Ex Blues v Carlton : Sponsored by Sydney Blues

doofdoof · **Joined:** Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm **Posts:** 2251

emtwenty wrote:

add 7.3 for Grigg. :cry:

Sydney Blue · **Posted:** Sun May 17, 2015 8:28 pm

doofdoof wrote:

emtwenty wrote:

add 7.3 for Grigg. :cry:

Sauce and Laidler have 1 each as well

bondiblue · **Posted:** Sun May 17, 2015 9:04 pm

Sydney Blue wrote:

doofdoof wrote:

emtwenty wrote:

add 7.3 for Grigg. :cry:

Sauce and Laidler have 1 each as well

Breaks my heart.

Damning numbers.

Add that to carltonshop numbers a you can dream of what could be.
Sadly it ain't so.

Blue Sombrero · **Posted:** Thu May 21, 2015 9:29 am

Love this concept. Hate the outcome and the questions it poses.

camel · **Posted:** Thu May 21, 2015 9:52 am

Round 7

Carlton 9.3.57
Ex Blues 20.8.128

Betts 6.2
Kennedy 4.2
Garlett 3.2
Robinson 3.0
Waite 2.2
Grigg 2.0

-------------------------
TOTAL (After R7)
-------------------------
Carlton 75.72.522
Ex Blues 93.54 612
-------------------------

The accuracy is a further kick in the guts! But at least we're equal on scoring shots.

SurreyBlue · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am **Posts:** 10471

camelboy wrote:

Round 7

Carlton 9.3.57
Ex Blues 20.8.128

Betts 6.2
Kennedy 4.2
Garlett 3.2
Robinson 3.0
Waite 2.2
Grigg 2.0

-------------------------
TOTAL (After R7)
-------------------------
Carlton 75.72.522
Ex Blues 93.54 612
-------------------------

The accuracy is a further kick in the guts! But at least we're equal on scoring shots.

You would hate to add Laidler & Jacobs value as well. Might not be direct goals but boy oh boy!

Sydney Blue · **Posted:** Sun May 24, 2015 7:43 pm

Close won this week
9 9 to 9 7
Kennedy 4 1
Betts 3 1
Sauce 1 1
Garlett 1 2
Waite 0 2

Its 5 to 3
But our percentage not looking good

emtwenty · **Joined:** Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm **Posts:** 7074

We scored more than Port though

GWS · **Posted:** Sun May 24, 2015 11:21 pm

Ken's a genius apparently... :lol:

Teddy Hopkins · **Posted:** Sun May 24, 2015 11:44 pm

I seem to remember one day back in round 2 1969 the blues kicked a lazy 30 30 = 210 in ONE game against the hawks.

They were the days when players wanted to COME to us to play.

:cry:

Sydney Blue · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2015 7:40 pm

9 8 62 to 16 7 103
Smacked this week
Kennedy 6 4
Waite 3 1
Garlett 2 1
Eddie 2 1
Grigg 2 0
Robbo 1 0

5 to 4 but overall its embarrassing

camel · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2015 8:01 pm

That's ugly!

emtwenty · **Joined:** Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm **Posts:** 7074

Good to see kennedy step up against quality opposition in geelong. Wce are actually pretty good. And their injury list is horrible.

Sydney Blue · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2015 8:16 pm

emtwenty wrote:

Good to see kennedy step up against quality opposition in geelong. Wce are actually pretty good. And their injury list is horrible.

I didn't think WCE would get a sniff at finals this year certainly going ok at the moment
Draw gets a bit tougher for them now not to many easy beats in run home.
Confidence is a wonderful thing

idle · **Joined:** Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:48 pm **Posts:** 931

I have to ask, are those stats really relevant considering the types of players and teams or ex-players our now playing with?

Sydney Blue · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2015 8:41 pm

idle wrote:

I have to ask, are those stats really relevant considering the types of players and teams or ex-players our now playing with?

10 players at 8 clubs
Trying to get your point.
I think what these stats are showing is that our recruiting may have been on the money and our coaching and development are holding them back.

idle · **Joined:** Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:48 pm **Posts:** 931

Sydney Blue wrote:

idle wrote:

I have to ask, are those stats really relevant considering the types of players and teams or ex-players our now playing with?

10 players at 8 clubs
Trying to get your point.
I think what these stats are showing is that our recruiting may have been on the money and our coaching and development are holding them back.

That's an excellent point I never considered. There's been a lot of talk about our woeful drafting results, so these stats reflect our drafting my not have been that bad, and our development was the culprit after all. Who is responsible for player development @ Carlton? Is it a team of people or does the onus rest upon one individual?

4thchicken · **Joined:** Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am **Posts:** 3136

idle wrote:

Sydney Blue wrote:

idle wrote:

I have to ask, are those stats really relevant considering the types of players and teams or ex-players our now playing with?

10 players at 8 clubs
Trying to get your point.
I think what these stats are showing is that our recruiting may have been on the money and our coaching and development are holding them back.

That's an excellent point I never considered. There's been a lot of talk about our woeful drafting results, so these stats reflect our drafting my not have been that bad, and our development was the culprit after all. Who is responsible for player development @ Carlton? Is it a team of people or does the onus rest upon one individual?

Its not purely player development

Laidler - one bad season with 3 dislocated kneecaps. Dumped for NO compensation
robinson - was performing. Dumped for NO compensation
garlett - one bad season. Dumped for NO compensation
betts - let go and picked up thomas rather than opting to take FA compo (would have been either first round or end of first round)
waite - let go for NO compensation

bondiblue · **Posted:** Sun May 31, 2015 9:18 pm

idle wrote:

I have to ask, are those stats really relevant considering the types of players and teams or ex-players our now playing with?

It points at something wrong at Carlton.

Ex Blues v Carlton : Sponsored by Sydney Blues

Who is online