Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 1:20 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:04 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Michael Jezz wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
I can already see the idiots on here calling for the coach and an already new board 23 games into an 88 game rebuild. Success is not linear


the board is the same

Mr Gleeson (10 years 6 months)

Its half the size a different president. Judds in and gleesons out. They have wrung all the changes. Give them a go. This is 4 years minimum
Mr Clarke (9 years 9 months)
Mr Fried (9 years 11 months)
Mr LoGiudice (6 years 6 months) and
Mrs Pratt (5 years and 7 months),
Mr Sayers (4 years) and
Mr Mathieson (4 years).
Ms Jenkins 1 year 1 month

there is your board...there is no "whole of club reset"

pratts and mathiesons appointed the judge as the president


Im not giving any of the above a go - they are all proven failures as a Board
Regarding Judd - the age reports that he did "a deal" - if Judd is getting paid for a Board role- Judd has to go.
If Judd was confident of his abilities he should have put his name up for election by the members- members would respect that - rather than being invited on by the President
Judd is great footballer but that does not translate to a good administrator


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:12 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3475
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
I can already see the idiots on here calling for the coach and an already new board 23 games into an 88 game rebuild. Success is not linear


the board is the same

Mr Gleeson (10 years 6 months)

Its half the size a different president. Judds in and gleesons out. They have wrung all the changes. Give them a go. This is 4 years minimum
Mr Clarke (9 years 9 months)
Mr Fried (9 years 11 months)
Mr LoGiudice (6 years 6 months) and
Mrs Pratt (5 years and 7 months),
Mr Sayers (4 years) and
Mr Mathieson (4 years).
Ms Jenkins 1 year 1 month

there is your board...there is no "whole of club reset"

pratts and mathiesons appointed the judge as the president


Im not giving any of the above a go - they are all proven failures as a Board
Regarding Judd - the age reports that he did "a deal" - if Judd is getting paid for a Board role- Judd has to go.
If Judd was confident of his abilities he should have put his name up for election by the members- members would respect that - rather than being invited on by the President
Judd is great footballer but that does not translate to a good administrator


Call me pedantic but the role of the Board is not to administer it's to set strategy and provide oversight to Management (administrators). Jude's role as incoming football Director will (should) be to ensure management of the football department is aligned with the strategy determined by the board.

But yeah Judd will be no good at Admin because ummmmm football :banghead:

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:47 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:05 pm
Posts: 1005
Location: Raxacoricofallapatorius
It was a very disappointing game, no doubt. But I will reserve judgement until at least all the JLT games have been played.

Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

_________________
Carlton - Nothing's changed
I still love you, oh, I still love you
Only slightly, only slightly less
Than I used to, my love


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:49 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2742
Whoah there!

Melbourne is a team chock full of fantastic players. The only query on them is unknown quality of their coach - but so far, it looks like they have a pretty good game plan. I think they will do better than many people expect. And they are clearly giving everything in these practice matches.
By contrast, our defensive structures looked to be pretty underwhelming.

However, the pre-season's key feature is the lower standards of defensive pressure vs the season proper. That's why teams can perform particularly well during the pre-season but not once the real season begins (e.g. us a few years ago and collingwood last year, IIRC...).

Pre-season is where you look for spots of upside and more or less disregards the negatives (not the coaches but the fans...).
For the coach, I suspect the defensive structures would have fallen well short of what he would have bee teaching them so a good time to redress that. Would expect that to be a bit better against the Saints next week.

Regarding positives, I thought Harry showed some good attitude signs. Marchbank was smooth. Kruezer looked good to me - involved i a lot, took a few marks. Casboult looked in good shape and his kicking action much much better.
Was happily surprised by Fisher (wasn't expecting much).
Kym LeBetts was exciting.
Pickett was good.

Will be interesting to see who gets named this week, and more importantly, the week after....

