Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 8:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 2:45 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14897
bluedog wrote:
At least I could share my misery with a couple of my mates at the game. Had I been watching that at home, it would have been far more difficult, I reckon.

Go Blues, next year!

And go Giants, next week.

I watched the game at Ikon Park along with the other supporters.
At least we got to share the misery together and felt each others pain.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 2:48 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2022 5:28 pm
Posts: 174
We were always up against it. Some of the selection decisions were puzzling especially Cincotta out and TDK as sub, but the preference for returning senior players over raw kids is understandable whether you agree with it or not. My beef was more with the selection of an obviously hindered Durdin and out of touch Motlop, and to an extent Fantasia although I get the attraction of his experience. So as an exercise in evaluating the extent to which MC decisions harmed our chances, given the injury list reality, I have looked at the team selected and looking at who didn't have a great game and who could have replaced them. For the purposes of the exercise simply rating the players as a pass at 50 fantasy points leaves these players short of the mark:
Durdin
Kennedy
Kemp
Williams
Cowan
Fantasia

Of those I would only have had Durdin and Fantasia out (and others who passed the 50 point mark), but for this exercise who could have replaced these players to better effect?

The 5 omissions Binns (3 games) Lord (2) Moir (2) Carroll Cincotta I suppose are in the mix and Martin was a "test" in the injury list so he might have been an option (I don't know) NO ONE else with senior experience was available. I think general consensus is omitting Cincotta was a mistake but the others are not clear upgrades or even capable of fulfilling the same roles.

Then there is the decision to play an extra defender - which I disagreed with but can understand the idea - and more significantly to allow them to have Zorko as their spare which was simply disasterous. Cincotta in would have given us a tagger for him, or another, Lord a mid with defensive intent, Moir and/or Martin some X-factor up front, Binns and Carroll options in the mids - but ultimately I can't see any combination making the difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 2:52 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14897
Drewgirl wrote:
Brisbane laughed at us all night.

But our players wont care.

I am hoping like hell Brisbane gets their gobs smashed by GWS next week.

Rainer and Loman - Hate em……. Figjams of the highest order.

You can add Neale to that list, little smart arse deserved what he got. Having said that I don't think Newman should get suspended. Neale ran into him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:01 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14263
Location: Sydney
99prelim wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
I like Kennedy, but he can suck it up. We needed TDK on, we were much better once he came on, someone relatively big and slow had to make way, it was the new dad, so be it. Let's not forget Kennedy made one of the worst plays of a diabolical first half, taking a ball in D50 with time and space, and blindly dumping it out to the wing for the easiest "insufficient intent" call you'll ever see. Can't remember whether they scored from the repeat entry, but it was pathetic. Who cares whether he had more possessions than 8 players, he was as expendable as anyone else.


I'll see your Kennedy and raise you any of Motlop, Durdin or Fantasia...who had less impact in a whole game tan Kennedy had in 40 minutes


If we'd subbed one of those, everyone would have flipped that our tall, slow team had become taller and slower. Let's face it, there was no sub that made sense, hence the outrage at making TDK sub to begin with


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6886
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
that's not innovative mate. that's just foolish.


the innovation i speak of was when the game was over at HT and voss gave the guys license to risk. elijah was no-look handballing all thru the middle and over his shoulder, low spearing passes thru the corridor. the run and handball chain at every opportunity started. and all of that was possible bcos we were causing turnover.

it's manic and unorganised and dials in the collingwood "chaos ball" or the hawthorn "hokball" ... imo voss is too conservative to throw that kinda caution to the wind. he likes his hands on the footy first and big bodied mids owning the stoppage. it's not modern footy, espesh after the HTB rule change midyear. keep the ball alive and keep it moving forward at all costs is the new algorithm.

that's how hawks, gws, cats and swans play. it's not coincidence they're easily the 4 best teams this year too.


Mate , the ruckman as sub was a light hearted comment . Of course footy aint a laughing matter at the minute . Serious question , who do you think we should target in the off season ?


an A+ mid with harry as the trade bait.

trac is available - although he's 28 and H is 26, so imo they'd have to give something back to us.
Butters wants to come home to melbourne.
Bailey smith was my wishlist, but his heart is on geelong, away from the bright lights of melbourne and closer to the ocean.

