Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 7:50 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 2:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
club29 wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
He certainly "let them play" in the first few game but since then there been a shift to a defensive style BG.



They have ramped up the defensive pressure almost at the expense of attacking football. We are kicking 5 and 6 goals a game because our skills under pressure are shizen. But even if we were good at this part I'm not sure we'd make enough opportunities to kick 100 points.

Which is ok if we can keep the opposition to 60-80 like we have in the last two games.

Or it May just be he's decided we should get defence and skills under pressure sorted first before becoming more attacking.


That is the way i see it Cimm. The club probably are not that big on winning at the moment. THinking long term. Maybe they have all decided to spend the rest of the year focusing on getting a defensive edge into the team. A nice starting point for a better future.

It is not as though we are not attacking at all. Its just we balls up a lot of scoring ops with bad skills ,taking poor options and having poor tall forwards. Should be able to tweak that a bit for next season.


I could only glimpse at the game after 1/4 time last night and every time I did I saw us win the all and give it straight back.

If I'd watched the whole game I might have killed someone, probably the dog.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 2:53 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
AGRO wrote:
At least I'm back to giving a shit.

Blah blah blah stupid people

Blah blah blah I know better

Blah blah blah they're all missing a chromosome because I can't accept mistakes and the realities of ill-discipline

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:34 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
blueoutlaw wrote:
F... it, i would trade Henderson and Yarran...grab couple top ten picks rebuild next year...aim for finals in 2017/18 sick of seeing teams bulldogs,saints rebuild come past us again,i start to worry we wont see a premiership for a decade!
Geez we are hard to watch live at the game...don't know if its opposition pressure... or pressure to stick to the game plan,we make poor decisions by foot sometimes
Who knows what we can do certainly not me, but i do know i am over watching the blues being beaten by f...... richmond



Trading our most talented players is not the answer. And what for? Some wet behind the ears kid that you will call for recruiters heads over because he doesnt get a game in the first season, who may or may not make it.
We need to send hendo back where he plays well. Let yarran get over michel and find someone else.
We have little depth due to the age structure of our list and hence we expect too much of our injury replacements.
Heres an idea. Lets develop what we already have?

Byrne. And sheehan
Buckley holman graham, fields, bb, whiley,
Giles watson foster, jaksch, jones.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:34 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:24 pm
Posts: 829
sstormin123 wrote:
Yeah perhaps I shouldn't have lumped him in with some of those names. But I don't think that he is a good field kick, as many big fellas aren't. But it's not like he has the same kicking ability as Henderson, Fields or Reiwoldt for example


Agreed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:45 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun May 31, 2015 8:24 pm
Posts: 829
Blue Sombrero wrote:
sstormin123 wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
sstormin123 wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
First of all, AFL is not a game.
Second, Casboult did not miss a kick tonight and also landed a nice 30 metre pass on is left side. His field kicking has never been an issue more than anybody else, unlike his shooting for goal, which is now not so much of an issue. I can understand why posters have favourite players and favourite whipping boys alike but don't make shit up.


Thanks Gramps, I'll remember that, cheers for taking the time to point out. Well worth your time.

Casboult has improved his kicking no doubt, and his goalkicking, I'm a big advocate of his and think he really contributes for us.
But if you think he is a quality field kick, then you are kidding yourself. He did well tonight, but he isn't a consistently a quality kick or decision maker - which is fine, because he is a big bloke and not that many are. The point is, combined with the other buttons of poor kicks in the side, it doesn't give us much of a chance. What part of that 'shit' is made up?

You made up the bit about AFL being a game. It's actually not. I thought someone who didn't know that might need it pointed out.
The bit where you think I said he was a quality field kick for starters is made up as well. I don't mind you quoting me. I don't even mind your lack of respect for your elders but please don't make shit up that I didn't say.
His field kicking has never been an issue. You made the part up about his being a poor field kick as well but I should have known you had no idea from the first moment when you thought AFL was actually a game.


Lel BS plz. I didn't quote you. Respecting elders is good one tho, I should do that unequivocally. Thanks!
Either you skim through these posts or your comprehension skills are declining rapidly, Casboult is one of many whose field kicking is an issue. That assessment isn't based on just last nights game.

I didn't say you quoted me. I said, "I don't mind you quoting me." To use your own words,
Either you skim through these posts or your comprehension skills are declining rapidly.
Being old as I am, I have no idea what the first phrase is supposed to mean. Is it even English?


Ok now I feel like calling you Gramps too. Haha. Relax a bit buddy. I've seen far more ridiculous comments on here lately than sstormin123's post. I like Bell. So other than lumping him and Caz in with rest, his comments are fine.

