rid of our injury prone players in contract? We only got rid of 3 injury prone players because we didnt renew their contract.
And, have a look at who comes in from this so called depth to cover the injured:
White, Evans, Motlop, O'Keefe, Carroll, Fogarty, Binns, Lord, Young, 31yo Fantasia, a lame Pittonet.... We tried to trade Young. Thank god we didnt. You dont see Cats Pies or Swans play skinny undeveloped players until they are ready unless you are a Gulden, Daicos or Selwood. Its stupid to gift kids games, for a taste...maybe for a taste if they are playing in a strong winning culture. Otherwise they get injured and lose confidence. Sometimes we have half a dozen of them out there. What are we doing?
Developing kids?
Expecting kids to win us games?
Playing to be a Top 4 team?
Palying for the Flag?
Its a kindergarten!
...and look who we have had to keep in the team regardless of bad form this year
Curnow, Gov, Motlop, Acres...
WE started the year with 13 out injured for round 1, and had to play Harry McKay who was obviously not right, and we found out he wasn't. Then in round 2 when we lost McKay, we played a lame Curnow, who hasn't come good.
Read all the papers. Read the social media forums. Its the List that is the problem for any coaches .
Austin said after the Trade period we had the 2nd best list in the AFL. Ofcourse he would. Its his job that's on the line. What a goose, patting himself on the back...and the club believed him, so do some posters. Well its been proven wrong!!!!!!!!
And some expect Vossy to pull a rabbit out of his arse, by moving the deck chairs. I'm not saying he's not the blame. I'm saying there has been a glaring deficiency with list depth and it appeared from round 1 with 13 out injured.
Get fairdinkum. Fix the game plan. Fix the list. Get some FA's and dont bother with topping up with more kids. Add the 4 we are earmarked and it brings our kids to 21 of the list of 44. Can anyone not see that as a problem?
We have 16 players coming out of contract at the end of this year? That's dangerous, but I wonder why?
If you can't change the people, change the people.