Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:11 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3431 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 168, 169, 170, 171, 172
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14670
Location: Sydney
I'm glad braithy reminded us that we were in 2nd place this time last year, the season after making a preliminary final, having just annihilated Geelong while wearing orange socks.

I don't think many at that stage were saying Voss isn't the guy, his style of footy doesn't win games? Maybe keogh, but y'know, it's keogh, man.

And then they changed the HTB rule midway through a season, after a three-time premiership coach singled out an incident involving our star forward and having a big sook.

I don't mean to just make excuses and pretend that everything that's happened since can be ignored. But that was hugely unfair. @#$%&! AFL putting their finger on the scales to the benefit of Collingwood and Hawthorn, and to our detriment. Maybe not by design, but I am not going to dismiss this as a factor.

Anyway, the main reason I bring this up was to show that Voss *can* build a strong Carlton side. What has happened since? Well, I've already put my cards on the table and speculated that we have schisms in the playing group. Is it a failing of Voss that he hasn't rooted it out or overcome it? Maybe. Could another coach have done so? Maybe. Or made it worse.

That's why I , GreatEx, side with SideFx in saying let's look for and excise the tumours, if they exist, or find an onfield leader that can better unite the troops. Maybe we need a new coach too, but only if Wright has fully investigated the root cause of the fragility of the group and determined that there's a head coach candidate out there who's willing to sign on and will do a better job of fixing it than Voss. Because it's clear that Voss is not going to turn it around with this list.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:32 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3516
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
GreatEx wrote:
I'm glad braithy reminded us that we were in 2nd place this time last year, the season after making a preliminary final, having just annihilated Geelong while wearing orange socks.

I don't think many at that stage were saying Voss isn't the guy, his style of footy doesn't win games? Maybe keogh, but y'know, it's keogh, man.

And then they changed the HTB rule midway through a season, after a three-time premiership coach singled out an incident involving our star forward and having a big sook.

I don't mean to just make excuses and pretend that everything that's happened since can be ignored. But that was hugely unfair. @#$%&! AFL putting their finger on the scales to the benefit of Collingwood and Hawthorn, and to our detriment. Maybe not by design, but I am not going to dismiss this as a factor.

Anyway, the main reason I bring this up was to show that Voss *can* build a strong Carlton side. What has happened since? Well, I've already put my cards on the table and speculated that we have schisms in the playing group. Is it a failing of Voss that he hasn't rooted it out or overcome it? Maybe. Could another coach have done so? Maybe. Or made it worse.

That's why I , GreatEx, side with SideFx in saying let's look for and excise the tumours, if they exist, or find an onfield leader that can better unite the troops. Maybe we need a new coach too, but only if Wright has fully investigated the root cause of the fragility of the group and determined that there's a head coach candidate out there who's willing to sign on and will do a better job of fixing it than Voss. Because it's clear that Voss is not going to turn it around with this list.


Walsh and Cripps simply didn't adjust and were pinged over and over plus the lack of winning clearance by dragging in the opposition midfield then then free your arms and get a handball out really hurt us.

And we just played a bit shit from quarter time in the Giants game for 8 weeks.

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 7:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21574
Location: North of the border
Braithy wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
sinbagger wrote:

Mick's already explained that Voss didn't "spray a rookie kid", and that all the [;ayer including the seniors got a bake, and why he thinks that, I don't understand why you keep repeating it.

And I am not "defending Voss", I am sure you can think up other reasons to have a go at Voss instead of this debatable one.



mick didn't explain anything, he made a wrong assumption. the guys at sen said the whole spray was directed at an 8 gamer.i couldn't care less binns was baked.

but surely everyone in the leadership group deserved the brunt of the bake, not the 8-gamer? that is the problem i had. and like cru said - the self preservation among our leaders is so on the nose it's not funny. only that same self-preservation extends to voss himself who didn't seem to have the marbles to man up and go at cripps - the one guy yday who really earned it.


I just watched a replay of the so called incident, and from the TV he definitely doesn't direct the entire spray at Binns, I actually think the issue is that Binns was standing directly in front of him and was brave enough to meet Voss's gaze directly, so it "seems" like it was directed at Binns, but that's a brief moment in the entire act.



it really doesn't matter.

next time (and there will be a next time) voss needs to stand in front of cripps and direct all that emotion his way. not an 8 gamer.

easy kill etc etc
The spray that Voss supposedly gave to Binns would have been nothing compared to the spray he copped from me in the lounge room.



Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 9:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7271
GreatEx wrote:
Because it's clear that Voss is not going to turn it around.



we can finally agree, old mate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 9:26 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6641
Braithy wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Yet the supporters are expecting Voss to pull a rabbit out of his hat with the same list that has had nearly 12mths of excessive injuries.



nope. just improve, play a gamestyle we can get behind, win or (honourable) loss.

the biggest problem with voss has been gameweeks where we have had a full compliment of players to choose from. and he goes tall and lumbering and contested. he brings docherty (who was already too slow before his 3rd acl) straight into an elimination semi.

voss has had so many chances to do something here. and in 4 years he has failed. time's up.


his time was up for me in 2023, when on a 9 game win streak - brought on by injury, not good coaching, pittonet recovers from injury and he's straight back into the team.

we go from running and dare and exciting footy, to slow, boring, contested and easily dispatched by the other team.

our 2023 finals run was bcos of the urgency and hunger and desire from the playing group - sheer will; and despite voss's unsustainable and limiting gameplan.

in 2024 it was clear he wasn't the guy that was going to coach us to 17. and now in 2025, people are still saying keep him around, so we can be completely redundant next year too.

lucky we have wright. he's not going to sit on his hands, and he could care less about supporters who want voss. he wants to win and will do what he needs to make that happen.

so really, these convos are moot. bcos voss is good as gone in summer when we don't make the 8

Like I said we will have to agree to disagree.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 9:29 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7271
Sidefx wrote:
Like I said we will have to agree to disagree.



only if you're absolutely sure i can't convince you that voss is inadequate and you should think like me.


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 9:43 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6641
17th Premiership wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
keogh wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sidefx wrote:

I agree he is at the head of the problem being the coach, but how has targeting the head gone for us for the last 20+ years?




i just hate this logic. bcos the other 5 coaches failed as well, as some sort of goodwill, we keep another failed coach? to set us back how many more years?


not for me. michael voss has failed, we now move onto the next. i don't care if the next one fails (i really do), we sack him too and we keep going until we find one who will deliver a brand of football we can be proud of, and win meaningful games and fingers crossed - the flag.

If Wright was in charge a few years ago Voss wouldn’t be appointed
We know that
I still think we need a new style of president
Not a guy who is from the top end of town
A person who is a people person
This is why we have [REDACTED] up so many appointments

You might be right Keogh, he may not have.
But you are also assuming that McRae could've done better with our playing list.
That I find harder to believe.
We will all know one way or another at the end of this season and next.
Just don't get your hopes up, we've had plenty of a messiah come in before and try.


I’m not convinced it is the list.
I find it hard to believe so many players, many of whom we know are good players, are playing so badly (executing their skills so badly).
When McRae was appointed, IIRC, most of the footy world thought the Pies were a bottom 8 list (maybe even bottom 4). McRae was even panned when he directed them to keep playing attacking footy even when they were getting well beaten in a game because, he said, that’s how we want to play.
I think with a better game plan, that players understand better, everyone knows where to run and when and where to kick the ball. And these kicks, in a good game plan, don’t rely so much on absolute precision but allow for margin of error e.g. kicking to an open space for a teammate to run into. When this happens, the skills look much better, and the players all look much better and there is less reliance on the bottom 6 and also less reliance on individual moments of brilliance.
I think Voss is generally a strong leader of men but the game plan and/or assistants needs to change. If not Voss himself.
I very much hope that Graeme Wright pulls the right reign because there will be a lot of people with varying opinions in his ear. And, like on TC, most of these opinions are valid. But not all the solutions will work.

That's cool too you don't need to be convinced.
I'll just say, that when players are saying they need to step up, people within the club are saying our depth is not there, people outside the club are pointing at holes in our list. They can't all be wrong, but that is up to you on how you interpret that.
Sorry but I have explained too many times the issues with the list, how it affects our game plan, what we can and can not do because of our limitations to give you a more appropriate response.
But I will say, on the weekend when I see open players forward of the ball and said player looks at them and then kick backwards and the broadcast pans to Voss spewing about it, I know that a lot more is player driven then most would like to believe.
If you can't get your basics right under any game plan with little to no pressure, there is something going on between the ears of the players.
Maybe Wright has put them all on notice and the club has had a shake up, hence TDK wanting to speak to him.
Who knows.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 9:44 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6641
Braithy wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Like I said we will have to agree to disagree.



only if you're absolutely sure i can't convince you that voss is inadequate and you should think like me.


:lol:

That's a hard no Braithy, but I applaud your tenacity. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 10:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6641
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:

I’m not defending the playing list, and I thought last year was probably the first time we started to address it.

The issue with last years clean out was they were all relatively low wages (compared to offloading Williams as an example).

Sorry my mistake.
I agree we addressed the age gap and the upcoming inclusion of team 19.
But if we were to be competitive this year, make finals and push up the ladder we did the total opposite.
Which is what annoyed me the most, our 'stars' are all getting older and Crippa will not be on the list in couple of years (unless we trade him out this year) and game is evolving past a few in our 1st 18.
Our window with this team is now and at the latest next season, then it is done.

I'm not sure on salary cap issues, others have discussed this more than me.
But if we added more cheap players like Haynes that would've been the smarter move especially with 2 mature and relatively injury free players leaving.
Owies was the odd one for me, he didn't really need to go.
If we kept him we wouldn't have added Evans.


Hindsight rocks and with it I’d have traded Harry last year as some have/had suggested. We could have kept our picks for this year and probably still landed Jagga, and got a more dynamic experienced player too.

