Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:47 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 10:50 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
grrofunger wrote:
murraycray wrote:
I believe Bolton is out of his depth. Sacking him is the easy way out. What he needs is support. An adviser if you like. An experienced operator at AFL LEVEL !

For example someone he can liaise with during the week, and even sit in the Coaches box with him on match days.

Pluck out any names you like as candidates, but for me blokes like David Parkin, Robert Walls or maybe Kenny Sheldon. Note there is a Carlton background with each of those guys. Something we lack throughout the present coaching staff.

I wouldn't ask Bolton if he was agreeable to this, because he'd probably say no, I'd be telling him it's happening.


Yep , the Neil Craig role which was kind of filled by Barker which really has just left a void.

We do need a senior experienced head into assist.


I think the position we find ourselves in is more to do with lack of continuity in who's available to play each week.

I'm happy for Bolton to be given more time with a hopefully near full list of players over the next 18 months.

Lets face it. The current players playing are mostly past their best/were never any good/inexperienced. That isn't Boltons fault.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 10:56 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Of course the club is disappointing with 2018 and you know that when at the draft last season SOS publically stated that what this club needs to do is start winning games he was absolutely unequivocal about that

They would not have expected a 0-6 start and would be unnerved by lack of competitiveness in some games and obviously the messaging has changed after losing the first 4
That's why some of us were really disappointed with the Gold Coast game that was the one to win and that if we had won would have stemmed the bleeding and given us confidence
What was really disappointing about that game was Murphy once again went public and said the players got ahead of themselves after losing to Richmond -hello what a farce

Having said that have been badly affected by injuries -senior players and those brought in OShea and Mullet have been woeful in leading and making us competitive

Yes there is some youthful talent that we should continue to back and we have no option in my view to continue to back the young coach and get games into this young talent


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:10 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
murraycray wrote:
I believe Bolton is out of his depth. Sacking him is the easy way out. What he needs is support. An adviser if you like. An experienced operator at AFL LEVEL !

For example someone he can liaise with during the week, and even sit in the Coaches box with him on match days.

Pluck out any names you like as candidates, but for me blokes like David Parkin, Robert Walls or maybe Kenny Sheldon. Note there is a Carlton background with each of those guys. Something we lack throughout the present coaching staff.

I wouldn't ask Bolton if he was agreeable to this, because he'd probably say no, I'd be telling him it's happening.



Disagree. Bolton is no Malthouse ego wise. I don't know him but my opinion would be taht he would embrace having an experienced mentor/director of coaching etc. He'd be a complete hypocrite if he argued against it as it contradicts his 'learning environment' philosophy. As I said previously, I believe he's reflective enough to know that he and the other coaches need to learn just as much as the players

As to who that person could be, dunno????

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:13 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Braithy wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
a 21 point @#$%&! smashing...


dannyboy wrote:
just to be clear 21 points is a big margin?



watch the game? 21pts was very flattering. we were smashed all over the park. dogs kick a little straighter we lose by 10 goals. Dogs really execute in front of goal, we lose by 80 or 90 pts.

... to a dogs team many in the pre match thread thought we were a proper chance of beating – six day turn around from perth, equally as bad form as us etc etc


was there outcry last season?

no there was not, because we were competitive. I watched every game, a fair few at the ground and i can only remember 2 games - port & tigers where we were never in those games. all the others we were pretty good, and had come a long long way from the malthouse nightmare.

this season, 0-6 with possibly the hardest 5 weeks schedule in afl to come and there has not been one game we've been in. we;ve probably played 3 good quarters of football all season so far.

right now this feels more like the pagan nightmare.

i don't think bolton is the right coach for this team. i think our rebuild and squad turnover is a necessary evil we have to endure - very few in their right mind would argue against that path of a total reset.

But! keeping bolton and rebuilding are seperate issues, which lotsa ppl here like to conflate.

i firmly believe there were better options out there when we got bolton (like dew) ... i'm so devout in the belief only someone who has played afl, can coach afl. they don't even have to have had rich team success, but they need to know the level of competition and ruthlessness that they're walking their kids into.

and bolton on gamedays, struggles almightily. i also question whether he commands the total respect of the playing group. tas league footy is a world away from the big league.


i won't be surprised to see bolton sacked at some point, and tbh, i'll be a little relieved when its done.


"A little straighter"

Needed to be 19.6 to lose by 10 goals, or for your 90 point scenario - 25.0.

