Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 3:47 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2341 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 ... 118  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:46 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2704
bondiblue wrote:
Doesn't matter what McGovern cost in the past. Its done.
McGovern or McAdams? No brainer really.
McGovern is still young, can play forward or back and will improve desire aggression competitiveness with fitness
Keeper and class

Next.

Martin: Doesn't matter what he cost us or not anymore. Its done.
He's a class player we have added to the list.
If you question his aggression, tackling, chasing and defensive efforts, you haven't been watching. He has set the benchmark for our club
If you're questioning his kicking to goals because he missed a couple and didnt take the shot Cripps called for, he kicked 4 goals against reigning Premiers
Keeper and class

Next.

Keep adding established class players and we will keep getting better as the kids mature.

Papley, if its 2 first rounders, well aren't we lucky if we can prize this competitive beast who can also run through the midfield?!
Williams, if its $1M upfront and pay overs, costing no picks, well aren't we lucky if we can prize this competitive beat for a midfield role, whilst Kemp & Co develop?!
Viney, if he's a possibility, it wouldn't cost us picks, and he would add depth aggression to the midfield group
Surprise Me, coz its about time we were surprised by a left field class player, and Austin must have one or two of these up his sleeve.

Writing off kids under 23yo is madness. They are depth and developing or may come on if we get the above.
Some of Dow, OBrien Stocker Kemp Cuningham and SPS will make it, or will be traded, but some will be success stories.
We do not have to delist any of the kids, but we need to get more class and aggression on board.

We have a war chest which we must spend this year or all that effort to bank $ over the last 3 years to get us to 105% is wasted. Wasted!
Martins front ended $1M is paid and that space is there this year.
Cripps has been paid front ended and payments in advance when we didn't land the big fish we were after (Kelly Shiel Coniglio)

Can you stop worrying about the cost and surprise us with 3 or 4 class players in the Trade period, because its possible. We are a destination club.

No more kids. There's no Rowell or Anderson types at pick 6 and over. Stop dreaming at the Draft. We got 2 first rounders from one pic last year. Enough kids.

Hey, we can still make the finals this year, but that's not important whilst gun players Kreuzer, Charlie, Marchbank, Newman are on the sidelines.

I would love to have won the Dees, Port, Pies and Saints games, but we didn't, we could've, but didn't. Next year. I like where we are at.

Every Carltonian has a fear of failure, and I'm sure no stone will be left unturned, and whilst the salary cap and total list numbers will decrease, we are on the rise, and we have a war chest we HAVE TO spend.

Go Blues.


Nice post. :clap: :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 12:26 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6328
Your right about the McGovern deal it’s done.
Where towards the end of the second year of that deal. McGovern’s contract is for 5. So given it’s about 40%of its completion it’s fair to make some comparisons between the 2. Lets forgot about picks 26 and 28 for a minute :wink: .

A bit of history about Shane McAdam. He is from Halls Creek in WA. He tried out at the draft camp where he showed he had the physical tools with the tests they do. As is sometimes the case, he didn’t get a look in at any of the clubs. So he went back to Halls Creek played local footy for a few years before at 22 he wants another crack at the AFL. He moves to Adelaide gets an apprenticeship and plays for Sturt where he stars in 2018. Adelaide want him. Meanwhile Adelaide have a crap 2018 in all regards and the Gov wants out to Carlton. Because we were so shit in 2018( 3 years into SOs rebuild) we have 2 picks in the lower leagues as compensation . We didn’t choose McAdam or Kreuger from South Adelaide because Adelaide and Geelong respectively wanted those 2 players. Kreuger was part of the Setterfield deal.

The reason I am writing this is to highlight that a players path to the AFL can be varied. If someone like McAdam never gives up on the dream and has the physical tools to play AFL which every club should have known about you may get a decent player for next to nothing.In Carlton’s case actually nothing
Contrast this to Mc Govern . No doubt he has talent but his work ethic on field is below AFL standard. To be unfit like he was last year is inexcusable on all accounts. It’s says a bit about his character at the time. Hopefully that’s improved in the last year
McAdam is 6 months younger plays in the same position and probably gets $550000 less this year which leaves more room in the cap
McAdam is quick athletic has footy smarts is an excellent mark for his size. His kicking needs improvement but the best thing about him is his work ethic. His second and third efforts.
Might have something to do about his journey :wink:
Says a bit about his character.
I used to be mates with Andy Collins. You wouldn’t meet a more determined son of a bitch. At 23 he was running around at Sandy. 200 games, 3 flags and a B and F later the rest is history. And ironically he is Gibbons greatest fan.

