David Teague: SAKCED 26/8/21

deano35 · **Joined:** Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:45 pm **Posts:** 1757

Drewgirl wrote:

The thing is though, if we are going to get rid of Teague, why are we prolonging it? Why are we still interviewing him ?

We need to move on so we employ a new coach, make calls on players and attract new players. We cant waste a second as we need every moment leading into pre season.

Plus its only fair on Teague as well especially during Covid to look for a new job.

This is all confusing, unless the narrative is all wrong and Teague will end up staying. Maybe our thoughts are all wrong and we are trying to now be the nice guy after having been bagged in the media and by Pickering?

Curious !!

I'd suggest they will finally release the findings of the review to David for him to state his case.

azzablue · **Joined:** Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 1566

deano35 wrote:

Drewgirl wrote:

The thing is though, if we are going to get rid of Teague, why are we prolonging it? Why are we still interviewing him ?

We need to move on so we employ a new coach, make calls on players and attract new players. We cant waste a second as we need every moment leading into pre season.

Plus its only fair on Teague as well especially during Covid to look for a new job.

This is all confusing, unless the narrative is all wrong and Teague will end up staying. Maybe our thoughts are all wrong and we are trying to now be the nice guy after having been bagged in the media and by Pickering?

Curious !!

I'd suggest they will finally release the findings of the review to David for him to state his case.

Sayers is a former bean counter , he will show that he done a diligent process and that he won’t dance to media drum to make announcements ,

Interesting strategy when everyone knows the outcome ,,,

azzablue · **Joined:** Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 1566

Walsh wrote:

Is he sacked yet? :roll:

Are you still here ?? Tick Tock tick tock

Walsh · **Joined:** Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm **Posts:** 2333

azzablue wrote:

Walsh wrote:

Is he sacked yet? :roll:

Are you still here ?? Tick Tock tick tock

So is he sacked yet - thought it was going to happen in the morning - that's what you said

Mickstar · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm **Posts:** 7444

deano35 wrote:

Drewgirl wrote:

The thing is though, if we are going to get rid of Teague, why are we prolonging it? Why are we still interviewing him ?

We need to move on so we employ a new coach, make calls on players and attract new players. We cant waste a second as we need every moment leading into pre season.

Plus its only fair on Teague as well especially during Covid to look for a new job.

This is all confusing, unless the narrative is all wrong and Teague will end up staying. Maybe our thoughts are all wrong and we are trying to now be the nice guy after having been bagged in the media and by Pickering?

Curious !!

I'd suggest they will finally release the findings of the review to David for him to state his case.

For sure.............entitled to have his say..........two sides to every story .

Scotty12000 · **Posted:** Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:01 am

Walsh wrote:

azzablue wrote:

Walsh wrote:

Is he sacked yet? :roll:

Are you still here ?? Tick Tock tick tock

So is he sacked yet - thought it was going to happen in the morning - that's what you said

Will be ironic if the bloke you hate is the saviour of the bloke you’re devoted to. Will you bow down before Sayers if he doesn’t kill your Bambi?

Scotty12000 · **Posted:** Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:02 am

azzablue · **Joined:** Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 1566

CK95 wrote:

Sidefx wrote:

Club email from Sayers.

Quote:

I wanted you to be the first to know that our football club has today entered its next phase of the extensive independent football department review that has been conducted by external panel members Geoff Walsh, Graham Lowe and Matthew Pavlich.

As communicated last week, the external panel had delivered a final report to me, the Club’s Board of Directors, and CEO Cain Liddle.

This report contains detailed information from key stakeholders across the entire football department and will be used as a basis for our club to make necessary and informed decisions to take the football department forward and improve our on-field performance.

With our AFL season complete, our club is now in a position to fully brief the senior leaders of the Football Department on the review findings. This process will commence this week and will involve consultation between the Board and football department regarding the recommendations provided.

The Club will take the necessary time required to absorb this review and any outcomes or decisions will be made on the timeframe that is in the best interest of the Club, not based on external expectations or pressure.

