Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:43 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
GreatEx wrote:
He's wrong to (sort of) defend Malthouse - the reason our list is so shit is because he got rid of everyone who could kick a goal and brought in his permacrocked mate and a bunch of utter spuds.



Patrick Smith was 100% correct in this article.

At last someone has the courage to face the truth... Bravo Patrick Smith.

The most important fact though is that the AFL do not care about Carlton. They care about GWS, Port Adelaide, North Melbourne and Brisbane. Carlton is irrelevant to them except when it comes to negotiating TV deals and then all of a sudden they say "look at the crowds we get at Carlton matches". "We got 94,000 to the game Carlton vs Richmond etc" "look at us"...

So if Malthouse and the recruiting staff didn't bring in Thomas, all those spuds from Footscray, GWS etc... would we have been how much better?

There have been some good recruiting decisions and some bad recruiting decisions...but the fact is when you have a rubbish team you can't afford to make ANY bad recruiting decisions, whilst good clubs can afford to make the odd poor decision and it is of no real consequence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
Dominator_7 wrote:
First bad performance since JB took over and he takes a cheap shot.
Agree about his point re. Board the taking responsibility, but he wraps it up in a silly argument

Blues2005 wrote:
There has been a massive over-reaction to Friday night.

Carlton are currently, for a variety of reasons, an ordinary side. Everybody knows that.

Friday night was about how good Hawthorn are, not how bad we are.


Agree.
Up until Friday night, most people were full of praise for how JB had gone about things, and how we ve unearthed some quality kids in Cripps, Doc, Graham etc.
One bad loss, and all of a sudden, we need AFL assistance.
Come off it lol


So you are happy with Carlton having lost more matches than any other club in the last 15 years?

Carlton is in a cycle of poor performances...how do you climb out of the cravass in a socialist system without AFL assistance?

If it was a free market football competition then there would be no need to go to the AFL for assistance...but the AFL holds all the cards and they don't give a dammn about Carlton. The past 15 years should have been ample proof of that...the AFL is busy funding North, throwing cash at Port, setting up teams in western Sydney...hell they would throw money at Ganmain Grong Grong Matong's team before they would throw money at Carlton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2130
Blues2005 wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
That's a 151 year old record....worst ever, no team should lose by that much.

Even Pago didn't get beaten by that much at Carlton....sheesh

And in the captains 200th

This is what really has me scratching my head. People are saying "a thrashing was expected", "we had X number of players under 50 games", "we were without such and such", "Hawthorn are the benchmark" etc.

But this wasn't just another thrashing we're all so used to, but THE WORST LOSS IN CARLTON'S HISTORY. How people can even try to begin rationalising this as they would a standard 10-12 goal loss is baffling to me. And if people are going a bit dramatic in their reactions I can't see a better time for it!


It was also one of the worst (based on age/experience/general lack of quality) teams in Carlton's history, against one of the best, if not the best, in Hawthorn's. On top of this, you had Carlton coming back from Perth on a six-day break against a Hawthorn team that was coming off two smashings of fellow top-four sides. It was a recipe for disaster and that's exactly how things turned out.

If this loss had come against a middle-of-the-road side then I would understand the hysteria. Instead, it came against one of the best sides we've seen, one that barring injury/unforeseen circumstances will surely win its third Premiership in a row.

You can't simply dismiss the circumstances.


15 years of poor performances now means the few Carlton fans who remain are willing to accept what that team served up on the weekend because the opposition team was pretty good.

It is now expected Carlton will lose...it just depends on how much depending on the opposition.

A five goal loss to the AFL sponsored North is "honourable", a ten goal loss "not so good" a 15 goal loss "a bit disappointing" a 20 goal loss " very disappointing".

I can guarantee you one thing I won't be around in 15 years time watching Carlton matches if this merry-go-round of ineptitude continues. I have had enough...and if Brisbane gets the priority pick and Carlton doesn't get it...that is the final straw as far as I am concerned.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2057
Blues2005 wrote:
There has been a massive over-reaction to Friday night.

Carlton are currently, for a variety of reasons, an ordinary side. Everybody knows that.

Friday night was about how good Hawthorn are, not how bad we are.


This is not about Friday night's performance

This is about our complete ineptitude for over 15 years

Just take a look at our list, which is the worst in the AFL

That is a disgrace considering the amount of early draft picks we have been privy to

Even last year, we decide to make ridiculous decisions at the draft table

Melbourne were forced to relinquish control of it's affairs to the AFL

Carlton are in the same boat

This will be highly embarrassing if this occurs

However, if this leads to a proper independent review of the club then bring it on


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I think if youre looking at the loss in isolation you're a fool.
but if you're going back into our history over the millennium and judging the fifteen years in their true pathetic context you're on the right track..

This is without doubt the most pathetic club this millennium without doubt..its been brought here by a galaxy of amateur clowns who have always been happy to point the blame at everybody but themselves..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:45 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8201
We'll see what happens during the last 6 games. MM dragged us down a long way and occasionally those efforts still rears it's ugly head, especially in terms of effort. Until then we've won a couple of games and been competitive. Want to see that run and spread again that we had against the two South Australian sides and the Gold Coast. Trying to play Hawthorn's style of play on Friday was Barker's first real blunder. We don't have the ability to do that and were naturally chewed up badly. Just play to our strengths.

