Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 8:13 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:39 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Did you know that in 2005 the Blues actually had 66 more scoring shots than in 2004... all this despite:

* 2004 being seen as some kind of positive year
* 2005 being seen by some as a backward, negative year
* many of our so called forwards playing back eg Whitnall, Lappin. Houlihan

the Blues kicked 25.41 more in 2005. Only another goal a game more of course, but thats 66 shots which could have been an 3 goals per game if we could kick straight.

2004: 268 g, 217 behinds, 1825 points at 55% goal scoring accuracy (ignoring OOBOF)
2005: 293g, 258b, 2016 points at 53% goal scoring accuracy.

I'll put the defence figures up later. Does this surprise anyone?


Last edited by molsey on Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:45 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Yeah I knew that. :wink:

Imagine how well the forward line will go when we have a decent midfield!

While we are theorising, if the Fish had played all 22 games like he played his 7 this year, he would have kicked 40 goals.

I reckon we already have our forward line, we need a midfield (and better KP backmen, and ... and ...)! :lol:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:49 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
no, the end of the year we played some good footy - good enough to have many people here shitting themselves about losing the P.P. :lol: and scored heavily in those games.

Like the wizard cup, I think we get glimpses of possibility, this season (for me) is about whether these possibilties can become more concrete.

I like those glimpses and so still think Denis is the right man for the job because I firmly believe the list is as crappy as any that has ever been assembled. As someone said when talking of the draft, just draft the best because we have weaknesses everywhere, but for me, most notibly midfield and defence.

If they can begin to be fixed I think people will see a brand of football that scores heavily and puts pressure on the opposition to do likewise. I like it too because it means we are never out of the contest - think Roos during the 90's.

'Course if the glimpses remain distant over the next two years then Denis is shit and CG was brilliant and Sheik has a sense oif humour and Mike and Dan know far more about football than the Ghost (all of these things may be true biut I box them together with the Denis is shite quadrella).

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:59 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I was hoping someone would pick up those themes - not the Sheik / humour theme but the Pagan, list themes. To take the defensive numbers as well:

Points Against:
2004: 328 Goals, 267 Behinds, 2235 - 55%
2005: 400 goals, 270 b, 2670, 60%

An extra 72.3 were scored against us, lifting goal scoring efficiency from 55% to 60%. Midfield / defensive zones not only suffering but giving up more 'easier' goals (not going to argue bad luck, put enough pressur eon them and they'll miss)

In midfield, Bentick, Simpson, Carrazzo found their way in to replace Camporeale (banished to half back and out of the Club (!)), McGrath (back pocket), Johnson etc. Also in came Whitnall to try to plug it.

1300 posts!

ps Jack knows more about football than the Ghost!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:22 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
yeah his dad taught him well :wink:

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:07 am 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
molsey wrote:
Points Against:
2004: 328 Goals, 267 Behinds, 2235 - 55%
2005: 400 goals, 270 b, 2670, 60%

An extra 72.3 were scored against us, lifting goal scoring efficiency from 55% to 60%. Midfield / defensive zones not only suffering but giving up more 'easier' goals (not going to argue bad luck, put enough pressur eon them and they'll miss)



Does anyone have inside defensive 50 statistics or centre clearance stuff for the 2 years to wtry and apportion blame? Its easy to say midfield / defense but can someone break it up to the 2? Its easy to blame midfield but I didn't see any of Livingston or Teague or even Thornton really killing their opposition forwards.

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Athorn the Wonderkid wrote:
molsey wrote:
Points Against:
2004: 328 Goals, 267 Behinds, 2235 - 55%
2005: 400 goals, 270 b, 2670, 60%

An extra 72.3 were scored against us, lifting goal scoring efficiency from 55% to 60%. Midfield / defensive zones not only suffering but giving up more 'easier' goals (not going to argue bad luck, put enough pressur eon them and they'll miss)



Does anyone have inside defensive 50 statistics or centre clearance stuff for the 2 years to wtry and apportion blame? Its easy to say midfield / defense but can someone break it up to the 2? Its easy to blame midfield but I didn't see any of Livingston or Teague or even Thornton really killing their opposition forwards.


I still maintain that the lack of pressure and accountability in the midfield led to increased pressure in the backline and at least helps to explain the poorer seasons of Teague and Thornton. T-Bird was also injured for much of the season.

A lot of the success/failure of teams in the modern game starts in the midfield. Get that right and you're well on your way to being successful. Get it wrong and it doesn't matter what you have in the backline.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:33 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
I think we have a shit backline.

I think our midfield is better.....just.

This is based on no facts

no stats

no desires

no whispers

probably not even drunken observation

it might in all reality exist

only in my mind


still

I reckon we have a shit backline.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:37 am 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
dannyboy wrote:
I think we have a shit backline.

I think our midfield is better.....just.



I think our midfield is worse than our backline. I think with some pressure in midfield the defenders will get an even break.

It's like that old Irish gag about 2 kids arguing about whose dad would win a fight between the 2. "Your Dad could beat up my Dad" "No, your Dad would beat up my Dad". Unfortunately for us the whole team gets beaten up withour midfield.

But no takers on season defensive 50 entries? the herald-sin track them weekly - does this stuff get dumped anywhere?

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:37 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 2367
Location: Riyadh
dannyboy wrote:
I think we have a shit backline.

I think our midfield is better.....just.

