billy_bongo wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
Durdin and Motlop have been poor in their positioning. Durdin has worked hard to impact the game.
These guys are NEVER front and centre of the forwards where they should be. Always outnumbered and outskilled at the fall of the ball and if Charlie or Harry don't mark/free kick, they are nowhere to be seen.
It's a hard trade to find form in if you aren't ever in the right spots.
We either have dumb players, dumb coaches, a dumb gameplan or all of the above
We are dumb.
Both need to go back to the magoo's .They have had an armchair ride .
Who replaces them?
If we're talking small forwards, Durds, Mots and Owies are it. So no one.
We already have a problem with keeping the ball in the F50, which is part of the plan. Our smalls aren't the problem.
Durds:
Goals: 1.1 Average (according to AFL.com)
Tackles: 4 Elite (perhaps Pickett the only one with more, 4.

Mots:
Goals: 0.9 Average
Tackles: 3 Above average
Owies:
Goals 2.2 Elite (Charlie 2.8; Higgins 2.2)
Tackles: 1 Below average (Down a bit this year -his career average with Blues, 3.06)
And remember, our mostly young blokes are operating in a dysfunctional team and forward line.
But people like to go for easy targets
Some of the others:
Elliot:
Goals: 1 Average
Tackles: 3 Above average
Bobby Hill:
Goals: 1.3 Above average
Tackles: 2 Below average
Papps:
Goals: 1.9 Above average
Tackles: 3 Above average
Spargo
Goals: 1.3 Above average
Tackles: 1.7 Below average
Good to see real numbers bb. Are they career numbers? All of 2023?
I'd love to see the whole picture: kicks, handballs, & marks, and efficiency. It hasnt been great for last 6 weeks.
I had a look at their output over the last 6 weeks (not incl WCE) and come to the same conclusion, Mots and Durds are not in good form, and they should be accountable for that. They are no easy targets for our current quagmire, they just appear to be part of the problem for ample and commonly suggested reasons given by posters. We are all looking for clues, not scapegoats. I'm sure no one would disagree their last 6 weeks (minus WCE) have been poor. That's the point.
Look how long it took for Fish fans to look at his output this year, only to realise he wasn't playing well after he was dropped and watched his VFL output: calling for easy handballs, running into trouble, having to go backwards, slowing down forward momentum.... . I'm not going to be an apologist for Mots and Durds. They are playing with the big boys and will be judged like big boys.
Owies has been the best small forward for the last couple years. It was proven we really didnt need 4 small forwards (Fisher incl). Do we really need 3 small forwards with the numbers they have been producing for the last 6 weeks? I can't make a case for them TBH. If Durds was running through with the mids...maybe...but he's not. I know they are only 20yo's and developing, but I prefer developing to be done in the reserves.
I dont think we have the luxury to be carrying players (for development or because of career averages) when we are looking for 8 more wins with only 13 games left to play.