Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:48 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 7:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1234
The Duke wrote:
Blue Boys wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It might be just a coincidence but currently the two side winless on the bottom of the ladder have coaches that have never played AFL/VFL
and I have had just a brief look and there hasn't been any coach that has won a premiership that has not played the game at the highest level

Sure there has been plenty of coaches that were great players that failed but the stats the other way are far worse

Yep that’s a reasonable stat, one that the club were probably aware of when the recruited bolts as head coach. Given Carlton’s current squad and injuries I couldn’t imagine we would be in a better place if we had another coach in place. Our list is a long way away from being in premiership contention, and I wouldn’t be blaming bolts for the state of our list.


Yeah nah I disagree. Bolts has now been to the draft/trade period 3 times. I suggest that every player on our list has had his contract renewed or extended in that time. That makes every player HIS player.

Bolts is also responsible for the players de-listed, traded and drafted. He's responsible for the game plan and morale - for better or for worse.

Sure, call it a young and emerging list, but if you're not happy with quality of the list, you can't blame anyone but the current coaching dept.


I think you're being a little disingenuous if you think it's Boltons fault that 40 odd players have been turned-over over the past 3 years. Carlton had initiated its rebuild before Bolton was brought on board. The fact that an 18 or 19 year old has been re-signed doesn't change the fact that the player is in his 1st or 2nd year and is massively inexperienced. Yes the head coach takes the fall for poor recruiting decisions, but you're kidding yourself if you think Silvagnis not the one pulling the strings.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 7:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1234
jim wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It might be just a coincidence but currently the two side winless on the bottom of the ladder have coaches that have never played AFL/VFL
and I have had just a brief look and there hasn't been any coach that has won a premiership that has not played the game at the highest level

Sure there has been plenty of coaches that were great players that failed but the stats the other way are far worse


Hardly ever has a coach who has not played at the highest level gone on to have longevity. Might be that little bit less respect for them dishing out orders when they haven't played. Don't know for sure but that must be close to a reason beyond a coincidence. That history was my only reservation when we got Bolton.

Neil Craig did but at the time Adelaide were very SA centric and didn't take to Victorian coaches for a long time.


I would imagine it would be pretty difficult to participate in the interview process for a senior coaching role unless you worked in the industry or were known in the industry. Clubs aren't really prepared to take risks, regardless of how experienced or qualified the candidate is. Hence there are very few coaches that werent ex afl footballers. I actually think Carlton did the right thing by bringing in someone who they thought was the best guy for the role, regardless of the fact he wasn't a big name or a past great player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 7:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34527
Location: The Brown Wedge
Blue Boys wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Blue Boys wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It might be just a coincidence but currently the two side winless on the bottom of the ladder have coaches that have never played AFL/VFL
and I have had just a brief look and there hasn't been any coach that has won a premiership that has not played the game at the highest level

Sure there has been plenty of coaches that were great players that failed but the stats the other way are far worse

Yep that’s a reasonable stat, one that the club were probably aware of when the recruited bolts as head coach. Given Carlton’s current squad and injuries I couldn’t imagine we would be in a better place if we had another coach in place. Our list is a long way away from being in premiership contention, and I wouldn’t be blaming bolts for the state of our list.


Yeah nah I disagree. Bolts has now been to the draft/trade period 3 times. I suggest that every player on our list has had his contract renewed or extended in that time. That makes every player HIS player.

Bolts is also responsible for the players de-listed, traded and drafted. He's responsible for the game plan and morale - for better or for worse.

Sure, call it a young and emerging list, but if you're not happy with quality of the list, you can't blame anyone but the current coaching dept.


I think you're being a little disingenuous if you think it's Boltons fault that 40 odd players have been turned-over over the past 3 years. Carlton had initiated its rebuild before Bolton was brought on board. The fact that an 18 or 19 year old has been re-signed doesn't change the fact that the player is in his 1st or 2nd year and is massively inexperienced. Yes the head coach takes the fall for poor recruiting decisions, but you're kidding yourself if you think Silvagnis not the one pulling the strings.


