Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 09, 2025 2:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 147 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 2:49 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8201
Donstuie wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
did nobody see the hit Murphy took? tell me that wouldn't affect the output of most

Should've been taken off then.
Tell that to the coaching staff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 4:28 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2057
Another loss for the once mighty Blues

The beginning of the end for Bolton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 7:33 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7161
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
I'm still bracing myself for Charlie having done an ACL.
Players have taken rush field before only to find out they're done. fingers crossed.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:51 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12527
Location: Brisbane
WOW wrote:
Another loss for the once mighty Blues

The beginning of the end for Bolton




Can only hope that it turns around, as it has for Buckley.

As a supporter, that's all I can do - hope.

:|

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 10:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I'm still bracing myself for Charlie having done an ACL.
Players have taken rush field before only to find out they're done. fingers crossed.


i couldn't find the vomit emoji

i guess this is what years of negative outcomes does to your psyche


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 10:11 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
doofdoof wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I'm still bracing myself for Charlie having done an ACL.
Players have taken rush field before only to find out they're done. fingers crossed.


i couldn't find the vomit emoji

i guess this is what years of negative outcomes does to your psyche

Hate to say it, but the same thought occuered to me.

Every time I see one of our players go down "sore" I prepare myself for it to escalate to the end of their year, or worse "2-3 weeks" :banghead:

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:55 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7161
Donstuie wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I'm still bracing myself for Charlie having done an ACL.
Players have taken rush field before only to find out they're done. fingers crossed.


i couldn't find the vomit emoji

i guess this is what years of negative outcomes does to your psyche

Hate to say it, but the same thought occuered to me.

Every time I see one of our players go down "sore" I prepare myself for it to escalate to the end of their year, or worse "2-3 weeks" :banghead:



Nah his acl is fine. if it's anything bad, it's his meniscus. hopefully though, he just jarred it. that can send shooting nerve pain up and down the whole leg and leave the knee a little numb.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 2:57 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
did nobody see the hit Murphy took? tell me that wouldn't affect the output of most

:clap:
Been waiting for some of the enlightened ones on here to take that into consideration.
He was on of our best in Rd one and was probably unconscious for a few seconds after getting whip-lashed in that Docker sandwich.
I wouldn't be surprised if he's out injured as a precaution at least.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 2:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Braithy wrote:
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.

But you are criticizing those who are lamenting our lack of run and carry and here you are calling for it.
50 cents each way?

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 6:34 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7161
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.

But you are criticizing those who are lamenting our lack of run and carry and here you are calling for it.
50 cents each way?



I'm not sure what you're saying here? i'm criticising people who want run & carry?

i'd love you to come with one single post where i've done that, lol.

i'm all for it. I'm not all for the 3 talls in the forward 50. it didn't work 5 years, 3 years ago and and it sure isn't working now either. in fact, in the modern game of maintaining forward pressure so at a minimum you slow the exit rebound down (or stop it completely) it won't ever work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 7:36 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14584
Location: Sydney
Sydney Blue wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
In: Silvagni, Kennedy, O'Brien
Out: Curnow, Murphy, Garlett
Fasolo must be an out
Garlett out
Curnow out

Kruex in
JSos in
Kennedy in



Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk


Both of those suggestions make us so slow and ponderous, I almost fell asleep reading them. So it's probably exactly what's going to happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 10:52 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..Hopefully Newman has some good intel to help us win..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 11:11 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9047
Location: Melbourne
Braithy wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I'm still bracing myself for Charlie having done an ACL.
Players have taken rush field before only to find out they're done. fingers crossed.


i couldn't find the vomit emoji

i guess this is what years of negative outcomes does to your psyche

Hate to say it, but the same thought occuered to me.

Every time I see one of our players go down "sore" I prepare myself for it to escalate to the end of their year, or worse "2-3 weeks" :banghead:



Nah his acl is fine. if it's anything bad, it's his meniscus. hopefully though, he just jarred it. that can send shooting nerve pain up and down the whole leg and leave the knee a little numb.


Scans have cleared him of any structural damage

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Braithy wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.

But you are criticizing those who are lamenting our lack of run and carry and here you are calling for it.
50 cents each way?



I'm not sure what you're saying here? i'm criticising people who want run & carry?

i'd love you to come with one single post where i've done that, lol.

i'm all for it. I'm not all for the 3 talls in the forward 50. it didn't work 5 years, 3 years ago and and it sure isn't working now either. in fact, in the modern game of maintaining forward pressure so at a minimum you slow the exit rebound down (or stop it completely) it won't ever work.

HUmblest apologies. Got you confused with another poster. After going back I see we aren't that far apart, really.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 4:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4441
Location: Perth
Could sure do with some emotional nourishment, starting this week.

Big game. Have to convert these positive performances in to early wins. Risk confidence dropping in the group otherwise.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 4:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
Braithy wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.

But you are criticizing those who are lamenting our lack of run and carry and here you are calling for it.
50 cents each way?



