Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 9:36 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 10
  [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Paddycripps
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Lynch is a horrible sniper
Top
 Profile  
 
missnaut
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13157
Location: Melbourne
Apparently the AFL have said nothing to see here with the goal review?

Typical.
Top
 Profile  
 
Wojee
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
missnaut wrote:
Apparently the AFL have said nothing to see here with the goal review?

Typical.



Probably OKed the ARC decision by watching it on a Nokia 8250.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa
Top
 Profile  
 
bluehammer
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:53 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20167
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
oh no, they apparently had "access to hi def super slo mo visio"

And if you buy that, I've got a once in a lifetime investment opportunity for you

_________________
Congratulations CK95
Top
 Profile  
 
GreatEx
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:00 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14269
Location: Sydney
Sydney Blue wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
What did Dunstall say?
Basically said not enough evidence to overturn the goal and it changed the outcome of the game

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


Thanks Syd... good egg, that Jason.

I wouldn't have had a problem with the decision if Doc's earlier touch had also been called a behind. In both cases there was finger flapping but no decisive evidence that the flap came from the ball, and no change in ball trajectory. Yes, there was a foot in the vicinity for Doc, but no decisive evidence that the foot hit the hand. So it's really just two brands of speculation.

It also seems to me that the burden of proof should be higher when the ump has already given the all-clear and the goal ump signalled a goal, as opposed to when the review is called for straight away. Dunno what the laws say on this point but from an "ethical" standpoint I think it should be higher.
Top
 Profile  
 
Crusader
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:07 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7454
Location: Bendigo
The review doesn’t happen if ‘Elite Kick’ hits up the wiiiiide open team mate (Boyd?) 40m out.

His whole attitude towards footy is a cancer. He kicked that goal in the 2nd quarter and it was like he’d won Wimbledon. Every time he’s involved in the contest, win or lose, there’s a finality to his body language.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.
Top
 Profile  
 
frank dardew
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:15 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Let’s not get hung up on a goal review in respect to the result
Goal review wasn’t the reason we were 35 points behind in the second quarter
Wasn’t the reason we kicked 0.4 in the first quarter
Wasn’t the reason for 70 plus 50 forward entries by Richmond

Very poor performance not adapting to wet weather football playing too cute for conditions dumb
Madly handballing to team mates when it’s is pouring down rain inside of going long by a kick
Being murdered out of the centre having no answer to Prestia
Lucky to lose by 15 in my view
Said last week if we played like we did against Essendon* against a good side we were going to lose -we did and learnt nothing from last week
Running out of soldiers and can’t catch a break with injury or player continuity so it’s having an impact

Poor performance last night in a winnable game no excuses yes umpires terrible but no one to blame but ourselves
Top
 Profile  
 
GreatEx
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:19 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14269
Location: Sydney
Crusader wrote:
The review doesn’t happen if ‘Elite Kick’ hits up the wiiiiide open team mate (Boyd?) 40m out.
.


It was Boyd, maybe closer to 45m out, and near the boundary line. Hardly a gimme. LOB saw him and decided against it, it's not like he was too busy patting himself on the back.
Top
 Profile  
 
rhino27
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:31 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:58 pm
Posts: 4299
GreatEx wrote:
Crusader wrote:
The review doesn’t happen if ‘Elite Kick’ hits up the wiiiiide open team mate (Boyd?) 40m out.
.


It was Boyd, maybe closer to 45m out, and near the boundary line. Hardly a gimme. LOB saw him and decided against it, it's not like he was too busy patting himself on the back.


I may contradict myself here. I felt he probably should've given it to Boyd but at same time I get frustrated when some of our players don't back themselves in and look for any other option rather than take the responsibility themselves. So with that, didn't have an issue with him backing himself in.
Top
 Profile  
 
missnaut
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:40 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13157
Location: Melbourne
bluehammer wrote:
oh no, they apparently had "access to hi def super slo mo visio"

And if you buy that, I've got a once in a lifetime investment opportunity for you
If they've got this footage, why doesn't the viewer see it instead of the VHS era stuff?
Top
 Profile  
 
bluehammer
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20167
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
missnaut wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
oh no, they apparently had "access to hi def super slo mo visio"

And if you buy that, I've got a once in a lifetime investment opportunity for you
If they've got this footage, why doesn't the viewer see it instead of the VHS era stuff?
Preeeeeeeeecisely

_________________
Congratulations CK95
Top
 Profile  
 
Mickstar
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:58 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7169
frank dardew wrote:
Let’s not get hung up on a goal review in respect to the result
Goal review wasn’t the reason we were 35 points behind in the second quarter
Wasn’t the reason we kicked 0.4 in the first quarter
Wasn’t the reason for 70 plus 50 forward entries by Richmond