The fact that 40 players have been turned over could well be the reason we're in such disarray. I think I remember someone saying that no club has ever turned more players over in such a short period. Perhaps there's a very good reason for that.

For the record, I'm not blaming SOS or Bolts for the young kids. I think both have done very well identifying the quality we have. I'm just concerned we're not getting anywhere near the best out of them. They're not progressing as footballers IMO.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 7:52 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
Rod Waddell wrote:
Interesting views and l agree there's no turning back now.

We have been unlucky with injuries to certain players whom whilst not world beaters -

"it's the sum of the parts that makes the whole"

However my frustration/concern lies in the following:

1. Of the 22 that run out each week, they keep making basic errors - why does that continue to be the case?
2. Our firsts and seconds have not won a game. This cannot be good for club morale.


Girls won the spoon too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 8:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Duke I think our young players are developing but are suffering from lack of continuity due to injury and are being let down by our older senior players

Marchbank now Charlie Weitering Cunningham Byrne Pickett Kennedy all haven't had a lot of continuity

Fisher has obviously improved and I would argue that Obrien and Dow improve every week

Charlie shows more this year than last

Weiters Marchbank and SPS haven't played as well this year


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 8:52 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34527
Location: The Brown Wedge
frank dardew wrote:
Duke I think our young players are developing but are suffering from lack of continuity due to injury and are being let down by our older senior players

Marchbank now Charlie Weitering Cunningham Byrne Pickett Kennedy all haven't had a lot of continuity

Fisher has obviously improved and I would argue that Obrien and Dow improve every week

Charlie shows more this year than last

Weiters Marchbank and SPS haven't played as well this year


I agree that that has contributed, but also the loss of other, more experienced, middle tier players has surely had an impact.

That's probably why other sides in a re-build phase don't overturn 40+ players in 2 seasons.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2018 9:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agree Duke but this is why ultimately I think we will be a good team because we have these young talented players who need games are getting games and once they are battle hardened will be good

I think whilst March SBS and Weiters haven't been good this year all have talent and with more experience will be much better and long term players

Been unlucky because even Williamson and macredie have not had any continuity and haven't played a senior game yet

Obviously too backline is really labouring without Docherty not just his skill but poise and leadership and younger players are suffering worst

Particularly with Simmo being less effective this year

Midfield in my view is suffering from lack of leadership with Gibbs and Murphy not playing but obviously not underplaying how well Cripps is leading and playing

Midfield also suffering from Kreuz being injured and not having as good a season as last


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 7:19 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
moshe25 wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
moshe25 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
The idea that you have to have played at the top level to be a good coach is stupid. Look at football (soccer) - just in the top 10 of the English Premier League alone you have the likes of Klopp, Mourinho, Wenger and Benitez who were all lower-division nobodies as players. As managers, All four have either won or made the final of the Champions League.



it's far from stupid. to get your manager's licence in the world game is a completely different task to AFL ... by the time these managers get to big clubs and win titles and trophies they're already among the best few managers in the world (and the players know this). the world of football management or NFL coaching is an apples & oranges argument.


AFL is so much more small time and insular than football. most of the kids playing have never travelled, never lived, don't have much experience in anything. they have a pack mentality where they follow (often blindly). so you only need a few players not to be onboard with a rookie coach, and things head south pretty quick.
Yes, but same is true of an AFL playing experienced coach. Tony Shaw, Tim Watson, Royce Hart, Kevin Bartlett, Brett Ratten, Murray Wiedeman, Bill Goggin, Wayne Schimmelbusch, Matthew Knights, Darrell Baldock, Bob Skilton. These are just completely off the top of my head - all were guns, most were premiership players, most were duds as coaches losing their players at some point.

Conversely, I could come up with a raft of ordinary players who became gun coaches, the likes of Tom Hafey, Mick Malthouse, Denis Pagan, Alan Joyce, etc.