And don’t put the pencil through Kreuger.
Has had more knee surgery. Is contracted for 2021 and Geelong rate him.

The point I’m making here is every recruiting team have to look at the lower leagues. It’s starting to become obvious you can find late blooming talent. More importantly guys that really hate losing. No soft cocks.
Eg Sam Collins turfed by the Dockers back to Werribee now one of the best key defenders at GC and hates losing
Luke Ryan hates getting beaten. One of the best defenders in 2020 after running around at Coburg
And there are more


On Martin I disagree. Let’s see how he goes tonight. He is on good coin. Needs to have a greater output.

Kids have 2 years to show what their capable of. Then they can be chopped. Two years is long enough. You can’t wait forever in this caper.The AFL move too fast for that.
Many of our kids haven’t shown enough in a longer time frame.
Just because they dominated TAC doesn’t mean they will make it at AFL level.

I’m not interested in trading away pick for a big banana.
Not yet anyway.
Only when your truly knocking on the door.
And we are way off it at the moment


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:34 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:51 pm
Posts: 546
our recruiting has been very poor we have been slow for years , i can not believe it has taken 2020 to point this out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:37 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
jamespul65 wrote:
our recruiting has been very poor we have been slow for years , i can not believe it has taken 2020 to point this out.


:donk:

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 2:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
Not sure what relevance McAdam’s back story has. It appears the summary is:
McAdam; overlooked as a teenager, never gave up on his dream, went back and played state league, finally got his chance, incredible work ethic, star.

McGovern; overlooked as a teenager, never gave up on his dream, went back and played state league, finally got his chance, shit work ethic, shit player.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:41 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
cecil89 wrote:
Not sure what relevance McAdam’s back story has. It appears the summary is:
McAdam; overlooked as a teenager, never gave up on his dream, went back and played state league, finally got his chance, incredible work ethic, star.

McGovern; overlooked as a teenager, never gave up on his dream, went back and played state league, finally got his chance, shit work ethic, shit player.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 3:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
The Dow & LOB draft is looking sketchy now. Wonder if that is why SOS was given his marching orders. While it is early, Stocker hasn't exactly set the world on fire either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:05 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7480
Location: Bendigo
Blue Vain wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Our first choice forward group for 2021 is likely to be:

Casboult, McKay, Charlie, Jack, McGovern and the opportunist small - if not Eddie, then Fisher or Cunningham.


5 forwards over 6'3" and 1 small? The ball would be walking out of our forward line with a bow on it.

Jack is our best defensive forward. If he can handle Fyfe, the fact that he's also our best set shot and an inch taller than his likely opponent each week is a significant overmatch for us.

Similarly, McGovern tips the contested forward entries in our favour. Its a real shame that he only gets to 60% of the contests that we need him to, but that's just how it is. What he offers is miles ahead of anything the developing mids have offered so far.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:08 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:31 pm
Posts: 932
Paddycripps wrote:
The Dow & LOB draft is looking sketchy now. Wonder if that is why SOS was given his marching orders. While it is early, Stocker hasn't exactly set the world on fire either.

