Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 6:21 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 7 of 14
  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
bondiblue
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 6:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
jake_h03 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
PercyJones wrote:
yep, JSOS and Harry in for Pitto and Ed. Fogs/Cotterell to sub role. I'm comfortable with Jack being second ruck against teams where they dont have a second recognised ruck. Suns will run Levi as the second ruck and I think Jack can be competitive against him. Ditto for GWS.



201 cm 101 kgs vs 194cm 92 kgs. Levi will eat Jack alive, and Levi is a recognised ruckman.

I'm uncomfortable we put Jack in that situation TBH.


Jack has been going up against ruckmen Levi’s size for years and holding his own. All he has to do is compete in the air and nullify the opposing ruckman, then we have a huge advantage at ground level


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


I dont agree in this case, and there's plenty of other rucks I wouldn't like to put Silvagni against.

I actually don't really care who rucks anymore TBH, but if I can give our mids a leg up with one or the other, that counts in a game of inches in Finals.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
Paddycripps
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:08 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sydney Blue
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 9:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21411
Location: North of the border
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.
Just out of interest would you want Charlie rucking.
If the answer is No then you might have to rethink the thought of Harry.

They both essentially play similar positions

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws
Top
 Profile  
 
sinbagger
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 10:38 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9628
Location: Australia
Sydney Blue wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.
Just out of interest would you want Charlie rucking.
If the answer is No then you might have to rethink the thought of Harry.

They both essentially play similar positions

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


Charlie’s not even as tall as Cripps, Harry’s height makes him a natural choice as second ruck.
Top
 Profile  
 
Crusader
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 10:44 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7469
Location: Bendigo
We’ve had 7-8 interchanges up our sleeves for most of the last couple of months. An extra tall in the forward line won’t upset the apple cart.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.
Top
 Profile  
 
Mickstar
PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2023 11:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7187
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.


Harry actually was doing the rucking in the forward fifty prior to his injury .

_________________
All my dangerous friends
Top
 Profile  
 
sinbagger
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 9:39 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9628
Location: Australia
Mickstar wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.


Harry actually was doing the rucking in the forward fifty prior to his injury .


Exactly, there’s no reason we couldn’t have TDK on the ball all day, and when he has a break Harry takes the fwd 50 work whilst Cripps takes the defensive 50 work.
Top
 Profile  
 
carntheblues
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:06 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2700
sinbagger wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.


Harry actually was doing the rucking in the forward fifty prior to his injury .


Exactly, there’s no reason we couldn’t have TDK on the ball all day, and when he has a break Harry takes the fwd 50 work whilst Cripps takes the defensive 50 work.



And who takes the centre bounce?
Top
 Profile  
 
SurreyBlue
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10482
If we want to stop the triple teaming of our one key forward and more importantly get our attack back to it's most potent - Harry comes in. I have no doubt he will be back asap.
The decision will be whether he replaces Cottrell or Motlop in the 22. I suspect it will be Cottrell.
The major decision however will be, who JSoS replaces? Is it Pittonet or the other above mentioned. It would be terrible to lose Motlop, as he does provide a real spark but IMO Pitto isn't fit and JSoS is just such a key player for us!!!
It's getting very tight for spots.
Top
 Profile  
 
sinbagger
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:33 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9628
Location: Australia
carntheblues wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.


Harry actually was doing the rucking in the forward fifty prior to his injury .


Exactly, there’s no reason we couldn’t have TDK on the ball all day, and when he has a break Harry takes the fwd 50 work whilst Cripps takes the defensive 50 work.



And who takes the centre bounce?


Cripps or Acres.
Top
 Profile  
 
17th Premiership
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2742
As players become available in the coming weeks…:

McKay for Cottrell
Walsh for Ed
Cerra for Dow
McGovern for Marchbank
JSOS for Pitto
Kennedy for Fogarty
Boyd for Fisher or Cincotta

Fog, Motlop, Cunningham, Fisher, Cincotta, Cottrell, Kennedy, Boyd fighting for four spots I think.

Assuming no more injuries which is unlikely.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Top
 Profile  
 
SurreyBlue
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10482
17th Premiership wrote:
As players become available in the coming weeks…:

McKay for Cottrell
Walsh for Ed
Cerra for Dow
McGovern for Marchbank
JSOS for Pitto
Kennedy for Fogarty
Boyd for Fisher or Cincotta

Fog, Motlop, Cunningham, Fisher, Cincotta, Cottrell, Kennedy, Boyd fighting for four spots I think.

Assuming no more injuries which is unlikely.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Just about nailed it - my guess is:
McKay for Cottrell
Walsh for Ed
Cerra for Dow (sub in best side)
McGovern for Cincotta
JSOS for Pitto
Kennedy for Fogarty
Fisher has earned his spot - so far. Needs to keep performing but that goes for ALL.
Top
 Profile  
 
CK95
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35684
Location: Half back flank
I can't picture our best side without Fogarty in it, reckon he's been integral. I think I'd actually drop Cuningham or Motlop before him.

