Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 12:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3482 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 1:21 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14677
Location: Sydney
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
.

Doesn't matter what happens to Voss. If the List isn't balanced, which it hasn't been since SOS traded in injury prone retreads, then the problem will remain for the next coach. Simples


i read this as, "which it hasn't been since SOS traded in injury prone retards."

oh, how i laughed and chuckled.


Damn you, I was about to make an "auto-correct?" quip but you got in first :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 1:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10611
So now it’s all SoS fault. lol
How many years have Voss and Aussie had to fix this?
I just can’t be bothered anymore………sorry I’m done with these discussions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 1:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7286
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

If you believe Wright will address our needs, how? If you don't, why? Don't worry about Voss. He wont be the problem.




i do believe in wright and his vision and his ability. however, i'm not sure the board will allow someone to come in and rearrange all the furniture to make it all happen. board is too self serving and governed by profit. the board is the obstacle to our success imho.


i'm not at all worried about voss. i have it real good, that he's gone and wright doesn't want him. and that was the major factor behind voss going to fiji on the bye week, rather than dig in and get to work in sorting out our onfield rubbish we've been serving up.


new coach is a big tick in the right direction. clearing out some top end salary to retool the list is the next item on the agenda, and the players we pick up will be the ones wright identifies. so all good there. but bcos our salary cap is at the wall, we need to give a little to get a little.

not sure how you find the salary cap such a hard concept to grasp. we are maxed out and have to move some players off it in order to resculpt the list into a more modern looking footy team.


So Wright is the solution, but he may not be?

And you're not worried about Voss but replacing him is a big part of the solution?



i'm not worried about voss... as in he'll be gone and we don't have to look at him anymore.


we have several issues right now. current list balance, development/ recruiting and coaching. off the field we have a biz first board with no football knowledge or nous. balance the board out. replace coaching and rejig the list for more balance for the modern game.


i personally think wright is the answer (provided the board piss off and let him do his job). he knows football. he knows how you win and what you need. his formula - small forwards are premium, ball movement and system are more preferred over the big lumbering talls, hero ball and the contest which we all now know thanks to voss, get you nowhere.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25361
Location: Bondi Beach
This is what we all should be worried about, and we've been on this since the Sydney game, well, really since round 2 when he returned to the field on one leg. Runs like an old man.

Quote:
Even though Curnow could be judged on his lessening scoreboard return, Lyon is more concerned about his overall effort and he compared him to fellow previous Coleman winner Nick Larkey, who is also not in peak goal-kicking form.

“I compare him to Nick Larkey, who's also really badly out of form. But Nick Larkey tries his guts out,” Lyon said.

Every contest that Nick Larkey was in - against much better opposition in Jacob Weitering than Curnow had on the weekend - he fights hard, he scraps, and he throws himself back in the contest.

“He does everything you want from a key forward. Now, he's not in great form, but he laid five tackles on the weekend, Charlie didn't lay a tackle and he hasn't laid a tackle in seven games that he's played this year.”


https://www.sen.com.au/news/2025/06/23/lost-his-appetite-why-lyon-is-so-disappointed-in-curnow

Quote:
“Remember earlier in the year when we were talking about big key forwards, I said he's not a great, and people wanted to hound me down,” Lyon said.

“Well, here we are sitting at this stage of the year, and they (Carlton) are slowly going out of relevance at the moment.

“Patrick Cripps is not in great form but tries his guts out. Jacob Weitering tries his guts out in the back half, and I'm watching Charlie run around (not doing that). That's my observation of it.

“I’ve been really disappointed with the way he's gone about it.”


Vossy's leaders have let him down, and are part responsible for another coach they have let down and sshown the door.

Nothing changed when Vossy arrived.

The tail continued to wag the dog.

Drop him. That will send a message.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:36 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:23 pm
Posts: 512
Think Voss is relatively good as a coach. Main issue is personell.

Only excellent kick in the side I can think of is Carrol.

