cecil89 wrote:
This zoning system is based on targeting multicultural and aboriginal players, often from disadvantaged families who wouldn't otherwise have an opportunity to play football or progress through football pathways. Access to the best private schools and to traditional footy factories wouldn't be an advantage in this situation at all. In fact, access to a non-traditional area could be seen as advantageous.
I hope you are right...but I have my suspicions. I was reading the article in the AFL Football Record and it mentions that
"AFL clubs have been given funding over the summer to establish club-branded talent academies throughout Victoria and the NT."
If you have a look at the list Carlton is the only club to get just one region.
Richmond get Bendigo and the Murray Bushrangers for example.
Hawthorn gets Eastern Rangers and Gippsland Power - two strong zones.
At the very least, these other AFL clubs can build strong relationships with people/clubs in these zones that Carlton cannot do.
This is at the very least a way other clubs can strengthen themselves with the backing of the AFL.
This is ALSO maybe the way the AFL can start towards zoning, therefore having it in line with the Swans zone, GWS zone etc...and my guess is 5-10 years down the track Carlton will have to bid for a player in the Calder zone which Essendon* can choose not to or to match the bid. This type of scenario opens up a whole new layer of favouritism if it eventuates this way.