You do realise that they converted slightly ahead of us?....


they also turfed a half dozen out on the full, and blew a lot of golden inside 50 chances with horrible decision making and basically stopped running in the last qtr. i can't see how anyone could have watched that game and then tell me with a straight face it didn't feel like a 50 pt loss.

bulldogs are a team desperately out of form - they're actually a woeful side right now, who happened to be younger and less experienced than us as well, and other than Cripps and levi, no player won their position on the night.


make no mistake. we are standing right in line to being the worst team in AFL history. very realistic to think we'll 0-11.

i'm not sure how any coach survives that, whether we like it or not.


Are we allowed to include all our stuff ups (misses, turnovers etc) or does that dilute your argument?

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:16 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
dannyboy wrote:
Braithy wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
a 21 point @#$%&! smashing...


dannyboy wrote:
just to be clear 21 points is a big margin?



watch the game? 21pts was very flattering. we were smashed all over the park. dogs kick a little straighter we lose by 10 goals. Dogs really execute in front of goal, we lose by 80 or 90 pts.

... to a dogs team many in the pre match thread thought we were a proper chance of beating – six day turn around from perth, equally as bad form as us etc etc


was there outcry last season?

no there was not, because we were competitive. I watched every game, a fair few at the ground and i can only remember 2 games - port & tigers where we were never in those games. all the others we were pretty good, and had come a long long way from the malthouse nightmare.

this season, 0-6 with possibly the hardest 5 weeks schedule in afl to come and there has not been one game we've been in. we;ve probably played 3 good quarters of football all season so far.

right now this feels more like the pagan nightmare.

i don't think bolton is the right coach for this team. i think our rebuild and squad turnover is a necessary evil we have to endure - very few in their right mind would argue against that path of a total reset.

But! keeping bolton and rebuilding are seperate issues, which lotsa ppl here like to conflate.

i firmly believe there were better options out there when we got bolton (like dew) ... i'm so devout in the belief only someone who has played afl, can coach afl. they don't even have to have had rich team success, but they need to know the level of competition and ruthlessness that they're walking their kids into.

and bolton on gamedays, struggles almightily. i also question whether he commands the total respect of the playing group. tas league footy is a world away from the big league.


i won't be surprised to see bolton sacked at some point, and tbh, i'll be a little relieved when its done.


It wasn't a smashing. In a smashing no way Curnow would have lined up for an easy shot that put us within ten points. It was a poor showing. It was a game I thought we could win but didn't. It hurt just as the rest of this season hurts but truthfully the hurt is as much my fault as anything else. I want this to end. We all do. But it cannot be hurried up. What I have to deal with is my expectations, that's really where the pain comes from. Not Bolton's coaching. Not Casboult's kicking. Me wanting this to end and so over summer I imagined it would end - but we have added DOW & O'Brien to our inexperience. Logically there was always going to be a step back especially when Dockerty, Kruiser and Murphy are missing and Gibbs was traded out. Also Rowe played his first game last week for yonks - history will tell you the following week is the tough one when returning from a long lay off.

Now all of this you can disagree with but 21 points will never be a smashing...Its a sign you only see what they could have done to us and what we didn't do and the truth lies in a lot more than that. At the end you admit you are being driven by an ideology and so there is no point discussing the oros and cons (I know this is therefore a waste but what the heck), your mind cannot be changed. You might as well believe if we all said eight hail Martys at the same time for three month Carlton would win the flag. Its your belief and so a fact like 21 points is not a smashing, matters little, its outside your belief vision and you cannot see it.


Well said
PS. Are we praying to St. Marty McFly to get into the DeLorean and take us back to...

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:20 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
99prelim wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
Braithy wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
a 21 point @#$%&! smashing...


dannyboy wrote:
just to be clear 21 points is a big margin?



watch the game? 21pts was very flattering. we were smashed all over the park. dogs kick a little straighter we lose by 10 goals. Dogs really execute in front of goal, we lose by 80 or 90 pts.

... to a dogs team many in the pre match thread thought we were a proper chance of beating – six day turn around from perth, equally as bad form as us etc etc


was there outcry last season?

no there was not, because we were competitive. I watched every game, a fair few at the ground and i can only remember 2 games - port & tigers where we were never in those games. all the others we were pretty good, and had come a long long way from the malthouse nightmare.

this season, 0-6 with possibly the hardest 5 weeks schedule in afl to come and there has not been one game we've been in. we;ve probably played 3 good quarters of football all season so far.

right now this feels more like the pagan nightmare.

i don't think bolton is the right coach for this team. i think our rebuild and squad turnover is a necessary evil we have to endure - very few in their right mind would argue against that path of a total reset.

