aboynamedsue wrote:
I've said this many times, but Fitzpatrick & Johnston have to be the unluckiest players to never win a Norm Smith.
Fitzy could have won in 79, 81 or 82. As dominant as he was in 81, I suspect he didn't get it that year because he was up against Collingwood's rookie ruckman (Moore being forced to play out of the goal square due to injury) and because Doull was something of a sentimental favourite. I don't think anyone begrudged Doull though, he thrashed Davis that day. Fitzpatrick's game in 82 is underestimated. He was hugely influential at CHF, especially in the premiership quarter. And in 79 he played a stellar game against the Brownlow medallist.
Johnno could easily have won the medal in 79, 82 or 87. Harmes was a worthy winner in 79, so I don't have a problem with that. Rhys-Jones got the job done in 87, but Dermie played injured and was impacted by Dunstall's absence. Then again, I guess Dermie was just about the number 1 player in the comp at the time. The real crime was Rioli being awarded it in 82. If you go back and watch that game, he was beaten soundly by Hunter. Rioli had a purple patch late first quarter/early second quarter, when Hunter was off concussed. Aside from that, Rioli had minimal impact on the match. He wasn't even Richmond's best player that day, let alone the best on ground. Johnno or Fitzy should have got it in 82, without a doubt.
I probably would have gone:
79- Harmes
81- Doull
82- Fitzpatrick
87- Johnston
Great post. I agree, but FWIW, I would've gone:
79 - Francis
81 - Fitzpatrick
82 - Johnston
87 - Johnston
95 - Kouta
But, aside from 82, the actual winners were all worthy.
_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!
After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit
http://fromthemoshpit.com/