Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 6:20 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3729 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147 ... 187  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 3:52 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2700
This is all turning to madness. :mad:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:11 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
It’s not madness, we just literally announced the panel for the coaching selection.

Ross didn’t want to go through a diligent process. That’s his choice, obviously reasons why.

It doesn’t mean we don’t have any other candidates lined up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:36 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:14 pm
Posts: 362
Its been madness since lo giudice declared the review public.

The arrogant Carlton supporters from times past keep thinking we have this under control, we are being ruthless like we should etc, but we just look like a reactive unprofessional organisation that's completely out of touch with modern times.

Its pandemonium.

The people we thought are gettable aren't. Now we pin our hopes to Brian Cook coming across and bringing Chris Scott with him from Geelong?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:39 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10376
Location: Coburg
in your opinion.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:42 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10482
The Normal One wrote:
It’s not madness, we just literally announced the panel for the coaching selection.

Ross didn’t want to go through a diligent process. That’s his choice, obviously reasons why.

It doesn’t mean we don’t have any other candidates lined up.


Incorrect. Ross had the job, if Clarko didn’t want it.
Problem was our management kept chasing a person not interested and stretching the appointment out. Add the political influence behind the scenes - again - by our CEO and his sidekick, it all ended up in an absolute embarrassing disaster - again. Don’t blame Ross for walking away. Joke of a process.


Last edited by SurreyBlue on Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
thryleon wrote:
Its been madness since lo giudice declared the review public.

The arrogant Carlton supporters from times past keep thinking we have this under control, we are being ruthless like we should etc, but we just look like a reactive unprofessional organisation that's completely out of touch with modern times.

Its pandemonium.

The people we thought are gettable aren't. Now we pin our hopes to Brian Cook coming across and bringing Chris Scott with him from Geelong?


Do you think we could have an external review and keep it quiet?
Had we tried and the news inevitably leaked out into the public, no doubt you would have whinged about that as well.
Normally I'd be happy to debate the issues but I must admit, I despise skulking flowers turning up here out of the blue, claiming innocence, with no intention other than to push a rebel boards agenda.
Must be an old age thing.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:53 pm 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4746
Everything is just media speculation. So what we spoke to Clarkson and Lyon. Of course we were going too.

All the supposed shambles is the media doing as we haven’t really said anything.

What gets me is how Carolyn Wilson is finding out things? We have a bad leaker trying to make us look bad - thats the problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:53 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
Blue Vain wrote:
thryleon wrote:
Its been madness since lo giudice declared the review public.

The arrogant Carlton supporters from times past keep thinking we have this under control, we are being ruthless like we should etc, but we just look like a reactive unprofessional organisation that's completely out of touch with modern times.

Its pandemonium.

The people we thought are gettable aren't. Now we pin our hopes to Brian Cook coming across and bringing Chris Scott with him from Geelong?


Do you think we could have an external review and keep it quiet?
Had we tried and the news inevitably leaked out into the public, no doubt you would have whinged about that as well.
Normally I'd be happy to debate the issues but I must admit, I despise skulking flowers turning up here out of the blue, claiming innocence, with no intention other than to push a rebel boards agenda.


it's amusing you think a rebel board is a bad thing with what is happening at the club past 20 years. So much mediocrity can affect supporters too, I guess,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
SurreyBlue wrote:
The Normal One wrote:
It’s not madness, we just literally announced the panel for the coaching selection.

Ross didn’t want to go through a diligent process. That’s his choice, obviously reasons why.

It doesn’t mean we don’t have any other candidates lined up.


Incorrect. Ross had the job, if Clarko didn’t want it.
Problem was our management kept chasing a person not interested and stretching the appointment out. Add the political influence behind the scenes - again - by our CEO and his sidekick, it all ended up in an absolute embarrassing disaster - again. Don’t blame Ross from walking away. Joke of a process.


You've obviously been hanging around our newly active agitators Surrey. Any danger of you having any proof whatsoever for any of it or do you just drop bombs and walk away like them?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Walsh wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
thryleon wrote:
Its been madness since lo giudice declared the review public.

The arrogant Carlton supporters from times past keep thinking we have this under control, we are being ruthless like we should etc, but we just look like a reactive unprofessional organisation that's completely out of touch with modern times.

Its pandemonium.

The people we thought are gettable aren't. Now we pin our hopes to Brian Cook coming across and bringing Chris Scott with him from Geelong?