We’re in a bind, we’ve got no draft capital, what we do have is probably tied to the FS/academy, and some damaged goods.

We can also neither afford to keep nor lose TDK.

So, if we’re not in ‘win now’ mode, and there’s question marks around Voss’ capabilities as a senior coach, do you still want to persevere?

It wasn't hindsight at the time though, but enough of that, I was just making a point that our list needs were not addressed.
I was in the trade Harry camp.

I agree we are in a bind, if we didn't trade away our 1st pick we would probably be playing all the kids to see who and who doesn't make the cut at the end of the year.

As for preserving, I'm not sure.
We are in a jam now, are we able to attract the right senior talent?
Honestly, who would want to come to the Carlton basket case 2.0.
Like last time we will only attract rejects or injured players if this is the case.
A new coach won't help in fact I can see it being worse, players want stability and that is something we have proven we can't offer.
IMO we are better off to make incremental changes.
Change some of the players this year, add more senior depth 3-4.
Change the coach next year if we don't make improvements with a better healthier list.
I'd rather a well thought out plan than a knee jerk reaction to appease the supporter base and anyone else at the club.
Surely Cook has imposed that level of professionalism and modern day football management on the club in his time.
Time will only tell if Wright blows it all up for better or worse.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 10:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7389
GreatEx wrote:
I'm glad braithy reminded us that we were in 2nd place this time last year, the season after making a preliminary final, having just annihilated Geelong while wearing orange socks.

I don't think many at that stage were saying Voss isn't the guy, his style of footy doesn't win games? Maybe keogh, but y'know, it's keogh, man.

And then they changed the HTB rule midway through a season, after a three-time premiership coach singled out an incident involving our star forward and having a big sook.

I don't mean to just make excuses and pretend that everything that's happened since can be ignored. But that was hugely unfair. @#$%&! AFL putting their finger on the scales to the benefit of Collingwood and Hawthorn, and to our detriment. Maybe not by design, but I am not going to dismiss this as a factor.

Anyway, the main reason I bring this up was to show that Voss *can* build a strong Carlton side. What has happened since? Well, I've already put my cards on the table and speculated that we have schisms in the playing group. Is it a failing of Voss that he hasn't rooted it out or overcome it? Maybe. Could another coach have done so? Maybe. Or made it worse.

That's why I , GreatEx, side with SideFx in saying let's look for and excise the tumours, if they exist, or find an onfield leader that can better unite the troops. Maybe we need a new coach too, but only if Wright has fully investigated the root cause of the fragility of the group and determined that there's a head coach candidate out there who's willing to sign on and will do a better job of fixing it than Voss. Because it's clear that Voss is not going to turn it around with this list.

You can take a snapshot at anytime during the past 4 years and it's a Voss can/can't coach outcome :lol:

Year 1... finals bound, nothing surer... then kaka, we join the limited club of missing finals in the last round after being in the top 8 all year

Year 2... first half of the season, kaka... then the injuries come and we change things up a little, and go on a 10 zip run... get a little lucky in finals and end up in a prelim

Year 3... start the season like millionaires, second on the table... then kaka again

Year 4... start the season, kaka... if history is anything to go by, we may not lose another game in the run home :hopeandprayers:

If you plot the Voss years you'd come up with a near perfect sine wave... a laughing stock :lol:

Injuries are an excuse to an extent. I'd expect them to hinder us against the better teams. Not struggle and/or lose against the bottom 6. Like Voss said in the presser... the difference between our best and worst is to big. Players must bear some of the responsibility but structures, confusion, motivation and form all going down the kaka, and that's on the coaches... all of them.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 10:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6641
GreatEx wrote:
I'm glad braithy reminded us that we were in 2nd place this time last year, the season after making a preliminary final, having just annihilated Geelong while wearing orange socks.

I don't think many at that stage were saying Voss isn't the guy, his style of footy doesn't win games? Maybe keogh, but y'know, it's keogh, man.

And then they changed the HTB rule midway through a season, after a three-time premiership coach singled out an incident involving our star forward and having a big sook.

I don't mean to just make excuses and pretend that everything that's happened since can be ignored. But that was hugely unfair. @#$%&! AFL putting their finger on the scales to the benefit of Collingwood and Hawthorn, and to our detriment. Maybe not by design, but I am not going to dismiss this as a factor.

Anyway, the main reason I bring this up was to show that Voss *can* build a strong Carlton side. What has happened since? Well, I've already put my cards on the table and speculated that we have schisms in the playing group. Is it a failing of Voss that he hasn't rooted it out or overcome it? Maybe. Could another coach have done so? Maybe. Or made it worse.

That's why I , GreatEx, side with SideFx in saying let's look for and excise the tumours, if they exist, or find an onfield leader that can better unite the troops. Maybe we need a new coach too, but only if Wright has fully investigated the root cause of the fragility of the group and determined that there's a head coach candidate out there who's willing to sign on and will do a better job of fixing it than Voss. Because it's clear that Voss is not going to turn it around with this list.

I agree with this logic.
:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3431 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 168, 169, 170, 171, 172

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group