AFL Website: Wankers of the week!
Well picked up Ryan on the minnows of football commentary: the AFL website.
Ironic isn't it.
Ex Hawks recruiter Pelchen gave us an A, as did SENs Terry Wallace A, and Buckenara another A, Commercial TV commentary are very favourable too, etc etc, and the apprentice journos gave Carlton trade period a 6/10 despite the activity, let alone keeping our pick 3 for a mid and adding pick 10 to our arsenal for another mid, and adding 2 x 2nd rounders in the so called "super draft". That's just 1 point more than Hawks, Pies and others who did nothing, zilch.
The whole footy world knows we are in rebuild, the profile we are after, the need for higher draft picks, and the addition of mids who fit the profile and window we are targeting. The word rebuild suggest rebuild, not keeping older players who may not be around for our next tilt but have trade value to get us what we need/ want.
The AFL apprentice journos seem to have forgotten the above, yet in their synopsis suggest we have added young mids to bolster our midfield. They also suggest we lost Rockliff and the loss of Gibbs
ALSO leaves a whole in the midfield. We never had Rockliff. He was an option, not a player. Whats with the "ALSO"? He was offered more money at Port and he isn't exactly the right fit for our targeted profile.

...what was the AFL journos spin on that?
Here's the names of of the AFL apprentices:
Nick Bowen
Nathan Scmook
Dinny Navaratnam
Did they hear whispers about Devons chronic knee and that he chose a club who will nurse him through the injury?
Did they consider Carlton we not prepared to over pay for Rockliff, and only want players who WANT to play for Carlton?
Do they know good the Super Draft is next year.
Do they realise we have held our fire and have huge cap space for a big play for Trade/ FA next year in our final year of the rebuild?
I think they should have another read of what they penned then have a look at the score they gave SOS compared to other teams who basically failed to participate.