Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue May 06, 2025 7:14 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1520 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 76  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2021 6:37 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2698
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
Need two bonafide mids and a bonafide wing

If we are not top 3-5 in clearances and stoppages dont expect to win many games and talent going through there at this moment isnt good enough.

Maybe Hewett as FA
Pick 6(8) for Cerra
Future 2nd for Lipinski to play on the other wing
2022 first for Parker and Stephenson with 2nd coming back.
Might be going somewhere,



Let's just get a coach who doesn't need a list of 22 A Graders to be successful.



:thumbsup: Always like your work BV. :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2021 7:06 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9608
Location: Australia
Quote:
do not have one player aged 28 or older who I consider to be in their best 10 players, except for Ed Curnow


Yet…

Quote:
Jacob Weitering, Liam Jones, Sam Walsh, Patrick Cripps, Harry McKay, Curnow, Jack Silvagni and Matthew Kennedy gave their all most of the time, but the rest were found wanting.


Last I looked Jones was older than 28, this was obviously knocked out in the ad break during Saturday nights match.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/how ... 58ngg.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2021 7:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18493
Location: threeohfivethree
murraycray wrote:
Buckenara didn't rate Walsh as an A Grader. Not sure he's seen too many Carlton games. :roll:


To be fair the AFLPA only rated him the second best player in the league.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:11 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2147
Location: East Melbourne
GWS wrote:
murraycray wrote:
Buckenara didn't rate Walsh as an A Grader. Not sure he's seen too many Carlton games. :roll:


To be fair the AFLPA only rated him the second best player in the league.
And he's an AA. Not too many B graders get an AA guernsey.

I think Buckenara is saying that Walsh is not old enough to rate, but that is stupid logic because he is already one of the best in the league.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

_________________
Silvagni


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
I'm a huge fan of players able to kick and handball on both sides, as mush as I am a fan of 2 bonafide ruckmen in a Final, let alone a GF.

Quote:
Former Western Bulldogs captain Bob Murphy believes Luke Beveridge’s “fanatical” obsession with his players being able to kick on both feet is one of the reasons behind the Dogs’ miraculous win on Saturday night.

The men from Footscray were able to storm home in the final quarter to win by a solitary point over the Lions at the Gabba, keeping themselves in the premiership hunt.


Bailey Smith was the hero for the Bulldogs, kicking a miraculous goal from the pocket on his opposite foot in the dying minutes that was crucial in securing the win.

Murphy believes the reason Smith was able to kick the goal was due to his coach’s insistence to learn to kick with both feet.

“Luke Beveridge, he’s fanatical about players being able to kick on both sides,” he said on SEN Drive.

“To get you out of trouble and to save time, you need it."


https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/09/07/beveridges-fanatical-ethos-that-contributed-to-bulldogs-finals-win/

That's why I'm not a fan of williamson in the backline. Seen him turn to trouble too many times.

Simmo on the other hand could kick accurately on his right foot when needed despite the lack of style.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
malbi wrote:
GWS wrote:
murraycray wrote:
Buckenara didn't rate Walsh as an A Grader. Not sure he's seen too many Carlton games. :roll:


To be fair the AFLPA only rated him the second best player in the league.
And he's an AA. Not too many B graders get an AA guernsey.

I think Buckenara is saying that Walsh is not old enough to rate, but that is stupid logic because he is already one of the best in the league.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk


:thumbsup:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
Stefchook wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
What our mix is in defence -
Again, we have our two tall defenders locked-in, but who plays as third tall?
Plowman, Parks, Marchbank ... heck, maybe McGovern. Kemp

What are our plans with Kemp? Is he going to be a defender?

We then have a number of small defenders: Docherty, Saad, Williams (maybe), Newman, Stocker (maybe). If we play two talls, and a third tall / medium defender / intercepting mark, then only three of them get a game each week. Which three?


Yeah, I'm intrigued as well about how we're going to structure this. I suspect Kemp is a lock to keep developing in defence. With his package of height and athleticism, he's too talented to not be in the side. Thankfully he's one of those guys who should be able to match up on smaller guys. And if we keep Marchbank and he can actually stay fit, I think he's another lock to be played in defence. He's been out of the team too long to be playing him in some other more experimental role.

But with Weiters, Jones and Plowman all locks as well. It certainly places a squeeze on the small defender role. Pretty sure Saad and Docherty will be prioritised. So perhaps Williams midfield/small forward? Stocker redeployed to midfield?


I don't think the 3rd tall suits Plowman. He struggles on players his size and above, and he's certainly not an intercept mark.

