Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 7:46 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 223 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:07 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
bosman wrote:
jimmae wrote:
bosman wrote:
No run, no pressure, coming off a 6 day break coming back from WA, young team and playing the top team who has smashed other top teams... Was always going to be ugly....

This gets thrown around a lot by mug punters so I don't blame you for repeating it, but in reality that's just utter garbage. It's a problem to be solved by the conditioning and medical staff, and we are @#$%&! hopeless at it.

Hell, look at the body shape of the Hawthorn players versus ours. We're shaped like it's 2009.

Review Buttifant, but I suspect we'll be sacking the sports scientists, the doctors, the physios and the nutrtionists because this isn't the first time this has happened. Our facilties are sufficient enough for the gap not to be this big purely from the perspective of athletic performance.


Wasn't repeating anything and I'm no mug. So many people are keyboard experts these days.

Well if you're interested, sit down and listen to an exercise physiologist try and explain the wear and tear that occurs during the season as they clutch at drops in platelet counts and WBC & RBC and searching for drug interactions that mitigate this, even though their high school level models fail to explain the data coming in. Plenty of lectures and lecture slides online.

The good clubs pool these people with the doctors, the sports scientist, the physios and the nutritionists so that they come up with a better process overall with their collective understanding of the human body. As individual groupings, particularly in the training area, they are @#$%&! hopeless at coming up with solutions.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:12 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Liam Jones and Jason Tutt are MM inspired mistakes
BB looking average.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:23 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
Blueboy74 wrote:
club29 wrote:
Eddie talking sense. A lot of Melbourne clubs are stuffed due to being in no mans land when the two new clubs took all the players from the draft.

Teams have been down for a long time at a time when things were designed to be equalised.

The AFL have to rethink things.


His comments were nonsense.

"AFL needs to do something to get Essendon** and Carlton up the top". Give me a spell.

We've both been [REDACTED] for 15 years and for differing resasons, only have ourselves to blame. We've had first round draft picks, priority picks, AFL funded assistance and yet still at rock bottom.

Blaming expansions teams is a complete cop out.

Clubs already near the top had a clear advantage over others when the expansion teams came in ... it made it harder for the other clubs to catch up on them because they never got the good draft picks.

Hawthorn got a massive boost to their rebuild when they picked up Buddy and Roughead in 2004 draft ... if the expansion teams came in at that time they would never have had those players.

So if you were already up there the system made it harder for others to narrow the gap.

Hawthorn, Collingwood, Geelong all won recent flags, Richmond, WB, St Kilda, Melbourne all improving, Nth in a Prelim last year. Three of those clubs have 70,000+ members.

We're our own worst enemy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:26 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4444
Location: Perth
AGRO wrote:
We dropped 4% points tonight, one more and we'd be sponsored by the TAC (wipe off 5).

Leaves us only about .9% above Brisbanes and sets us up perfectly for our game against them in a few weeks time. :wink:


Might be by design but how did it go for us this build?

High risk strategy when you've got no recent success to fall back on. Not to mention all the flow on effects (player confidence/moral, member and supporter angst, low crowds, sponsors and stakeholders etc).

You confident the club will get it right this time?

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:29 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4303
Location: Strathmore
jimmae wrote:
bosman wrote:
jimmae wrote:
bosman wrote:
No run, no pressure, coming off a 6 day break coming back from WA, young team and playing the top team who has smashed other top teams... Was always going to be ugly....

This gets thrown around a lot by mug punters so I don't blame you for repeating it, but in reality that's just utter garbage. It's a problem to be solved by the conditioning and medical staff, and we are @#$%&! hopeless at it.

Hell, look at the body shape of the Hawthorn players versus ours. We're shaped like it's 2009.

Review Buttifant, but I suspect we'll be sacking the sports scientists, the doctors, the physios and the nutrtionists because this isn't the first time this has happened. Our facilties are sufficient enough for the gap not to be this big purely from the perspective of athletic performance.


Wasn't repeating anything and I'm no mug. So many people are keyboard experts these days.

Well if you're interested, sit down and listen to an exercise physiologist try and explain the wear and tear that occurs during the season as they clutch at drops in platelet counts and WBC & RBC and searching for drug interactions that mitigate this, even though their high school level models fail to explain the data coming in. Plenty of lectures and lecture slides online.