I'm not sure what you're saying here? i'm criticising people who want run & carry?

i'd love you to come with one single post where i've done that, lol.

i'm all for it. I'm not all for the 3 talls in the forward 50. it didn't work 5 years, 3 years ago and and it sure isn't working now either. in fact, in the modern game of maintaining forward pressure so at a minimum you slow the exit rebound down (or stop it completely) it won't ever work.


Agree that we have issues locking the ball in our forward 50 right now, but disagree that you can’t play 3 talls in the modern era. Port went with Marshall, Westhoff and 2 rucks (with Dixon still to come back) and they managed to get the win. Last years premiers also had a 2 key forwards and 2 ruckmen setup. The crows consistently had 3 talls when they made their grand final run and even the dogs took 3 blokes in excess of 190cm in their forwardline in 2016. Richmond appear to be the only exception and even they’ve added another key forward this season.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 5:21 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 906
cecil89 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.

But you are criticizing those who are lamenting our lack of run and carry and here you are calling for it.
50 cents each way?



I'm not sure what you're saying here? i'm criticising people who want run & carry?

i'd love you to come with one single post where i've done that, lol.

i'm all for it. I'm not all for the 3 talls in the forward 50. it didn't work 5 years, 3 years ago and and it sure isn't working now either. in fact, in the modern game of maintaining forward pressure so at a minimum you slow the exit rebound down (or stop it completely) it won't ever work.


Agree that we have issues locking the ball in our forward 50 right now, but disagree that you can’t play 3 talls in the modern era. Port went with Marshall, Westhoff and 2 rucks (with Dixon still to come back) and they managed to get the win. Last years premiers also had a 2 key forwards and 2 ruckmen setup. The crows consistently had 3 talls when they made their grand final run and even the dogs took 3 blokes in excess of 190cm in their forwardline in 2016. Richmond appear to be the only exception and even they’ve added another key forward this season.


Pretty true, the key is to have the other forwards chase like maniacs, and if the talls can chase as well so much the better. Our 3 have a reasonable amount of toe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 5:55 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7161
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.

But you are criticizing those who are lamenting our lack of run and carry and here you are calling for it.
50 cents each way?



I'm not sure what you're saying here? i'm criticising people who want run & carry?

i'd love you to come with one single post where i've done that, lol.

i'm all for it. I'm not all for the 3 talls in the forward 50. it didn't work 5 years, 3 years ago and and it sure isn't working now either. in fact, in the modern game of maintaining forward pressure so at a minimum you slow the exit rebound down (or stop it completely) it won't ever work.

HUmblest apologies. Got you confused with another poster. After going back I see we aren't that far apart, really.



Haha. all good mate!

da da da da daaa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 6:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7161
cecil89 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Sydney will be looking at this game as the one they get back on track with. They won't want to win, they'll want to bury us by 10 goals. Going to be a big test against a veteran, hungry team.

Sydney is also one team which is slower than us with an ageing midfield. Be a great stage to run and carry and take the game on. Let the players play on instinct. Sometimes it's easier to mark, kick, handball and find targets playing fast – less time to think. And i think our list is that way inclined. when we play fast, we look really good.

3 big, key forwards isn't helping the fast play though. there's almost no forward defensive pressure coming from us once the pill hits the floor...

I was baffled with harry looking to breakout and charlie already a star, why we chased gov. we were crying out for a speedy, creative small forward.

But you are criticizing those who are lamenting our lack of run and carry and here you are calling for it.
50 cents each way?



I'm not sure what you're saying here? i'm criticising people who want run & carry?

i'd love you to come with one single post where i've done that, lol.

i'm all for it. I'm not all for the 3 talls in the forward 50. it didn't work 5 years, 3 years ago and and it sure isn't working now either. in fact, in the modern game of maintaining forward pressure so at a minimum you slow the exit rebound down (or stop it completely) it won't ever work.


Agree that we have issues locking the ball in our forward 50 right now, but disagree that you can’t play 3 talls in the modern era. Port went with Marshall, Westhoff and 2 rucks (with Dixon still to come back) and they managed to get the win. Last years premiers also had a 2 key forwards and 2 ruckmen setup. The crows consistently had 3 talls when they made their grand final run and even the dogs took 3 blokes in excess of 190cm in their forwardline in 2016. Richmond appear to be the only exception and even they’ve added another key forward this season.


It's true, you can make it work. but you need elite mids locking down that neutral forward of centre zone, along with some elite forward pockets harassing & creating defensive pressure.

in our set up, 2 key forwards and more foot speed is a better balance. swapping a key for someone quick, would benefit us much more.

Polson (imo) made a big impact on the weekend. lots of second efforts and creating pressure. He chipped in with a nice goal and had a few goal assists too. I wonder if garlett would be good in that role? garlett and polson crumbing around harry and gov, with charlie playing higher up the park (forward wing?)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 147 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group