I prefer Jones and Weiters to be lockdown KPF's. Jones shouldn't leave his man alone to do the intercepting. I know he does it aplomb every now and then, but in Finals, I'd rather Marchbank play that role because of his athleticsim and abilty to intercept, otherwise its Kemp for me whilst Marchy recovers from an ACL....but if Kemp is a big bodied mid...I'm salivating for that day.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:26 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
I agree with gary bucanera keep our draft picks and keep building just add a free agent to the list.


Gary Buckenara once again demonstrated why he's cleaning out peoples toilets instead of working in the AFL.


Another has been looking to sell a headline for clicks.

Pass.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
keep p6 and offer next years first for cerra.

This year's first for Gibcus. Only other area we are short (no pun intended) are KPB. By the time Jones retires he will be ready.


WE need to get that midfield sorted.

Maybe Dow and SPS have a breakthrough year next year, maybe its Setterfield and stocker. Maybe Williams gets super fit over the summer to play the role he was recruited for, but midfield is No. 1 priority.

Gibcus is made for intercept role. Jones is playing intercept because Marchbank is injured and Plowman isn't an intercept mark. I don't know if Gibcus ia a KPD because that's what you're looking for from a FB or CHB imo.

I'd like us to consider Joshua Cripps to develop for Jones' role. He'd still be available in the 2nd round.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:40 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
bluechampion wrote:
List management priorities need to be based on how we think we're gonna play in 2022 and onwards.

With that in mind we need to decide on the following:

What our Ruck situation is going to be -
a) Do we play one ruckman with a tall utility to offer a chop-out?
b) Do we play two genuine rucks?

If a) who is that tall utility player? Do we need to trade one in? Do we think that at this stage in his career De Koning is that player and Pittonet is the no 1 ruckman?
If b) do we need another ruck on the list so that we can play the same style in the VFL, and to provide depth?

This then affects our forward set-up -
Our no. 1 and no. 2 tall forwards are set: McKay & Curnow. We then have either a resting ruckman or a tall utility-type. That's probably enough talls, so where do players like Silvagni & McGovern fit into this set-up?


An inform Casboult circa round 1-6 in 2020 was so crucial for us. The best contested mark in the AFL and at 200cm and 105kg could hole his ground in the ruck. Perfect.

If DeKoning could get his timing for marking sorted he'd be great as the 3rd tall/ruck. But, at some stage, DeKoning will be No.1 ruck and it may well be 2022 if he has a huge preseason developing his strength.

Silvagni and Gov wouldn't be needed as 3rd tall if we had a bonafide ruck-forward.

I'm an unabashed fan of 2 genuine rucks who are a threat forward too.

Silvagni is perfect as a big bodies mid imo.

I don't want Silvagni rucking...unless we have no choice due to injury.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 8:42 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..if Marchbank can ever withstand afl, I'd play him on a wing.. ..run back hard to fill the space and pop up as a 7th defender.. ....he can also push forward to help slow opposition run out of our F50..


Ideally that's a role he can play if he comes back as fit and mobile as he was since he was 18yo till he got injured 2 years ago.

I miss Marchbank. Teague missed him more. I hope he can comeback to help us as planned.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 10:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2147
Location: East Melbourne
bondiblue wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
List management priorities need to be based on how we think we're gonna play in 2022 and onwards.

With that in mind we need to decide on the following:

What our Ruck situation is going to be -
a) Do we play one ruckman with a tall utility to offer a chop-out?
b) Do we play two genuine rucks?

If a) who is that tall utility player? Do we need to trade one in? Do we think that at this stage in his career De Koning is that player and Pittonet is the no 1 ruckman?
If b) do we need another ruck on the list so that we can play the same style in the VFL, and to provide depth?

This then affects our forward set-up -
Our no. 1 and no. 2 tall forwards are set: McKay & Curnow. We then have either a resting ruckman or a tall utility-type. That's probably enough talls, so where do players like Silvagni & McGovern fit into this set-up?


An inform Casboult circa round 1-6 in 2020 was so crucial for us. The best contested mark in the AFL and at 200cm and 105kg could hole his ground in the ruck. Perfect.

If DeKoning could get his timing for marking sorted he'd be great as the 3rd tall/ruck. But, at some stage, DeKoning will be No.1 ruck and it may well be 2022 if he has a huge preseason developing his strength.

Silvagni and Gov wouldn't be needed as 3rd tall if we had a bonafide ruck-forward.

I'm an unabashed fan of 2 genuine rucks who are a threat forward too.

Silvagni is perfect as a big bodies mid imo.

I don't want Silvagni rucking...unless we have no choice due to injury.

I think the ruck position is almost our most pressing. DeKoning is 2-3 years off what we need him to be. He needs to bulk up, get fitter and get a bit of mongrel about him. He needs to have a big pre-season. Pittonet can't jump off the ground. He's not the answer. We need to find a new No 1 ruckman from somewhere. DeKoning can develop in the forward line and relieve ruck.

