Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 9:32 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2341 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 118  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 3:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
bender wrote:
can we change the name of this thread to 'keogh hates sos'?

It's bloody tempting...

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:05 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6359
With the information in the Papley thread, we have now locked in our 3rd small forward, which is good that a player like himself wants to come to us. It's a sign of things getting better at the club.

But I thought I'd check some team stats from this season that are interesting:
Hitouts - 13th
Clearances - 6th
Inside 50 - 16th
Goal assists - 16th
Shots at goal - 16th
Shot efficiency - 12th
Goal efficiency - 12th

To me this says we can win the clearance, just not get it to the forward 50. But when we do, we're not the worst in the league at converting our shots at goal.

1%'ers - 15th
Turnovers - 6th least
Disposal efficiency - 17th

While our turnovers are not bad it's sometimes when we do them that is the issue.
1% stat reflects a younger playing group IMO
and our disposal efficiency could be said to be the same as the 1% stat. But coupled with the other above stats, it can also mean we can clear the ball to the opposition and our mids are struggling to move the ball past the centre. And when they do its will little efficiency (38.7%).

I guess you can read stats anyway you want and twist them to suit your argument, but to me this says we really need more quality mids now. And in that elusive age range we are missing. Because we can have the best forward line in the league, but what's the point if we can't get it to them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Sidefx wrote:
I guess you can read stats anyway you want and twist them to suit your argument, but to me this says we really need more quality mids now. And in that elusive age range we are missing. Because we can have the best forward line in the league, but what's the point if we can't get it to them.

Putting aside the rumblings that it's not only small forwards we're looking at, one of the perks of recruiting some actual small forwards is that the mids we've been trialling up there can actually play and develop in the midfield.

Better yet, if said small forwards can play in the middle as well (such as Martin and Papley) it adds another dynamic.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6359
Donstuie wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
I guess you can read stats anyway you want and twist them to suit your argument, but to me this says we really need more quality mids now. And in that elusive age range we are missing. Because we can have the best forward line in the league, but what's the point if we can't get it to them.

Putting aside the rumblings that it's not only small forwards we're looking at, one of the perks of recruiting some actual small forwards is that the mids we've been trialling up there can actually play and develop in the midfield.

Better yet, if said small forwards can play in the middle as well (such as Martin and Papley) it adds another dynamic.


Yeah I agree, especially Papley. He seems quite the nugget and would be able to help lift the load a little, but at the expense of him not being in the forward line.
Our other mids aside from Gibbons that we've been using up forward all have their issues, fitness, kicking, form, speed, size, injuries etc. Let's hope with another pre-season they can all lift a little and address some of their deficiencies/issues. Because at the moment we have no real solid inside mids firmly on the radar (that we supporters know of) and we might not have a choice.
It will be an interesting few weeks to see who goes where and what we eventually get.
Fingers crossed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
blues_clues wrote:
Liddle and Lloyd hot pursuit of Dom Abrogio have failed. Graham Wright was also approached but the Hawks slammed the door shut on that attempt immediately. Theres a bit of bad blood between us and the Hawks. Sounds as if SOS has survived this one.


FMD

Didnt Carlton give the Hawks the 2nd rounder they required by Hawks to secure O'Meara? Answer ...YES....

What's their problem?

THEY OWE CARLTON !!!

Give us a future 2nd rounder for Martin and stop the sooking.

Thanks for AR and the new Psychologist...whats her name....???

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
dannyboy wrote:
Could no one please buy my book...mind you, its unavailable anyway....has been for about 3 years... Hope that satisfies the decorum....mind you it'll probably be brought up again and again.

And just to try and clarify

A soap box is not a discussion, its just 1 voice disregarding discussion by trying to shout out all opposing views. It has nothing to do with positive or negative, everything to do with not even trying to enter into a discussion.

Try discussing sometimes, that involves agree/disagreeing in the search for common ground, for connection, not I am right you are wrong. Agro and others, and I do not always agree yet they never bore me because they do engage in debate---of course I cannot say they feels the same about me.

I just hate someone who needs to go on and on and on about the same thing with no movement. If 2 + 2 = 4 say it once and discuss something else, if it doesn't show me the shifting ground - that's the really interesting part – something BV or Blue Sombrero constantly do even if they (BV is particular) don't understand great poetry...

Do I discuss, not much anymore...and I accept that is a sad reflection on me. Mostly though, I enjoy the opinions and the debates...just not the lectures - like this one...so I'll step off the soap box and let Sidex and Keogh continue on and on...


Great post db.

I really like keogh and appreciate all the TCers who have been here since I did in that moment of despair for me in 2002...the stuff keogh relates to and refers to.

