Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:22 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 ... 350  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 2:16 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Rexy wrote:
club29 wrote:
If we can hold onto Docherty, Williamson, Cripps, Marchbank, SPS, Dow, Curnow and a few others for 3 more years and get some good senior players in through trades, and then do another 44-66 game build we will be fully rebuilt.

Original 66 game rebuild seemed a little optimistic.


Weitering not in your grouping there... ?


...a few others. There is a chance he will still be around in 3 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 4:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21544
Location: North of the border
If you want to look at clubs that have done a total rebuild there are no greater examples than GWS and GC
Now granted we don't have the draft concessions they both have but if you look at the two clubs one tried to develop a club based on youth and a handful of seasoned players like Ablett and Brennan and they tried Campbell Brown - the other went the youth rout but surrounded them with hard nuts Ward, Brogdan , Mumford Setanta - Shaw - Johnson Cornes etc - these guys took the heat off whilst Cameron Patten Greene Kelly sheilds Etc could develop -
My fear here is we have gone the Gold coast route who despite having a heap of early round draft picks they are no closer now than when they started .
We have basically recruited players of a certain age profile (under 25) who have been just getting on their feet themselves and most have fallen away .
Brisbane have noted this and drafted in Hodge - now he isn't going to do this on his own he needs others around him
Goldcoast have been building since 2011 and are no closer - GWS since 2012 and have been finals last two years and could give it a shake this year

I don't feel that Murphy - Kruezer - Simpson - Thomas have provided the same chop out to the players that Brogdan - Ward - Mumford and co have done with the GWS youth

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 7:17 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Sydney Blue wrote:
If you want to look at clubs that have done a total rebuild there are no greater examples than GWS and GC
Now granted we don't have the draft concessions they both have but if you look at the two clubs one tried to develop a club based on youth and a handful of seasoned players like Ablett and Brennan and they tried Campbell Brown - the other went the youth rout but surrounded them with hard nuts Ward, Brogdan , Mumford Setanta - Shaw - Johnson Cornes etc - these guys took the heat off whilst Cameron Patten Greene Kelly sheilds Etc could develop -
My fear here is we have gone the Gold coast route who despite having a heap of early round draft picks they are no closer now than when they started .
We have basically recruited players of a certain age profile (under 25) who have been just getting on their feet themselves and most have fallen away .
Brisbane have noted this and drafted in Hodge - now he isn't going to do this on his own he needs others around him
Goldcoast have been building since 2011 and are no closer - GWS since 2012 and have been finals last two years and could give it a shake this year

I don't feel that Murphy - Kruezer - Simpson - Thomas have provided the same chop out to the players that Brogdan - Ward - Mumford and co have done with the GWS youth


Maybe the best approach is the hardest. No gimmicks, messiahs, rebuilds, catch phrases etc. Just try and get the best people and players in you can and try and develop a game plan which can build sustainable success.

I was thinking about this today, and yes the club still seems to think we can circumvent the system somehow (either by messiahs, tanking or in this case completely blowing up the list and doing the mother of all rebuilds).

I fear we won’t go anywhere until our board is cleaned out and we are no longer have any Pratt’s or mathisons involved and we have people in charge of the club who are pro active and vision.

The fact off field we may not be as bad as we once were hardly means we are good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 7:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34527
Location: The Brown Wedge
Sydney Blue wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
[Who is to say that the rebuild is just not another Messiah approach.
Chances are it wont work and we go through years of pain for nothing


I would have thought a total rebuild with youth is the total opposite to a messiah approach. :?
Can anyone explain what Ive missed?
The rebuild is just another goose that is going to lay the golden egg.
We tried Pagan that didn't work
We ran with Ratten and got Judd and didn't work either
Then Malthouse
Now it is the rebuild that will lead to the promise land.

It's just another Messiah complex . Youth will lead us to glory

MLG announced this rebuild at the beginning of Malthouse's last year.
People have conveniently forgotten that the 66 games have come and gone and the club is still heading south

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Going into this year is you knew by round 5 we had the players missing that we do, what would you be expecting?