There’s more questions than answers at the moment with our young midfield stocks. We’ve drafted or revruited Cunners, Kennedy, SPS, Setterfield, Fisher, Dow, O’Brien, Walsh, Stocker, Philp and Kemp as midfielders or potential midfielders.
Kemp - haven’t seen yet but comes with a big reputation.
Philp - way too early to call.
Stocker - unfortunately an interrupted year with personal issues (wish him the best) but we’re still unsure what we’ve got there. I liked what I saw last year but DT didn’t even give him a proper look in the pre-season. Not once an emergency before leaving the hub.
Walsh - star.
LOB - where’s he at? Unsighted all year. Barely an emergency after the first 4-5 rounds. Showed a bit last year but clearly not in Teague’s good books. Cottrell has gone past him on the wing in the eyes of the coaches.
Dow - injured most of the year, made to earn his way in scratch matches and finally back in the team. Looked a 200 game player in his first year but has been downhill since. Must play the remaining games to get a grasp on whether he can become a reliable quality midfielder.
Setterfield - coming along very nicely.
SPS - why isn’t he in the midfield? Played at half back since Teague took over and too little effect this year in particular. Why is he being held back? All the talent in the world but has regressed unfortunately and I’m hoping that’s just due to him playing out of position.
Fisher - re-purposed as a small forward. Has played the role well. Will he graduate back to the midfield? One of our best mids in 2018 but rarely sighted there since Teague took over.
Kennedy - has improved this year but still the jury is out on whether he’s a quality midfielder? In the same contested mould as Cripps, Curnow and Setterfield and behind all in the pecking order. 5th year in the system and out of contract.
Cunners - do the club see him as a midfielder anymore? Played well there vs Essendon* and then moved back to the forward line after an average showing (along with most of his teammates) the following week vs St Kilda. Hasn’t really been sighted in the back half of the year. Feels like he’s been pitted against Fisher for a small forward role next to Eddie.

A lot of potential in that group but also more questions about their viability as midfielders going forward. Take out Walsh and Setters who are tracking well, we need a few more of those guys to make it as quality midfielders to elevate us for the next 5 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24723
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
Your right about the McGovern deal it’s done.
Where towards the end of the second year of that deal. McGovern’s contract is for 5. So given it’s about 40%of its completion it’s fair to make some comparisons between the 2. Lets forgot about picks 26 and 28 for a minute :wink: .

A bit of history about Shane McAdam. He is from Halls Creek in WA. He tried out at the draft camp where he showed he had the physical tools with the tests they do. As is sometimes the case, he didn’t get a look in at any of the clubs. So he went back to Halls Creek played local footy for a few years before at 22 he wants another crack at the AFL. He moves to Adelaide gets an apprenticeship and plays for Sturt where he stars in 2018. Adelaide want him. Meanwhile Adelaide have a crap 2018 in all regards and the Gov wants out to Carlton. Because we were so shit in 2018( 3 years into SOs rebuild) we have 2 picks in the lower leagues as compensation . We didn’t choose McAdam or Kreuger from South Adelaide because Adelaide and Geelong respectively wanted those 2 players. Kreuger was part of the Setterfield deal.

Thanks for sharing.

The reason I am writing this is to highlight that a players path to the AFL can be varied. If someone like McAdam never gives up on the dream and has the physical tools to play AFL which every club should have known about you may get a decent player for next to nothing.In Carlton’s case actually nothing
Contrast this to Mc Govern . No doubt he has talent but his work ethic on field is below AFL standard. To be unfit like he was last year is inexcusable on all accounts.

Thats unfair and discussed ad nauseum. He came off an ankle op over summer. Didnt do a preseason. Teague wanted him to play regardless of his condition. In the end, Teague was wrong and Russell got him fit. Came back a different specimen. He is an assett...and we keep on getting good players on our list.

It’s says a bit about his character at the time. Hopefully that’s improved in the last year
McAdam is 6 months younger plays in the same position and probably gets $550000 less this year which leaves more room in the cap
McAdam is quick athletic has footy smarts is an excellent mark for his size. His kicking needs improvement but the best thing about him is his work ethic. His second and third efforts.
Might have something to do about his journey :wink:
Says a bit about his character.

Lets wait for a couple more games before we judge him. He has shown some good signs in the last 2 weeks. Ive noticed, but I have gone all giddy over him. I'm not writing him off, but its silly to be comparing him and Gov to prove a point. All youre doing is belittling a Gov in that exercise

I used to be mates with Andy Collins. You wouldn’t meet a more determined son of a bitch. At 23 he was running around at Sandy. 200 games, 3 flags and a B and F later the rest is history. And ironically he is Gibbons greatest fan.

Great player Andy. The Mighty Zebra. Collins did love Gibbons. Maybe he should be a recruiter. What did he say about Gov? Ask him and let us know.