I remember where I was in an internet cafe in Karabi Thailand back then.....I now the hurt...then a mate of mine, a TS contributor told me to have a look at TC.

That post from keogh deserves an apology ... attacking the man ... [REDACTED] form.

This targeting the man has been going on and on and on.... I'm sorry you were targeted danny nd cannot understand why... and I'm glad you remind me in your sig what you wrote and do, as it feels good to be around some good wordsmiths with a vivid imagination and not just some soap box slaggers, and it reminds me that theres something I still want to read one day.

Pick up the standard fellas ... TC is about discussion and variety of views.
Like BF we at TC and all Carlton forums are all Carltonians and rusted on till death do us apart....even then I'm sure its Dark Navy Blue where I'm going.

I love youse all.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:07 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:27 am
Posts: 3581
bondiblue wrote:
blues_clues wrote:
Liddle and Lloyd hot pursuit of Dom Abrogio have failed. Graham Wright was also approached but the Hawks slammed the door shut on that attempt immediately. Theres a bit of bad blood between us and the Hawks. Sounds as if SOS has survived this one.


FMD

Didnt Carlton give the Hawks the 2nd rounder they required by Hawks to secure O'Meara? Answer ...YES....

What's their problem?

THEY OWE CARLTON !!!

Give us a future 2nd rounder for Martin and stop the sooking.

Thanks for AR and the new Psychologist...whats her name....???


I’ve got another big bag of salt for this rumour too. Bolton would have to be the best talent scout in the country if the other rumour was true. For this one, Ambrogio only started at the Lions in 2017... not sure we’d be trying to poach someone so new to their current role.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18494
Location: threeohfivethree
bondiblue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
Could no one please buy my book...mind you, its unavailable anyway....has been for about 3 years... Hope that satisfies the decorum....mind you it'll probably be brought up again and again.

And just to try and clarify

A soap box is not a discussion, its just 1 voice disregarding discussion by trying to shout out all opposing views. It has nothing to do with positive or negative, everything to do with not even trying to enter into a discussion.

Try discussing sometimes, that involves agree/disagreeing in the search for common ground, for connection, not I am right you are wrong. Agro and others, and I do not always agree yet they never bore me because they do engage in debate---of course I cannot say they feels the same about me.

I just hate someone who needs to go on and on and on about the same thing with no movement. If 2 + 2 = 4 say it once and discuss something else, if it doesn't show me the shifting ground - that's the really interesting part – something BV or Blue Sombrero constantly do even if they (BV is particular) don't understand great poetry...

Do I discuss, not much anymore...and I accept that is a sad reflection on me. Mostly though, I enjoy the opinions and the debates...just not the lectures - like this one...so I'll step off the soap box and let Sidex and Keogh continue on and on...


Great post db.

I really like keogh and appreciate all the TCers who have been here since I did in that moment of despair for me in 2002...the stuff keogh relates to and refers to.

I remember where I was in an internet cafe in Karabi Thailand back then.....I now the hurt...then a mate of mine, a TS contributor told me to have a look at TC.

That post from keogh deserves an apology ... attacking the man ... [REDACTED] form.

This targeting the man has been going on and on and on.... I'm sorry you were targeted danny nd cannot understand why... and I'm glad you remind me in your sig what you wrote and do, as it feels good to be around some good wordsmiths with a vivid imagination and not just some soap box slaggers, and it reminds me that theres something I still want to read one day.

Pick up the standard fellas ... TC is about discussion and variety of views.
Like BF we at TC and all Carlton forums are all Carltonians and rusted on till death do us apart....even then I'm sure its Dark Navy Blue where I'm going.

I love youse all.


You signed up to TC four years before it started? :eek: :lol:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7453
Location: Bendigo
Sidefx wrote:
With the information in the Papley thread, we have now locked in our 3rd small forward, which is good that a player like himself wants to come to us. It's a sign of things getting better at the club.

But I thought I'd check some team stats from this season that are interesting:
Hitouts - 13th
Clearances - 6th
Inside 50 - 16th
Goal assists - 16th
Shots at goal - 16th
Shot efficiency - 12th
Goal efficiency - 12th

To me this says we can win the clearance, just not get it to the forward 50. But when we do, we're not the worst in the league at converting our shots at goal.

1%'ers - 15th
Turnovers - 6th least
Disposal efficiency - 17th

While our turnovers are not bad it's sometimes when we do them that is the issue.
1% stat reflects a younger playing group IMO
and our disposal efficiency could be said to be the same as the 1% stat. But coupled with the other above stats, it can also mean we can clear the ball to the opposition and our mids are struggling to move the ball past the centre. And when they do its will little efficiency (38.7%).

I guess you can read stats anyway you want and twist them to suit your argument, but to me this says we really need more quality mids now. And in that elusive age range we are missing. Because we can have the best forward line in the league, but what's the point if we can't get it to them.