I'd go thru GWS mids from melbourne and see if they want to come home. same with lions and freo.


i'm on the fence about young. his best is good enough, but he's so inconsistent i'm not sure i trust him. so, we could need another tall defender.

and an electric small forward. maybe trade up and get the best small in the draft. looking at what the wizard has done for the hawks - immediate impact.

draft the campo twins and keep developing lord.

i'd listen to offers for walsh, cerra, harry and even pittonet. not sure what kind of currency they'd have. we'll need to give something, to get something good. i'm not emotional or invested in any of our players tbh ... i just want to win flags by whatever means necessary.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:18 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18480
Location: threeohfivethree
dannyboy wrote:
think we have fallen into the old trap of thinking our star players will do the job, we need to build a system that delivers. Harry and TDK were the only 2 I would have brought back in but then the bed was made by not playing kids during the year.

coaches need to not evaluate players, they need to evaluate themselves.

Cincotta, Lord, Moir and Binns deserved their spots.

Durdin, Motlop and Cerra did not.


Oy you!

Check your inbox! :grin:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:18 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 370
forget last night we were DONE ,my issue is games against dogs ,port, Ferals all those games was there for the taking at 3/4 time and we know wat happened ,it is our lack of leg speed ,spread we are to SLOW simple . big trade /delist period coming up this system our u12 game plan has failed us .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35647
Location: Half back flank
99prelim wrote:

Would've preferred a 50 point loss with the 3 kids in, even if it was just to (a) reward them for playing their part while more senior players are underdone and (b) expose them to a finals experience



Agree but I think the bigger failing was not giving guys like lord maybe 5 or 6 games experience through the year & not 2. If we'd had more of a look at him they might have felt more confident bringing him in.


It's really been a shambles this season




Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35647
Location: Half back flank
kezza wrote:
I watched the game at Ikon Park along with the other supporters.
At least we got to share the misery together and felt each others pain.



Yikes. Would have been a very flat night. Was the setup good though?

I watched at home with my 12 y.o. He went to bed once he'd had a gutful, smart kid :lol:



Sent from my moto g54 5G using Tapatalk

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:01 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8119
Cons:

Embarrassing and timid first half.
Started like a third of the team hadn't adjusted to AFL intensity, let alone finals intensity.
42 tackles is embarrassing. Hard to believe you can win any game with that few tackles, let alone a final.
Fumbling and turnovers.
Pittonet's start to the game was insipid. Instead of setting a standard. He didn't compete in ruck contests. He dropped 2 sitters. And he kept getting outmarked by his opponent.
Still staggered by the decision to play Motlop ahead of Cincotta. He's been consistently awful since his return from injury. Cincotta could have sat on Zorco. He would have added some pace and defensive intent. He's also a more dangerous forward at the moment anyway.
Small forwards again.

Pros:

Competed in the second half.
Cripps, Weiters, TDK, Harry, Young and Acres (although his ball use was horrible).
At least Cerra kept Neale under control.
Elijah gave us some drive in the second half.
Oli managed to bring Zorko under control.
At least Fantasia crumbed the ball in forward 50 a couple of times, unlike the other 3 small forwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:22 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 10:13 am
Posts: 335
Location: Melbourne
If you get a chance, have a read of the article that Peter Ryan wrote in The Age. Balanced assessment of where we are at. Mentions the EF between Geelong & Collingwood in 2020 where the half time score was 60 to 6 in favour of Geelong. Both teams have since won premierships. His belief is we will have failed if we don’t make a Preliminary Final in the next 2 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:26 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10373
Location: Coburg
GWS wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
think we have fallen into the old trap of thinking our star players will do the job, we need to build a system that delivers. Harry and TDK were the only 2 I would have brought back in but then the bed was made by not playing kids during the year.

coaches need to not evaluate players, they need to evaluate themselves.

Cincotta, Lord, Moir and Binns deserved their spots.