But! keeping bolton and rebuilding are seperate issues, which lotsa ppl here like to conflate.

i firmly believe there were better options out there when we got bolton (like dew) ... i'm so devout in the belief only someone who has played afl, can coach afl. they don't even have to have had rich team success, but they need to know the level of competition and ruthlessness that they're walking their kids into.

and bolton on gamedays, struggles almightily. i also question whether he commands the total respect of the playing group. tas league footy is a world away from the big league.


i won't be surprised to see bolton sacked at some point, and tbh, i'll be a little relieved when its done.


It wasn't a smashing. In a smashing no way Curnow would have lined up for an easy shot that put us within ten points. It was a poor showing. It was a game I thought we could win but didn't. It hurt just as the rest of this season hurts but truthfully the hurt is as much my fault as anything else. I want this to end. We all do. But it cannot be hurried up. What I have to deal with is my expectations, that's really where the pain comes from. Not Bolton's coaching. Not Casboult's kicking. Me wanting this to end and so over summer I imagined it would end - but we have added DOW & O'Brien to our inexperience. Logically there was always going to be a step back especially when Dockerty, Kruiser and Murphy are missing and Gibbs was traded out. Also Rowe played his first game last week for yonks - history will tell you the following week is the tough one when returning from a long lay off.

Now all of this you can disagree with but 21 points will never be a smashing...Its a sign you only see what they could have done to us and what we didn't do and the truth lies in a lot more than that. At the end you admit you are being driven by an ideology and so there is no point discussing the oros and cons (I know this is therefore a waste but what the heck), your mind cannot be changed. You might as well believe if we all said eight hail Martys at the same time for three month Carlton would win the flag. Its your belief and so a fact like 21 points is not a smashing, matters little, its outside your belief vision and you cannot see it.


Well said
PS. Are we praying to St. Marty McFly to get into the DeLorean and take us back to...


:lol: Wouldn't mind a Grays Sports Almanac so i could know when we get good again.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:35 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:26 am
Posts: 8024
Location: Melbourne
I'm as frustrated as the xt supporter, but I have faith in what Bolts and the club are doing and much of the proof is already in the pudding.

1 - team makeup. SOS and Bolts have done the hardest part of the team rebuild. KPP. We have a gem in Charlie, Weitering whist struggling, is another piece, Harry is starting to come on and Marchbank has slotted in. These are the hardest players to recruit and develop. Ask Collingwood.

Our current problems are all due to us simply not having a solid midfield. Its Cripps, Murphy and daylight. I can see that Kennedy and Lang were to assist in that regard whilst our midfield recruits develop.

The thing is, finding midfielders through the draft isn't that difficult. Its the KPP's which we have done a very good job in getting.

2 - cohesion. Judd spoke about this on Footy Confidential. Its an area thats under increasing analysis, and its one we are certainly struggling with. But again for mine, the pieces in the puzzle are their. We've got a back 6 that is getting more and more settled. And time is the key here. Interesting that Port were pointed out as an example where even though a side adds a swag of good players, it can and does upset a teams cohesion.

Its why the last thing this list needs is any more change or upheaval.

In regard to Bolts coaching ability. I think too many are being way too harsh. He is lacking cattle and injuries are impacting that further. I think tat yes they've had a couple of bad days and poor decisions at selection table. But shit happens.

And as I say to our junior analysts - bring me solutions not problems. Nothing I see in this thread seems to be about the former.

_________________
Everything before the word "but" is horseshit - J Snow


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:44 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Well said Aircav :thumbsup:

Although there’s one thing I disagree with, in that solutions have been presented in this thread:

1) Bring Elliott back
2) Find a way we can cheat the system to “even things up”
3) Sakc Bolts and bring someone who does things differently
4) Stop turning over players

Genius!

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
The list is so unbalanced that an accurate assessment of Boltons ability is impossible.

I'm also not convinced either us or Brisbane is all that worried about the losses.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 11:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
The one thing that's clear with Bolton is that with a near full list in the preseason we played a more attacking style which looked pretty good.

Then the injuries piled on from R1 and our 'depth' players just aren't up to that style so we've gone back to last years defensive style to minimize the damage.

Injuries and lack of continuity have halted our development for the time being.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 12:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Rexy wrote:
The one thing that's clear with Bolton is that with a near full list in the preseason we played a more attacking style which looked pretty good.

