dannyboy wrote:
redback wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
show me a strong on field club with shit off field board. I think they aren't as easy to separate as you make out.
the board scored micky your messiah, his love child, his fitness guru, the draftees of his choice
paid out all expenses and 1 mill salary, they have given him all the assistance and every demand has been fulfilled
so who is inept
the dysfunctional board who has delivered everything your super coach demands or the dysfunctional super coach that can't deliver
Firstly, never said MM was the messiah — a dumb argument is when you put words in someone else's mouth. Just address what I say...not the fantasies you have your hand on.
Secondly, reread what you posted — aren't you saying the same thing - the board is hopeless therefore the appointments they make are hopeless... That's the point really. MM was a terrible choice (obviously now). Letting him run it his way was a terrible decision (obviously now)...But why would anything else this board does be any better? My money is on another @#$%&! up because the top of the club is rotten, the ghosts are howling...and everyone is dithering...seriously until the club's board is strong and clear nothing will change...or if it does it will be temporary...because every decision Carlton makes is a shortcut...and that's been the problem since Pagan (and maybe beyond)...
No I’m not saying the same thing. The board has made changes and adapted when needed unfortunately the advice and final decision has been lacking.
The board have gone and given everything the super coach with a hefty pay packet desires and he fails, how is that the boards fault?
They hired what they thought was a good coach with experience and a good reputation but it hasn’t worked out. They haven’t been negligent at all. On the contrary they have done everything in their power to aid and support that particular decision to succeed.
What I am saying it would be negligent and dumb to continue the association as it has been obvious to many of us for a long time now that he isn’t up to it and quite selfish and arrogant.
How is our board hopeless when it gives its employees every chance to succeed?
The board and its members have copped a lot of flak because of some rumours and innuendo from the know it all crowd and its hangers.
Show me how they are rotten and use us as a play thing as most people on here jump on a band wagon.
They go and try and get the best people (recommended and experienced) so the club can succeed.
They work on those expert recommendations and assist and support those staff members with whatever they require. Is that been hopeless or inadequate?
When the advice and opinion from those is incorrect and misgiving then that would be negligent if they don't correct the situation and keep supporting and not make change like some here refuse to concede.
The board (right or wrong) have made the hard decision firstly to go with un unknown after the disastrous pagan era. Ratten again was made redundant after they thought he could not take the team further, which again was a decision for the better of the club. Micky was bought in and given every chance to succeed but was evident he was spent. Now they have to make another tough decision to break with the secure and bring in someone else.
Like I said the board has gone and made the right decisions at the right time but unfortunately they haven’t exactly been given the right advice at each particular time.
except all these decisions for the betterment of the club - how have they turned out?
In my job if I continually hired the wrong people no matter what my "best intentions" were, and then gave the wrong people all the help in the word (throwing good money after bad?) I would soon not have my job - its not my intention that count - not in the workplace, its the outcomes of my decisions.
0 flags.
Login
Register
FAQ