Listening to Barks on the radio today, he seemed much more upset about our forwards not working hard enough into space and creating space for each other than he was about youngsters fluffing kicks. What's happening 70m up the ground is what makes the ball carrier look bad and/or indecisive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:52 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 1170
The way the game is played now with teams storming forward en masse when they have possession, good disposal skills have never been at more of a premium; turn the ball over and the opposition is presented with an open forward half. Also, with the way the ball can be brought back into play immediately after a behind good goal kicking skills have never been more important.

Until our kicking and handball skill levels rise appreciably we will never be anything but a lower order team. Stating the bleeding obvious I know, but for years I've been saying we must only recruit players with good disposal skills, why in the name of all that is holy did we recruit Jones and Tutt?

The god awful misses by Tutt and Carrazzo last night will long linger in the memory. Carrazzo is well over thirty, played nearly 200 games and is still as bad a kick as we have in our team. The sad thing is that not for one moment did I expect either Tutt or Carrazzo to kick those absolute sitters.

As for talk of recruiting Bennell, please no.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 3:54 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7304
Cazzesman wrote:
http://www.afl.com.au/video/2015-07-10/full-postmatch-blues

The way Barker speakers and explains things rationally is more and more like Ross Lyon every week.

That's not a bad thing IMHO.

Regards Cazzesman


Thats exactly what i was thinking.Close your eyes and you would swear it was Lyon.Love that talking but saying nothing style.Sorta showing contempt for the media but not really showing it................
Anyhow,i did say Barker couldnt coach pigs to be dirty.I was wrong,Barker COULD coach pigs to be dirty.Still not sure he can coach or whether he is the man for the job.But i gotta admit he is doing a very good audition......................i actually reckon the good coaches greatest strength is there abilityy to identify talent.They have the happy knack of identifyying blokes out of the magoos who can step up.Got a feeling Barker is no mug when sorting the wheat from the chaff.If he possesses that ability it will take him a long way.The good coaches dont waste time on list cloggers.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 4:13 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
ThePsychologist wrote:
Braithy wrote:
henderson is so much better as a back, and yarran a much better downhill skier in the forward half, i don't know why we don't swap them permanently.


Totally agree about Henderson. If we are truly rebuilding his future is in defence. Just reads it so well and sets up and is a great foil for Jamison. Could easily be as good as Rance as a defender.

As for Yarran I don't think it's about position but about attitude. Can be a weapon in defence if on. Has really annoyed me the psat few weeks. Everyone is trying and he is letting others down. Shouldn't be tolerated.

As part of the rebuild we should be settling the defence first. A future of:

B: Buckley Jamison Fields
HB: Tuohy Henderson Docherty

Simmo as extra man.

options: Yarran Byrne Sheehan DVR Giles White Smith Jaksch

That could easily be a top 4 defence IMO.

For the rest of the year I'd look at Rowe up forward with Casboult & Everitt with possibly Walker. Rowe & Casboult relieve Kruezer for parts of game. Maybe try Jaksch up forward as well.


Exactly. With henderson down back we look so much more poised. And with tuohy and doc make a great hb line.

Our mids are doing ok

That really leaves our forward line to be worked out. We need three talls.
1. Has to be casboult
2 rowe/jaksch/watson
3 dre/walker/white/jones

Rowe may be the answer for second tall. His confidence and skills may have improved with his stint down back. He is not a bad kick for goal either.
We have forward options that need to be explored. I would like the rest of the year to be spent trying to find the right forward combination. Lets not go into next season "wondering" if the likes of watson or jones are going to make it or not. A decision on these two players in particular, needs to be made.

Two players we have missed this year, is sheehan and byrne. These guys have the right attitude. Mayber byrne can be changed to hf? Sheehan is more if a straight runner, like tuohy and belongs back.

Smith may be a smoky to hold down the small forward position. Needs to work on his fitness, but a bustling, hard at it small forward, would be a great addition


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 4:31 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 539
we are to slow the opp team always out run us with there spread and of course our ability to hand the ball over helps,of players when we go the long bomb to fwd line to a pack of players.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 4:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
gerry atric wrote:
Vickery probably will get off because it was a clash of heads and the 'head is sacrosanct" rule is intermittent at best. The inconsistency of the Gibbs/Schultz decisions is absurd and renders the tribunal more of a lottery than even back in the 'Jack Gaffney's Wheel of fortune' days. I still can't believe that Raines savage punch on Cripps didn't even warrant a suspension and got no comment from the million woeful commentators who somehow eake a living in footy media. Apparently punching someone in the guts and putting them in the hands of the trainers for 5 minutes is absolutely okay now. Let's hope all the Auskickers follow this fine lead by the AFL.

