Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 8:13 pm

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 6 of 8
  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
club29
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 7:55 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9113
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Heavs wrote:
Not a big fan of crying umpiring because so many calls are down to interpretation. But Christ I got mad when that bloke who can't afford a second name took the 'mark' over chas curnow then proceeded to play on from 5 metres in front of it and set up a goal. Not interpretation, basic rule.

Because it's early in the game it won't be discussed. But @#$%&! you umpires.


If you have taken a mark you can play on ? Happens all game every week.

...but was it a mark? No replay on that one. Looked like Curnow had a chunk of it.


Last edited by club29 on Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
muzza
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
Rod Waddell wrote:
Rod Waddell wrote:
"Hawks kicked 75 points last week and beat the Swans.

CFC kicked 75 points last week and lost to WCE.

Can you see the correlation?"

Wrote this in the pre-match discussion. If we kicked 75 points we would of won....by a point!

Doesn't make me feel any better

You're like Nostradamus :razz:
Top
 Profile  
 
emtwenty
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
GreatEx wrote:
emtwenty wrote:
First game at the SCG. Crowd felt so unnatural & manufactured. Only time they pay attention is when someone scores.


Being a Sydney resident, I'd say they are genuine in their support but don't really "get" the game. The prime example was the Sydney vs. GWS game at the SCG this season. The first 15 minutes of the game was some of the most intense footy you'll ever see: big hits, ferocious tackles, smothers, etc. Real high quality stuff that would have the MCG roaring. But after those 15 minutes the score was 0.1 to 0.0, and you could hear a pin drop. Then finally Sydney breaks through for a goal, and the crowd wakes up from its slumber with a heartfelt cheer. Man, for me the goal was the anti-climax to some seriously amazing football, but I guess Sydneysiders are all about the razzamatazz.


Felt so weird sitting in a crowd where they make no comment during general play - no commenting on umpiring, players decisions etc. just waiting for Buddy to score.

Except those clappers they all have they use at the most random of times
Top
 Profile  
 
limestone
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:07 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 770
Delboy74 wrote:
NTBlue wrote:
Umpire... you pay a free kick if a ruckman takes possession in a ruck contest and gets tackled. you do not pay a free kick if an opposition player makes slight contact by just touching the back of the ruckmans jumper whilst he is kicking the ball. That is not a tackle. We are not playing the primary school tiggy tiggy touch. One of the worst 3 decisions of the day.


I was also perplexed by this, and the "commentators" didn't even pick up on it. Sometimes wonder if they're actually watching the game.


I saw that on the replay today. Terrible decision . I rewound it back 3 times to make sure I wasn't seeing things .
Top
 Profile  
 
GreatEx
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:53 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14746
Location: Sydney
emtwenty wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
emtwenty wrote:
First game at the SCG. Crowd felt so unnatural & manufactured. Only time they pay attention is when someone scores.


Being a Sydney resident, I'd say they are genuine in their support but don't really "get" the game. The prime example was the Sydney vs. GWS game at the SCG this season. The first 15 minutes of the game was some of the most intense footy you'll ever see: big hits, ferocious tackles, smothers, etc. Real high quality stuff that would have the MCG roaring. But after those 15 minutes the score was 0.1 to 0.0, and you could hear a pin drop. Then finally Sydney breaks through for a goal, and the crowd wakes up from its slumber with a heartfelt cheer. Man, for me the goal was the anti-climax to some seriously amazing football, but I guess Sydneysiders are all about the razzamatazz.


Felt so weird sitting in a crowd where they make no comment during general play - no commenting on umpiring, players decisions etc. just waiting for Buddy to score.

Except those clappers they all have they use at the most random of times


True, it's not a real footy crowd if you don't hear BALL! and MAN! every 2 seconds. :)

The clappers are indeed a disgrace. Last Sydney game I went to they were handing those out along with little placards advertising the new season of My Master Kitchen or Australia's Got Top Models or some other Channel 7 abomination, and the guy handing them out tried to force them into my hands so I had to pin my arms to my side and say sternly "I don't want that crap". All my Sydney mates took them. It was the worst moment of my life. Well, maybe not worst... top 100 perhaps.
Top
 Profile  
 
sinbagger
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:31 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9939
Location: Australia
club29 wrote:
Heavs wrote:
Not a big fan of crying umpiring because so many calls are down to interpretation. But Christ I got mad when that bloke who can't afford a second name took the 'mark' over chas curnow then proceeded to play on from 5 metres in front of it and set up a goal. Not interpretation, basic rule.

Because it's early in the game it won't be discussed. But @#$%&! you umpires.


If you have taken a mark you can play on ? Happens all game every week.

...but was it a mark? No replay on that one. Looked like Curnow had a chunk of it.


Lay week they pay the man in front even though the Carlton player had most of the mark from behind, this week they play the man behind because he had most of the mark even though the Carlton player was in front.

Because Carlton.
Top
 Profile  
 
moshe25
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:59 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
Yep, the AFL is against Carlton.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/
Top
 Profile  
 
TheBluesMuse
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:49 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
I thought the umpires helped us in the first half....then they didn't in the second half.

I've come to expect that our game is unique in the fact that the umpires form matters just as much as the players form....it's crap but if I'm to keep enjoying the game I just have to accept it.

Umpires should be held accountable ...there should be video reviews after the games and if you get more than 3 decisions wrong in a game you're demoted.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger
Top
 Profile  
 
Stone Free
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:19 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:40 am
Posts: 4088
Location: Reclining always
TheBluesMuse wrote:

Umpires should be held accountable ...there should be video reviews after the games and if you get more than 3 decisions wrong in a game you're demoted.


