Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 09, 2025 9:38 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:32 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3441
B: Zach Tuohy - Sam Rowe - Jacob Weitering
HB: Dylan Buckley - Lachie Plowman - Sam Docherty
C: Kade Simpson (C) - Sam Kerridge - Ed Curnow
HF: Jack Silvagni - Liam Jones - David Cuningham
F: Matthew Kreuzer - Levi Casboult - Matthew Wright
R: Andrew Phillips - Patrick Cripps - Bryce Gibbs

Interchange from: Dennis Armfield - Simon White - Liam Sumner - Dale Thomas - Andrejs Everitt - Blaine Boekhorst - Nick Graham


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:32 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
Cripps doubtful......eeeek


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19223
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
london blue wrote:
Cripps doubtful......eeeek


According to?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Sin City wrote:
Extended bench of Armfield, White, Sumner, Thomas, Everitt, Boekhorst and Graham.

It'll be very interesting to see which way they go.

Very interesting to see what standards they accept.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:55 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8183
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
jim wrote:
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Really?

First time you've mentioned this. Tell me more!

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:07 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8183
cimm1979 wrote:
jim wrote:
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Really?

First time you've mentioned this. Tell me more!


I'll be mentioning it many more times too. 1000s of times while they still do it. It does us no good at all. Rather win a few less tap outs to pick a runner and get more value around the ground. To me it's a no-brainer. You can win the clearances to a losing ruck, happens alot. Be ok if they can do something off the ball but they don't. Like, who could possibly disagree with that logic. It's like having two "Warnock's" on the ground.

At least we still have two key forwards. That at least worked alot better last week as we kicked our 3rd highest score of the year (pity about the result).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:22 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
Rexy wrote:
Sin City wrote:
Extended bench of Armfield, White, Sumner, Thomas, Everitt, Boekhorst and Graham.

It'll be very interesting to see which way they go.

Very interesting to see what standards they accept.

I'd like to see Boekhorst persisted with, so one of us is going to end up disappointed.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
jim wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
jim wrote:
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Really?

First time you've mentioned this. Tell me more!


I'll be mentioning it many more times too. 1000s of times while they still do it. It does us no good at all. Rather win a few less tap outs to pick a runner and get more value around the ground. To me it's a no-brainer. You can win the clearances to a losing ruck, happens alot. Be ok if they can do something off the ball but they don't. Like, who could possibly disagree with that logic. It's like having two "Warnock's" on the ground.

At least we still have two key forwards. That at least worked alot better last week as we kicked our 3rd highest score of the year (pity about the result).


It's your keyboard but why anyone would keep barking on about a selection preference when it's obvious it's the way they want to go with seems strange.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:26 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10477
Is there a game this weekend? :lol: :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
SurreyBlue wrote:
Is there a game this weekend? :lol: :razz:


There's a few rippers unfortunately ours isn't one of them.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:16 pm
Posts: 2825
Location: addis ababa, Ethiopia
feeling very blah.
Early on I was interested in the game plan and 23
Then I was interested in Charlie then Silvagni.
I wanted to support walks when he retired.
Now what?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:33 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
jim wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
jim wrote:
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Really?

First time you've mentioned this. Tell me more!




At least we still have two key forwards. That at least worked alot better last week as we kicked our 3rd highest score of the year (pity about the result).


Could that have also ruined a mechanism of our team defense that allowed such a winning score against?

The second ruck probably has more to do with it. Or perhaps the extra tall all round. Whether it is a ruck or a second tall forward.
I think Bolton is doing it to get the endure factor happening. Making the players work harder for future gains. Help finish lower on the ladder as to not do a 2004. Give Phillips game time for future gains.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4623
If we dont beat Melbourne, I'm ripping up my membership!



Actually, a little sick of hearing Dees supporters calculating percentages.
Would be nice to LOSE by one point!.....I'll then start doing the calculation for the number of tens of goals they have to beat Geelong by...at Skilled
:)

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21400
Location: North of the border
jim wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
jim wrote:
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Really?

First time you've mentioned this. Tell me more!


I'll be mentioning it many more times too. 1000s of times while they still do it. It does us no good at all. Rather win a few less tap outs to pick a runner and get more value around the ground. To me it's a no-brainer. You can win the clearances to a losing ruck, happens alot. Be ok if they can do something off the ball but they don't. Like, who could possibly disagree with that logic. It's like having two "Warnock's" on the ground.

At least we still have two key forwards. That at least worked alot better last week as we kicked our 3rd highest score of the year (pity about the result).

15 of the 18 teams selected 2 ruckman this week
What is your point are you trying to say Casboult is 2nd ruck when we are totally bereft of forward targets

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:20 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10477
club29 wrote:
jim wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
jim wrote:
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Really?

First time you've mentioned this. Tell me more!




At least we still have two key forwards. That at least worked alot better last week as we kicked our 3rd highest score of the year (pity about the result).


Could that have also ruined a mechanism of our team defense that allowed such a winning score against?

The second ruck probably has more to do with it. Or perhaps the extra tall all round. Whether it is a ruck or a second tall forward.
I think Bolton is doing it to get the endure factor happening. Making the players work harder for future gains. Help finish lower on the ladder as to not do a 2004. Give Phillips game time for future gains.


Finally someone has said it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 8:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17948
cimm1979 wrote:
jim wrote:
Two ruckmen. Means we essentially play with 17 on the field again as the ruckman not on the ball will be useless.


Really?

First time you've mentioned this. Tell me more!


:lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
Effes wrote:
london blue wrote:
Cripps doubtful......eeeek


According to?


bone bruising in his knee - was always a test

Speculative on my behalf though
......and I can't understand how graham gets another chance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:25 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4623
How does Thomas get a game?
Hopefully Sumner for Thomas out of that interchange

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 12:58 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
I hope they bring in Sumner and Everitt. We need some run this week (every week) if we are to win. Not Graham but he may be for Cripps.
I like the way the Dees play. And the Dogs.
I wish we played that way.

In the next two weeks we have the chance to :
1. Snuff out someone's finals hopes and
2. Consign the enemy to the wooden spoon.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 130 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group