Also I certainly agree with criticism of Yarran's effort and leadership (not) and menzels intensity, but Hendo didn't fail through lack of effort, he runs as much as Nick R, but he is a very good CHB who is playing as a solid forward and was thrashed by a fantastic defender. I always had Rance pegged as a crazy brave defender, but I didn't realise he was so good. He is a star and way to good for Hendo, it was a talent thing not an effort thing, and Hendo isn't helped by lack of skill up field and around him.

I still find it incredibly disappointing that the three guys we traded for a precious pick#7 in the draft are battling at VFL level in a side where almost everyone gets a game. I can't believe KJ is not pushing harder for selection than a first year 3rd round rookie. Don't ever swap out of top ten picks unless it is for Judd. We don't need 3 for 1 deals we need players with loads of class. And the higher our pick the more likely we are to get players with class. And in retrospect Shane Rogers is looking okay. Can't remember when he took over from Hughes, but the Cripps, Holman and Graham picks are looking good and Menzel has great talent if he can get fully fit and use his skill. Hope Giles gets a bit of a run at it next year


The three for 1 deal was ok. Picking bokehurst was the error


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
padre wrote:
That really leaves our forward line to be worked out. We need three talls.
1. Has to be casboult
2 rowe/jaksch/watson
3 dre/walker/white/jones

Rowe may be the answer for second tall. His confidence and skills may have improved with his stint down back. He is not a bad kick for goal either.
We have forward options that need to be explored. I would like the rest of the year to be spent trying to find the right forward combination. Lets not go into next season "wondering" if the likes of watson or jones are going to make it or not. A decision on these two players in particular, needs to be made.

Two players we have missed this year, is sheehan and byrne. These guys have the right attitude. Mayber byrne can be changed to hf? Sheehan is more if a straight runner, like tuohy and belongs back.

Smith may be a smoky to hold down the small forward position. Needs to work on his fitness, but a bustling, hard at it small forward, would be a great addition

We don't need three talls, especially if only two of the names floated can do anything at ground level. It's an advantage to us if they deserve a spot.

Speaking of which, Everitt very much deserves his spot.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
jimmae wrote:
AGRO wrote:
At least I'm back to giving a shit.

Blah blah blah stupid people

Blah blah blah I know better

Blah blah blah they're all missing a chromosome because I can't accept mistakes and the realities of ill-discipline


what the @#$%&! are you on about?

i agree with Agro , Barker has made me care again too.

I couldn't have cared less if we won or lost and watched the games at the end of malthouses reign of terror with just a sense of numbness.

Since that bloodsucker has gone i've slowly felt the passion creeping back and watch the games now with a touch of emotion and care.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:30 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
padre wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Braithy wrote:
henderson is so much better as a back, and yarran a much better downhill skier in the forward half, i don't know why we don't swap them permanently.


Totally agree about Henderson. If we are truly rebuilding his future is in defence. Just reads it so well and sets up and is a great foil for Jamison. Could easily be as good as Rance as a defender.

As for Yarran I don't think it's about position but about attitude. Can be a weapon in defence if on. Has really annoyed me the psat few weeks. Everyone is trying and he is letting others down. Shouldn't be tolerated.

As part of the rebuild we should be settling the defence first. A future of:

B: Buckley Jamison Fields
HB: Tuohy Henderson Docherty

Simmo as extra man.

options: Yarran Byrne Sheehan DVR Giles White Smith Jaksch

That could easily be a top 4 defence IMO.

For the rest of the year I'd look at Rowe up forward with Casboult & Everitt with possibly Walker. Rowe & Casboult relieve Kruezer for parts of game. Maybe try Jaksch up forward as well.


Exactly. With henderson down back we look so much more poised. And with tuohy and doc make a great hb line.

Our mids are doing ok

That really leaves our forward line to be worked out. We need three talls.
1. Has to be casboult
2 rowe/jaksch/watson
3 dre/walker/white/jones

Rowe may be the answer for second tall. His confidence and skills may have improved with his stint down back. He is not a bad kick for goal either.
We have forward options that need to be explored. I would like the rest of the year to be spent trying to find the right forward combination. Lets not go into next season "wondering" if the likes of watson or jones are going to make it or not. A decision on these two players in particular, needs to be made.

Two players we have missed this year, is sheehan and byrne. These guys have the right attitude. Mayber byrne can be changed to hf? Sheehan is more if a straight runner, like tuohy and belongs back.

Smith may be a smoky to hold down the small forward position. Needs to work on his fitness, but a bustling, hard at it small forward, would be a great addition


Mids are solid but we really lack that class and outside run. There is a bit of sameness about our mids.

Smith to me looks better suited to defence but we have plenty of options there. He would certainly make a presence inside forward 50.

I agree about Byrne, could easily be mid or hf. Classy looking player who uses it well and makes good decisions. If we could get Schache/Weitering and some gun mids things can really start to turn around.