The good clubs pool these people with the doctors, the sports scientist, the physios and the nutritionists so that they come up with a better process overall with their collective understanding of the human body. As individual groupings, particularly in the training area, they are @#$%&! hopeless at coming up with solutions.


How about this, 11 players with under 50 games and a few in single digits No amount of sport scientists, physios or nutritionists are going to get them extra game time experience, make them better ball users or even decision makers.

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:36 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
dadadadada wrote:
Blueboy74 wrote:
club29 wrote:
Eddie talking sense. A lot of Melbourne clubs are stuffed due to being in no mans land when the two new clubs took all the players from the draft.

Teams have been down for a long time at a time when things were designed to be equalised.

The AFL have to rethink things.[/quo

Clubs already near the top had a clear advantage over others when the expansion teams came in ... it made it harder for the other clubs to catch up on them because they never got the good draft picks.

Hawthorn got a massive boost to their rebuild when they picked up Buddy and Roughead in 2004 draft ... if the expansion teams came in at that time they would never have had those players.

So if you were already up there the system made it harder for others to narrow the gap.


GC17 was announced in March 2008, the very start of a 4 year block where we'd just picked up Judd, made finals and come off three #1 picks. We had plenty of time to prepare for the compromised drafts but didn't.

Hawks won their last flag without Franklin so the '04 draft was hardly a leg up. We could have had the same but decided to top up that year, came 11th, and ended up with Hartlett and Russell.

Too much blame directed elsewhere. Others have coped. We haven't.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Last edited by Blueboy74 on Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:36 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
bosman wrote:
How about this, 11 players with under 50 games and a few in single digits No amount of sport scientists, physios or nutritionists are going to get them extra game time experience, make them better ball users or even decision makers.

Actually, that's either directly or indirectly the reason they have jobs

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 1:44 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
club29 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
oligarchs off to have a drink with the '95 boys...


Stop saying the word oligarchs !!!

:clap:

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 4:11 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:00 am
Posts: 23
Boy that was painful. :cry:

Hard to fathom the gulf in quality of those footy teams. I was thinking the top 15 users of the ball on that ground are Hawthorn players. And that's not an exaggeration.

It just looks like hundreds and hundreds of bad decisions by the club at every level.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:50 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
i gave ellard and walker a mouthfull last night and i dont care if they got me tossed out, yarran was standing the mark when someone was haven a shot at goal, hands on knees and didnt extend harms till last second. i yelled out.... STAND THE MARK LIKE YOU GIVE A SHIT YARRAN YOU LAZY BUM... they both turn and give me greasy looks and walks says thats a bit harsh.... i told em clearly that its not harsh when i guy that bloody talented mopes around like a fairy who doesnt care and if i pay 450 a year for a membership we as fans deserve to see effort so if you think thats harsh boo hoo to you , dam i wish the club would call me to buy a raffle ticket to raise money for their end of season trip.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:51 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
guys like yarran are spitting in our faces, i always liked yazz but this year he just turning up for the pay cheque


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:54 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:36 am
Posts: 983
there are teams playing footy on Kepler-452b that are closer to an AFL premiership than we are...

_________________
i don't wanna spend my life explaining myself. Either you get it, or you don't- Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:55 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
club29 wrote:
Eddie talking sense. A lot of Melbourne clubs are stuffed due to being in no mans land when the two new clubs took all the players from the draft.

Teams have been down for a long time at a time when things were designed to be equalised.

The AFL have to rethink things.



So true.

The AFL haven't got the model right.

Not only did the introduction of the new clubs make life harder for some existing clubs, but irrespective of this the fact remains certain clubs seem to stay at the top forever and certain other clubs take decades now to rise.

It just takes too long for some teams to be in striking distance of a flag.

The AFL wanted a competitive comp where teams all got their time in the sun but it's not working.

Haw, Syd, Geel, Coll, WC , Port - these are teams that have won the most recent flags and they are always at the top or thereabouts.

I have stopped watching games now, not just Carlton but other games too. The AFL will start losing people if they're not careful.

The irony is just when teams like Carlton need draft assistance the AFL take away priority picks and make it harder to get FSs at least at the top end.

Too many clubs not enough talent and the systems don't make it easy to rise up quickly.

I know clubs must take some responsibility for poor recruiting etc but even there one could argue the AFL need to get involved somehow... The AFL shoukdnt stand and watch clubs run themselves into the ground through poor management.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:57 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 539
maybe we are the new fitzroy like some1 suggested years a go. NEVER


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:59 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
I don't think there's any doubt we need to clean the list out to a large extent.

