Braithy wrote:
voss isn't a good coach ... i'm sure we can all agree.
was watching some damning footage of weitering from friday night. how many times have we watched a spud forward, or a defender moonlighting as a forward (as was the case friday night) completely take weitering out of the play. running him back to the square, giving him a tour of the weakside boundary line away from play.
why wouldn't coaching want weitering more involved? send haynes to the spud, and let weitering move higher up the ground to spoil and intercept where the ball is going.
same as BV's obsverations ... when you know cripps only runs one way, and he's being beaten soundly and can't get near it. head him off into the F50 for a breather to break the tag.
so many opportunities to move some magnets and potentially change a game's outcomes, and our coach and his staff are way beyond passive and heading into incompetence, imo ...
I disagree, I don't think he's the best in the league but to say he isn't a good coach is a bit of a reach.
Chris Scott has been praised as being a good coach who I and a lot of other people think is pretty ordinary and Voss has bested him several times now.
The biggest issue I have with this constant need to sack the coach all the time, is that we have been doing this for the whole of this century and we have been crap.
How long did Geelong stick with Scott before he won a premiership (not including his first on the back of Mark Thompson and their dip in the supplements section)?
Answer, it was 11 years.
It is a shining example of stability at the top, a defined game plan, astute trading/drafting and luck with injuries.
(let's not mention cheap farms).
We finally have a stable coaching group like them or not, we have a very defined game plan, we are just missing a handful of the players to execute it and we need to keep trimming the annually injured.
Our list is our problem, coaching can only do so much with a shallow list and high injuries.
We are desperate for speed and skill, if we get more of that then we can rely less on stoppage to stoppage contested football.
This alone will reduce injuries and game fadeouts, especially if we can fix the F50 entries to capitalise on all the grunt work we can do.
If Lord keeps going as good as he is and then we add Jagga, our midfield will be versatile and damaging and most importantly not relying on the few to do all the work.
Situational Analysis is so right.
No point in being frustrated by results influenced by injury and skillset of players on hand, let alone umpires.
I'm sure the injured TDK, Newman and Williams alone would improve us immensely. Add the other 9 injured to fight for spots, and the coach's player profile changes.