Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 09, 2025 6:44 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 1:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24631
Location: Kaloyasena
There was only one mistake with the Judd deal and that was throwing Kennedy in with picks 3 & 20.

We should have held fast at picks 3 & 20 but we blinked.

Ablett went to Gold Coast for Picks 10 & 15.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 1:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
AGRO wrote:
There was only one mistake with the Judd deal and that was throwing Kennedy in with picks 3 & 20.

We should have held fast at picks 3 & 20 but we blinked.

Ablett went to Gold Coast for Picks 10 & 15.

Ablett was an uncontracted signing, not a trade...

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 1:48 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:56 am
Posts: 135
AGRO wrote:
There was only one mistake with the Judd deal and that was throwing Kennedy in with picks 3 & 20.

We should have held fast at picks 3 & 20 but we blinked.

Ablett went to Gold Coast for Picks 10 & 15.


Ablett's move to GC wasn't a trade. As it was the AFL dudded the Cats massively with the compensation.

If we'd finished bottom in 2007 we'd have held all the cards and could be as aggressive as many wanted us to be.

As it was Richmond still had pick 1 in the pre-season draft and had Judd departed the Eagles for nowt - i can't imagine the Eagles would've allowed that, nor would Judd have left in such circumstances - Richmond would've gladly met any and all demands.

The issue is, had we screwed the Eagles over we'd have entered Collingwood and Essendon* territory in terms of trading. No one would want to deal with us and would hold a grudge over the fact we got a 'bargain' with Judd. Everyone would want their pound of flesh in negotiating with us and the conversation would always go back to,"yeah, but you screwed the Eagles."

We had to do the right thing and we did. Fair trade for all involved, really.

_________________
Whatever happened to this club
I wish I understood
We used to be so strong
We used to be so good


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:30 pm
Posts: 1832
Location: How blue do you do
They wanted Kennedy we wanted to give them Bower. that was the sticking point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:08 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 539
this is what has RUNIED our great club, our recruiting and trades has stuffed the club completely.We can only hope sos can get it right this year and next.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:38 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Hawthorn have had busts, every club does. Its the percentage of bad draft picks we have which is bad.

Also only focusing on Hawthorn's drafting since 07 neglects the great trading they have done in getting Gunston, Burgoyne, Gibson, Hale, Lake and Frawley.

What we have done well since 08 is a handful of things at best (Hendo, Cripps, Everett, Docherty, Menzel (though everyone else would have done it).

As maligned as he was/is getting Mitch Robinson at pick 40 was good. 100 games out of a 3rd rounder has to be a win.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 4055
Location: Recovering from the 1st effort
Manchego Cheese wrote:

The issue is, had we screwed the Eagles over we'd have entered Collingwood and Essendon** territory in terms of trading. No one would want to deal with us and would hold a grudge over the fact we got a 'bargain' with Judd. Everyone would want their pound of flesh in negotiating with us and the conversation would always go back to,"yeah, but you screwed the Eagles."

We had to do the right thing and we did. Fair trade for all involved, really.


Actually, looking at some of the woeful dud trades we've done over the years I am surprised more clubs don't beat a path to our door. We've become the new Fremantle at the trade table (Fremantle have turned their bad trade ability around BTW, I am speaking about their early trading years of McLeod/Croad etc)

_________________
"Who discovered we could get milk from cows, and what did he think he was doing at the time?" Billy Connolly


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
Adam Chatfield wrote:
As maligned as he was/is getting Mitch Robinson at pick 40 was good. 100 games out of a 3rd rounder has to be a win.


Our recruiting manager said he rated him in the top 10 that year so its lucky we didn't have another top 10.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
scottopee wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
As maligned as he was/is getting Mitch Robinson at pick 40 was good. 100 games out of a 3rd rounder has to be a win.


Our recruiting manager said he rated him in the top 10 that year so its lucky we didn't have another top 10.

