billc3 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
cecil89 wrote:
[quote="AGRO"][quote="cecil89"]I think Jones will still be on our primary list in 2016.
Which will make our list look pretty secondary.
If we're going to trade Henderson not only will Jones be on the list, but he'll probably be playing more regularly too.
I would really know who's idea it was to recruit Jones, who decided on a 3 year deal and who agreed to pick 46. It is easily the dumbest deal I have ever seen. Even at the time everybody knew it except Carlton. It is not even a question if he will make it, he is not even close to being an AFL player.
It just defies logic.
Is anyone ever going to take responsibility?
im utterly and completely convinced that the bloke who was our recruiter who left just after the draft last year made selections knowing he was going to go and was trying to @#$%&! us over as much as possible.
boekhurst at 19, jones for pick 46, tutt ....
its the only thing that makes any sense, someone who was trying to stitch us up did so very successfully IMO.
It's just interesting that no one I speak to can give a straight answer on this.[/quote]
Certainly that's what Malthouse was doing[/quote]
Did Malthouse make the recruitment department look bad or did the recruitment department make Malthouse look bad
Interesting argument
But I suppose we could always use the old chestnut and blame the board
Login
Register
FAQ