And don’t put the pencil through Kreuger.
Has had more knee surgery. Is contracted for 2021 and Geelong rate him.

So, we give kids just 2 years to show something, but we don't write off this bloke despite him being mature age. See the problem with your argument?

The point I’m making here is every recruiting team have to look at the lower leagues. It’s starting to become obvious you can find late blooming talent. More importantly guys that really hate losing. No soft cocks.
Eg Sam Collins turfed by the Dockers back to Werribee now one of the best key defenders at GC and hates losing
Luke Ryan hates getting beaten. One of the best defenders in 2020 after running around at Coburg
And there are more

I too have wanted to continue recruiting mature players late in the drafy since we got a taste with Duigan, but it doesn't mean we stop targeting trades of established players. Martin has been a star for us this year. The cost aside, I can't see why you can't see that...so I can only conclude, you don't want to see it. Agenda perhaps?


On Martin I disagree. Let’s see how he goes tonight. He is on good coin. Needs to have a greater output.

You're miles too harsh on Martin

Kids have 2 years to show what their capable of. Then they can be chopped. Two years is long enough. You can’t wait forever in this caper.The AFL move too fast for that.

2 years? They start at 19yo and you write them off by the time they are 20-21yo. Are you sure that's right?
Have a good look at players breaking out at 24yo and 25yo after years of development as peripheral players whereas our kids were thrown to the wolves and told to endure without developing their bodies for the rigours of AFL footy. Really unfair. Really unrealistic.


Many of our kids haven’t shown enough in a longer time frame.
Just because they dominated TAC doesn’t mean they will make it at AFL level.

I’m not interested in trading away pick for a big banana.
Not yet anyway.
Only when your truly knocking on the door.
And we are way off it at the moment

You've changed your tune.y about Gov? Ask him.
You have said what we need to get in a few times, and I'm talking beyond the State League opportunities because you wouldnt be using your first rounder on a state league player, not even Kelly.




Our recruiting can improve but jesus keogh you really are stuck in an argument you can't prove yet.

You can't write off kids after 2 years.

I have always agreed there are players missed from other leagues but like most selections they are punts too. You never know till they show their stuff against the big boys when they are developed. And it shouldn't stop us from targeting established players. We can do both. Blame the recruiters, not the players they selected.

You will see some of the Green shoots kick arse if developed properly and when they are mature enough to do so. I have used the example of Steele who is having a break out year at 25 after his best year last year at 24yo.

Go Blues. Not many pieces to the puzzle to go. Just need a midfielder in the State Leagues, plus Williams, Papley, Couch, Viney if we can ever land one of those...and we will. Its always been the plan, we just werent a destination club the last 3 years we have been on the hunt.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:22 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24723
Location: Bondi Beach
Crusader wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Our first choice forward group for 2021 is likely to be:

Casboult, McKay, Charlie, Jack, McGovern and the opportunist small - if not Eddie, then Fisher or Cunningham.


5 forwards over 6'3" and 1 small? The ball would be walking out of our forward line with a bow on it.

Jack is our best defensive forward. If he can handle Fyfe, the fact that he's also our best set shot and an inch taller than his likely opponent each week is a significant overmatch for us.

Similarly, McGovern tips the contested forward entries in our favour. Its a real shame that he only gets to 60% of the contests that we need him to, but that's just how it is. What he offers is miles ahead of anything the developing mids have offered so far.


I agree.

Re last sentence re developing mids....Different roles Different age. Can't compare.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24723
Location: Bondi Beach
david31 wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
The Dow & LOB draft is looking sketchy now. Wonder if that is why SOS was given his marching orders. While it is early, Stocker hasn't exactly set the world on fire either.