Issue has been conversion. Conversion of inside 50s to shots on goal from a lack of outside mids/half forwards with skills. Conversion of shots on goal to actual goals.

Cartlon has excellent inside mids a couple of great link up mids/runners but outside finishers like a Bont or Richards from the Western Bulldogs are missing.

Some positives of his moves this year. Has found a position for SOS in the backline. Has found McGovern best position is the 3rd tall forward.

That being said he (or his successor) has to be brutal this year with the list at the end of the year. Also have to make the right decisions. TDK not playing like a million dollars for example.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25361
Location: Bondi Beach
Anencephalic wrote:
Think Voss is relatively good as a coach. Main issue is personell.

Only excellent kick in the side I can think of is Carrol.

Issue has been conversion. Conversion of inside 50s to shots on goal from a lack of outside mids/half forwards with skills. Conversion of shots on goal to actual goals.

Cartlon has excellent inside mids a couple of great link up mids/runners but outside finishers like a Bont or Richards from the Western Bulldogs are missing.

Some positives of his moves this year. Has found a position for SOS in the backline. Has found McGovern best position is the 3rd tall forward.

That being said he (or his successor) has to be brutal this year with the list at the end of the year. Also have to make the right decisions. TDK not playing like a million dollars for example.


You're right. :thumbsup:

Its not the end of the world. We have a good core. But we need to drop out of form players with players knocking in the door with VFL form and AFL skills.

We are the worst skilled team in the competition.

Ultimately, the biggest issue in games this year is conversion. It has cost us 6 games. Charlie misses 3 of 4 shots. What about Motlop, who was fresh from coming on as the sub has a shot at goal dead in front, 35 out, wastes 45 seconds with 4 mins on the clock and 12 points down. Not only is his footy IQ questionable taking all that time off the clock when we are coming from 8 goals down with momentum, he friggin misses the shot at goal.

Set shots l;ast week. We missed 11. Its a skill issue, and a lack of discipline by Harry and Charlie.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25361
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

If you believe Wright will address our needs, how? If you don't, why? Don't worry about Voss. He wont be the problem.




i do believe in wright and his vision and his ability. however, i'm not sure the board will allow someone to come in and rearrange all the furniture to make it all happen. board is too self serving and governed by profit. the board is the obstacle to our success imho.


i'm not at all worried about voss. i have it real good, that he's gone and wright doesn't want him. and that was the major factor behind voss going to fiji on the bye week, rather than dig in and get to work in sorting out our onfield rubbish we've been serving up.


new coach is a big tick in the right direction. clearing out some top end salary to retool the list is the next item on the agenda, and the players we pick up will be the ones wright identifies. so all good there. but bcos our salary cap is at the wall, we need to give a little to get a little.

not sure how you find the salary cap such a hard concept to grasp. we are maxed out and have to move some players off it in order to resculpt the list into a more modern looking footy team.


So Wright is the solution, but he may not be?

And you're not worried about Voss but replacing him is a big part of the solution?



i'm not worried about voss... as in he'll be gone and we don't have to look at him anymore.


we have several issues right now. current list balance, development/ recruiting and coaching. off the field we have a biz first board with no football knowledge or nous. balance the board out. replace coaching and rejig the list for more balance for the modern game.


i personally think wright is the answer (provided the board piss off and let him do his job). he knows football. he knows how you win and what you need. his formula - small forwards are premium, ball movement and system are more preferred over the big lumbering talls, hero ball and the contest which we all now know thanks to voss, get you nowhere.


Forget the Board. All this shit about the Board. Diesel is a football person. Thank god Wright is a football person.

The Football Dept led by Lloyd is the big issue.
Everything down from him down needs to be scrutinised, and find reasons why they should be kept, and if there is better out there, get 'em.