PS. Yes, we know Weitering is a star in the making and probably better than our other forwards. But, for gods sake, let him become the AFL's premier backman rather than move him forward to plug a temporary hole.
Moving him to the forward line will not suddenly make us a top 8 team; and it doesn't matter whether we finish 11th rather than 12th; or 14th rather than 15th, in 2017.
In the meantime, we would be robbing him of important time to develop his key defensive skills and experience, and rob our own potential forwards of developing their skills.
Sure, swing him forward during the odd match here and there to mix it up for him and the opposition; loosen him up every now and then.
But I think the calls on TC to move him forward are misplaced and potentially v damaging to our long term development.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:09 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9354
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
frank dardew wrote:
Sorry Rexy can't agree with ya
Rowe has little or no clue about rucking Casboult has some
Casboult not great as a forward and obviously kicking diabolical but Rowe ain't nearly as good a mark
and isn't as good decision maker which doesn't say a lot because Casboult isn't great either
Both are fairly limited footballers but Casboult is a better forward than Rowe


caboult is crap
rowe is crap


Agree with this. As long as we're having a conversation about whether include either/or Casboult or Rowe, we're royally [REDACTED].

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:25 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:05 pm
Posts: 4581
Location: St Helens
Cuningham had a pretty good second half after a quiet first half. he's an interesting one this year, what he does is first class but he does nowhere near enough just yet. Hopefully he's given another full game this weekend to try and build some form.

Casboult was pretty good up the ground. He's obviously not the answer as a FF but when he plays further up the ground he's alright. He and Kreuzer were both good.

Curnow, Gibbs, Murphy, Simpson, Docherty. We know what we're gonna get from them. Once again we saw just how badly we rely on Cripps in the guts though.

Rowe has a big role to play this year in what will most likely be an even younger back line than last year.

Marchbank and Plowman were probably the biggest highlight of the day for us.

Charlie Curnow was good on the ball, he could go a long way to solving our midfield problems if he makes it as a big bodied midfielder but as we saw again in the second half he's also so good when he plays close to goal.

LeBois definitely has something to work with, he's seriously nippy around the packs.

Pickett was good, better than I was expecting. he and Wright should be our small forwards this year.

Harry McKay was still just a bit off the pace and needs a bit more time but the two chase down tackles show he's willing to work.

Kerridge needs a role change. Best bet for him would be to release Ed and do an apprenticeship as our tagger like the role he had against Hawthorn last year. Not classy enough at this stage to be an out and out midfielder but he runs his guts out and gets to a lot of contests.

Looked to me like we treated it like a practice game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 3:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
Positives

Not many
Charlie as a midfielder
Glimpses from LeBois and Pickett
Marchbank was extremely solid for a first hit out.
Kreuzer thought he played well one of our better players despite the negative crap on here
Fisher while not a fan of drafting him showed with a bit more size he might be able make it

Negatives
Game plan especially handballing the ball forward 15m to someone who is stationary and gets put under more pressure who then tries the same to eventually turn it over?? How do forwards lead to this???
Rowe has a role to play on the stay at home forwards but gets run ragged by anyone who can move around and run back to goal.
Kicking!! Charlies kicking was very poor he needs to improve this.
Palmer wasn't a fan no matter how cheap we got him did nothing to suggest otherwise.
SOS had a shocker
McKay needs a good run in the VFL to build up his confidence when the season starts.
Thomas looks like a 40yr old fan running around?? Players go past him from behind in a couple of steps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
This place is still a joy.

February .

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:14 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
Good to see we view this as a development year and have started tanking before the season started. Better to be up front with these things

Sent from my OPPO R9m using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 6:24 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1234
chelodina wrote:
Good to see we view this as a development year and have started tanking before the season started. Better to be up front with these things

Sent from my OPPO R9m using Tapatalk

Tanking suggests we're better than we are playing or we're just not trying, I don't think that is the case. We're just not that great, we're inexperienced and developing. We're a couple of years behind Melbourne in our rebuild. You've got be a little patient.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:21 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1621
Yes we're certainly 2 to 3 years behind the Demon's development, it was plain to see.
There's plenty of work to be done yet.
The thought of adding a Darcy Fogarty or Jarrod Brander is sublime and makes it all the more bearable.

_________________
Go Blue Boys


Last edited by bmaurizio on Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:21 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Blue Boys wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Good to see we view this as a development year and have started tanking before the season started. Better to be up front with these things

Sent from my OPPO R9m using Tapatalk

Tanking suggests we're better than we are playing or we're just not trying, I don't think that is the case. We're just not that great, we're inexperienced and developing. We're a couple of years behind Melbourne in our rebuild. You've got be a little patient.


murphy, gibbs simpson kruezer kerridge docherty smedts rowe plowman palmer thomas casboult buckley ed curnow white wright gorringe- that is 17/22 that are highly experienced or re-used players that played for carlton

that is not a rebuild


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Honest question. Is there anything you actually like about Carlton?