Durdin, Motlop and Cerra did not.


Oy you!

Check your inbox! :grin:


oops.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19221
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Oliver Caffrey
@ollycaffrey
An expensive night at the Gabba for Carlton defender Nic Newman. Fined $6250 (can be downgraded to $3750) for striking and another $5000 ($3125 with a guilty plea) for engaging in a melee

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:06 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
GWS wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
think we have fallen into the old trap of thinking our star players will do the job, we need to build a system that delivers. Harry and TDK were the only 2 I would have brought back in but then the bed was made by not playing kids during the year.

coaches need to not evaluate players, they need to evaluate themselves.

Cincotta, Lord, Moir and Binns deserved their spots.

Durdin, Motlop and Cerra did not.


Oy you!

Check your inbox! :grin:

Absolutely


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
blueianh wrote:
We were always up against it. Some of the selection decisions were puzzling especially Cincotta out and TDK as sub, but the preference for returning senior players over raw kids is understandable whether you agree with it or not. My beef was more with the selection of an obviously hindered Durdin and out of touch Motlop, and to an extent Fantasia although I get the attraction of his experience. So as an exercise in evaluating the extent to which MC decisions harmed our chances, given the injury list reality, I have looked at the team selected and looking at who didn't have a great game and who could have replaced them. For the purposes of the exercise simply rating the players as a pass at 50 fantasy points leaves these players short of the mark:
Durdin
Kennedy
Kemp
Williams
Cowan
Fantasia

Of those I would only have had Durdin and Fantasia out (and others who passed the 50 point mark), but for this exercise who could have replaced these players to better effect?

The 5 omissions Binns (3 games) Lord (2) Moir (2) Carroll Cincotta I suppose are in the mix and Martin was a "test" in the injury list so he might have been an option (I don't know) NO ONE else with senior experience was available. I think general consensus is omitting Cincotta was a mistake but the others are not clear upgrades or even capable of fulfilling the same roles.

Then there is the decision to play an extra defender - which I disagreed with but can understand the idea - and more significantly to allow them to have Zorko as their spare which was simply disasterous. Cincotta in would have given us a tagger for him, or another, Lord a mid with defensive intent, Moir and/or Martin some X-factor up front, Binns and Carroll options in the mids - but ultimately I can't see any combination making the difference.

Reasonable view, although you’re being completely unfair on Kennedy and Motlop was short of the mark


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13148
Location: Melbourne
Effes wrote:
Oliver Caffrey
@ollycaffrey
An expensive night at the Gabba for Carlton defender Nic Newman. Fined $6250 (can be downgraded to $3750) for striking and another $5000 ($3125 with a guilty plea) for engaging in a melee


At least he didn't get suspended.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:24 pm
Posts: 1503
Location: Princes Park
I want to know how they told the back line to play this year.

Absolutely Hemorrhaging opposition scoring to be 4th Worst in comp. when last year was one the best defensive results in 50 years.

I want Effing Answers.

Screw everything else - THIS was the key difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:26 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:31 pm
Posts: 932
Ghost of PrincesPark wrote:
I want to know how they told the back line to play this year.

Absolutely Hemorrhaging opposition scoring to be 4th Worst in comp. when last year was one the best defensive results in 50 years.

I want Effing Answers.

Screw everything else - THIS was the key difference.

Our team defence really drove us to the prelim last year but was almost non existent this year. A good offensive profile for 15 weeks really masked over the defensive cracks which were more like chasms by the end of the season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4908
DLC wrote:
If you get a chance, have a read of the article that Peter Ryan wrote in The Age. Balanced assessment of where we are at. Mentions the EF between Geelong & Collingwood in 2020 where the half time score was 60 to 6 in favour of Geelong. Both teams have since won premierships. His belief is we will have failed if we don’t make a Preliminary Final in the next 2 years.

Collingwood were very lucky to have Nick Daicos fall in their lap.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:57 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10461
Very disappointing. I said before the game, I was to trust the MC and believe.
Well - never again……


Last edited by SurreyBlue on Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group