GreatEx wrote:
I don't buy the theory that 22 out of 28 was flattering to deceive. That's like saying Collingwood's flag was a fluke. Would be lovely if it was true, but eventually the pattern tells a story.
I do agree that tinkering with the gameplan at 11-4 with easier fixtures coming up was hubristic in the extreme. The rule re-interpretation was a cruel blow, typical @#$%&! AFL to put its finger on the scale when we're flying.
If you say that our 22 of 28 was down to fine margins and only partial dominance of matches, then you have to consider the reverse. This year: lost to Adelaide based on just a few minutes of bad footy by us/good footy by them. Lost to Collingwood because of a shank after the siren. Lost to GWS because our 2 great quarters were not as great as their 2 great quarters. Hell, even though we might have lost against Hawthorn, the margin was down to injuries. We've only been soundly thrashed twice. You don't have to dominate every moment of every game to be a great team. Be realistic. The side on top of the ladder has 6 losses including a 112-point belting with only two first-23 players out.
What about the Freo game in Adelaide?
It’s all relative
The fact is that the rule changes have really exposed us as a team
Our style of bash and crash footy doesn’t stack up and even if the rules didn’t change you can only sustain it for around half a season
The dam wall well and truly broke after quarter time
Even with a full list I don’t think we are able to win number 17
We get scored against way too easily particularly from stoppage
We are middle of the table for inside 50s due to poor movement
You need pace and skill to cut through the opposition from the back half
Then when we get it into the forward 50 we are bottom tier for marks inside 50 this despite Curnow and McKay
What does that tell you
We don’t have the personal to play fast flow footy changing angles etc
And our lack of leg speed across the ground makes us so vulnerable to turnover
The game continues to evolve rapidly
Crash and bash footy our trade mark is already redundant and teams have worked us out
It will be interesting to see what the List Management team do in 6 weeks time
In my opinion we simply have to start again because of Tasmania coming in
As much as I love Cripps and Walsh do you trade one of them
You may get 2 first round picks
That’s 2 first round picks in the next 2 years to get 4 quality kids
And look for talent everywhere
Watching Mannagh and Humphries doing good things at Geelong for nothing in terms of draft picks continues to piss me off
There are obviously other factors
Coaching
Culture
But I maintain it starts with recruiting