GWS wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
The Rhino wrote:
Right.
West Coast have signed who?
Hasn't free agency just been fantastic for Collingwood also?
flower rich clubs..
Free agency is just a piece of the puzzle. It is really just a new piece of the pu zzle...so discussing free agency is like discussing 5% of the issue. The big picture is in what has been done already. And the big picture is Carlton is in deep do-do. The media want you to believe it is all due to poor draft selections and nothing else. Carlton's problems all stem from poor drafting (all of its own making)..nothing else apparently.
At a poor club poor decisions are made to try and break the cycle.
The only teams not to make the top 4 since 2004..
Carlton
Essendon***
Melbourne and
Richmond...
Why is that the case? Is it all due to poor recruiting?
p.s I really hope Richmond leap into the top4 this year, but either way they will be cannon fodder for the 30 million $$ Hawthorn.
Or maybe the arrogance of the clubs with a born to rule mentality is providing a little interest payback in the karma stakes?
If we hadn't made such a @#$%&! mess of the draft and trade periods over the last twenty years and we'd put in place processes and systems to build a resilient organisation and still failed to make any impact on the top four then I think you might have a point worth pursuing but until we can prove that we're worthy of being anything other than a laughing stock for any significant period of time then aiming your venom at outside sources is purely empowering those prolonging our period in the dark ages.
I understand your viewpoint.
There are significant hurdles needed internally within the club.
However, what I would like to see is
a) if the AFL deems it is good enough for them to wipe out North Melbourne's debt via a series of grants, back-door payments etc...then it is good enough for them to wipe out Carlton's debt...or are all animals equal but some are more equal than others? With money, Carlton can then put more resources into recruiting, player welfare, membership (remember they didn't have enough money to man the phones earlier this year for membership)etc.
Or alternatively if they aren't going to do extra "dividends" payments to Carlton, then get North Melbourne to pay back to the AFL the money the AFL gave them. So too Port. Why did they deem North Melbourne's debt was more important to the AFL? Who deems this?
b) the "equalisation fund" that Carlton has to put money into that goes to other clubs. Carlton should not have to pay a cent for this scheme. This is an insane concept as it is once again piecemeal and ad-hoc and messy. Do we base "equalisation" on revenue or on where clubs have finished on the ladder over the last 15-20 years? what an insane idea. Socialism gone troppo...and believe me the AFL is operating as a quasi-socialist utopia.
c) the draw... why on earth would Carlton be scheduled to play Hawthorn twice? Who thought of this brilliant idea? Didn't the AFL realise that in the 2014 grand final they wiped the floor of the Swans...so scheduling Carlton to battle it out against Hawthorn twice is insanity. Maybe their execs missed the 2014 grand final as they were too busy bean counting and handing money hand over fist to GWS, North Melbourne, Port and other "project" teams and didn't get time to see the match. A reminder for the AFL - the match was over by the end of the 1st quarter. The Swans had Buddy Franklin, Kennedy, McVeigh and Jack in their team and they STILL got whipped by over 60 points by Hawthorn...and you schedule Carlton to meet this team twice? Why?
d) the AFL needs to change its perception of Carlton. I think this must be the reason why they continually funnel money into North, Port etc and bypass Carlton. They see Carlton as a "big club"... those days are over. 20 years of being humbled would surely change anyone with half a brain's opionion.
These are just logical first steps in what the AFL needs to do to write the wrongs. They also need to acknowledge that assistance is needed in the draft.
All of this will help as well as addressing the internal problems at Carlton you have mentioned.