_________________
Silvagni


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2021 12:01 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
malbi wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
List management priorities need to be based on how we think we're gonna play in 2022 and onwards.

With that in mind we need to decide on the following:

What our Ruck situation is going to be -
a) Do we play one ruckman with a tall utility to offer a chop-out?
b) Do we play two genuine rucks?

If a) who is that tall utility player? Do we need to trade one in? Do we think that at this stage in his career De Koning is that player and Pittonet is the no 1 ruckman?
If b) do we need another ruck on the list so that we can play the same style in the VFL, and to provide depth?

This then affects our forward set-up -
Our no. 1 and no. 2 tall forwards are set: McKay & Curnow. We then have either a resting ruckman or a tall utility-type. That's probably enough talls, so where do players like Silvagni & McGovern fit into this set-up?


An inform Casboult circa round 1-6 in 2020 was so crucial for us. The best contested mark in the AFL and at 200cm and 105kg could hole his ground in the ruck. Perfect.

If DeKoning could get his timing for marking sorted he'd be great as the 3rd tall/ruck. But, at some stage, DeKoning will be No.1 ruck and it may well be 2022 if he has a huge preseason developing his strength.

Silvagni and Gov wouldn't be needed as 3rd tall if we had a bonafide ruck-forward.

I'm an unabashed fan of 2 genuine rucks who are a threat forward too.

Silvagni is perfect as a big bodies mid imo.

I don't want Silvagni rucking...unless we have no choice due to injury.

I think the ruck position is almost our most pressing. DeKoning is 2-3 years off what we need him to be. He needs to bulk up, get fitter and get a bit of mongrel about him. He needs to have a big pre-season. Pittonet can't jump off the ground. He's not the answer. We need to find a new No 1 ruckman from somewhere. DeKoning can develop in the forward line and relieve ruck.


Spot on

Midfielders feed off rucks work. I think the hit outs to advantage that show Pitto in top 5 or 10 av hits to adv ...whatever ..I just don't see it and need a definition of what is considered hit outs to advantage.

I recall one game I followed up to see when Pitto had his 4 hit outs to advantage and the only thing I could find remotely to advantage was when Pitto hit the ball to a space ... but each time the opposition ended up swooping on it. :roll:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Last edited by bondiblue on Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2021 3:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1566
malbi wrote:
GWS wrote:
murraycray wrote:
Buckenara didn't rate Walsh as an A Grader. Not sure he's seen too many Carlton games. :roll:


To be fair the AFLPA only rated him the second best player in the league.
And he's an AA. Not too many B graders get an AA guernsey.

I think Buckenara is saying that Walsh is not old enough to rate, but that is stupid logic because he is already one of the best in the league.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

What a stupid article was that when Walsh had his own category it’s called AAA

_________________
#sayerscouldbetheman!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2021 5:30 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
bondiblue wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
keep p6 and offer next years first for cerra.

This year's first for Gibcus. Only other area we are short (no pun intended) are KPB. By the time Jones retires he will be ready.


WE need to get that midfield sorted.

Maybe Dow and SPS have a breakthrough year next year, maybe its Setterfield and stocker. Maybe Williams gets super fit over the summer to play the role he was recruited for, but midfield is No. 1 priority.

Gibcus is made for intercept role. Jones is playing intercept because Marchbank is injured and Plowman isn't an intercept mark. I don't know if Gibcus ia a KPD because that's what you're looking for from a FB or CHB imo.

I'd like us to consider Joshua Cripps to develop for Jones' role. He'd still be available in the 2nd round.


bondi, you have already mentioned 5 players already on our list who should/could blossom as mids under a new coach. To those add Kemp, O'Brien, Fogarty, Carroll, and Ramsay.

So we have maybe 10 mids in addition to the admittedly weak midfield who are already on the list. Give them a proper try under a new coach before giving them the boot.

We need an extra? Maybe, who knows if any of these will make it but at least we have them. But a tall such as Gibcus we don't have at all. Closest is Marchbank who is shorter and cannot get on the field.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2021 7:22 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
bondiblue wrote:
I'm a huge fan of players able to kick and handball on both sides, as mush as I am a fan of 2 bonafide ruckmen in a Final, let alone a GF.

Quote:
Former Western Bulldogs captain Bob Murphy believes Luke Beveridge’s “fanatical” obsession with his players being able to kick on both feet is one of the reasons behind the Dogs’ miraculous win on Saturday night.

The men from Footscray were able to storm home in the final quarter to win by a solitary point over the Lions at the Gabba, keeping themselves in the premiership hunt.


Bailey Smith was the hero for the Bulldogs, kicking a miraculous goal from the pocket on his opposite foot in the dying minutes that was crucial in securing the win.

Murphy believes the reason Smith was able to kick the goal was due to his coach’s insistence to learn to kick with both feet.

