verbs wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
Returning home is a completely different kettle of fish. I never begrudged Troy Bond returning home.
Hamill and Campo however have spat in the face of the club that gave them their chance. Nathan Brown falls into this category too.
Returning home is perhaps the weakest excuse of the lot. After a club has recruited a player, accommodated a player and developed their football career, the player turns their back on all that support, normally at the peak of their career, and spit in the face of the club that gave them their chance at AFL.
It's as weak as piss.
Footy is meant to be a man's game, not a game where boys run home to mummy the minute they get homesick.
That's where I disagree.
A club selects a player based on certain qualities / characteristics.
The club offers that player a contract which he accepts and fulfills. Now if that player was shite and didn't pull his wait do you think the club would care what he did, nor would a club care what the player felt if they wanted too not renew a contract, I think not.
Like it or not Stevens at Port was probably a win / win, Stevens was recruited and developed / played in an environment that had a winning culture, particularly over recent years, and in return Stevens gave them good service.
Now as a supporter you would hope a player would stay, but at the end of the day, just because a club selects you and nurtures you, as long as you fulfill your contractual obligatoon that is the calculated risk they take choosing an interstate player.
Neither right nor wrong, but an observation