I actually think sticking up on KPPs is a luxury we can't afford now.

We need to stockpile high end young midfiekders through the draft by the bucketload bec we simply need to be competitive ASAP in the midfield. That's where games start these days. We can worry about talls later IMO.

I'd be trading/releasing via FA Kreuzer, Yarran, Henderson, Walker, Jamison etc and get as many high picks as possible and drafting 90% midfielders. We need to build a young group of quality mids very quickly else we can wave goodbye to Cripps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:01 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:05 pm
Posts: 347
Location: Adelaide
Blue Revival wrote:
there are teams playing footy on Kepler-452b that are closer to an AFL premiership than we are...


Because they're in the Goldilocks zone. Meanwhile we're the 3 bears wandering aimlessly around in the forest with no real destination in mind just passing the time away. :cry:

_________________
Make Carlton Football Club your sponsored World Vision Child today


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:05 am 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7553
Location: NowHere.....
We all knew that our club would never be the same again, a while back now...R.I.P Blues

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:23 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
Paddycripps wrote:
club29 wrote:
Eddie talking sense. A lot of Melbourne clubs are stuffed due to being in no mans land when the two new clubs took all the players from the draft.

Teams have been down for a long time at a time when things were designed to be equalised.

The AFL have to rethink things.



So true.

The AFL haven't got the model right.

Not only did the introduction of the new clubs make life harder for some existing clubs, but irrespective of this the fact remains certain clubs seem to stay at the top forever and certain other clubs take decades now to rise.

It just takes too long for some teams to be in striking distance of a flag.

The AFL wanted a competitive comp where teams all got their time in the sun but it's not working.

Haw, Syd, Geel, Coll, WC , Port - these are teams that have won the most recent flags and they are always at the top or thereabouts.

I have stopped watching games now, not just Carlton but other games too. The AFL will start losing people if they're not careful.

The irony is just when teams like Carlton need draft assistance the AFL take away priority picks and make it harder to get FSs at least at the top end.

Too many clubs not enough talent and the systems don't make it easy to rise up quickly.

I know clubs must take some responsibility for poor recruiting etc but even there one could argue the AFL need to get involved somehow... The AFL shoukdnt stand and watch clubs run themselves into the ground through poor management.


Yep.

Bring back the days when Carlton won 7 flags in 20 years, Collingwood made 40 GFs in 100, or Hawthorn made 7 GF's in a row.

Or Sr Kilda, Fitzroy, Footscray, Geelong, Melboune and South Melbourne winning zero flags between them in 40+ years, or Nth taking 50 years to win one. All in a 12 team comp.

But yeah, it's so much harder for teams now.....

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:54 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Pro - I wasn't there
I thought in the toughest of conditions BB stood up. He got belted by Gibson off the ball, and due to the woeful tribunal Gibson will get fined instead of suspended, but I thought BB showed a bit. Holman looks to have something and a good left foot. Murph has been outstanding in the second half of season, gets belted every week, gets no protection. Cripps again looks a star in the making.

To think in 2004 they were behind us. HAwks have built success on a ruthless, single minded coach with absolute belief in his plans and the ability to instill that plan and belief in every player. Also they built a side around Hodge #1, 3 top tens in 2004 ND - Lewis Franklin, Roughead and smart late pick in Micthell and good #13 pick in Rioli, then they have topped up with lots of players from other clubs and now free agency comes in to make the strong stronger

Hate our slow chip/ chip play. In 2004/5 Clarkson was hammered by everyone by introducing this style, and he turned it to gold, but I don't want a copy of a ten year old strategy I want a strategy that negates and surpasses that. I guess the swans got done by 90 so maybe 135 was okay, still I can't remember being angrier about a game. I hate Hawthron.

We are back to 2003. It's a long way back and we need to make smart decisions and be really good at the draft, what are the chances.....

That performance almost certainly puts Barks out of the job, it was utterly non-competitive. He has a second chance. How come we get to play the Hawks twice, I thought the top 8 played twice and the bottom 8 played each other twice. How does last years 12th get two shots at last year's premiers twice in a few weeks?

Better deliver something way better than that next week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 10:15 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
westy63 wrote:
Will never follow carlton again pathetic. Got to get another spirt. Ps cant stand this shit.U


I hope never to see you again.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 223 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], sticksaftersiren87 and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group