Totals aren't the greatest measures of performance against the standard.

For instance, you say have the 6th lowest total turnovers. That's pretty good.... however, we have the 17th total disposals. Can't turn it over if you don't have it.

Interestingly, we have the lowest total of disposals against. That's great!.... except, we play in games that average 710 disposals both teams combined. The top four teams play in games that average:

787 Collingwood
718 Geelong
736 GWS
749 Richmond

So, do we play in games that are pretty close to Geelong, who finished on top of the ladder? Maybe... however, our possession differential (for v against) is -3.6 per game. Geelong's possession differential is 10.8 per game in their favour. GWS come in at 22.8 per game, Collingwood at 15......... and Richmond are -17, a paltry 3.5 above Gold Coast, thus proving the futility of total season statistics in isolation.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 6:57 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9354
People can come up with statistics to prove anything. Forfty percent of all people know that.

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:51 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21399
Location: North of the border
What people fail to take into consideration when they say recruiters should have taken player x over player y is that would player x been as good if he had come to Carlton.

Carlton' s problems have been not who we should have taken it is what we have done to them once we have them.
You get the occasional freakish player that stars no matter where they go.
But the majority needs heaps of development.
You could be the greatest spotter of talent in the world but unless someone harnesses that talent it's a waste of time.

So when Keogh and co rant continuously and say look at them over there it's a pointless exercise.

Carlton problem has been development not recruitment

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:41 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:06 pm
Posts: 3366
This is the damn truth.

_________________
"In better news for Blues fans, Jarrad Waite was not named on the club's injury list."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 9:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24612
Location: Kaloyasena
Sydney Blue wrote:

Carlton problem has been development not recruitment

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk



Our development has been poor no doubt - but Wayne Hughes and Shane Rogers send you their warmest regards.


:wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6359
Crusader wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
With the information in the Papley thread, we have now locked in our 3rd small forward, which is good that a player like himself wants to come to us. It's a sign of things getting better at the club.

But I thought I'd check some team stats from this season that are interesting:
Hitouts - 13th
Clearances - 6th
Inside 50 - 16th
Goal assists - 16th
Shots at goal - 16th
Shot efficiency - 12th
Goal efficiency - 12th

To me this says we can win the clearance, just not get it to the forward 50. But when we do, we're not the worst in the league at converting our shots at goal.

1%'ers - 15th
Turnovers - 6th least
Disposal efficiency - 17th

While our turnovers are not bad it's sometimes when we do them that is the issue.
1% stat reflects a younger playing group IMO
and our disposal efficiency could be said to be the same as the 1% stat. But coupled with the other above stats, it can also mean we can clear the ball to the opposition and our mids are struggling to move the ball past the centre. And when they do its will little efficiency (38.7%).

I guess you can read stats anyway you want and twist them to suit your argument, but to me this says we really need more quality mids now. And in that elusive age range we are missing. Because we can have the best forward line in the league, but what's the point if we can't get it to them.

Totals aren't the greatest measures of performance against the standard.

For instance, you say have the 6th lowest total turnovers. That's pretty good.... however, we have the 17th total disposals. Can't turn it over if you don't have it.

Interestingly, we have the lowest total of disposals against. That's great!.... except, we play in games that average 710 disposals both teams combined. The top four teams play in games that average:

787 Collingwood
718 Geelong
736 GWS
749 Richmond

So, do we play in games that are pretty close to Geelong, who finished on top of the ladder? Maybe... however, our possession differential (for v against) is -3.6 per game. Geelong's possession differential is 10.8 per game in their favour. GWS come in at 22.8 per game, Collingwood at 15......... and Richmond are -17, a paltry 3.5 above Gold Coast, thus proving the futility of total season statistics in isolation.

Exactly, that's why I used more than one statistic to back my opinion.
Personally, I don't buy much into the total disposal stat because some teams are high possession teams and work the ball forward. Other teams rush the ball forward with little or no possession like Richmond do. It's actually quite impressive how good they are multiple taps to players without even taking a possession.
Inside 50 is pretty definitive of scoring possibility though, less options equals less scoring ability. Unless you have a team of 50+ meter goal kickers, then it's useless also.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6359
robertbb wrote:
People can come up with statistics to prove anything. Forfty percent of all people know that.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:26 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6359
Sydney Blue wrote:
What people fail to take into consideration when they say recruiters should have taken player x over player y is that would player x been as good if he had come to Carlton.

Carlton' s problems have been not who we should have taken it is what we have done to them once we have them.
You get the occasional freakish player that stars no matter where they go.
But the majority needs heaps of development.
You could be the greatest spotter of talent in the world but unless someone harnesses that talent it's a waste of time.