Very poor performance not adapting to wet weather football playing too cute for conditions dumb
Madly handballing to team mates when it’s is pouring down rain inside of going long by a kick
Being murdered out of the centre having no answer to Prestia
Lucky to lose by 15 in my view
Said last week if we played like we did against Essendon** against a good side we were going to lose -we did and learnt nothing from last week
Running out of soldiers and can’t catch a break with injury or player continuity so it’s having an impact

Poor performance last night in a winnable game no excuses yes umpires terrible but no one to blame but ourselves


Very , very sensible way to look at it Frankie .Reckon you are right Frank, face your own inadequicies before laying fault at others . ..............reckon our mids need to take it upon themselves and work it out . After all , they are not novice's and need to work there shit out amongst themselves . I mean , it is crystal clear TDK is getting killed in his tapwork yet they didn't re jig in any way . Baffling .

_________________
All my dangerous friends
Top
 Profile  
 
CK95
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 2:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35660
Location: Half back flank
Cerra would have been really handy last night. I reckon of all our outs we missed him the most

_________________
#DonTheStash
Top
 Profile  
 
Wojee
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 2:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
CK95 wrote:
Cerra would have been really handy last night. I reckon of all our outs we missed him the most


We can't get Pittonet back soon enough either.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa
Top
 Profile  
 
tommi
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 2:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Ya know….

after the game i was kinda pissed off…
then i wasn’t this morning…but now I’m
pissed off again…!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!
Top
 Profile  
 
Paddycripps
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
frank dardew wrote:
Let’s not get hung up on a goal review in respect to the result
Goal review wasn’t the reason we were 35 points behind in the second quarter
Wasn’t the reason we kicked 0.4 in the first quarter
Wasn’t the reason for 70 plus 50 forward entries by Richmond

Very poor performance not adapting to wet weather football playing too cute for conditions dumb
Madly handballing to team mates when it’s is pouring down rain inside of going long by a kick
Being murdered out of the centre having no answer to Prestia
Lucky to lose by 15 in my view
Said last week if we played like we did against Essendon** against a good side we were going to lose -we did and learnt nothing from last week
Running out of soldiers and can’t catch a break with injury or player continuity so it’s having an impact

Poor performance last night in a winnable game no excuses yes umpires terrible but no one to blame but ourselves


This.

We have been poor for 3 weeks now.

Keep this up and we don't deserve to play finals.

I don't accept injuries as an excuse. We have missed a mid most games this year and thrived.

We simply, for one reason or another, have started playing below par for a sustained period of late.
Top
 Profile  
 
Paddycripps
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
I hope Voss told them to play wet weather football because if not then he is accountable as much as the players for that shite.
Top
 Profile  
 
Mickstar
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7169
tommi wrote:
Ya know….

after the game i was kinda pissed off…
then i wasn’t this morning…but now I’m
pissed off again…!


kindest regards tommi


Sounds like me after EVERY game .

_________________
All my dangerous friends
Top
 Profile  
 
Crusader
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 3:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7454
Location: Bendigo
GreatEx wrote:
Crusader wrote:
The review doesn’t happen if ‘Elite Kick’ hits up the wiiiiide open team mate (Boyd?) 40m out.
.


It was Boyd, maybe closer to 45m out, and near the boundary line. Hardly a gimme. LOB saw him and decided against it, it's not like he was too busy patting himself on the back.

He had that much empty space around him, he could’ve played on and kicked from 30.

‘Elite Kick’ turned his back.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sidefx
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 4:04 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6361
Crusader wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
Crusader wrote:
The review doesn’t happen if ‘Elite Kick’ hits up the wiiiiide open team mate (Boyd?) 40m out.
.


It was Boyd, maybe closer to 45m out, and near the boundary line. Hardly a gimme. LOB saw him and decided against it, it's not like he was too busy patting himself on the back.

He had that much empty space around him, he could’ve played on and kicked from 30.

‘Elite Kick’ turned his back.

I just watched it and disagree.
LOB had zero space when he marked so he had to stop.
If he passed it to Boyd, Pickett was there and would've run straight at him.
Decision was the right one, get it closer to goal.
We'd been over using the ball all night.

If we want to get picky, the kick on goal from Curnow was costly, it was a sitter for him or the Harry miss from 40 out with 4min to go.

There is no point focusing on the individual specifics and plays, it does no good.
The issue was the middle, clearances and F50 entires for them, we were owned.
IMO we lacked an inside mid/tagger to replace Cerra.
Graham had 10 tackles to our best Cripps 5 and Short had 989m gained, he needed to be shut down.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 10
  [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group