Do you think we could have an external review and keep it quiet?
Had we tried and the news inevitably leaked out into the public, no doubt you would have whinged about that as well.
Normally I'd be happy to debate the issues but I must admit, I despise skulking flowers turning up here out of the blue, claiming innocence, with no intention other than to push a rebel boards agenda.


it's amusing you think a rebel board is a bad thing with what is happening at the club past 20 years. So much mediocrity can affect supporters too, I guess,


I'm happy to look at alternative board options. What is there to assess?
That's right. @#$%&! all.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:59 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
thryleon wrote:
Its been madness since lo giudice declared the review public.

The arrogant Carlton supporters from times past keep thinking we have this under control, we are being ruthless like we should etc, but we just look like a reactive unprofessional organisation that's completely out of touch with modern times.

Its pandemonium.

The people we thought are gettable aren't. Now we pin our hopes to Brian Cook coming across and bringing Chris Scott with him from Geelong?


Do you think we could have an external review and keep it quiet?
Had we tried and the news inevitably leaked out into the public, no doubt you would have whinged about that as well.
Normally I'd be happy to debate the issues but I must admit, I despise skulking flowers turning up here out of the blue, claiming innocence, with no intention other than to push a rebel boards agenda.


it's amusing you think a rebel board is a bad thing with what is happening at the club past 20 years. So much mediocrity can affect supporters too, I guess,


I'm happy to look at alternative board options. What is there to assess?
That's right. @#$%&! all.


Well thats quite the opposite of what you insinuated before. And before you dismiss everything just be patient and wait and then make a judgement. Seems you have already made one without surveying all the facts. Isn't that your strong point?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Walsh wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
thryleon wrote:
Its been madness since lo giudice declared the review public.

The arrogant Carlton supporters from times past keep thinking we have this under control, we are being ruthless like we should etc, but we just look like a reactive unprofessional organisation that's completely out of touch with modern times.

Its pandemonium.

The people we thought are gettable aren't. Now we pin our hopes to Brian Cook coming across and bringing Chris Scott with him from Geelong?


Do you think we could have an external review and keep it quiet?
Had we tried and the news inevitably leaked out into the public, no doubt you would have whinged about that as well.
Normally I'd be happy to debate the issues but I must admit, I despise skulking flowers turning up here out of the blue, claiming innocence, with no intention other than to push a rebel boards agenda.


it's amusing you think a rebel board is a bad thing with what is happening at the club past 20 years. So much mediocrity can affect supporters too, I guess,


I'm happy to look at alternative board options. What is there to assess?
That's right. @#$%&! all.


Well thats quite the opposite of what you insinuated before. And before you dismiss everything just be patient and wait and then make a judgement. Seems you have already made one without surveying all the facts. Isn't that your strong point?


Without surveying the facts? :lol:
There are no facts. And when I ask you to produce them, you fail to.
But I'll happily wait until these ghosts arrive. In the interim how about you stop having 50 pot shots at the current board/administration per day and I'll happily stop getting involved. :thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:13 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Maybe the rebel ticket has convinced clarko to join the Carlton board.... And that's why he's playing coy...

Or maybe we are poaching eddie McGuire?

All will be revealed!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 7:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10482
Blue Vain wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
The Normal One wrote:
It’s not madness, we just literally announced the panel for the coaching selection.

Ross didn’t want to go through a diligent process. That’s his choice, obviously reasons why.

It doesn’t mean we don’t have any other candidates lined up.


Incorrect. Ross had the job, if Clarko didn’t want it.
Problem was our management kept chasing a person not interested and stretching the appointment out. Add the political influence behind the scenes - again - by our CEO and his sidekick, it all ended up in an absolute embarrassing disaster - again. Don’t blame Ross from walking away. Joke of a process.


You've obviously been hanging around our newly active agitators Surrey. Any danger of you having any proof whatsoever for any of it or do you just drop bombs and walk away like them?


I know what I have been told BV. I've also learnt no use arguing with posters on such discussion as it gets you nowhere. You certainty don't have to listen to what I have to say. Things will be uncovered long term and you can make up your mind about what I say.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:01 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
Facts as i know them:

Board called a review of the football department
Only spokesperson during the review was the coach
Members were told we would be advised of the results of the review
Senior coach sacked as a result of the review
4th coach sacked in 10 years
President announced he would be replaced by an experienced coach wiht a more defensive mindset
President announced finals were the expectation in 2022

As a passionate and patient supporter for 55 years i am prepared to once again let the new faces have a chance. However, 2022 must be the year of significant turnaround.