I know an AFL umpire socially, and this does actually happen.
Top
 Profile  
 
AGRO
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:20 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24653
Location: Kaloyasena
TheBluesMuse wrote:
I thought the umpires helped us in the first half....then they didn't in the second half.

I've come to expect that our game is unique in the fact that the umpires form matters just as much as the players form....it's crap but if I'm to keep enjoying the game I just have to accept it.

Umpires should be held accountable ...there should be video reviews after the games and if you get more than 3 decisions wrong in a game you're demoted.



Then we'd have 27 different umpires every week.


:lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill
Top
 Profile  
 
GreatEx
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14746
Location: Sydney
No worries, we'll keep turning them over 'til we find one who likes Carlton. :D
Top
 Profile  
 
Effes
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19535
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
AFLCA Votes:

SYDNEY SWANS v CARLTON
10 Josh Kennedy (Syd)
6 Patrick Cripps (Carl)
5 Bryce Gibbs (Carl)
4 Lance Franklin (Syd)
2 Jake Lloyd (Syd)
2 Luke Parker (Syd)
1 Kade Simpson (Carl)

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch
Top
 Profile  
 
Blue Sombrero
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:56 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Effes wrote:
AFLCA Votes:

SYDNEY SWANS v CARLTON
10 Josh Kennedy (Syd)
6 Patrick Cripps (Carl)
5 Bryce Gibbs (Carl)
4 Lance Franklin (Syd)
2 Jake Lloyd (Syd)
2 Luke Parker (Syd)
1 Kade Simpson (Carl)

That's one for the mathematicians to work out how the votes went.
Josh 5 + 5
Cripps
Gibbs
Buddy
Lloys
Parker
Simmo 1 + 0

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)
Top
 Profile  
 
grrofunger
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 1:07 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Effes wrote:
AFLCA Votes:

SYDNEY SWANS v CARLTON
10 Josh Kennedy (Syd)
6 Patrick Cripps (Carl)
5 Bryce Gibbs (Carl)
4 Lance Franklin (Syd)
2 Jake Lloyd (Syd)
2 Luke Parker (Syd)
1 Kade Simpson (Carl)

That's one for the mathematicians to work out how the votes went.
Josh 5 + 5
Cripps
Gibbs
Buddy
Lloys
Parker
Simmo 1 + 0


maybe

Josh 5 + 5
Cripps 3 + 3
Gibbs 4 + 1
Buddy 0 + 4
Lloys 0 + 2
Parker 2 + 0
Simmo 1 + 0

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.
Top
 Profile  
 
frank dardew
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:16 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
One of our best performances of the season

disappointing about Charlie but got glimpses of immense talent - good to get more senior game time into Weiters and SOJ

Thought we also saw good things /developments from Graham Buckley and Bokehurst

Cripps Gibbs simpson Docherty excellent

Kreuzer much better around the ground this week - Phillips continues to improve - would like him to get a few more possies around the ground - seems to be a good mark though

Backline working very well

Midfield did very well

Sumner and Plowman did enough to hold their spots and hopefully have still a lot of upside in the next few years

Kerridge and wright both good warriors
Top
 Profile  
 
buzzaaaah
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:35 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
That's the only way it works Gro, no maybe.


Love to know who gave Buddy 4 votes. I felt he was back to 2012 Buddy where he wants to kick every goal the Swans produce. Thats the year the Hawks lost the GF.
If Tippet doesn't get back, they are in trouble.

_________________
T E A M
Top
 Profile  
 
stubba
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:38 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:00 am
Posts: 8229
Location: canberra
buzzaaaah wrote:
That's the only way it works Gro, no maybe.


Love to know who gave Buddy 4 votes. I felt he was back to 2012 Buddy where he wants to kick every goal the Swans produce. Thats the year the Hawks lost the GF.
If Tippet doesn't get back, they are in trouble.


Correct. (No maybe.)

_________________
I need some new conspiracy theories; all my others have come true.
Top
 Profile  
 
Blueboy74
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:47 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4585
Location: Blisstonia.
No problem with JPK, ridiculous amount of contested ball and was just too strong in a few significant moments.

4 goals out 10 could be seen as the difference, but I didn't notice Franklin after half time. Got on the end of a couple, and was always going to cash in being their only target.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'
Top
 Profile  
 
GreatEx
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14746
Location: Sydney
Yep, Buddy was definitely doing his best Andy Cole impression, just hanging around waiting to score cheap goals. There was one (2nd or 4th quarter) where his team-mate was running into an open goal but Buddy started screaming for it and almost caused enough confusion in the team-mate's mind to cost them the goal. In all, he got 3 goals on the goal line and one excellent shot from 50m. His kicking around the ground was atrocious - numerous turnovers and one incredibly lucky "assist" where he tried to roost it 60m for a goal but instead scrubbed in 20m to where Kennedy happened to be lurking and then overpowered Buckley for a goal. No way did Buddy deserve votes, he was shit.
Top
 Profile  
 
Heavs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 1:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17526
Location: Left Cuckistan
club29 wrote:
Heavs wrote:
Not a big fan of crying umpiring because so many calls are down to interpretation. But Christ I got mad when that bloke who can't afford a second name took the 'mark' over chas curnow then proceeded to play on from 5 metres in front of it and set up a goal. Not interpretation, basic rule.

Because it's early in the game it won't be discussed. But @#$%&! you umpires.


If you have taken a mark you can play on ? Happens all game every week.

...but was it a mark? No replay on that one. Looked like Curnow had a chunk of it.


Well I thought it was a line ball call on the mark but that's interpretation so I can't really sook about that. But the over the mark thing was because the play had stopped. He came to ground well over the mark, got up off his ass and ran on. Once the play is stopped you have to go back behind your mark.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 6 of 8
  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MPH78 and 35 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group