Mitch Robinson was and still is just a good suburban/bush league player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:55 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
2ndeffort wrote:
Manchego Cheese wrote:

The issue is, had we screwed the Eagles over we'd have entered Collingwood and Essendon*** territory in terms of trading. No one would want to deal with us and would hold a grudge over the fact we got a 'bargain' with Judd. Everyone would want their pound of flesh in negotiating with us and the conversation would always go back to,"yeah, but you screwed the Eagles."

We had to do the right thing and we did. Fair trade for all involved, really.


Actually, looking at some of the woeful dud trades we've done over the years I am surprised more clubs don't beat a path to our door. We've become the new Fremantle at the trade table (Fremantle have turned their bad trade ability around BTW, I am speaking about their early trading years of McLeod/Croad etc)


and who looked after their recruiting then?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:55 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Hawthorn have had busts, every club does. Its the percentage of bad draft picks we have which is bad.

Also only focusing on Hawthorn's drafting since 07 neglects the great trading they have done in getting Gunston, Burgoyne, Gibson, Hale, Lake and Frawley.

What we have done well since 08 is a handful of things at best (Hendo, Cripps, Everett, Docherty, Menzel (though everyone else would have done it).

As maligned as he was/is getting Mitch Robinson at pick 40 was good. 100 games out of a 3rd rounder has to be a win.


Gunston was gifted to them due to circumstance TICK
Could have got Nat Fyfe for the Burgoyne pick.
Lake was basically free! TICK
Could have picked up Luke Parker with the Hale pick.
Frawley was a free agent.

IDIOTS.

I'm a hindsight recruiting genius.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Rexy wrote:
scottopee wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
As maligned as he was/is getting Mitch Robinson at pick 40 was good. 100 games out of a 3rd rounder has to be a win.


Our recruiting manager said he rated him in the top 10 that year so its lucky we didn't have another top 10.

Mitch Robinson was and still is just a good suburban/bush league player.


He has gone a bit spiv-ish for me of late.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:03 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Hawthorn have had busts, every club does. Its the percentage of bad draft picks we have which is bad.

Also only focusing on Hawthorn's drafting since 07 neglects the great trading they have done in getting Gunston, Burgoyne, Gibson, Hale, Lake and Frawley.


Agree and Three Premierships proves it. In the end that's all that matters. They all make mistakes but sides like Hawthorn get more right than wrong and when they get it wrong they move on quickly to correct. We seem to hang onto bad players and give them good contracts.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Adam Chatfield wrote:
Hawthorn have had busts, every club does. Its the percentage of bad draft picks we have which is bad.

Also only focusing on Hawthorn's drafting since 07 neglects the great trading they have done in getting Gunston, Burgoyne, Gibson, Hale, Lake and Frawley.

What we have done well since 08 is a handful of things at best (Hendo, Cripps, Everett, Docherty, Menzel (though everyone else would have done it).

As maligned as he was/is getting Mitch Robinson at pick 40 was good. 100 games out of a 3rd rounder has to be a win.

Could have been 200.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:18 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 939
We've only operated true to form. Billionaires don't waste their time developing talent for their businesses, they simply acquire the best available talent they can buy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3253
idle wrote:
We've only operated true to form. Billionaires don't waste their time developing talent for their businesses, they simply acquire the best available talent they can buy.


Rubbish generalisation

I've worked for billionaires.

They get to where they are because they build talent. They recognise you need talent around you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 3:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17892
Not sure anyone needed to say it

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 4:11 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:48 pm
Posts: 939
cough*


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 4:53 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Was it Garlett for Foster or Garlett for Smith?
Also if we are serious about fixing our culture, trading Garlett was a good move


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:24 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24631
Location: Kaloyasena
jimmae wrote:
AGRO wrote:
There was only one mistake with the Judd deal and that was throwing Kennedy in with picks 3 & 20.

We should have held fast at picks 3 & 20 but we blinked.

Ablett went to Gold Coast for Picks 10 & 15.

Ablett was an uncontracted signing, not a trade...


The point being made was the commensurate value of picks 3 & 20 and 10 & 15.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group