As has been said, it's a nice problem to have. But this is us we're talking about, & it's going to be a moot point anyway with more injuries inevitable :grin:

_________________
#DonTheStash
Top
 Profile  
 
jake_h03
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:56 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8962
Location: Melbourne
SurreyBlue wrote:
If we want to stop the triple teaming of our one key forward and more importantly get our attack back to it's most potent - Harry comes in. I have no doubt he will be back asap.
The decision will be whether he replaces Cottrell or Motlop in the 22. I suspect it will be Cottrell.
The major decision however will be, who JSoS replaces? Is it Pittonet or the other above mentioned. It would be terrible to lose Motlop, as he does provide a real spark but IMO Pitto isn't fit and JSoS is just such a key player for us!!!
It's getting very tight for spots.


Harry for Cottrell or Motlop (or Cuningham or Fogarty or Owies) makes us significantly less mobile and weaker at ground level. JSOS in for Pitto evens it out and gives us some extra forward pressure back.

I loathe the thought of Charlie, Harry, and one of TDK/Pitto in the forward line at the same time, which we will be forced into if JSOS doesn't replace Pitto

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:
Top
 Profile  
 
Blue Vain
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 3:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
sinbagger wrote:
carntheblues wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.


Harry actually was doing the rucking in the forward fifty prior to his injury .


Exactly, there’s no reason we couldn’t have TDK on the ball all day, and when he has a break Harry takes the fwd 50 work whilst Cripps takes the defensive 50 work.



And who takes the centre bounce?


Cripps or Acres.


So to confirm, you want to take our best clearance player (by a long way) and get him to do the centre square and back line ruck work?
So that a 200cm+ forward who cant kick for shit doesn't have to relieve ruck? If Harry wants a game, it should be at the expense of Pitto. TDK takes 70% ruck work, Harry 30%.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sydney Blue
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 3:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21411
Location: North of the border
Pressure Rating with vs without Harry McKay during the 8 game win streak:

WITH: 195
WITHOUT: 187
DIFFERENCE: +8 WITH HARRY

Not only that, 3 of Carlton's 4 highest pressure games during the streak were WITH Harry McKay.

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws
Top
 Profile  
 
jake_h03
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 3:15 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8962
Location: Melbourne
Sydney Blue wrote:
Pressure Rating with vs without Harry McKay during the 8 game win streak:

WITH: 195
WITHOUT: 187
DIFFERENCE: +8 WITH HARRY

Not only that, 3 of Carlton's 4 highest pressure games during the streak were WITH Harry McKay.


Interesting... But let me guess, those games were with JSOS as the second ruck and not Pitto. Correct?

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:
Top
 Profile  
 
CK95
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 3:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35684
Location: Half back flank
Sydney Blue wrote:
Not only that, 3 of Carlton's 4 highest pressure games during the streak were WITH Harry McKay.




Needs its own DVD.

_________________
#DonTheStash
Top
 Profile  
 
FarmerBlue
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 3:52 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
sinbagger wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
No to Jack rucking.

Either play 2 proper rucks or Harry needs to learn to ruck.
Just out of interest would you want Charlie rucking.
If the answer is No then you might have to rethink the thought of Harry.

They both essentially play similar positions

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


Charlie’s not even as tall as Cripps, Harry’s height makes him a natural choice as second ruck.


I would love to see Harry play the same role as Joe Daniher. Would do him wonders

Seeing TDK as Ruck supported by both Jack & Harry would give us great balance and options through the middle and forward
Top
 Profile  
 
azzablue
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2023 4:15 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1566
bondiblue wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Rod Spooky Galt wrote:
Big couple of weeks in the reserves ahead, Gold Coast doing well in the VFL, then fairly likely we'll make the wildcard round. Hopefully another win to get a game into Harry, JSOS, whoever needs it ahead of an elimination final.


Yes , exactly Rod . We don't want blokes coming in stone cold . They need to clock up some K's .


All we have to do is keep bringing the same game and intent every game, and our depth players covering the 6 out, along with our Reserves team are playing the same tune.

I think we pick the best available, and we win.

If we add a 3 players to get a couple games into them before Elimination Final, we should.
Treat the games as practise games with intent to keep winning, and holding a spot in this Finals team.

If Hewett and Kennedy are available and fit in a Final, I'd play them both. Made for Finals footy.
As long as they bring the same intent as the team, and Hewett is leading the way.

Pittonet did a lot of grunt work that goes unnoticed. Gawn didn't star, nor did he win the game for the Dees. Pitto did his job. So did the mids.


Glad someone else noticed Pitto's invaluable grunt work . The discerning eye of Bondi notice's these things .


Did you see the embrace displayed between TDK & Pitto on the ground after the siren, as acknowledgement for a job well done.

Pitto didnt mark, but Gawn 's marking wasn't a feature of the game either. There's good reason for that.

I know the argument against Pitto, but judging him poorly to expedite Silvagni's spot in the 22, isnt the way Vossy goes about it.

Incumbents spot to lose. Although, Harry Walsh and Gov should walk right in, even if it means my boy Marchy loses he's spot.

Marchy at least is primed to play Finals with exposure to a Finals game and playing well within a defensive machine. Silvagni is in the same boat imo; primed for Finals when called on.


only 4 certs
mckay
cerra
walsh
mcgovern

jsos , boyd , kennedy have to wait

wow depth who would of thought this a decade ago or 5 years for that matter or 3 years or ......

some unlucky boys coming up

_________________
#sayerscouldbetheman!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 7 of 14
  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], killpies and 107 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group