Blue Vain wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
I agree and he wasn't what we needed. But he's on our list and unless we can get something of substantial value for him, we have to make the most of the situation.
IMHO, our forward line is too tall to have Charlie, Harry and TDK or Levi playing there with McGovern or Jack. IMHO, going forward the structure is better with Charlie as the key, TDK as the bail out option and McGovern as the 3rd tall and small forwards/resting mids making up the numbers.
Go back to that game against the Doggies where Charlie kicked a lazy 7, he was playing at Full Forward.
Harry McKay was at CHF and took 10 contested marks further up the ground including the connection on the wing from the backline.
No. Harry had 6 possessions, 4 marks and 1 tackle for 4 quarters of footy.
I'm sure it was the game vs the Doggies he took 10 marks.
Gosh, that was from top of my head. Better check.
That's right, not when Charlie kicked those 7.
Rnd 5 Apr 21, Charlie didn't play. 11 contested marks, 20 possessions to Harry 3 goals and we won.
We lost the game when Charlie kicked 7.
Harry just needs to improve his kicking by the look of things.
He could give it off to others, but if you're a KPF in range, you should take a shot.
If he is going to be a Levi type of kick, yes we need to improve on thaat.
I can't argue in favour of Harry to be disposed of knowing what he is capable of, but glad to see the option for trade up for discussion.
Who knows what we can get for him.
He's only turned 23.
Login
Register
FAQ