If you really investigated, I think you'd find that there's no correlation, just like all the other, more advanced "big time", professional sports have found. In fact, I believe it's your kind of thinking about this that actually KEEPS the AFL small time.

The skill sets of playing and coaching have virtually nothing in common with each other. Similar to acting vs directing, programming vs project management, and research vs academic management. The quicker Australia jumps on board, the quicker we'll grow!

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Barrass
Walls
Matthews
Roos
Blight
Nichols
Blight
Even Jezza
And Bomber Thompson was no mug player



Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Those Blights were both good players...

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk


Is that Wibur and Orville Blight. They were both great in the air

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 7:30 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Sydney Blue wrote:
It might be just a coincidence but currently the two side winless on the bottom of the ladder have coaches that have never played AFL/VFL
and I have had just a brief look and there hasn't been any coach that has won a premiership that has not played the game at the highest level

Sure there has been plenty of coaches that were great players that failed but the stats the other way are far worse




Well since you were never a teacher or a paramedic yourself, you would have NFI whatsoever (nor have credibility to comment or an understanding) of the work they do, their value to society or the remuneration they should receive

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 7:35 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
jim wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
It might be just a coincidence but currently the two side winless on the bottom of the ladder have coaches that have never played AFL/VFL
and I have had just a brief look and there hasn't been any coach that has won a premiership that has not played the game at the highest level

Sure there has been plenty of coaches that were great players that failed but the stats the other way are far worse


Hardly ever has a coach who has not played at the highest level gone on to have longevity. Might be that little bit less respect for them dishing out orders when they haven't played. Don't know for sure but that must be close to a reason beyond a coincidence. That history was my only reservation when we got Bolton.

Neil Craig did but at the time Adelaide were very SA centric and didn't take to Victorian coaches for a long time.


Wayne Brittain sacked prematurely after 1 year cause we HAD TO get Pagan and we had a massive injury list
Carlton's best tactical coach of the last 20 years

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 7:51 am 
Online
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18031
Sydney Blue wrote:
It might be just a coincidence but currently the two side winless on the bottom of the ladder have coaches that have never played AFL/VFL
and I have had just a brief look and there hasn't been any coach that has won a premiership that has not played the game at the highest level



Is it also a coincidence that the 2 winless sides on the bottom of that ladder were bottom of the ladder sides when they took them over?
Sides with probably the worst lists?

Rome want built in a day. Were all of you people who now have concerns about Boltons AFL credentials voicing them when he took over?
Were you voicing them in his first year?

The internet is full of retrospective experts. I understand that some people are impatient and want immediate results but it gets a bit tedious when they come out with the same negative shit over and over again. Yes, you have concerns about Bolton. We get it. But seriously, if you don't have anything to add other than the same negative shit every day, why do you bother?
The only certainty out of the rebuild IMHO is the same people who are whinging about Bolton will be the first in the queue celebrating success when it comes.
And I have no doubt it will come.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 9:34 am 
Online
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
it just shows a lack of patience as they look to why they aren't getting the results they want now.

I think Richmond is a classic example - everyone and their dog thought Hardwick couldn't coach but Richmond held their nerve. Much as I hate it it seems Collingwood have also held their nerve with Bucks and are on the improve.

With Brittain and perhaps (I am willing to admit) with Ratts the club again lost their nerve and went for the strategy as some are now (again) crying out for - they went for the experience coach that just set us back to square one all over again.

Seriously, the argument about having played football just makes me smile. It gets you in the door for the interview and that's it - the rest comes down to whether you can actually coach or not and has no bearing on what level you played football at. Especially nowadays with so many coaches and other experts. Its about people management, its about teaching, its about motivating, all skills that are not distinct to football.

I just hope the club is not listening to sites like this, that they hold their nerve, that they understand much of the pain is about the inexperience of the list and that most supporters do not understand it takes time, time tallied in seasons, not in wishes.