There’s more questions than answers at the moment with our young midfield stocks. We’ve drafted or revruited Cunners, Kennedy, SPS, Setterfield, Fisher, Dow, O’Brien, Walsh, Stocker, Philp and Kemp as midfielders or potential midfielders.
Kemp - haven’t seen yet but comes with a big reputation.
Philp - way too early to call.
Stocker - unfortunately an interrupted year with personal issues (wish him the best) but we’re still unsure what we’ve got there. I liked what I saw last year but DT didn’t even give him a proper look in the pre-season. Not once an emergency before leaving the hub.
Walsh - star.
LOB - where’s he at? Unsighted all year. Barely an emergency after the first 4-5 rounds. Showed a bit last year but clearly not in Teague’s good books. Cottrell has gone past him on the wing in the eyes of the coaches.
Dow - injured most of the year, made to earn his way in scratch matches and finally back in the team. Looked a 200 game player in his first year but has been downhill since. Must play the remaining games to get a grasp on whether he can become a reliable quality midfielder.
Setterfield - coming along very nicely.
SPS - why isn’t he in the midfield? Played at half back since Teague took over and too little effect this year in particular. Why is he being held back? All the talent in the world but has regressed unfortunately and I’m hoping that’s just due to him playing out of position.
Fisher - re-purposed as a small forward. Has played the role well. Will he graduate back to the midfield? One of our best mids in 2018 but rarely sighted there since Teague took over.
Kennedy - has improved this year but still the jury is out on whether he’s a quality midfielder? In the same contested mould as Cripps, Curnow and Setterfield and behind all in the pecking order. 5th year in the system and out of contract.
Cunners - do the club see him as a midfielder anymore? Played well there vs Essendon** and then moved back to the forward line after an average showing (along with most of his teammates) the following week vs St Kilda. Hasn’t really been sighted in the back half of the year. Feels like he’s been pitted against Fisher for a small forward role next to Eddie.

A lot of potential in that group but also more questions about their viability as midfielders going forward. Take out Walsh and Setters who are tracking well, we need a few more of those guys to make it as quality midfielders to elevate us for the next 5 years.


We all know Fish does allright when thrown in the midfield mix. Elusive. Quick. Smart. Teague has pigeon holed him so now he does his midfield type work forward of the centre square and he shows he's got all the right qualities to rove.

Coaches don't always get it right, and this will apply to Teague too.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 4:58 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7480
Location: Bendigo
bondiblue wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Our first choice forward group for 2021 is likely to be:

Casboult, McKay, Charlie, Jack, McGovern and the opportunist small - if not Eddie, then Fisher or Cunningham.


5 forwards over 6'3" and 1 small? The ball would be walking out of our forward line with a bow on it.

Jack is our best defensive forward. If he can handle Fyfe, the fact that he's also our best set shot and an inch taller than his likely opponent each week is a significant overmatch for us.

Similarly, McGovern tips the contested forward entries in our favour. Its a real shame that he only gets to 60% of the contests that we need him to, but that's just how it is. What he offers is miles ahead of anything the developing mids have offered so far.


I agree.

Re last sentence re developing mids....Different roles Different age. Can't compare.

:? The comparison is on the scoreboard. We're three goals better per game when McGovern is in the side.

You have to win the 50-50 contests if you want to turn forward 50 entries into scores. McGovern has a Spalding-like chaos element to his game that can wear defenders down and provide more opportunities for the likes of Betts/Fisher and Charlie.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
dane wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
our recruiting has been very poor we have been slow for years , i can not believe it has taken 2020 to point this out.


:donk:



It's not like we haven't tried to address that over the years though.....Dow, O'Brien, Polson, Cootrell, etc. They're quick, question is whether they can actually play.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:27 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7480
Location: Bendigo
david31 wrote:

SPS - why isn’t he in the midfield? Played at half back since Teague took over and too little effect this year in particular. Why is he being held back? All the talent in the world but has regressed unfortunately and I’m hoping that’s just due to him playing out of position.

The co-Captain is the difference in his game this year. Playing both Docherty and Simpson means we have two spare defenders in a seven-man defensive set up.

The theory is all well and good on paper, but it counts for sweet FA when we get torched by medium & small forwards each week.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
Crusader wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Our first choice forward group for 2021 is likely to be:

Casboult, McKay, Charlie, Jack, McGovern and the opportunist small - if not Eddie, then Fisher or Cunningham.


5 forwards over 6'3" and 1 small? The ball would be walking out of our forward line with a bow on it.

Jack is our best defensive forward. If he can handle Fyfe, the fact that he's also our best set shot and an inch taller than his likely opponent each week is a significant overmatch for us.

