Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 3:36 pm

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 12 of 12
  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
baz_baz
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Ando the Wonderkid wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
Ando the Wonderkid wrote:
Curnow? Which A grader was he tagging that warrants a vote? Give a scragging tagger a vote for drawing even with Ablett, but for [insert name of B grade mid]?


Really?

So lets give no brownlow votes when sides play those on the bottom of the ladder.

Logic

Play on shit players get no vote

Play shit sides give no votes?

Are you for real?


Who did he beat? What influence was there on the game? Was he in our top 10?


You are given votes for how you play the game not necessarily on who you beat

16 disposals
11 contested possessions
3 centre clearances.... best for cfc
3 stoppage clearances
10 tackles

grab your mobile phone and ring someone who cares about whether you think he is worthy or not :thumbsup:

_________________
Go BLues
Top
 Profile  
 
Effes
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19392
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Restricted Jack Steven to 16 possessions

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25008
Location: Bondi Beach
Effes wrote:
Restricted Jack Steven to 16 possessions


Jack Stevens got a couple shots at goal.

Stevens got a few shepherds in too 1%ers.

The quality of Curnows disposals were questionable.

Cripps on the other hand stole contested balls from opponents, weighed up options and was effective enough to find targets.

I thought a lot of Curnows disposals were over the head, to say optimistic and led to another contest or turnover.

What's his turnovers and his disposal efficiency? That should answer a few questions.

I watched the game a few times looking at the value of Curnow and Carrazzo.
I loved Curnow last year, but this year I feel he's off the boil.

Carrazzo doesn't create, plays hot potatoe and kicks the long lob hoping for something good. At this stage of his career with his experience I expect more. I feel the game has passed him.

Maybe he's doing what the coach wants. He didn't get coaches votes for nothing.

I'm looking forward to see what the young Whiley has to offer the midfield. I'm convinced Cripps has a more positive effect that both Curnow and Carrazzo, and I'd bet Whiley will too.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
baz_baz
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
bondiblue wrote:
Effes wrote:
Restricted Jack Steven to 16 possessions


Jack Stevens got a couple shots at goal.

Stevens got a few shepherds in too 1%ers.

The quality of Curnows disposals were questionable.

Cripps on the other hand stole contested balls from opponents, weighed up options and was effective enough to find targets.

I thought a lot of Curnows disposals were over the head, to say optimistic and led to another contest or turnover.

What's his turnovers and his disposal efficiency.

I watched the game a few times looking at the value of Curnow and Carrazzo.
I loved Curnow last year, but this year I feel he's off the boil.

Maybe he's doing what the coach wants. He didn't get coaches votes for nothing.


Effective disposal 62.5%

_________________
Go BLues
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25008
Location: Bondi Beach
baz_baz wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Effes wrote:
Restricted Jack Steven to 16 possessions


Jack Stevens got a couple shots at goal.

Stevens got a few shepherds in too 1%ers.

The quality of Curnows disposals were questionable.

Cripps on the other hand stole contested balls from opponents, weighed up options and was effective enough to find targets.

I thought a lot of Curnows disposals were over the head, to say optimistic and led to another contest or turnover.

What's his turnovers and his disposal efficiency.

I watched the game a few times looking at the value of Curnow and Carrazzo.
I loved Curnow last year, but this year I feel he's off the boil.

Maybe he's doing what the coach wants. He didn't get coaches votes for nothing.


Effective disposal 62.5%


That's higher than I thought. I'm going to watch the game again to see for myself.
So 16 disposals an 10 were effective. I'm surprised.

I love curnows endeavour and commitment to his fitness, and the training standards he sets, but I also think he's a big part of our negative footy, within the 'gang' of taggers.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
baz_baz
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:45 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
bondiblue wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Effes wrote:
Restricted Jack Steven to 16 possessions


Jack Stevens got a couple shots at goal.

Stevens got a few shepherds in too 1%ers.

The quality of Curnows disposals were questionable.

Cripps on the other hand stole contested balls from opponents, weighed up options and was effective enough to find targets.

I thought a lot of Curnows disposals were over the head, to say optimistic and led to another contest or turnover.

What's his turnovers and his disposal efficiency.

I watched the game a few times looking at the value of Curnow and Carrazzo.
I loved Curnow last year, but this year I feel he's off the boil.

Maybe he's doing what the coach wants. He didn't get coaches votes for nothing.


Effective disposal 62.5%


That's higher than I thought. I'm going to watch the game again to see for myself.
So 16 disposals an 10 were effective. I'm surprised.

I love curnows endeavour and commitment to his fitness, and the training standards he sets, but I also think he's a big part of our negative footy, within the 'gang' of taggers.


Yep Bondi that's off the stats website.