This is based on no facts

no stats

no desires

no whispers

probably not even drunken observation

it might in all reality exist

only in my mind


still

I reckon we have a shit backline.



When in other threads, virtually everyone has Luke Livingston in their best 22, that's sufficient evidence for me that we have a shit backline.

_________________
"The old believe everything, the middle-aged suspect everything, and the young know everything." Oscar Wilde


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:41 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:41 pm
Posts: 980
JackWorrall wrote:


When in other threads, virtually everyone has Luke Livingston in their best 22, that's sufficient evidence for me that we have a shit backline.


Well I'm hoping that we will soon be seeing Hartlett down back instead of maybe a Livingston...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 11:56 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
dannyboy wrote:
I reckon we have a shit backline.


I reckon you are correct....Midfield is a problem but at least we has glimpses last year through Bentick and Simmo...Backline is just shit shit shit.


Jarusa wrote:
I reckon we already have our forward line, we need a midfield (and better KP backmen, and ... and ...)!


I agree. It makes me wonder why they have us picking Dowler at 4 when he has serious issues with his defensive game...the only way I can rationalise this decision is if he is certainly THE best contested mark and THE best forward KPP...then we can't really pass him up ...but they better be bloody sure because Kennedy and Ryder are, under my understanding, untapped potential.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:37 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
for me the backline problem is not one of individual players, rather it is a design problem.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:46 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
dannyboy wrote:
for me the backline problem is not one of individual players, rather it is a design problem.


Please explain.

ps Mike & Dan are 2 buffoons who write under the mistaken belief that people will read them. I hear they are deeply upset that jokey newcomers The Fuzz have overtaken them for hits, within months of inception. It is clear on this site that all posters would prefer Ghost articles over M&D, heck, even Garrie articles over M&D, heck, even a blank piece of computer screen over M&D.

pps I've never won a POW before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:20 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
say last season it was

Campo Livo Teague
Whits T-Bird Lappin

or

Carrots T-Bird Teague
Lappin Whits Houla

or a combination of such

for a start too small

Too slow

shit rebounding capability

thats what i mean by design

now say we could have Walker and Russell and Simmo in the back half
now the speed and rebound is tyhere, add height in Saddo, Carlos or Waite or Hartlett, toss in a Mclaren or French to drop back and T-bird or Livo to grab fullback and we may have a backline. Prob is we don't know about far too many of these guys, I know that but at least the design is there.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:28 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
dannyboy wrote:
I think we have a shit backline.

probably not even drunken observation

it might in all reality exist

only in my mind

still

I reckon we have a shit backline.



It started to look shit once SOS retired - but I would hazard a guess that your drunken observations may outnumber your sober ones. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:35 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3265
midfield shit?
backline shit?

We need ruckmen to get it down and create the big man leadership around the ground amongst our 'little kids'

When Barnaby has come back from injury during the last two seasons, we have looked better. He needs back up - give Gary Dempsey as much freedom to develop as he likes to build a team of BIG Blokes that are capable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 2:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
BigBlind wrote:
I agree. It makes me wonder why they have us picking Dowler at 4 when he has serious issues with his defensive game...the only way I can rationalise this decision is if he is certainly THE best contested mark and THE best forward KPP...then we can't really pass him up ...but they better be bloody sure because Kennedy and Ryder are, under my understanding, untapped potential.



What defensive issues does Dowler have that Kennedy and Ryder dont?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:06 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 940
Talk all you like about the quality (or lack of) our defence but you clowns are missing the most important aspect to the team overall - THE SPINE !!!

We have a plethora of players decent enough to fill a pocket or flank at either end of the ground but the four key positions down the spine are huge holes that we cannot fill.

Argue all you like about Thornton being CHB (yeah, right ?? :roll: ), tell me 1000 times that Fev is a true FF (sure, he can kick goals but so does Phil Matera & Steven Milne) but the sad facts are we are bereft of quality talls down the spine.

Until we address these key positions, it won't matter how good our midfield are, we will get shellacked more times than not because of it.

_________________
GROUND ZERO + DRAFTING YOUTH = SUSTAINED SUCCESS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:16 pm 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
TheSheik wrote:
Talk all you like about the quality (or lack of) our defence but you clowns are missing the most important aspect to the team overall - THE SPINE !!!

We have a plethora of players decent enough to fill a pocket or flank at either end of the ground but the four key positions down the spine are huge holes that we cannot fill.

Argue all you like about Thornton being CHB (yeah, right ?? :roll: ), tell me 1000 times that Fev is a true FF (sure, he can kick goals but so does Phil Matera & Steven Milne) but the sad facts are we are bereft of quality talls down the spine.

Until we address these key positions, it won't matter how good our midfield are, we will get shellacked more times than not because of it.


Clowns? You're the one wearing the outfit?

Hmm, sounds like an opinion there Mr.Clown. Do you have anything to back that up? The stats starting this talk about how the output from the forwards improved in 2005 and that the defence seemed to give up a lot more easy goals. How would a Centre half forward, as required udner Sheik's Spine Theory ("SST") have stopped this ceaseless goal scoring at the opposition's goalface? How does Fevola being a goalkicker affect that outcome?

Seems like we'll have to agree to disagree, perhaps forever. Watching Carlton in 2005 was like the proverbial sieve from midfield. Until we get hard running accountable skilled midfielders we may never know how good or bad our defence really is.

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group