So when Keogh and co rant continuously and say look at them over there it's a pointless exercise.

Carlton problem has been development not recruitment

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

I think your point has more weight than a lot of people realise.
Even if we did draft some of the best talent they still need a good environment to develop in.
This includes support of more senior players and is why teams like Hawthorn, Geelong, Richmond etc seem to unearth gems all the time. Their roles are not as demanding as a Walsh role is to Carlton for example.
Our total rebuild was always going to have casualties and areas of concern. And our now missing age bracket is a net result, let's hope some more holes get filled in this area. And we also get back early in the draft either this season or next so we don't make another one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24665
Location: Bondi Beach
GWS wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
Could no one please buy my book...mind you, its unavailable anyway....has been for about 3 years... Hope that satisfies the decorum....mind you it'll probably be brought up again and again.

And just to try and clarify

A soap box is not a discussion, its just 1 voice disregarding discussion by trying to shout out all opposing views. It has nothing to do with positive or negative, everything to do with not even trying to enter into a discussion.

Try discussing sometimes, that involves agree/disagreeing in the search for common ground, for connection, not I am right you are wrong. Agro and others, and I do not always agree yet they never bore me because they do engage in debate---of course I cannot say they feels the same about me.

I just hate someone who needs to go on and on and on about the same thing with no movement. If 2 + 2 = 4 say it once and discuss something else, if it doesn't show me the shifting ground - that's the really interesting part – something BV or Blue Sombrero constantly do even if they (BV is particular) don't understand great poetry...

Do I discuss, not much anymore...and I accept that is a sad reflection on me. Mostly though, I enjoy the opinions and the debates...just not the lectures - like this one...so I'll step off the soap box and let Sidex and Keogh continue on and on...


Great post db.

I really like keogh and appreciate all the TCers who have been here since I did in that moment of despair for me in 2002...the stuff keogh relates to and refers to.

I remember where I was in an internet cafe in Karabi Thailand back then.....I now the hurt...then a mate of mine, a TS contributor told me to have a look at TC.

That post from keogh deserves an apology ... attacking the man ... [REDACTED] form.

This targeting the man has been going on and on and on.... I'm sorry you were targeted danny nd cannot understand why... and I'm glad you remind me in your sig what you wrote and do, as it feels good to be around some good wordsmiths with a vivid imagination and not just some soap box slaggers, and it reminds me that theres something I still want to read one day.

Pick up the standard fellas ... TC is about discussion and variety of views.
Like BF we at TC and all Carlton forums are all Carltonians and rusted on till death do us apart....even then I'm sure its Dark Navy Blue where I'm going.

I love youse all.


You signed up to TC four years before it started? :eek: :lol:


Thats when despair set in: 2002.
Look to you left. 2006... Feb 2
4 years of despair

Anyone got a good joke about despair? Cue.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:35 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Sitting by the window of her convent, Sister Barbara opened a letter from home one evening. Inside the letter was a $100 bill her parents had sent.
Sister Barbara smiled at the gesture. As she read the letter by the window, she noticed a shabbily dressed stranger leaning against the lamp post below.
Quickly, she wrote, "Don't despair ~ Sister Barbara," on a piece of paper and wrapped the $100 bill in it Then she got the man's attention and tossed it out the window to him. The stranger picked it up, and with a puzzled expression and a tip of his hat, went off down the street.
The next day, Sister Barbara was told that a man was at her door, insisting on seeing her. She went down, and found the stranger waiting. Without a word, he handed her a huge wad of $100 bills.
"What's this?" she asked.
"That's the $8,000 you have coming Sister," he replied. "Don't Despair paid 80-to-1!"


Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Can we please change the title of the thread to 'List management 2011-2018'? That way the last ten pages will be on topic.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2020
PostPosted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 12:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
moshe25 wrote:
Sitting by the window of her convent, Sister Barbara opened a letter from home one evening. Inside the letter was a $100 bill her parents had sent.
Sister Barbara smiled at the gesture. As she read the letter by the window, she noticed a shabbily dressed stranger leaning against the lamp post below.
Quickly, she wrote, "Don't despair ~ Sister Barbara," on a piece of paper and wrapped the $100 bill in it Then she got the man's attention and tossed it out the window to him. The stranger picked it up, and with a puzzled expression and a tip of his hat, went off down the street.
The next day, Sister Barbara was told that a man was at her door, insisting on seeing her. She went down, and found the stranger waiting. Without a word, he handed her a huge wad of $100 bills.
"What's this?" she asked.
"That's the $8,000 you have coming Sister," he replied. "Don't Despair paid 80-to-1!"


Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

Boom Boom

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2341 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 118  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Toranasaurus and 129 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group