As always, I remain committed to continue being open and transparent with our members and supporters regarding any outcomes and decisions that will arise out of this review, including the summarised findings, and as such, once this process is complete, our members will be the first to know.

Gerard & Kingy just had a cry about this

Poor Gerard, what’s he going to do when the cats also implode in the finals !!

Walsh · **Joined:** Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm **Posts:** 2333

Scotty12000 wrote:

Walsh wrote:

azzablue wrote:

Walsh wrote:

Is he sacked yet? :roll:

Are you still here ?? Tick Tock tick tock

So is he sacked yet - thought it was going to happen in the morning - that's what you said

Will be ironic if the bloke you hate is the saviour of the bloke you’re devoted to. Will you bow down before Sayers if he doesn’t kill your Bambi?

Ridiculous post.

Sayers is already on my shitlist. But will not bag the guy willingly like some of you neanderthals like doing.

He made a rookie error based on emotion and needs to make amends - to me, that's weak.
As for Teague - he has been outright mistreated, humiliated, hanged out to dry, by a rookie that has absolute no experience managing a board of a listed company. He is Mickey Mouse until proven otherwise.

frank dardew · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm **Posts:** 7640

I think it is part of due process I think it is appropriate to ask the present incumbents what is their response to the findings and given an opportunity to defend or advocate their position in contrast with the review findings

Then even if you make the decision ultimately to terminate you have given these people a chance to respond to the criticism in the report

I also agree that for too long we have danced to media tune and you can’t win with them any way

azzablue · **Joined:** Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:23 am **Posts:** 1566

Walsh wrote:

azzablue wrote:

Walsh wrote:

Is he sacked yet? :roll:

Are you still here ?? Tick Tock tick tock

So is he sacked yet - thought it was going to happen in the morning - that's what you said

Oh you hanging your hat on that !!

Sorry did I say I was Luke sayers ??

Have you ever been thru a corporate review ?? I have been ,the end result is known , but all processes need to be shown to be taken

Don’t be scared , we are all here for you when you needs us when your mate is shown the door

jim · **Joined:** Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm **Posts:** 8222

Sounds like he isn't getting sacked in a hurry. Wonder if it is a case keeping him depending on if Clarko says yay or nay.

If you really planned on a new coach no matter what he'd be gone already this morning.

Drewgirl · **Joined:** Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm **Posts:** 4777

That’s the thing. If we were so sure we were sacking him, it would have been done already.

And if we made our mind up, no matter what Teague would present, it will make no difference.

More to this i suggest.

frank dardew · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm **Posts:** 7640

It may be waiting to understand whether Clarko is interested I think it is more going through the process giving Teague an opportunity to front the decision makers to put his case in respect to the review findings

Have to let Teague have that opportunity in my view to respond to report and it’s conclusions

camel · **Posted:** Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:38 am

CK95 wrote:

Sidefx wrote:

Club email from Sayers.

Quote:

I wanted you to be the first to know that our football club has today entered its next phase of the extensive independent football department review that has been conducted by external panel members Geoff Walsh, Graham Lowe and Matthew Pavlich.

As communicated last week, the external panel had delivered a final report to me, the Club’s Board of Directors, and CEO Cain Liddle.

This report contains detailed information from key stakeholders across the entire football department and will be used as a basis for our club to make necessary and informed decisions to take the football department forward and improve our on-field performance.

With our AFL season complete, our club is now in a position to fully brief the senior leaders of the Football Department on the review findings. This process will commence this week and will involve consultation between the Board and football department regarding the recommendations provided.

The Club will take the necessary time required to absorb this review and any outcomes or decisions will be made on the timeframe that is in the best interest of the Club, not based on external expectations or pressure.

As always, I remain committed to continue being open and transparent with our members and supporters regarding any outcomes and decisions that will arise out of this review, including the summarised findings, and as such, once this process is complete, our members will be the first to know.

Gerard & Kingy just had a cry about this

Here's the basics of their cry…

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/teams/ ... 27c849e97f

Quote:

…Speaking on SEN radio, North Melbourne great David King said he “felt so sorry for Teague” and called for the Blues to rip the bandaid off if they don’t think he’s the man for the job for 2022.