I hated it when Liddle interfered in the Football Dept.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 2:51 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9889
Location: Australia
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

If you believe Wright will address our needs, how? If you don't, why? Don't worry about Voss. He wont be the problem.




i do believe in wright and his vision and his ability. however, i'm not sure the board will allow someone to come in and rearrange all the furniture to make it all happen. board is too self serving and governed by profit. the board is the obstacle to our success imho.


i'm not at all worried about voss. i have it real good, that he's gone and wright doesn't want him. and that was the major factor behind voss going to fiji on the bye week, rather than dig in and get to work in sorting out our onfield rubbish we've been serving up.


new coach is a big tick in the right direction. clearing out some top end salary to retool the list is the next item on the agenda, and the players we pick up will be the ones wright identifies. so all good there. but bcos our salary cap is at the wall, we need to give a little to get a little.

not sure how you find the salary cap such a hard concept to grasp. we are maxed out and have to move some players off it in order to resculpt the list into a more modern looking footy team.


So Wright is the solution, but he may not be?

And you're not worried about Voss but replacing him is a big part of the solution?



i'm not worried about voss... as in he'll be gone and we don't have to look at him anymore.


we have several issues right now. current list balance, development/ recruiting and coaching. off the field we have a biz first board with no football knowledge or nous. balance the board out. replace coaching and rejig the list for more balance for the modern game.


i personally think wright is the answer (provided the board piss off and let him do his job). he knows football. he knows how you win and what you need. his formula - small forwards are premium, ball movement and system are more preferred over the big lumbering talls, hero ball and the contest which we all now know thanks to voss, get you nowhere.


Forget the Board. All this shit about the Board. Diesel is a football person. Thank god Wright is a football person.

The Football Dept led by Lloyd is the big issue.
Everything down from him down needs to be scrutinised, and find reasons why they should be kept, and if there is better out there, get 'em.

I hated it when Liddle interfered in the Football Dept.


Thanks, I was about to ask, isn't Diesel Williams on the board? I mean, isn't he a footy person?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 3:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6665
Braithy wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

If you believe Wright will address our needs, how? If you don't, why? Don't worry about Voss. He wont be the problem.




i do believe in wright and his vision and his ability. however, i'm not sure the board will allow someone to come in and rearrange all the furniture to make it all happen. board is too self serving and governed by profit. the board is the obstacle to our success imho.


i'm not at all worried about voss. i have it real good, that he's gone and wright doesn't want him. and that was the major factor behind voss going to fiji on the bye week, rather than dig in and get to work in sorting out our onfield rubbish we've been serving up.


new coach is a big tick in the right direction. clearing out some top end salary to retool the list is the next item on the agenda, and the players we pick up will be the ones wright identifies. so all good there. but bcos our salary cap is at the wall, we need to give a little to get a little.

not sure how you find the salary cap such a hard concept to grasp. we are maxed out and have to move some players off it in order to resculpt the list into a more modern looking footy team.


So Wright is the solution, but he may not be?

And you're not worried about Voss but replacing him is a big part of the solution?



i'm not worried about voss... as in he'll be gone and we don't have to look at him anymore.


we have several issues right now. current list balance, development/ recruiting and coaching. off the field we have a biz first board with no football knowledge or nous. balance the board out. replace coaching and rejig the list for more balance for the modern game.


i personally think wright is the answer (provided the board piss off and let him do his job). he knows football. he knows how you win and what you need. his formula - small forwards are premium, ball movement and system are more preferred over the big lumbering talls, hero ball and the contest which we all now know thanks to voss, get you nowhere.

How will you be able to tell?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7681
Location: Bendigo
bondiblue wrote:

Forget the Board. All this shit about the Board. Diesel is a football person. Thank god Wright is a football person.

The Football Dept led by Lloyd is the big issue.
Everything down from him down needs to be scrutinised, and find reasons why they should be kept, and if there is better out there, get 'em.

I hated it when Liddle interfered in the Football Dept.

