Blue Vain wrote:
We need 2 smaller defenders this week. Willo to replace Newman and perhaps Setterfield to replace SPS in defence.
I'd push SPS to half forward and leave out Lang for Silvagni. SPS either doesn't have the intensity or defensive craft required to play defence IMO. Too often he lets his opponent get goal side and his effort to chase are below standard.
I'm tempted to give Harry the arse as I think we're too tall with Harry, Levi, McGovern and JSOS up forward but I can't see it happening.
Plowman Jones, Simpson
Williamson Weitering Docherty
Newnes Cripps Walsh
Gibbo Levi Martin
Eddie JSOS McGovern
Pittonet Ed Murphy
Setterfield (7th defender), Cuningham, SPS, Harry
I have avoided commenting since the Melbourne debacle because I am now of the opinion our season is done and dusted. We will finish where we are atm, 16th, having watched GCS and Melbourne pass us by.
This post of BV's is a reflection of what I am thinking against Geelong BUT I can't see the MC having the balls to do it.
Geelong's forward structure revolved around their smalls on the weekend. Hawkins and Ragatalea (sp) seem to have not done much except compete. We have Jones and Weitering to man them up. After that, we need to look at who is available. A lot of teams are now following the trend of having small forwards and mids score the bulk of their goals. We have to adapt to that. My prediction that Hunt and Pickett would get hold of us last weekend was thwarted only by the absence of Pickett.
Oh and the vision of Cripps shouldering Setterfield (who was running for him to receive the handball) out of the way in the corridor so he could go wide and look for Murphy was nothing more than an example of what I was referring to last week when I said the leadership group play waxing.
So.
Newman is out for the season. We need a creative, quick half back and for mine that has to be Williamson. I am concerned they will put Goddard in.
I am happy for Plowman to stay and I don't even care if he doesn't run down the ground. We tried that in Rd 1 and Richmond scored about five of their goals giving it to someone out the back because we were unable to get back after a turnover.
Doc stays and Simmo, who despite his age is still one of our hardest runners and generally uses the footy pretty well. I don't agree he is a coaster.
That leaves us SPS, who looks hopelessly out of place on the backline, especially when he is under pressure. He is not naturally a defensive player so IMO, he should go to the wing. His place could be taken by someone who gains yards. That is Martin. He has the leg speed to go with their small forwards and also to run away from them when he gets the footy. Yarran with attitude.
The centreline then reads Setterfield, Cripps SPS/Newnes.
At CHF we should have someone mobile and aggressive, good overhead and can hoof it. To me that is still Levi. Harry is lazy and needs to run at the footy to get his hands on the ball. He won't tackle or chase and can't kick for goal to save his life because his approach to set shots is s reflection of his approach to the game, which is that he has always been the biggest kid in the team and he will just mark it and kick it. I am all for dropping him this week and giving one of Ben Silvagni or TDK a go at FF. At least they will be hungry and ready to give it a shot. Harry needs a wake up call. He could be anything but as a FF he is next to useless atm. Taking marks at HBF shouldn't be his job. As one commentator put it last weekend,
"Harry marks the ball.... kicks long to where Harry should be taking the mark."
Of course they won't drop Harry. He's the great white hope alongside Charlie. He knows that. He just has to turn up for training to get picked to play.
Lang goes for Jack and Fisher might be available. I like Setterfield but he might be in danger he has the skills but still doesn't get it enough. McGovern had a good second half of the game when he got mobile but he needs to lift as well. Cunningham needs to find it more but at least he covers the ground at pace when he has it.
The Geelong ground has no wings, which is why Geelong wins there all the time. They play straight down the middle using precision and leg speed. Unless we have a similar plan, we will have our biggest loss for the season this week and 67,000 members will ask themselves why they bother.
My guess is that we will come out, try the usual chippy chippy bullshit down the wings to a contest, turn the footy over and watch their mids tear us a new one down the corridor, which we rarely defend, because we are unaware of its existence until quarter or half time. Then the penny will drop but Geelong is NOT Melbourne and they won't fold.
If plan A is to play chippy chippy and wait until we have our backs to the wall and then play a high intensity game of sharing the footy and being daring, it is not working. We need to start playing daring footy BEFORE the game is all but lost.
I'm almost done getting up at 1:00 a.m. to watch them serve up what they have been doing for so long. If they put in as much effort as I (and you lot) do as a supporter, we'd be well up the ladder by now.