“Luke Beveridge, he’s fanatical about players being able to kick on both sides,” he said on SEN Drive.

“To get you out of trouble and to save time, you need it."


https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/09/07/beveridges-fanatical-ethos-that-contributed-to-bulldogs-finals-win/

That's why I'm not a fan of williamson in the backline. Seen him turn to trouble too many times.

Simmo on the other hand could kick accurately on his right foot when needed despite the lack of style.

Agree on Williamson and throw fisher in as a left foot liability


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
azzablue wrote:
malbi wrote:
GWS wrote:
murraycray wrote:
Buckenara didn't rate Walsh as an A Grader. Not sure he's seen too many Carlton games. :roll:


To be fair the AFLPA only rated him the second best player in the league.
And he's an AA. Not too many B graders get an AA guernsey.

I think Buckenara is saying that Walsh is not old enough to rate, but that is stupid logic because he is already one of the best in the league.

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk

What a stupid article was that when Walsh had his own category it’s called AAA


What would the market place pay to get Walsh to their side? 3 1st rounders?

Walsh has already proven he's an A grade player. The market value tells us, not Buckenara and his paid for headlines.

Walsh's been elite for the last 6-7 years at all levels he's played. 'nuff said

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
london blue wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I'm a huge fan of players able to kick and handball on both sides, as mush as I am a fan of 2 bonafide ruckmen in a Final, let alone a GF.

Quote:
Former Western Bulldogs captain Bob Murphy believes Luke Beveridge’s “fanatical” obsession with his players being able to kick on both feet is one of the reasons behind the Dogs’ miraculous win on Saturday night.

The men from Footscray were able to storm home in the final quarter to win by a solitary point over the Lions at the Gabba, keeping themselves in the premiership hunt.


Bailey Smith was the hero for the Bulldogs, kicking a miraculous goal from the pocket on his opposite foot in the dying minutes that was crucial in securing the win.

Murphy believes the reason Smith was able to kick the goal was due to his coach’s insistence to learn to kick with both feet.

“Luke Beveridge, he’s fanatical about players being able to kick on both sides,” he said on SEN Drive.

“To get you out of trouble and to save time, you need it."


https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/09/07/beveridges-fanatical-ethos-that-contributed-to-bulldogs-finals-win/

That's why I'm not a fan of williamson in the backline. Seen him turn to trouble too many times.

Simmo on the other hand could kick accurately on his right foot when needed despite the lack of style.

Agree on Williamson and throw fisher in as a left foot liability


Agree on Fish too.

OBrien? Left foot only.

There's 3 who we shouldn't need to play with all the untapped talent we have on our list...but we do.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2021 8:37 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
Look at what Geelong have to choose from to cover Parfitt.

Quote:
Scott gave little away as to who was in line to replace the midfielder, however the call will be down to Quinton Narkle, Sam Simpson, Zach Guthrie, Luke Dahlhaus or Shaun Higgins.


https://www.afl.com.au/news/675042/scott-slams-dr-larkins-after-haymaker-tweet-on-stewart

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2021
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 12:41 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8119
bondiblue wrote:
Stefchook wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
What our mix is in defence -
Again, we have our two tall defenders locked-in, but who plays as third tall?
Plowman, Parks, Marchbank ... heck, maybe McGovern. Kemp

What are our plans with Kemp? Is he going to be a defender?

We then have a number of small defenders: Docherty, Saad, Williams (maybe), Newman, Stocker (maybe). If we play two talls, and a third tall / medium defender / intercepting mark, then only three of them get a game each week. Which three?


Yeah, I'm intrigued as well about how we're going to structure this. I suspect Kemp is a lock to keep developing in defence. With his package of height and athleticism, he's too talented to not be in the side. Thankfully he's one of those guys who should be able to match up on smaller guys. And if we keep Marchbank and he can actually stay fit, I think he's another lock to be played in defence. He's been out of the team too long to be playing him in some other more experimental role.

But with Weiters, Jones and Plowman all locks as well. It certainly places a squeeze on the small defender role. Pretty sure Saad and Docherty will be prioritised. So perhaps Williams midfield/small forward? Stocker redeployed to midfield?


I don't think the 3rd tall suits Plowman. He struggles on players his size and above, and he's certainly not an intercept mark.

I prefer Jones and Weiters to be lockdown KPF's. Jones shouldn't leave his man alone to do the intercepting. I know he does it aplomb every now and then, but in Finals, I'd rather Marchbank play that role because of his athleticsim and abilty to intercept, otherwise its Kemp for me whilst Marchy recovers from an ACL....but if Kemp is a big bodied mid...I'm salivating for that day.


I think Plowman more likely to match up on a smaller forward. Kemp (and Marchbank, if he stays on the list) to cover 3rd talls.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1520 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 76  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group