Then the injuries piled on from R1 and our 'depth' players just aren't up to that style so we've gone back to last years defensive style to minimize the damage.

Injuries and lack of continuity have halted our development for the time being.

Therein lies our biggest problem IMO.

Injuries shouldn’t be an excuse, but the fact is they’re always available as one.

When was the last time we had a best 22 available without at least one injury, let alone an extended period?

Martin, Cotchin, Rance and Riewoldt have played nearly 5 seasons together uninterrupted. Yet for years we’ve had a revolving door of quality players on the sidelines. Add this to our dearth of players brought in between 2009-2014, and it’s no wonder we have a cohesion problem.

Either our players don’t prepare properly, our medicos aren’t up to it, we select ‘weak’ players, or God simply hates us.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 12:15 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24640
Location: Kaloyasena
Our medicos don’t have a good reputation in the industry.

May have an impact on us attracting Free Agents down the track as well.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 12:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21546
Location: North of the border
Donstuie wrote:
Rexy wrote:
The one thing that's clear with Bolton is that with a near full list in the preseason we played a more attacking style which looked pretty good.

Then the injuries piled on from R1 and our 'depth' players just aren't up to that style so we've gone back to last years defensive style to minimize the damage.

Injuries and lack of continuity have halted our development for the time being.

Therein lies our biggest problem IMO.

Injuries shouldn’t be an excuse, but the fact is they’re always available as one.

When was the last time we had a best 22 available without at least one injury, let alone an extended period?

Martin, Cotchin, Rance and Riewoldt have played nearly 5 seasons together uninterrupted. Yet for years we’ve had a revolving door of quality players on the sidelines. Add this to our dearth of players brought in between 2009-2014, and it’s no wonder we have a cohesion problem.

Either our players don’t prepare properly, our medicos aren’t up to it, we select ‘weak’ players, or God simply hates us.
The players are getting injuries as most weeks its boys against men.
I have kept saying it for years if you are going to fill the list with kids you need at least half a dozen seasoned hard nuts to take the load off them .
Our older players are to concerned with their own form to provide protection for the young players.


Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 12:37 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:58 pm
Posts: 1636
Donstuie wrote:
Well said Aircav :thumbsup:

Although there’s one thing I disagree with, in that solutions have been presented in this thread:

1) Bring Elliott back
2) Find a way we can cheat the system to “even things up”
3) Sakc Bolts and bring someone who does things differently
4) Stop turning over players

Genius!


:roll:

_________________
"Then joked and said he (Jack himself) probably wouldn't even need to play until round 2 against Collingwood."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:55 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Patience needed in Blues' first 'full-blown rebuild': Bolton

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/pat ... 4zc6e.html

Quote:
"It hurts. Players hurt. Coaches hurt. I'm sure our supporters hurt when you haven't got a win on the board yet. We're going to work incredibly hard but it is the first time in history, too, that we have had a genuine rebuild."

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:12 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Well provided the players do hurt

Not sure when Captain says after losing first game by 5 goals that the reason they lost against Gold Coast was that the players got ahead of themselves -what got ahead of themselves after a 5 goal loss and having lost 10 pot of the last 11 games last season

Doesn't signal hurt to me

Hope he is right as clubs membership and supporters are jumping off at the rate of knots -not saying that is good but not winning March and April almost every year for the last 5 means this is more acute


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
AIRCAV wrote:
I'm as frustrated as the xt supporter, but I have faith in what Bolts and the club are doing and much of the proof is already in the pudding.

1 - team makeup. SOS and Bolts have done the hardest part of the team rebuild. KPP. We have a gem in Charlie, Weitering whist struggling, is another piece, Harry is starting to come on and Marchbank has slotted in. These are the hardest players to recruit and develop. Ask Collingwood.

Our current problems are all due to us simply not having a solid midfield. Its Cripps, Murphy and daylight. I can see that Kennedy and Lang were to assist in that regard whilst our midfield recruits develop.

The thing is, finding midfielders through the draft isn't that difficult. Its the KPP's which we have done a very good job in getting.

2 - cohesion. Judd spoke about this on Footy Confidential. Its an area thats under increasing analysis, and its one we are certainly struggling with. But again for mine, the pieces in the puzzle are their. We've got a back 6 that is getting more and more settled. And time is the key here. Interesting that Port were pointed out as an example where even though a side adds a swag of good players, it can and does upset a teams cohesion.

Its why the last thing this list needs is any more change or upheaval.