Similarly, McGovern tips the contested forward entries in our favour. Its a real shame that he only gets to 60% of the contests that we need him to, but that's just how it is. What he offers is miles ahead of anything the developing mids have offered so far.


McGovern yes but you cant have Casboult, McKay, Charlie, Jack and McGovern with 1 small. It's not practical. Show me a best 22 without mids resting forward.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 5:31 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6363
Crusader wrote:
david31 wrote:

SPS - why isn’t he in the midfield? Played at half back since Teague took over and too little effect this year in particular. Why is he being held back? All the talent in the world but has regressed unfortunately and I’m hoping that’s just due to him playing out of position.

The co-Captain is the difference in his game this year. Playing both Docherty and Simpson means we have two spare defenders in a seven-man defensive set up.

The theory is all well and good on paper, but it counts for sweet FA when we get torched by medium & small forwards each week.

I've been saying it all year, Teague is wasting him in the backline.
If he's not in the middle then he needs to be on the HFF getting instruction from Eddie and Martin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6328
cecil89 wrote:
Not sure what relevance McAdam’s back story has. It appears the summary is:
McAdam; overlooked as a teenager, never gave up on his dream, went back and played state league, finally got his chance, incredible work ethic, star.

McGovern; overlooked as a teenager, never gave up on his dream, went back and played state league, finally got his chance, shit work ethic, shit player.


How was McGoverns work rate tonight
Do you want me to remind you of picks 26 and pick 28


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6328
bondiblue wrote:
keogh wrote:
Your right about the McGovern deal it’s done.
Where towards the end of the second year of that deal. McGovern’s contract is for 5. So given it’s about 40%of its completion it’s fair to make some comparisons between the 2. Lets forgot about picks 26 and 28 for a minute :wink: .

A bit of history about Shane McAdam. He is from Halls Creek in WA. He tried out at the draft camp where he showed he had the physical tools with the tests they do. As is sometimes the case, he didn’t get a look in at any of the clubs. So he went back to Halls Creek played local footy for a few years before at 22 he wants another crack at the AFL. He moves to Adelaide gets an apprenticeship and plays for Sturt where he stars in 2018. Adelaide want him. Meanwhile Adelaide have a crap 2018 in all regards and the Gov wants out to Carlton. Because we were so shit in 2018( 3 years into SOs rebuild) we have 2 picks in the lower leagues as compensation . We didn’t choose McAdam or Kreuger from South Adelaide because Adelaide and Geelong respectively wanted those 2 players. Kreuger was part of the Setterfield deal.

Thanks for sharing.

The reason I am writing this is to highlight that a players path to the AFL can be varied. If someone like McAdam never gives up on the dream and has the physical tools to play AFL which every club should have known about you may get a decent player for next to nothing.In Carlton’s case actually nothing
Contrast this to Mc Govern . No doubt he has talent but his work ethic on field is below AFL standard. To be unfit like he was last year is inexcusable on all accounts.

Thats unfair and discussed ad nauseum. He came off an ankle op over summer. Didnt do a preseason. Teague wanted him to play regardless of his condition. In the end, Teague was wrong and Russell got him fit. Came back a different specimen. He is an assett...and we keep on getting good players on our list.

It’s says a bit about his character at the time. Hopefully that’s improved in the last year
McAdam is 6 months younger plays in the same position and probably gets $550000 less this year which leaves more room in the cap
McAdam is quick athletic has footy smarts is an excellent mark for his size. His kicking needs improvement but the best thing about him is his work ethic. His second and third efforts.
Might have something to do about his journey :wink:
Says a bit about his character.

Lets wait for a couple more games before we judge him. He has shown some good signs in the last 2 weeks. Ive noticed, but I have gone all giddy over him. I'm not writing him off, but its silly to be comparing him and Gov to prove a point. All youre doing is belittling a Gov in that exercise

I used to be mates with Andy Collins. You wouldn’t meet a more determined son of a bitch. At 23 he was running around at Sandy. 200 games, 3 flags and a B and F later the rest is history. And ironically he is Gibbons greatest fan.

Great player Andy. The Mighty Zebra. Collins did love Gibbons. Maybe he should be a recruiter. What did he say about Gov? Ask him and let us know.