“If you don’t think that he’s going to be as good coach as someone else, and you make that decision, that’s your role. That’s why you’re on the board, you’re there to make the tough calls for the betterment the footy club,” he said.

“So do those, but make them. This is crazy. So we’ve gonna wait another week now?

“They can’t go back on that statement, it (a verdict on Teague’s fate) can’t be tomorrow because he’s (Sayers) just said end of the week. How long do they need to make these decisions?

“If they need another week they’re in the wrong jobs. They’re actually in the wrong jobs. When did the review land, was it two weeks ago?

“This is out of control. The members will turn.”…

Donstuie · **Posted:** Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:44 am

Amazing how the blokes who have been potting him all year suddenly feel sorry for him and think he’s been poorly treated.

Scotty12000 · **Posted:** Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:44 am

camel wrote:

CK95 wrote:

Sidefx wrote:

Club email from Sayers.

Quote:

I wanted you to be the first to know that our football club has today entered its next phase of the extensive independent football department review that has been conducted by external panel members Geoff Walsh, Graham Lowe and Matthew Pavlich.

As communicated last week, the external panel had delivered a final report to me, the Club’s Board of Directors, and CEO Cain Liddle.

This report contains detailed information from key stakeholders across the entire football department and will be used as a basis for our club to make necessary and informed decisions to take the football department forward and improve our on-field performance.

With our AFL season complete, our club is now in a position to fully brief the senior leaders of the Football Department on the review findings. This process will commence this week and will involve consultation between the Board and football department regarding the recommendations provided.

The Club will take the necessary time required to absorb this review and any outcomes or decisions will be made on the timeframe that is in the best interest of the Club, not based on external expectations or pressure.

As always, I remain committed to continue being open and transparent with our members and supporters regarding any outcomes and decisions that will arise out of this review, including the summarised findings, and as such, once this process is complete, our members will be the first to know.

Gerard & Kingy just had a cry about this

Here's the basics of their cry…

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/teams/ ... 27c849e97f

Quote:

…Speaking on SEN radio, North Melbourne great David King said he “felt so sorry for Teague” and called for the Blues to rip the bandaid off if they don’t think he’s the man for the job for 2022.

“If you don’t think that he’s going to be as good coach as someone else, and you make that decision, that’s your role. That’s why you’re on the board, you’re there to make the tough calls for the betterment the footy club,” he said.

“So do those, but make them. This is crazy. So we’ve gonna wait another week now?

“They can’t go back on that statement, it (a verdict on Teague’s fate) can’t be tomorrow because he’s (Sayers) just said end of the week. How long do they need to make these decisions?

“If they need another week they’re in the wrong jobs. They’re actually in the wrong jobs. When did the review land, was it two weeks ago?

“This is out of control. The members will turn.”…

"Don't sack Teague, give him a chance!"

- Okay, we'll run the process properly and hear him out and investigate the option of retaining him

"This is so disgusting and disrespectful, just sack him quickly and get it over with!"

:screwy:

jim · **Joined:** Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm **Posts:** 8222

https://www.afl.com.au/news/669894/blue ... -be-rushed

Scotty12000 · **Posted:** Mon Aug 23, 2021 11:52 am

Walsh wrote:

Ridiculous reply.

Sayers is already on my shitlist. I have bagged the guy willingly just like some of you neanderthals like doing.

The board made a rookie error based on emotion and needs to make amends - to me, that's strong.
As for Teague - he's a rookie that has absolute no experience managing a senior team of a national football club. He is Goofy and has been proven so.

EFA

rhino27 · **Joined:** Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:58 pm **Posts:** 4299

Admitedly I don't exactly how the soft cap works, but if we sack him, presumably his payout goes towards our soft cap.
If he resigns it doesn't? Maybe we are just trying to drag this out as painfully as possible for him (death by a thousand cuts) in the hope he'll just say stuff it, I resign and it wont go towards our soft cap?

David Teague: SAKCED 26/8/21

Who is online