Synbad wrote:
Nobody is going to put a ticket together.. Because the club has been bobby trapped.
That's the point.
It's not Harold Mitchell alone were talking about.
It's every top notch person around Melbourne who is capable
They're not touching it under the current circumstances for obvious reasons
The point is they're as apathetic as members not joining are apathetic
It's just that people don't see any value in it the way it is so they don't.
Smart people won't walk into a club that's set to explode if they go in by force?
They just find other things in life.
There's no mystery in that.. It's not shocking or anything like that.
Have you ever asked yourself why it's just these bozos on the board year in year out?
In all of Melbourne just these clowns working towards life membership for themselves?
Nobody better?
Just them?
Lol
Does the sound of the penny dropping ever hit home?
OK, so let's see.
- whoever these highly talented people are, they wouldn't be able to prevent the imminent 'explosion' you're talking about, because the only way they would see fit to enter the club is by exploding it themselves
- they're also apathetic enough that they'd rather watch the club implode than step in now and prevent further, presumably catastrophic, damage being inflicted on the club.
Sounds like the very way the current underperforming bunch got on to the board 8-10 years ago, no?
It's a very enticing picture you've painted. I can see the fervor for just giving them the keys and installing them without scrutiny from the members.
To be clear, don't mistake this comment as an mark of satisfaction with the current board, because I'm not satisfied. Who would be? All I'd like, before throwing open the doors to a new board, is the chance to know who are they are and hear how they'd right the ship. And then make a decision.
Until such time as they summon the courage allow the members to assess what they have to offer, I will hope the current board and administration stay true to the improvements I have seen over the last six months.
Considering Carlton's history, I would have thought anyone who wouldn't want a prospective new board and/or president to face some scrutiny prior to being installed would be the very definition of gullible. Or is that a silly thought?