And don’t put the pencil through Kreuger.
Has had more knee surgery. Is contracted for 2021 and Geelong rate him.

So, we give kids just 2 years to show something, but we don't write off this bloke despite him being mature age. See the problem with your argument?

The point I’m making here is every recruiting team have to look at the lower leagues. It’s starting to become obvious you can find late blooming talent. More importantly guys that really hate losing. No soft cocks.
Eg Sam Collins turfed by the Dockers back to Werribee now one of the best key defenders at GC and hates losing
Luke Ryan hates getting beaten. One of the best defenders in 2020 after running around at Coburg
And there are more

I too have wanted to continue recruiting mature players late in the drafy since we got a taste with Duigan, but it doesn't mean we stop targeting trades of established players. Martin has been a star for us this year. The cost aside, I can't see why you can't see that...so I can only conclude, you don't want to see it. Agenda perhaps?


On Martin I disagree. Let’s see how he goes tonight. He is on good coin. Needs to have a greater output.

You're miles too harsh on Martin

Kids have 2 years to show what their capable of. Then they can be chopped. Two years is long enough. You can’t wait forever in this caper.The AFL move too fast for that.

2 years? They start at 19yo and you write them off by the time they are 20-21yo. Are you sure that's right?
Have a good look at players breaking out at 24yo and 25yo after years of development as peripheral players whereas our kids were thrown to the wolves and told to endure without developing their bodies for the rigours of AFL footy. Really unfair. Really unrealistic.


Many of our kids haven’t shown enough in a longer time frame.
Just because they dominated TAC doesn’t mean they will make it at AFL level.

I’m not interested in trading away pick for a big banana.
Not yet anyway.
Only when your truly knocking on the door.
And we are way off it at the moment

You've changed your tune.y about Gov? Ask him.
You have said what we need to get in a few times, and I'm talking beyond the State League opportunities because you wouldnt be using your first rounder on a state league player, not even Kelly.




Our recruiting can improve but jesus keogh you really are stuck in an argument you can't prove yet.

You can't write off kids after 2 years.

I have always agreed there are players missed from other leagues but like most selections they are punts too. You never know till they show their stuff against the big boys when they are developed. And it shouldn't stop us from targeting established players. We can do both. Blame the recruiters, not the players they selected.

You will see some of the Green shoots kick arse if developed properly and when they are mature enough to do so. I have used the example of Steele who is having a break out year at 25 after his best year last year at 24yo.

Go Blues. Not many pieces to the puzzle to go. Just need a midfielder in the State Leagues, plus Williams, Papley, Couch, Viney if we can ever land one of those...and we will. Its always been the plan, we just werent a destination club the last 3 years we have been on the hunt.

Mc Govern was shit tonight
How long do you give him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2020 9:45 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:02 pm
Posts: 647
keogh wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
keogh wrote:
Your right about the McGovern deal it’s done.
Where towards the end of the second year of that deal. McGovern’s contract is for 5. So given it’s about 40%of its completion it’s fair to make some comparisons between the 2. Lets forgot about picks 26 and 28 for a minute :wink: .

A bit of history about Shane McAdam. He is from Halls Creek in WA. He tried out at the draft camp where he showed he had the physical tools with the tests they do. As is sometimes the case, he didn’t get a look in at any of the clubs. So he went back to Halls Creek played local footy for a few years before at 22 he wants another crack at the AFL. He moves to Adelaide gets an apprenticeship and plays for Sturt where he stars in 2018. Adelaide want him. Meanwhile Adelaide have a crap 2018 in all regards and the Gov wants out to Carlton. Because we were so shit in 2018( 3 years into SOs rebuild) we have 2 picks in the lower leagues as compensation . We didn’t choose McAdam or Kreuger from South Adelaide because Adelaide and Geelong respectively wanted those 2 players. Kreuger was part of the Setterfield deal.

Thanks for sharing.

The reason I am writing this is to highlight that a players path to the AFL can be varied. If someone like McAdam never gives up on the dream and has the physical tools to play AFL which every club should have known about you may get a decent player for next to nothing.In Carlton’s case actually nothing
Contrast this to Mc Govern . No doubt he has talent but his work ethic on field is below AFL standard. To be unfit like he was last year is inexcusable on all accounts.