Also your whole post makes no sense. A messiah is based on an individual leading us to glory, what we are trying now isn’t that
In this case the individual is the rebuild.
For some reason people think that slashing the list and going to the draft is the only solution to the promise land
If this was the case a year or so back we had 4 pick one and 2 pick twos .
We should have been dominating.
Since Pagan came in we have been slashing and burning the list almost every year.
We have been letting experience walk out the door on the premise that they would not lead us to the next premiership.
This club has slashed enough it is time they stop blaming the list and work with that list to get them playing better footy.
4 x No 1 and not one of them has taken the competition by storm. It either says the draft assessment is wrong or the development is wrong
I am convinced it is the latter.
Sydney Hawks and Geelong have so very ordinary players but none of them have 4 number ones like we had.
Going to the draft and topping up on youth will only work if you have the system in place for them to develop further.
Carlton obviously hasn't otherwise this top end would not go backwards once it arrived.
The players need job security and as 42 players will tell you that doesn't happen at Carlton and hasn't since Pagan walked in the door

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Agree with most of this

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 8:27 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
The Duke wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
[quote="Sydney Blue"][Who is to say that the rebuild is just not another Messiah approach.
Chances are it wont work and we go through years of pain for nothing


I would have thought a total rebuild with youth is the total opposite to a messiah approach. :?
Can anyone explain what Ive missed?
The rebuild is just another goose that is going to lay the golden egg.
We tried Pagan that didn't work
We ran with Ratten and got Judd and didn't work either
Then Malthouse
Now it is the rebuild that will lead to the promise land.

It's just another Messiah complex . Youth will lead us to glory

MLG announced this rebuild at the beginning of Malthouse's last year.
People have conveniently forgotten that the 66 games have come and gone and the club is still heading south

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Going into this year is you knew by round 5 we had the players missing that we do, what would you be expecting?

Also your whole post makes no sense. A messiah is based on an individual leading us to glory, what we are trying now isn’t that
In this case the individual is the rebuild.
For some reason people think that slashing the list and going to the draft is the only solution to the promise land
If this was the case a year or so back we had 4 pick one and 2 pick twos .
We should have been dominating.
Since Pagan came in we have been slashing and burning the list almost every year.
We have been letting experience walk out the door on the premise that they would not lead us to the next premiership.
This club has slashed enough it is time they stop blaming the list and work with that list to get them playing better footy.
4 x No 1 and not one of them has taken the competition by storm. It either says the draft assessment is wrong or the development is wrong
I am convinced it is the latter.
Sydney Hawks and Geelong have so very ordinary players but none of them have 4 number ones like we had.
Going to the draft and topping up on youth will only work if you have the system in place for them to develop further.
Carlton obviously hasn't otherwise this top end would not go backwards once it arrived.
The players need job security and as 42 players will tell you that doesn't happen at Carlton and hasn't since Pagan walked in the door

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk


Agree with most of this[/quote]

Basically we need to make a decision to stop delisting 10-15 a year and expecting some SOS trickery to lead us to the promised land. I am thinking that the plan has been to stabilize from this year on.

Mind you replacing list cloggers with other list cloggers in O’Shea Mullett and Shaw makes no sense. Are we to believe these are better because they are SOS’a chosen list cloggers.

Basically it’s smoke and mirrors, just work with what we have and work to get better players in and make the best with what we have, rather than thinking the grass is always greener with a new player traded in or a new shiny draft pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 10:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4627
Work with what we got??

Agree,

get some talent,
get KPP S sorted out
don't pay for gap fillers while the KPP and talent develops
Get some mids and mod talent through FA and trade when needed (and what's needed)


Sounds like a plan, it's what the club has said they'll do, and it's the way to go....



Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 11:16 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 905
It's been staring us in the face for 5+ years.

We need a TOTAL Club reset. We need a fresh, new board. With no attachment to Pratt, Mathieson, Elliott & Co.

This club is not a play toy for the rich and famous. They've already shown how much of a f&^% up they all are.

We, the supporters, are crying out far a saviour. The oldies, the middle generation, the kids, and the babies. We are at risk of becoming the St Kilda of the 21st century. In 100 years, if nothing changes, we'll be lucky to win 1 premiership. If we keep going down the path that Pratt and Mathieson lead us, we head down the path of oblivion.