Our list would look better if those in the stands were actually playing. List is ordinary but not as bad as it's looking.

Ratten's efforts here are looking better by the hour.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24631
Location: Kaloyasena
Mick Malthouse didn't drag us down anywhere.

Who appointed Mick Malthouse, who appointed Brett Ratten who appointed Denis Pagan?


There is a common denominator.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Well run club except the malthouse and Hughes Rogers thingy..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:53 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 1170
WOW wrote:
Blues2005 wrote:
There has been a massive over-reaction to Friday night.

Carlton are currently, for a variety of reasons, an ordinary side. Everybody knows that.

Friday night was about how good Hawthorn are, not how bad we are.


This is not about Friday night's performance

This is about our complete ineptitude for over 15 years

Just take a look at our list, which is the worst in the AFL

That is a disgrace considering the amount of early draft picks we have been privy to

Even last year, we decide to make ridiculous decisions at the draft table

Melbourne were forced to relinquish control of it's affairs to the AFL

Carlton are in the same boat

This will be highly embarrassing if this occurs

However, if this leads to a proper independent review of the club then bring it on


Agree. The worst side in the comp over the last 15 years. @#$%&! trying to sugarcoat this, we'd be laughing at any other clubs supporters who put a brave face on such a loss, the worst in our history. All those top draft picks and it comes to this. The years of ineptitude off the field culminates in us being massively in debt, appallingly run, and on our knees. The recruiting of Thomas says it all.


Last edited by cortez on Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
AGRO wrote:
Mick Malthouse didn't drag us down anywhere.

Who appointed Mick Malthouse, who appointed Brett Ratten who appointed Denis Pagan?


There is a common denominator.

Wait wait...

Stephen Kernahan, Richard Pratt and John Elliot are the same person??

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:55 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8201
AGRO wrote:
Mick Malthouse didn't drag us down anywhere.

Who appointed Mick Malthouse, who appointed Brett Ratten who appointed Denis Pagan?


There is a common denominator.
Elliot appointed Pagan, Pratt appointed Ratten, Sticks appointed Malthouse. No common denominator there. Pratt's worked pretty well. As it stands now Ratten did a good job against the backdrop of a crappy on-field culture.

Went from a kick from a PF, to the rabble we are now within a few year? Of course Mick dragged us down. Most it starts at the coach. He's the central figure and the key to extracting performance from the players. We all know that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
jimmae wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Mick Malthouse didn't drag us down anywhere.

Who appointed Mick Malthouse, who appointed Brett Ratten who appointed Denis Pagan?


There is a common denominator.

Wait wait...

Stephen Kernahan, Richard Pratt and John Elliot are the same person??

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING

Yes they are... its a culture..don't forget fatty mark ...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18622
Location: threeohfivethree
jimmae wrote:
Stephen Kernahan, Richard Pratt and John Elliot are the same person??


Effectively yes though one was a pretty good mark, one could sing a bit and the other was pissed most of the time.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Whilst they all were given different souls by God.. destiny brought them all together at Carlton to share the very same mentality from the culture they are immersed in.. a culture that has immersed us head deep in mediocrity..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:01 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24631
Location: Kaloyasena
jim wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Mick Malthouse didn't drag us down anywhere.

Who appointed Mick Malthouse, who appointed Brett Ratten who appointed Denis Pagan?


There is a common denominator.
Elliot appointed Pagan, Pratt appointed Ratten, Sticks appointed Malthouse. No common denominator there. Pratt's worked pretty well. As it stands now Ratten did a good job against the backdrop of a crappy on-field culture.

Went from a kick from a PF, to the rabble we are now within a few year? Of course Mick dragged us down. Most it starts at the coach. He's the central figure and the key to extracting performance from the players. We all know that.



Went from a Grand Final (1999) to a wooden spoon (2002).

Jesus mentioned something about building a house on solid foundations.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Went from an eliminational finals win in 2013 to last or second last in 2015 ..the gap between our best and worse is closing

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24631
Location: Kaloyasena
jimmae wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Mick Malthouse didn't drag us down anywhere.

Who appointed Mick Malthouse, who appointed Brett Ratten who appointed Denis Pagan?


There is a common denominator.

Wait wait...

Stephen Kernahan, Richard Pratt and John Elliot are the same person??

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING



No you're wrong jimmae, Stephen Kernahan, Richard Pratt and John Elliot (sic) are all different people.

I don't understand where you are coming from because usually you are always right.

NTTIAWWT.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Have we ever had a president who has presided over 2x 2.5 million dollars plus losses in a row? Wow wee !

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
GreatEx wrote:
He's wrong to (sort of) defend Malthouse - the reason our list is so shit is because he got rid of everyone who could kick a goal and brought in his permacrocked mate and a bunch of utter spuds.


Rubbish - the list wash shot by Ratten. Betts was a mistake. Waite and Garlett not as good as you are claiming. Daisy cost us salary cap that we would have spent anyway on this list. Compare that to who we have added since 2012


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Betts happened because the club felt small forwards aren't worth big bucks.. what they were noit paying attention to is big blokes can earn up to double and still score less . set up less and attacking forward tackle less..basically impact less

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group