I don't think there is anymore "wondering" about Watson or Jones. Not up to it. Maybe next year we could have a forward line with Casboult, Dixon, Schache with Everitt, Smith & Thomas. :wink:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
how?

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:38 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agree a very scrappy game because of the conditions and the game being completely over umpired
Set the tone by shocking htb decision against the Blues at the start that really resulted in first goal to Smug Jack
Really unlucky to lose Jamo so early particularly when Rowe wasn't playing
Thought given those circumstances Fields did ok and so did White although his disposal is shocking
The other guy who just keeps giving it back was Tutt whose endeavour is good

Thought Kreuzer casboult and Murphy touhy and Buckley all pretty good

Skills are bad and kicking for goal are killing us particularly when we dominate possession

Another game into Holman Buckley Cripps (looks injured to me )Menzel (looks injured to me )

Graham Docherty would have been handy last night hopefully they are back soon

Good endeavour and good tackling

Yazz and Hendo were both ordinary last night but it happens

Not bad keeping tigers to the score we did
As for some of the umpiring even Barker thought we were on the wrong end of it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 5:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Dixon with more ankle problems.

No thanks.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 6:24 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
ThePsychologist wrote:
padre wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Braithy wrote:
henderson is so much better as a back, and yarran a much better downhill skier in the forward half, i don't know why we don't swap them permanently.


Totally agree about Henderson. If we are truly rebuilding his future is in defence. Just reads it so well and sets up and is a great foil for Jamison. Could easily be as good as Rance as a defender.

As for Yarran I don't think it's about position but about attitude. Can be a weapon in defence if on. Has really annoyed me the psat few weeks. Everyone is trying and he is letting others down. Shouldn't be tolerated.

As part of the rebuild we should be settling the defence first. A future of:

B: Buckley Jamison Fields
HB: Tuohy Henderson Docherty

Simmo as extra man.

options: Yarran Byrne Sheehan DVR Giles White Smith Jaksch

That could easily be a top 4 defence IMO.

For the rest of the year I'd look at Rowe up forward with Casboult & Everitt with possibly Walker. Rowe & Casboult relieve Kruezer for parts of game. Maybe try Jaksch up forward as well.


Exactly. With henderson down back we look so much more poised. And with tuohy and doc make a great hb line.

Our mids are doing ok

That really leaves our forward line to be worked out. We need three talls.
1. Has to be casboult
2 rowe/jaksch/watson
3 dre/walker/white/jones

Rowe may be the answer for second tall. His confidence and skills may have improved with his stint down back. He is not a bad kick for goal either.
We have forward options that need to be explored. I would like the rest of the year to be spent trying to find the right forward combination. Lets not go into next season "wondering" if the likes of watson or jones are going to make it or not. A decision on these two players in particular, needs to be made.

Two players we have missed this year, is sheehan and byrne. These guys have the right attitude. Mayber byrne can be changed to hf? Sheehan is more if a straight runner, like tuohy and belongs back.

Smith may be a smoky to hold down the small forward position. Needs to work on his fitness, but a bustling, hard at it small forward, would be a great addition


Mids are solid but we really lack that class and outside run. There is a bit of sameness about our mids.

Smith to me looks better suited to defence but we have plenty of options there. He would certainly make a presence inside forward 50.

I agree about Byrne, could easily be mid or hf. Classy looking player who uses it well and makes good decisions. If we could get Schache/Weitering and some gun mids things can really start to turn around.

I don't think there is anymore "wondering" about Watson or Jones. Not up to it. Maybe next year we could have a forward line with Casboult, Dixon, Schache with Everitt, Smith & Thomas. :wink:


Re watson and jones. I still think it is worth a shot ( if form in the twos) demands it, to try them both out in the seniors under barker.
Has watson been given a fair go? I understand that the 1 game against GWS was not heartening but it was an 80 point hiding under malthouse.
Jones has had more opportunity. But all except sydney were under malthouse. I would still like to see him as a third tall tried under barker.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 7:54 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Have to say I agree 100% with all of Wallsy comments in this article

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/c ... 070124ca9e

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:11 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
King Kenny wrote:
chelodina wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
If Tutt plays another senior game I'll spew up.

If Yarran, Henderson and Menzel don't want to play hard, they can leave.

If the umpires think they had a good game, I give up.



Give me Tutt over those other three Prima Donnas you mention... Sheesh, no bigger princesses in the side- they certainly don't like to get dirty


Tutt tries, I agree with that, but seriously the amount of poor tackles, poor kicks were too many, and don't start me on the handballs, did he hit a target by hand?



He was not alone........ I guess if you only have one kick, like menzel, or donuts, like Henderson 6 weeks back, it is hard to make a mistake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2015 11:12 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Henderson looked great with no opponent. Was shithouse and needs a rocket for a poor performance.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group