A new board needs to SAY SORRY for the fuckups of the past, & only then can we move forward. Don't blame the AFL, say sorry, move forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 11:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Sydney Blue wrote:
If you want to look at clubs that have done a total rebuild there are no greater examples than GWS and GC
Now granted we don't have the draft concessions they both have but if you look at the two clubs one tried to develop a club based on youth and a handful of seasoned players like Ablett and Brennan and they tried Campbell Brown - the other went the youth rout but surrounded them with hard nuts Ward, Brogdan , Mumford Setanta - Shaw - Johnson Cornes etc - these guys took the heat off whilst Cameron Patten Greene Kelly sheilds Etc could develop -
My fear here is we have gone the Gold coast route who despite having a heap of early round draft picks they are no closer now than when they started .
We have basically recruited players of a certain age profile (under 25) who have been just getting on their feet themselves and most have fallen away .
Brisbane have noted this and drafted in Hodge - now he isn't going to do this on his own he needs others around him
Goldcoast have been building since 2011 and are no closer - GWS since 2012 and have been finals last two years and could give it a shake this year

I don't feel that Murphy - Kruezer - Simpson - Thomas have provided the same chop out to the players that Brogdan - Ward - Mumford and co have done with the GWS youth

Nice post and I have similar thoughts.
The injuries haven't helped to players like Doc who isn't a senior player in the games played sense but he acts like one.
Rowe and Silvagni both down back, the loss of Gibbs (which I agree with by the way) compounded by Murphy and Kreuzer doesn't make for a stable playing/learning environment.
Bolton needs to salvage something real from this season or the top up player(s) you mentioned that we will be needing at the end of the year and next year will all end up at Hawthorn, Sydney, Richmond, Collingwood or Geelong.
FA was designed for the bottom clubs but has just served to top up the clubs in the premiership window. Dogs saw that as a middle tier club and went big for Boyd to make sure they got their man. It was a huge gamble on their part as he was still relatively untried and is still not playing consistently good footy but they made their play and he played the game of his life when it counted. Norf tried it with Waite but the timing was wrong. He's been a better player for them than for us.
We need to look at the one player we absolutely know will deliver for us over a number of years and WHEN THE TIME IS RIGHT, just make the all-in play. Sloane or Wines come to mind this year but I don't think the end of this year is the right timing. We try for a FA this year but next year we should try to land our 'Moby Dick'. I am going to assume the MC has a player in their sights already.
Mature players are also around in the state leagues as we see from time to time. Kelly landed at Geelong at 23 via the draft, a ready made player. He can't be the only one.
One thing is for sure, regardless of how frustrating this can be, we have to stick with the plan, which may take a bit longer than everybody thought. BB is no fool and has worked at the most successful club of the modern era and now is at the most successful club in the comp's history. He knows our expectations and he knows what Hawthorn has achieved by building from the draft and then sustaining success on that foundation.
This is nothing compared to what happened in 2003 and we're still here. The problem was back then we had our hands tied and then we went the wrong route with Malthouse, which set us back five years or more. Had we done this in 2005 when we were allowed back into the draft, or even a bit later, maybe with Ratten, we'd be up there by now.
This is a journey, not a day trip. It takes a more complicated plan, one that is not so inflexible that it can't be massaged when it needs to be but certainly not one that we abandon out of impatience.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
You have to ask, how many of these players 23 and under will play at least 100 games of footy?

Byrne
Cripps
Cuningham
C Curnow
Dow
Fisher
Garlett
Kennedy
Lang
Macredie
Marchbank
McKay
O’Brien
Petrevski-Seton
Pickett
Plowman
Polson
J Silvagni
Weitering
Williamason


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
This excludes anyone who hasn’t played senior footy, such as Kerr or this year’s number 1 pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Basically we need to make a decision to stop delisting 10-15 a year and expecting some SOS trickery to lead us to the promised land. I am thinking that the plan has been to stabilize from this year on.

Mind you replacing list cloggers with other list cloggers in O’Shea Mullett and Shaw makes no sense. Are we to believe these are better because they are SOS’a chosen list cloggers.

Basically it’s smoke and mirrors, just work with what we have and work to get better players in and make the best with what we have, rather than thinking the grass is always greener with a new player traded in or a new shiny draft pick.


