Jaykay wrote:
Interesting topic - even though we canvassed all this last year. My feelings are that we should resist any change to our jumper.
Why? because we are The Navy Blues. We are a colour. That is, our name is a colour. We are not a bird (Hawks, Swans, Eagles, Crows, Magpies) our club is not represented by an animal (Dogs, Cats, Roos, Tigers, Lions) we have no biblical affiliations (Saints, Demons) and I don't quite know how to classify Dockers, Bombers, Power. We are the only club that is represented by a colour in our name.
How ridiculous is it then to force us to change our colour. The AFL are asking us to compromise our name. When our team runs out in silver, or orange or any other bloody colour - we are not The Navy Blues. We become the Mostly-Silver-With-a-Touch-Of Navy Blues. Or the Mostly-Orange-and-Silver-with-an-interesting-Navy-Blue-piping Navy Blues.
I meam, what colour is a Bomber really - mostly Battle-Ship gray, I would have thought. In any case, they are not called the Mostly-Black-With-a-Red-Sash Bombers, or even The-Black-and-Red Bombers. Colour has a different meaning for them - and for all of the other teams.
Nah, not interested. I want to see us dressed in our Navy Blue jumpers for all games.
Let those teams that can play in any colour and still not compromise their name go for the alternative strip.
We Are The NAVY BLUES.
I understand what you're saying, but I just don't get it. Changing the colours doesn't even get close to registering on my care factor. If the change was to be a permanent thing, then yeah I'd get a bit more concerned, but really, it'll be in use only 3-4 times a year.