I would hope Luke and the board are feeling an enormous sense of responsibility and pressure to deliver.

Given a similar background to Luke, i sense i understand what he is trying to do. To date i am encouraged, yet far from inspired.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:17 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:14 pm
Posts: 362
Blue Vain wrote:
thryleon wrote:
Its been madness since lo giudice declared the review public.

The arrogant Carlton supporters from times past keep thinking we have this under control, we are being ruthless like we should etc, but we just look like a reactive unprofessional organisation that's completely out of touch with modern times.

Its pandemonium.

The people we thought are gettable aren't. Now we pin our hopes to Brian Cook coming across and bringing Chris Scott with him from Geelong?


Do you think we could have an external review and keep it quiet?
Had we tried and the news inevitably leaked out into the public, no doubt you would have whinged about that as well.
Normally I'd be happy to debate the issues but I must admit, I despise skulking flowers turning up here out of the blue, claiming innocence, with no intention other than to push a rebel boards agenda.
Must be an old age thing.



I know you seem to have a bee in your bonnet about me, but you might want to have a look at how long I've been registered rather than how active I've been.

This account was created in 2008!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 8:57 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
I thought Gerard Whateley made a good point on 360. Process is fine when appointing our coach, but if we’re going through a process the head hunting needs to stop (if it’s happening). As long as every other candidate feels like a back-up option to Clarkson, we’ll struggle to attract the best candidates.
There has to be a point, pretty much now IMO, where we say we’ve kicked the tyres enough on Clarkson, Lyon, Scott, Buckley etc and now we open it up for any other suitable candidates and let the process run.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10482
Once upon a time, the coaches would have been knocking down our door to get their foot in, now ...... well it makes me sad what we have become.
This one is on the board for not knowing when to 'stop and walk away' and Sayers for not being strong enough to lead at this instance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:44 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6363
cecil89 wrote:
I thought Gerard Whateley made a good point on 360. Process is fine when appointing our coach, but if we’re going through a process the head hunting needs to stop (if it’s happening). As long as every other candidate feels like a back-up option to Clarkson, we’ll struggle to attract the best candidates.
There has to be a point, pretty much now IMO, where we say we’ve kicked the tyres enough on Clarkson, Lyon, Scott, Buckley etc and now we open it up for any other suitable candidates and let the process run.

I'd like to know how come they would feel like the back up to Clarkson?
Clarkson has said he isn't coaching next season, true or not that was HIS public statement.
So moving forward, the media produced Lyon as next best choice based on the fact he was the next most experienced and threw his own hat into the ring.
The club never said he was second option and the club made sure to clarify they are looking for not only an experienced coach, but also covering all bases with all coaches through a thorough process.
So as far as I can see it is exactly what they have told the media hounds and it's still not good enough, because they don't know what's going on and can't break a story.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 11:49 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1331
SurreyBlue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
The Normal One wrote:
It’s not madness, we just literally announced the panel for the coaching selection.

Ross didn’t want to go through a diligent process. That’s his choice, obviously reasons why.

It doesn’t mean we don’t have any other candidates lined up.


Incorrect. Ross had the job, if Clarko didn’t want it.
Problem was our management kept chasing a person not interested and stretching the appointment out. Add the political influence behind the scenes - again - by our CEO and his sidekick, it all ended up in an absolute embarrassing disaster - again. Don’t blame Ross from walking away. Joke of a process.


You've obviously been hanging around our newly active agitators Surrey. Any danger of you having any proof whatsoever for any of it or do you just drop bombs and walk away like them?


I know what I have been told BV. I've also learnt no use arguing with posters on such discussion as it gets you nowhere. You certainty don't have to listen to what I have to say. Things will be uncovered long term and you can make up your mind about what I say.


Ive been told I will win the lottery if I buy a ticket... Is that a guarantee Surrey?

Ive been called out on this site for "suggesting" things without factual basis (and I accepted that, but also prefaced my comments based on a history of what has transpired with this footy club).

So cough up evidence or its just fluff and bubble...

_________________
Cripps is the man


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3729 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147 ... 187  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 216 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group