Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 7:48 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 530 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 27  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:52 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
tap in 79 wrote:
chubbyruss wrote:
When do we hand back the keys :?:


The keys have already been handed over, and the more Carlton is in debt the more reliant they become.
This should give you a clue at what Carlton is thought of at AFL HQ.

http://www.themercury.com.au/sport/afl/ ... 7589225068


Nice pick up Tap.
Always bragged to my Tassie mates that they'd never see the Blues play there because we're ''a big club" ... even though I knew it was bullshite.
It's a telling snapshot of where we are at.

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:53 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
The Kick Inside wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
This should give you a clue at what Carlton is thought of at AFL HQ.

http://www.themercury.com.au/sport/afl/ ... 7589225068


That example is more about the realities of where the club is at. There might be 16 trophies in the cabinet - and that's something to be historically proud of, but Carlton is not a successful club. They don't deserve to be handed things just because they used to be successful. It's a bit like respect. It has to be earned.



Carlton is now a Vegas act.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:07 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 9354
So this is where the AFL steps in, covers our Princes Park debt (which was gotten into because of their about face on the Legends stand) and lets us pay $1 a year for the venue. Then they let us play all our games at the MCG, with a killer contract. Oh, and lets us make as much from our away games as we do from our home games. And we get to monopolise an entire state.

Oh, sorry, were not brown and gold.

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:08 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
Wojee wrote:
Carlton is now a Vegas act.


Probably closer to Rooty Hill RSL act actually. I wonder if Geoffrey Edelsten went to this Raheen gathering? As someone so very astutely pointed out to me this morning - here they are talking about building a club that stands on its feet without philanthropy and moving away from the old, corporate Carlton, but their first step is to hold a meeting at Raheen presumably with the same crowd?

Wonder if the Gandels were there. Should I enquire as to a guest list? Benefactor Bruce would have been there...past board members....past Presidents...the conversation would have been enthralling. No doubt they are all excited to see more of Marc Murphy's spectacular marking next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:12 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
kennyhunter wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
chubbyruss wrote:
When do we hand back the keys :?:


The keys have already been handed over, and the more Carlton is in debt the more reliant they become.
This should give you a clue at what Carlton is thought of at AFL HQ.

http://www.themercury.com.au/sport/afl/ ... 7589225068


Nice pick up Tap.
Always bragged to my Tassie mates that they'd never see the Blues play there because we're ''a big club" ... even though I knew it was bullshite.
It's a telling snapshot of where we are at.


Richmond play Norf in Tassie often & according to some they are who we should aspire to be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:17 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
The Kick Inside wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Carlton is now a Vegas act.


Probably closer to Rooty Hill RSL act actually.


Still better than Coogee Bay Pub :thumbsup:

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:23 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
emtwenty wrote:
Richmond play Norf in Tassie often & according to some they are who we should aspire to be.


Assets - check, Members - check, Sales - check, Excellent CEO - check, respected President. They have their shit together off-field. You can't even argue that Em! On-field is a slightly different story. Put the focus back on Carlton...stop making excuses for them. The club keeps going back and doing the same thing - let's have a secret meeting with the richest supporters...IT DOESN'T WORK!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:26 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
The Kick Inside wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Trigg told the group the club needed help to reduce its debt "or we will have to hand the keys over to the AFL".

I thought they already had handed over the keys?


'Handing over the keys' would be akin to what North did some years ago. See this from 2012.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=18752&p=1235551&hilit=North+Melbourne#p1235551

You're essentially not in control of your business and strategic plan. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing...it's when the AFL leave you to run their model when they walk away that you're potentially in dire straits. For North - that begins pretty soon.


The AFL will not let North fend for itself. Funding will not stop. The AFL will ensure that North get a sweet deal in Hobart after next year when it expires. They will hold the meeting in Tasy, try and attract business interest, throw their weight around etc. The AFL media attention given to their "blockbuster" with Richmond in Hobart is a clear indication of the AFL's priorities. When the draw came out one of the leading attractions of the new draw was "North's" blockbuster. Look at the games North has "attracted" this year to Tasy (with no help from the AFL of course.. :cool:

Carlton, meanwhile, funnels money into helping clubs such as North with "equalisation". Carlton is in NO position to be handing money over to the AFL for their "equalisation" aims.