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:42 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Perth
Donstuie wrote:
Honest question. Is there anything you actually like about Carlton?


No response. What a surprise!

_________________
I support the Navy Blues whatever happens!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:18 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9625
Location: Australia
bmaurizio wrote:
Yes we're certainly 2 to 3 years behind the Demon's development, it was plain to see.
There's plenty of work to be done yet.
The thought of adding a Darcy Fogarty or Jarrod Brander is sublime and makes it all the more bearable.


Just like adding Murphy, Gibbs and Kruezer made it all bearable?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:19 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9625
Location: Australia
Donstuie wrote:
Honest question. Is there anything you actually like about Carlton?


Yes, I liked watching Wayne Johnston play....


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 6:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
sinbagger wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Taff wrote:
Preferring the cricket at the moment. Will watch all the game later this afternoon. Keen to check out the new boys.
H
Hi Taff
I am getting a network error on Chrome,
On Explorer and Firefox it plays for about a minute and then gives me a network error message.
The chat guy says there is a known problem with Explorer but Firefox seems to be OK.
No issues with Chrome they are aware of.

A billion dollar industry that can't even successfully live stream the games is a joke.

I think i am glad I missed it but I have just paid $189 to watch the season.
20 mbs should be enough
/


Yeah I had lots of issues trying to watch a replay of the previous woman's match last weekend. The replay kept failing after a minute and a half. Every other live match and replay was ok. After they seemed to upload a new recording it all played ok, must have been a problem with the encoding.

I also found that I can't watch on safari or on the android web browser on my TV. Firefox works well on OSX and the iOS app also works well.

Both of today's matches streamed really well in HD from my iPhone to my Apple TV.

I also tried to chromecast to my android TV from iOS but it would only play from the start, never live. So chromecast support seems a little buggy.
I don't have any apple devices so I am hoping they williron out the kinks before Rd one.
Last year I watched every game without a single hiccup.
Well almost no hiccups.
There is a choke point in China apparently for sheer volume of usage.
Apparently the stream finds its way thorugh China sometyimes.
I have no idea how they do it.
My dad had to listen on SW radio Australia.
I'm thankful for what I have compared to that!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:39 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1234
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Blue Boys wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Good to see we view this as a development year and have started tanking before the season started. Better to be up front with these things

Sent from my OPPO R9m using Tapatalk

Tanking suggests we're better than we are playing or we're just not trying, I don't think that is the case. We're just not that great, we're inexperienced and developing. We're a couple of years behind Melbourne in our rebuild. You've got be a little patient.


murphy, gibbs simpson kruezer kerridge docherty smedts rowe plowman palmer thomas casboult buckley ed curnow white wright gorringe- that is 17/22 that are highly experienced or re-used players that played for carlton

that is not a rebuild

I think I heard a comentator say on the weekend we have the most players under 21 on a list. I stand to be corrected if that's not the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:59 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24699
Location: Bondi Beach
I have no doubt Carlton played bruise free footy on the weekend.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:38 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 2477
Blue Boys wrote:
Mosquito Fleet wrote:
Blue Boys wrote:
chelodina wrote:
Good to see we view this as a development year and have started tanking before the season started. Better to be up front with these things

Sent from my OPPO R9m using Tapatalk

Tanking suggests we're better than we are playing or we're just not trying, I don't think that is the case. We're just not that great, we're inexperienced and developing. We're a couple of years behind Melbourne in our rebuild. You've got be a little patient.


murphy, gibbs simpson kruezer kerridge docherty smedts rowe plowman palmer thomas casboult buckley ed curnow white wright gorringe- that is 17/22 that are highly experienced or re-used players that played for carlton

that is not a rebuild

I think I heard a comentator say on the weekend we have the most players under 21 on a list. I stand to be corrected if that's not the case.


the entire list of 44 may be and I would need to check, but the above list played and that is not young


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 220 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group