Thats unfair and discussed ad nauseum. He came off an ankle op over summer. Didnt do a preseason. Teague wanted him to play regardless of his condition. In the end, Teague was wrong and Russell got him fit. Came back a different specimen. He is an assett...and we keep on getting good players on our list.

It’s says a bit about his character at the time. Hopefully that’s improved in the last year
McAdam is 6 months younger plays in the same position and probably gets $550000 less this year which leaves more room in the cap
McAdam is quick athletic has footy smarts is an excellent mark for his size. His kicking needs improvement but the best thing about him is his work ethic. His second and third efforts.
Might have something to do about his journey :wink:
Says a bit about his character.

Lets wait for a couple more games before we judge him. He has shown some good signs in the last 2 weeks. Ive noticed, but I have gone all giddy over him. I'm not writing him off, but its silly to be comparing him and Gov to prove a point. All youre doing is belittling a Gov in that exercise

I used to be mates with Andy Collins. You wouldn’t meet a more determined son of a bitch. At 23 he was running around at Sandy. 200 games, 3 flags and a B and F later the rest is history. And ironically he is Gibbons greatest fan.

Great player Andy. The Mighty Zebra. Collins did love Gibbons. Maybe he should be a recruiter. What did he say about Gov? Ask him and let us know.

And don’t put the pencil through Kreuger.
Has had more knee surgery. Is contracted for 2021 and Geelong rate him.

So, we give kids just 2 years to show something, but we don't write off this bloke despite him being mature age. See the problem with your argument?

The point I’m making here is every recruiting team have to look at the lower leagues. It’s starting to become obvious you can find late blooming talent. More importantly guys that really hate losing. No soft cocks.
Eg Sam Collins turfed by the Dockers back to Werribee now one of the best key defenders at GC and hates losing
Luke Ryan hates getting beaten. One of the best defenders in 2020 after running around at Coburg
And there are more

I too have wanted to continue recruiting mature players late in the drafy since we got a taste with Duigan, but it doesn't mean we stop targeting trades of established players. Martin has been a star for us this year. The cost aside, I can't see why you can't see that...so I can only conclude, you don't want to see it. Agenda perhaps?


On Martin I disagree. Let’s see how he goes tonight. He is on good coin. Needs to have a greater output.

You're miles too harsh on Martin

Kids have 2 years to show what their capable of. Then they can be chopped. Two years is long enough. You can’t wait forever in this caper.The AFL move too fast for that.

2 years? They start at 19yo and you write them off by the time they are 20-21yo. Are you sure that's right?
Have a good look at players breaking out at 24yo and 25yo after years of development as peripheral players whereas our kids were thrown to the wolves and told to endure without developing their bodies for the rigours of AFL footy. Really unfair. Really unrealistic.


Many of our kids haven’t shown enough in a longer time frame.
Just because they dominated TAC doesn’t mean they will make it at AFL level.

I’m not interested in trading away pick for a big banana.
Not yet anyway.
Only when your truly knocking on the door.
And we are way off it at the moment

You've changed your tune.y about Gov? Ask him.
You have said what we need to get in a few times, and I'm talking beyond the State League opportunities because you wouldnt be using your first rounder on a state league player, not even Kelly.




Our recruiting can improve but jesus keogh you really are stuck in an argument you can't prove yet.

You can't write off kids after 2 years.

I have always agreed there are players missed from other leagues but like most selections they are punts too. You never know till they show their stuff against the big boys when they are developed. And it shouldn't stop us from targeting established players. We can do both. Blame the recruiters, not the players they selected.

You will see some of the Green shoots kick arse if developed properly and when they are mature enough to do so. I have used the example of Steele who is having a break out year at 25 after his best year last year at 24yo.

Go Blues. Not many pieces to the puzzle to go. Just need a midfielder in the State Leagues, plus Williams, Papley, Couch, Viney if we can ever land one of those...and we will. Its always been the plan, we just werent a destination club the last 3 years we have been on the hunt.

Mc Govern was shit tonight
How long do you give him


Absolutely dreadful. What is it with that guy. Would have been better to play TDK up there and let him grab a few. At least he competes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2341 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 ... 118  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 118 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group