The AFL want to follow the Hawthorn model with Tasy with North. It is clear. Anything else is diversion.

http://www.themercury.com.au/sport/kang ... 7586504754


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:35 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
Tap...get a hold of your emotions. The North deal has been in play for years. Don't go off half-cocked. Come back to me in 2022. Carlton's not too far behind. You can't mismanage football clubs these days. So many clubs are propped up these - it's a false economy. Let's merge!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:41 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14729
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Quote:
Trigg said the Raheen event was designed to connect with a new generation of Carlton supporters


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:44 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
Megaman wrote:
Quote:
Trigg said the Raheen event was designed to connect with a new generation of Carlton supporters


:lol: :lol:


Love it! Same old, Same old...they'll never change. There's a new breed of idiots going to run the place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:58 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:21 am
Posts: 434
Location: Wandering the Sunshine State
You may well be right, but maybe we should wait until the guest list is revealed before we blindly assume that the club has continued trying to bleed dry the old stalwart philanthropic supporters.

Holding it at Raheen may have been a cost minimization measure. Doesn't mean that the targeted new generation of "monied" Carlton supporters weren't present. Until I know for a fact otherwise I want to believe that the club is genuine and has turned over a new leaf.

_________________
A Blues Supporter - not a Blues Bagger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:21 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
The Kick Inside wrote:
Tap...get a hold of your emotions. The North deal has been in play for years. Don't go off half-cocked. Come back to me in 2022. Carlton's not too far behind. You can't mismanage football clubs these days. So many clubs are propped up these - it's a false economy. Let's merge!



I would prefer Carlton dies than merges. Thereby this takes away everything that the Carlton players have given the game - eg Jesaulenko, Judd, Johnston etc..so that the AFL can't own it and re-fashion it into something they can use.


Carlton can either joins the VFL (which the AFL would block) or die. No merge ever.

If you think North will merge with Melbourne based on the belief that the extra funding will stop I think you underestimate the relationships North people have created with the AFL head office. They are well on the way to following the Hawthorn model (thanks to the AFL) quite nicely thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:27 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:47 am
Posts: 429
China Blues wrote:
You may well be right, but maybe we should wait until the guest list is revealed before we blindly assume that the club has continued trying to bleed dry the old stalwart philanthropic supporters.

Holding it at Raheen may have been a cost minimization measure. Doesn't mean that the targeted new generation of "monied" Carlton supporters weren't present. Until I know for a fact otherwise I want to believe that the club is genuine and has turned over a new leaf.


The guest list won't be revealed. But I know someone who went and both were present. It was a good mix of new and old money. Real blue blood. The gravlax was a little too salty, but the grilled scallops wrapped in prosciutto was to die for.

I'm somewhat pleased that telling the Carlton elite that they won't be bailed up for a donation anymore puts real pressure on the club to focus on the apathetic Carlton fan. Perhaps lapsed members will be contacted. I for one look forward to being contacted. I won't donate to their cause, but there are other ways to assist that don't involve taking my credit card details. They just need to listen and acquiesce.

...and therein lies their challenge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:38 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
That doesn't solve their revenue issues Doc. They're going to have to start creating content, goods and services that they can charge for, and set aside capital for commercial and financial investment.

No amount of free advice is going to solve all of their problems. It's not dire, they just need to look around at what other clubs are doing in the AFL, globally and then make their own strategy. I think that's already begun with the branding of 'Carlton Media' on all new footage coming in.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:39 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4444
Location: Perth
If the supposed board challenge is serious, this would provide some pretty good ammunition I would of thought.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:44 am 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
MPH78 wrote:
If the supposed board challenge is serious, this would provide some pretty good ammunition I would of thought.


What's a board challenge going to change?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:45 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Posts: 1639
Location: Within the old Carlton recruting zone ...
kennyhunter wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
chubbyruss wrote:
When do we hand back the keys :?:


The keys have already been handed over, and the more Carlton is in debt the more reliant they become.
This should give you a clue at what Carlton is thought of at AFL HQ.

http://www.themercury.com.au/sport/afl/ ... 7589225068


Nice pick up Tap.
Always bragged to my Tassie mates that they'd never see the Blues play there because we're ''a big club" ... even though I knew it was bullshite.
It's a telling snapshot of where we are at.


We traded in our status as a big club years ago by taking the dollars to play interstate which cost us wins and a place higher up on the ladder.

_________________
In WADA we trust


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:51 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
MPH78 wrote:
If the supposed board challenge is serious, this would provide some pretty good ammunition I would of thought.

Most clubs would report $5m in losses for 3 years of poor performance in which they sacked two senior coaches, so while the question of mismanagement is reasonable, it's already been acknowledged and addressed quite transparently.

The debt ceiling is shockingly low for what it is, and probably should be switched to a rolling P/L target, similar to UEFA's financial fair play.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:04 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4444
Location: Perth
The Normal One wrote:
MPH78 wrote:
If the supposed board challenge is serious, this would provide some pretty good ammunition I would of thought.


What's a board challenge going to change?


The board.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 530 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 27  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], sticksaftersiren87 and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group