Blue Vain wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
That’s no secret, that the salary cap is a mess. Austin had no experience with payments previously, and only a relatively short amount of time in recruitment before being handed the role of Head of List Management by Liddle because of their pre-existing relationship at Richmond.
Ok...despite the potential
jobs for mates and/or
nepotism regarding his hire (it's Carlton and therefore comes with the territory), it's really not that hard and it definitely isn't the most difficult part of his job. You have a set budget and you make it fit. If you have any questions, you have one of the most experienced sports CEOs in the country to call upon and a very experienced Head of Football who is also an experienced list manager. There are also numerous board members who are extremely experienced financial professionals. Who knows if legit, but I'm not overly concerned.
Unfortunately, they’re not the only areas of incompetence.
There’s little forward planning…
One of the reasons last season was derailed because of the lack of viable ruckman (after Pittonet’s injury) on the list; HOK who isn’t anywhere near ready if required as he’s a youngster, was only added after the LTI to Philp. And the volleyballer may never be ready…
We had a crack at Grundy at the death, it would have required major gymnastics with the list/salary cap to make it happen….
After drafting Hollands & Cowan (who both look very good), we drafted Binns, a runner who is a very average user of the ball, yet we have the Campo’s twins available next year.
We’ve had no viable backup for our tall forwards either…
Handing out excessive contracts (payment/length wise) doesn’t help either…
So Austin has had 2 National Drafts to restructure a list that had tall forward luminaries like Ben Silvagni and Finbar O'Dwyer as our back ups. We have Pittonet, TDK and 2 developing rucks. That's the perfect balance IMHO. HOK looks good and "the Volleyballer" is worth the punt.
IMO, our list is
significantly better than it was when SOS was removed 2 years ag
o which is the measure on how Austin should judged.In your opinion…
And, after 3 National Drafts (not 2), who are our tall/medium forward backups??
Caminiti starred in a practice match, is 6 or 7 years younger than Jack, Charlie & Harry, and ended up at the Saints and is doing very well on a minimum contract.
I guess you missed the point on how HOK arrived on the list, which is the exactly the point being made…
And you didn’t address the Binns/Campo twins question… we already have enough turnover merchants on the list
And what happens if Pittonet or TDK get hurt?
Two years for LOB, how many years for Philp (based on what exactly?) and Young?
One quality tall defender, what happens if Weiters goes down?
Paying overs for players trade wise, massive contracts handed out, some poor trades… other clubs have found it a pleasurable experience trading with us

which isn’t really a good thing
Agree the list is in better shape than when SOS left, and to an extent, some gaps have been addressed.
And we should be doing better on field than what we are, which is a coaching issue.
However after 3 National drafts/trade periods, the list still has gaps, and the salary cap is a mess. And that’s Austin’s responsibility. Unfortunately he’s learning on the job