1. Sack Hamill.
2. Sack anyone that could’ve & should’ve sacked him on the spot.
3. Split Lloyd’s job into two - Performance & Talent.
4. Have a real good think about Diesel’s position.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1350
https://www.sen.com.au/news/2025/06/23/whateley-the-three-possibilities-of-whats-going-wrong-at-carlton

Quote:

Quote:
Cripps has been captain since 2018 and this is third coach he’s had to back in such circumstances.

I can’t recall of another captain who’s had to do it three times.

In 2019 he was declaring Brendan Bolton’s job couldn’t be safer.

“They have done a really good rebuild, we have got a super list and now it’s up to us to get the best out of players and take it forward,” he sad.

"It's going to turn – it's definitely going to turn – especially with the amount of work we're putting in and with how united we are as a group.”

Bolton was gone within months.

Cripps later admitted the experience left him mentally fried.

In 2021 it was standing behind David Teague.

"Teaguey and the coaching staff are working as hard as us as players and they'd be just as frustrated as we are. We're all in it together and we'll find a way through together," Cripps said.

"I can understand the frustration that may be coming from the fans and people outside the club, but the coaches, Teaguey, the leadership group and the players are working bloody hard to try and put them together."

At season’s end Cripps led a delegation to ask the administration not to sack the coach Carlton sacked the coach.

Yesterday Cripps was again left to espouse the virtues of Michael Voss and the certainty that things will turn if they all stick together.

And I reckon this goes right to the heart of the current collapse of hope and belief.

The sheer frustration of being here again at a time when they expected to be a good team.



So key summary here is that we have had 3 coaches since 2019. THREE COACHES in less than 6 years....

AGAIN. Please explain to me the value of sacking coach no.4 in 6/7years, when:

1. The playing list basically remains the same for a "new coach".
2. No change to the current "game plan" from a "new coach" would currently suit the list available at their disposal (even if a few are traded away)- as generally our list is - lacking depth, unskilled, generally lazy, not quick, has poor mental aptitude etc etc
3. Where is the $$$$ in the "soft cap" to allow for a payout of Voss (one year) and other assistants (x Years)?
4. Who on earth wants to come and coach a rabble of a club that we have become?
5. Who wants to come to a club which needs overhaul at the board and other levels, and do so with confidence such an overhaul would be done in a considered, independent and transparent way?

_________________
Cripps is the man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 7:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7681
Location: Bendigo
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
https://www.sen.com.au/news/2025/06/23/whateley-the-three-possibilities-of-whats-going-wrong-at-carlton

Quote:

Quote:
Cripps has been captain since 2018 and this is third coach he’s had to back in such circumstances.

I can’t recall of another captain who’s had to do it three times.

In 2019 he was declaring Brendan Bolton’s job couldn’t be safer.

“They have done a really good rebuild, we have got a super list and now it’s up to us to get the best out of players and take it forward,” he sad.

"It's going to turn – it's definitely going to turn – especially with the amount of work we're putting in and with how united we are as a group.”

Bolton was gone within months.

Cripps later admitted the experience left him mentally fried.

In 2021 it was standing behind David Teague.

"Teaguey and the coaching staff are working as hard as us as players and they'd be just as frustrated as we are. We're all in it together and we'll find a way through together," Cripps said.

"I can understand the frustration that may be coming from the fans and people outside the club, but the coaches, Teaguey, the leadership group and the players are working bloody hard to try and put them together."

At season’s end Cripps led a delegation to ask the administration not to sack the coach Carlton sacked the coach.

Yesterday Cripps was again left to espouse the virtues of Michael Voss and the certainty that things will turn if they all stick together.

And I reckon this goes right to the heart of the current collapse of hope and belief.

The sheer frustration of being here again at a time when they expected to be a good team.



So key summary here is that we have had 3 coaches since 2019. THREE COACHES in less than 6 years....