I suspect we still have two more tough seasons ahead. But I like the talent. I think its building, It will come if this club holds its nerve. but if it panics then we'll have to start all over again and probably waste the talent of Fisher, Curnow etc, much like we did with Gibbs, Murph, Simmo etc.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 9:46 am 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
If i reasonably expected 3-5 years on the bottom I would either go with a seasoned legend or a bright young optimist from a well structured club.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 9:53 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21551
Location: North of the border
dannyboy wrote:
it just shows a lack of patience as they look to why they aren't getting the results they want now.

I think Richmond is a classic example - everyone and their dog thought Hardwick couldn't coach but Richmond held their nerve. Much as I hate it it seems Collingwood have also held their nerve with Bucks and are on the improve.

With Brittain and perhaps (I am willing to admit) with Ratts the club again lost their nerve and went for the strategy as some are now (again) crying out for - they went for the experience coach that just set us back to square one all over again.

Seriously, the argument about having played football just makes me smile. It gets you in the door for the interview and that's it - the rest comes down to whether you can actually coach or not and has no bearing on what level you played football at. Especially nowadays with so many coaches and other experts. Its about people management, its about teaching, its about motivating, all skills that are not distinct to football.

I just hope the club is not listening to sites like this, that they hold their nerve, that they understand much of the pain is about the inexperience of the list and that most supporters do not understand it takes time, time tallied in seasons, not in wishes.

I suspect we still have two more tough seasons ahead. But I like the talent. I think its building, It will come if this club holds its nerve. but if it panics then we'll have to start all over again and probably waste the talent of Fisher, Curnow etc, much like we did with Gibbs, Murph, Simmo etc.
With Brittain and Ratts it was a totally different scenario.
This time the club has put it all on the line.
They have been a club who has questions about their drafting in the past and they have elected to build through the draft.
They have been a club whose development of players is arguably the worst in the comp and yet they have decided to back their development.
They have been a club that has struggled to retain players and attract players and yet they have openly said they are targeting free agents.
They have been a club that historically has either had one of their own or targeted one of the best in the terms of coaching but have decided to go with a novice.

In gambling terms they have put the house on a 1000 to 1 shot.
If it pays off well happy days .
If it doesn't it is years of misery.
Right now we are in the back straight about 100 meters off the leaders.
We may have to push the jockey off to catch the rest up

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 10:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
dannyboy wrote:
it just shows a lack of patience as they look to why they aren't getting the results they want now.

I think Richmond is a classic example - everyone and their dog thought Hardwick couldn't coach but Richmond held their nerve. Much as I hate it it seems Collingwood have also held their nerve with Bucks and are on the improve.

With Brittain and perhaps (I am willing to admit) with Ratts the club again lost their nerve and went for the strategy as some are now (again) crying out for - they went for the experience coach that just set us back to square one all over again.

Seriously, the argument about having played football just makes me smile. It gets you in the door for the interview and that's it - the rest comes down to whether you can actually coach or not and has no bearing on what level you played football at. Especially nowadays with so many coaches and other experts. Its about people management, its about teaching, its about motivating, all skills that are not distinct to football.

I just hope the club is not listening to sites like this, that they hold their nerve, that they understand much of the pain is about the inexperience of the list and that most supporters do not understand it takes time, time tallied in seasons, not in wishes.

I suspect we still have two more tough seasons ahead. But I like the talent. I think its building, It will come if this club holds its nerve. but if it panics then we'll have to start all over again and probably waste the talent of Fisher, Curnow etc, much like we did with Gibbs, Murph, Simmo etc.



Good post and I think most supporters are happy for the club to "hold its nerve" and ignore all of the white noise that is taking place in some media circles.