In regard to Bolts coaching ability. I think too many are being way too harsh. He is lacking cattle and injuries are impacting that further. I think tat yes they've had a couple of bad days and poor decisions at selection table. But shit happens.

And as I say to our junior analysts - bring me solutions not problems. Nothing I see in this thread seems to be about the former.


:thumbsup: You make sense.

History's most successful coach, Mick Malthouse, couldn't avoid a wooden spoon at Carlton. He didnt have the cattle was one reason. That he is a flower was a different problem he created for the club

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Rexy wrote:
The one thing that's clear with Bolton is that with a near full list in the preseason we played a more attacking style which looked pretty good.

Then the injuries piled on from R1 and our 'depth' players just aren't up to that style so we've gone back to last years defensive style to minimize the damage.

Injuries and lack of continuity have halted our development for the time being.

Therein lies our biggest problem IMO.

Injuries shouldn’t be an excuse, but the fact is they’re always available as one.

When was the last time we had a best 22 available without at least one injury, let alone an extended period?

Martin, Cotchin, Rance and Riewoldt have played nearly 5 seasons together uninterrupted. Yet for years we’ve had a revolving door of quality players on the sidelines. Add this to our dearth of players brought in between 2009-2014, and it’s no wonder we have a cohesion problem.

Either our players don’t prepare properly, our medicos aren’t up to it, we select ‘weak’ players, or God simply hates us.
The players are getting injuries as most weeks its boys against men.
I have kept saying it for years if you are going to fill the list with kids you need at least half a dozen seasoned hard nuts to take the load off them .
Our older players are to concerned with their own form to provide protection for the young players.


Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


So,whats the problem again? You're confusing me.

The coach? The culture? Too many kids? Older players not protecting the kids?

Playing too many kids will hurt any team. That's what we are doing.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 3:43 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
We could have done an Essendon* and declared top 4. Would love to see this thread if we did :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 4:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
99prelim wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
Braithy wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
a 21 point @#$%&! smashing...


dannyboy wrote:
just to be clear 21 points is a big margin?



watch the game? 21pts was very flattering. we were smashed all over the park. dogs kick a little straighter we lose by 10 goals. Dogs really execute in front of goal, we lose by 80 or 90 pts.

... to a dogs team many in the pre match thread thought we were a proper chance of beating – six day turn around from perth, equally as bad form as us etc etc


was there outcry last season?

no there was not, because we were competitive. I watched every game, a fair few at the ground and i can only remember 2 games - port & tigers where we were never in those games. all the others we were pretty good, and had come a long long way from the malthouse nightmare.

this season, 0-6 with possibly the hardest 5 weeks schedule in afl to come and there has not been one game we've been in. we;ve probably played 3 good quarters of football all season so far.

right now this feels more like the pagan nightmare.

i don't think bolton is the right coach for this team. i think our rebuild and squad turnover is a necessary evil we have to endure - very few in their right mind would argue against that path of a total reset.

But! keeping bolton and rebuilding are seperate issues, which lotsa ppl here like to conflate.

i firmly believe there were better options out there when we got bolton (like dew) ... i'm so devout in the belief only someone who has played afl, can coach afl. they don't even have to have had rich team success, but they need to know the level of competition and ruthlessness that they're walking their kids into.

and bolton on gamedays, struggles almightily. i also question whether he commands the total respect of the playing group. tas league footy is a world away from the big league.


i won't be surprised to see bolton sacked at some point, and tbh, i'll be a little relieved when its done.


"A little straighter"

Needed to be 19.6 to lose by 10 goals, or for your 90 point scenario - 25.0.

You do realise that they converted slightly ahead of us?....


they also turfed a half dozen out on the full, and blew a lot of golden inside 50 chances with horrible decision making and basically stopped running in the last qtr. i can't see how anyone could have watched that game and then tell me with a straight face it didn't feel like a 50 pt loss.

bulldogs are a team desperately out of form - they're actually a woeful side right now, who happened to be younger and less experienced than us as well, and other than Cripps and levi, no player won their position on the night.


make no mistake. we are standing right in line to being the worst team in AFL history. very realistic to think we'll 0-11.

i'm not sure how any coach survives that, whether we like it or not.


Are we allowed to include all our stuff ups (misses, turnovers etc) or does that dilute your argument?


Depends what point you are trying to prove.

If we stuff up opportunities: Bad for coach. Means our players are poorly drilled and structured.

If the opposition stuff up: Bad for coach. Means we should have lost by more, and the scoreline flattered us.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group