AGAIN. Please explain to me the value of sacking coach no.4 in 6/7years, when:

1. The playing list basically remains the same for a "new coach".
2. No change to the current "game plan" from a "new coach" would currently suit the list available at their disposal (even if a few are traded away)- as generally our list is - lacking depth, unskilled, generally lazy, not quick, has poor mental aptitude etc etc
3. Where is the $$$$ in the "soft cap" to allow for a payout of Voss (one year) and other assistants (x Years)?
4. Who on earth wants to come and coach a rabble of a club that we have become?
5. Who wants to come to a club which needs overhaul at the board and other levels, and do so with confidence such an overhaul would be done in a considered, independent and transparent way?

Maybe Cripps isn’t the man…

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2025 8:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7286
Crusader wrote:
Maybe Cripps isn’t the man…



i know right. what have all 3 coaches had in common.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19478
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
https://x.com/SENSportsday/status/1937468643631333596

Daniel Hoyne on SEN...."60-70% is good".

2nd for D50 to F50.

18th for scoring inside 50.

2nd hardest team to score against....only Pies are harder to score against.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 10:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25361
Location: Bondi Beach
Effes wrote:
https://x.com/SENSportsday/status/1937468643631333596

Daniel Hoyne on SEN...."60-70% is good".

2nd for D50 to F50.

18th for scoring inside 50.

2nd hardest team to score against....only Pies are harder to score against.



This is what I was referring to yesterday

The Champion data crew question our forwards IQ.

I question their skills to kick straight with discipline and respect for their set shots. All of them!

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 10:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
Effes wrote:
https://x.com/SENSportsday/status/1937468643631333596

Daniel Hoyne on SEN...."60-70% is good".

2nd for D50 to F50.

18th for scoring inside 50.

2nd hardest team to score against....only Pies are harder to score against.


Effes never let the facts get in the way of a week's worth of rants, vitriol and angst. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sorry all you ranters, I am being facetious. :yikes:

It is a pretty simple game.............You win the footy, hit your target, you retain possession, you deny the opposition, you give yourself an opportunity to score.

The Blues can't hit targets consistently enough to outscore their opponent.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 10:11 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25361
Location: Bondi Beach
SurreyBlue wrote:
So now it’s all SoS fault. lol
How many years have Voss and Aussie had to fix this?
I just can’t be bothered anymore………sorry I’m done with these discussions.


Don't be stupid, and leave in a huff.
That's been explained over the last 20 pages.
You are taking one comment out of context.
OK, I get it, you love SOS. I do too, but only the one who was playing for us.
He's gone, and he has a target on Carlton.

SOS had his success in his first Draft with ample first round picks from trading out players.
His results there after have been abysmal, with the exception of TDK.
Austin has had less currency to Trade and Draft, half of what SOS did, and hasn't moved the needle.

The List Managers have failed us.
We have, generally speaking, the worst skilled team in the comp.
We have the most missed set shots in history.
We have players without mongrel.
We have players who wont fly the falg let alone protect their team mates.

and that's just the start Surrey. But we can't pick and choose who to blame.
We posters can see where the issues are.
Amongst the lot of us, we've hit a lot of nails on the head.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 10:24 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19478
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Other snippet from Hoyne

When TDK is sole :cool: ruck, Carlton are 15-7
When it's TDK and Pittonet, Carlton are 4-12

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 10:54 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7408
Effes wrote:
https://x.com/SENSportsday/status/1937468643631333596

Daniel Hoyne on SEN...."60-70% is good".

2nd for D50 to F50.

18th for scoring inside 50.

2nd hardest team to score against....only Pies are harder to score against.


OK , so we are doing more things right than we are doing wrong . Considering the limited cattle at Voss's disposal due to injury and talent he aint doin" a bad job .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 11:23 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2886
Effes wrote:
Other snippet from Hoyne

When TDK is sole :cool: ruck, Carlton are 15-7
When it's TDK and Pittonet, Carlton are 4-12


Well, we’ll have a new stat next year, games where Pitto is sole ruck. That’ll be fun.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3482 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Scotty12000 and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group