We need to also remember that because of the role he plays most of his disposals are under pressure. Having said that I'm a bit with you in that I wonder who decides whether its effective or not

_________________
Go BLues
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25008
Location: Bondi Beach
baz_baz wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Effes wrote:
Restricted Jack Steven to 16 possessions


Jack Stevens got a couple shots at goal.

Stevens got a few shepherds in too 1%ers.

The quality of Curnows disposals were questionable.

Cripps on the other hand stole contested balls from opponents, weighed up options and was effective enough to find targets.

I thought a lot of Curnows disposals were over the head, to say optimistic and led to another contest or turnover.

What's his turnovers and his disposal efficiency.

I watched the game a few times looking at the value of Curnow and Carrazzo.
I loved Curnow last year, but this year I feel he's off the boil.

Maybe he's doing what the coach wants. He didn't get coaches votes for nothing.


Effective disposal 62.5%


That's higher than I thought. I'm going to watch the game again to see for myself.
So 16 disposals an 10 were effective. I'm surprised.

I love curnows endeavour and commitment to his fitness, and the training standards he sets, but I also think he's a big part of our negative footy, within the 'gang' of taggers.


Yep Bondi that's off the stats website.

We need to also remember that because of the role he plays most of his disposals are under pressure. Having said that I'm a bit with you in that I wonder who decides whether its effective or not


I'm ok with one tagger in the midfield. Perhaps a defensive HF.

I just want to know who is the most 'effective' tagger.
I'm questioning if it is Curnow. It certainly isn't Carrazzo Imo; he's depth nowadays ...Imo.

I think MM likes him because he's. VC, he has been around a long time, and is eloquent with a mike in his face. Good strong body but Imo the Game has gone past him. I'm not as sentimental given where my club has been the last 3 years.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
The Rhino
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Carrazzo was on him till he went off with that ankle injury, I think. Curnow went on to him after. Barely sighted afterwards.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?
Top
 Profile  
 
CK95
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:15 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35842
Location: Half back flank
Awwwww Steven!

_________________
#DonTheStash
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25008
Location: Bondi Beach
If rather have players our opponents need to tag rather than the other way which we have today.

Get Sheil.
Get Treloar
Get a quality KPF from....whoever.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
BurswoodBlue
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:34 pm
Posts: 46
jimmae wrote:
By the looks of it, one of the coaches gave Bell BOG.


I would've thought the two coaches gave Murph and Cripps 5 and 3 votes whilst Ding Dong and Henderson got a 4 each
Top
 Profile  
 
jimmae
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 3:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
BurswoodBlue wrote:
jimmae wrote:
By the looks of it, one of the coaches gave Bell BOG.


I would've thought the two coaches gave Murph and Cripps 5 and 3 votes whilst Ding Dong and Henderson got a 4 each

Based on the way MM spoke at the press conference I think he gave Murphy 5 and Cripps 4. The rest flows from that assessment.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.
Top
 Profile  
 
Blue Vain
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 3:12 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18009
BurswoodBlue wrote:
jimmae wrote:
By the looks of it, one of the coaches gave Bell BOG.


I would've thought the two coaches gave Murph and Cripps 5 and 3 votes whilst Ding Dong and Henderson got a 4 each


:thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 5:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25008
Location: Bondi Beach
The Rhino wrote:
Carrazzo was on him till he went off with that ankle injury, I think. Curnow went on to him after. Barely sighted afterwards.


Carrazzo took Armitage

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
Blue juice
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 9:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 10:28 am
Posts: 24
windows wrote:
Synbad wrote:
i did say Cripps played verrry well....

but we must consider the opposition.. their body size and the ground size.

Bigger bodies in congestion were always going to be better thna Billy Billings types in those conditions...


look i'm the first to bag players but he's getting better and better. he is moving much better. he doesn't look anywhere near as slow. his hands are unbelievable. he's going to be a terrific terrific mid field extractor for a long time and his rate of improvement in his run this year shows there is probably more to come.

you can't expect any more from a kid this early in his career. there should be no buts. its not his first good game. he's regularly getting his hands on it.


Totally agree. This kid will be Carlton's next captain. He will be grabbing games by the scruff of the neck sooner than you think.
Top
 Profile  
 
CK95
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 12:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35842
Location: Half back flank
Cripps crept into the crypt, crapped, & crept out again

_________________
#DonTheStash
Top
 Profile  
 
jimmae
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 11:04 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
CK95 wrote:
Cripps crept into the crypt, crapped, & crept out again

To the crepery for a creepy midnight crepe

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.
Top
 Profile  
 
CK95
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 3:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35842
Location: Half back flank
Cripes!

_________________
#DonTheStash
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 12 of 12
  [ 238 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain, bluebo baggers, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 54 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group