So what you're saying is the club should continue the path it has repeatedly said it would.
Turn the list over for 3 drafts then stabilise the list. :?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2715
Blue Vain wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Basically we need to make a decision to stop delisting 10-15 a year and expecting some SOS trickery to lead us to the promised land. I am thinking that the plan has been to stabilize from this year on.

Mind you replacing list cloggers with other list cloggers in O’Shea Mullett and Shaw makes no sense. Are we to believe these are better because they are SOS’a chosen list cloggers.

Basically it’s smoke and mirrors, just work with what we have and work to get better players in and make the best with what we have, rather than thinking the grass is always greener with a new player traded in or a new shiny draft pick.


So what you're saying is the club should continue the path it has repeatedly said it would.
Turn the list over for 3 drafts then stabilise the list. :?


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 10:50 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
I better get a few cliches in': Bolton responds to criticism

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/i-b ... 4zaql.html

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 1:48 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9823
Location: Australia
lucablue wrote:
It's been staring us in the face for 5+ years.

We need a TOTAL Club reset. We need a fresh, new board. With no attachment to Pratt, Mathieson, Elliott & Co.

This club is not a play toy for the rich and famous. They've already shown how much of a f&^% up they all are.

We, the supporters, are crying out far a saviour. The oldies, the middle generation, the kids, and the babies. We are at risk of becoming the St Kilda of the 21st century. In 100 years, if nothing changes, we'll be lucky to win 1 premiership. If we keep going down the path that Pratt and Mathieson lead us, we head down the path of oblivion.

A new board needs to SAY SORRY for the fuckups of the past, & only then can we move forward. Don't blame the AFL, say sorry, move forward.


Absolutely, any on field change or coaching staff change is just wallpaper, after so many years those in charge still haven’t been held account to their performance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 3:45 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
verbs wrote:
You have to ask, how many of these players 23 and under will play at least 100 games of footy?

Byrne
Cripps
Cuningham
C Curnow
Dow
Fisher
Garlett
Kennedy
Lang
Macredie
Marchbank
McKay
O’Brien
Petrevski-Seton
Pickett
Plowman
Polson
J Silvagni
Weitering
Williamason


Just the ones the coach likes.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
verbs wrote:
You have to ask, how many of these players 23 and under will play at least 100 games of footy?

Byrne
Cripps
Cuningham
C Curnow
Dow
Fisher
Garlett
Kennedy
Lang
Macredie
Marchbank
McKay
O’Brien
Petrevski-Seton
Pickett
Plowman
Polson
J Silvagni
Weitering
Williamason


The overwhelming majority IMO

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:13 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Blue Vain wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Basically we need to make a decision to stop delisting 10-15 a year and expecting some SOS trickery to lead us to the promised land. I am thinking that the plan has been to stabilize from this year on.

Mind you replacing list cloggers with other list cloggers in O’Shea Mullett and Shaw makes no sense. Are we to believe these are better because they are SOS’a chosen list cloggers.

Basically it’s smoke and mirrors, just work with what we have and work to get better players in and make the best with what we have, rather than thinking the grass is always greener with a new player traded in or a new shiny draft pick.


So what you're saying is the club should continue the path it has repeatedly said it would.
Turn the list over for 3 drafts then stabilise the list. :?


Yes I am, but I’m concerned they will do something stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
I cant see why they would. The club has been steadfast in its approach to this rebuild. It's some of the supporters who are wetting their pants and calling for it's abandonment.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Blue Vain wrote:
verbs wrote:
You have to ask, how many of these players 23 and under will play at least 100 games of footy?

Byrne
Cripps
Cuningham
C Curnow
Dow
Fisher
Garlett
Kennedy
Lang
Macredie
Marchbank
McKay
O’Brien
Petrevski-Seton
Pickett
Plowman
Polson
J Silvagni
Weitering
Williamason


The overwhelming majority IMO


Me too. And most are a long way from that point but all who do will be doing so around the same time. It’s a strong foundation if we keep them all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:13 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
http://www.carltonfc.com.au/video/2018- ... don-bolton

Even the most cynical of us would find it hard to miss the genuine passion this bloke has.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6991 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 ... 350  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman, Google [Bot], Humpers, jake_h03, Mickstar and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group