Last edited by doofdoof on Sat May 05, 2018 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 10:33 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2647
We are concerned because it is quite evident this year is below par, his first two years he did well and we made progress.
This year niente.
The drafting of the delisted free agents, suspect, the match day moves and the team selections, the game plan and structures, questionable.
I don't mind Bolton and think he has been good for the kids up until now but has he got the potential to improve as we go forward.
These decisions of late do need to be questioned.
The kids will grow and that is just a natural part of maturity and growth but will it be enough.
Will they be part of the future or will we see some exodus because of constant and long term frustration?
Is he just as stubborn as his predecessor, enough to set us back again after a few years of another wasted rebuild?
We have been down for a while, so have Melbourne, so have St kilda, so have Brisbane.
All you hear is they will get there or they should be more advanced then they are, they are mentally frail, their senior core isn't up to it.
This is where we have our concerns, the first two years have been good but what are we going to be in 3-5 years?
Yes we all love the club some are pessimistic some optimistic. Some question the path taken lately others don't seem to question enough.
All we need to see is what we saw last year, effort and grow with some reasonable decision making and improved skill both on and off the park.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 10:35 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10594
At the end of the day, everyone knows this is the clubs last chance to get it right, and if they feel the club is showing signs of getting it wrong, I feel the concerns many raise are justifiable.

It’s got nothing to do with nervous nellies or holding firm, etc. Its all about majority seeing things unfolding within the plan and highlighting it as a risk. As an example my main concern was always the trading of experience players. What has heightened this, was drafting of ‘experienced players’ nowhere near capable of supporting the kids. I’m also sure this will be the AFL’s response to us when we go crying about PP.

So to put on my corporate hat for a moment. From a business plan prospective, I would love to know how people operate a project plan such as this within their normal day to day environments. My question to the ‘positive’ posters; How much time do we give the club before we are allowed to voice concerns or risks? 6 months, 2 years, 5 years? When is it too late within a project before you raise a risk?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 10:49 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23924
No doubting this is hard for us Surrey.
One good thing I find is no pre game nerves. I don't expect much atm. It can be a really nice time out from the usual roller coaster though..and a great way to practice some detachment, pick up long discarded hobbies or relish new ones... invest in quiet time or bungee jumping etc. I find I still like to watch our games, but it is good to be able to switch off if it gets unbearable.
I believe it will be worth it to stay the course.
Yes, it has been a hec of a long time since footy derived joy was a regular occurence. Luckily there are a squillion other ways to get joyful experiences. Admittedly footy joy is a unique pleasure, but just think how insanely beautiful it will be when she comes back and hangs around for years on end.
I was too young last time we had that but I hope all of us here get to experience it.
I'm gonna say that I reckon it will begin to happen from next year on. We will be so improved from this year that it will feel fantastic and then by 2020 the real challenges for the grail should kick in.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 11:40 am 
Online
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
no problem with concerns


the question in all this is time

so far it is into its 3rd year and that is no where near enough time - 3 years turning list over and going younger, less experience, smaller bodies etc

2 more years of training, playing, developing

I expect glimpses

and then a real jump around the 4 to 5 year mark -

re concerns I think we may all have them from time to time but we should also expect realistic outcomes and understand this rebuild is separate to our past @#$%&! ups re Pagan, re Malthouse etc. We must not pile them altogrther as I long @#$%&! up.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2018 11:44 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:06 pm
Posts: 3366
Tricky comparing this to business, SurreyBlue. In business I can hire and fire, adjust my budgets, pivot or perish on projects, hell I can completely change the goalposts.

In footy, though, the goalposts tend to stay the same. You can’t hire new players (or fire them unless they expose their peepee or steal shit from a teammate or similar). You can’t spend more money on players thanks to the cap etc.

Out of interest, what is this last chance that everyone knows about? Is there a legitimate push to shut us down if we don’t make finals over the next couple of years? I hadn’t heard of that.

That’s a hardcore statement that wants some facts/sources behind it. Cos if you’re right, that changes everything and I would agree we would need short term success NOW.

_________________
"In better news for Blues fans, Jarrad Waite was not named on the club's injury list."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain, ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Hamster, kezza, MPH78, mymanmurph, Sedat and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group